ConflictClarifier

متتبع أزمة إيران-الخليج 2026
CC
Events Archive
strikeAug 9, 2026

Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan form mutual defense pact as Iran war and Houthi attacks reshape regional security

Summary

The new mutual defense agreement commits the three countries to treat an attack on one member as an attack on all, deepening military cooperation as war with Iran and renewed Houthi attacks place growing pressure on regional security. The agreement, formally named the "Mecca Joint Defence Agreement," was announced in a joint statement carried by the official Saudi press agency and Pakistan's foreign ministry. The three governments described the pact as reflecting a "shared commitment to further strengthening their collective security and to promoting peace, security and stability in the region and beyond." Pakistan's foreign ministry said the arrangement is "intended to strengthen collective deterrence" and confirmed that an attack against any of the three countries would be regarded as an attack against all of them. The pact comes as Saudi Arabia reassesses its security relationships during the war between the United States and Iran, a conflict that has spread instability across the region and disrupted maritime traffic through both the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea. Iran and the Iran-backed Houthi movement in Yemen have attacked Saudi Arabia, while Tehran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and Houthi threats against Red Sea shipping have increased pressure on Gulf energy exporters. Analysts have also pointed to growing concern in Riyadh that Washington can no longer be relied upon as the kingdom's sole security guarantor. Saudi and Turkish officials sought to emphasize that the agreement should not be interpreted as the creation of an alliance directed at a specific adversary. Ankara said the pact was "not aimed at any particular country," according to a statement from the Turkish presidency's communications director. Saudi Arabia similarly rejected suggestions that the agreement represented the formation of a new regional military bloc. Saudi Deputy Minister for Public Diplomacy Rayed Krimly said: "The agreement does not represent an effort to establish a military axis or a sectarian bloc. Nor is it linked to any nuclear ambitions or arms race, rather it is focused on building sustainable capabilities. The agreement does not constitute a threat to the security of any country in the region."The timing nevertheless places Iran at the center of much of the regional calculation surrounding the agreement. Since the wider war began, Saudi Arabia has strengthened its relationships with Turkey, Pakistan and Egypt, all of which have supported mediation and efforts to end the conflict. Umar Karim, an expert on Saudi foreign policy at the University of Birmingham in England, said the developing alignment "is clearly oriented towards Iran and meant to address Iran's new strategic approach which is geared towards dominance of the broader Gulf region." Turkey and Pakistan may also bring forms of influence that Saudi Arabia does not possess on its own because both countries share borders with Iran. Karim said their geographic position allows them to "exercise a different kind of leverage" on Tehran. The agreement was not conceived solely in response to the latest fighting. A source close to the Saudi military and government said the arrangement had been under discussion for an extended period, but that "the latest developments in the region expedite it." The deteriorating security environment appears to have accelerated a process already underway as Riyadh sought additional defense relationships beyond its longstanding dependence on Washington. Andreas Krieg of King's College London said: "The pact reflects Saudi Arabia's desire to diversify its security architecture rather than abandon its relationship with the United States. Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan are not trying to replace the United States. They are building the capacity to protect their interests when Washington cannot or will not do so."For Riyadh, Krieg said, the strategy is increasingly about creating overlapping sources of protection. Saudi Arabia "wants several layers of security rather than one American umbrella," he said, particularly after the shock created by the Iran war. The agreement could also advance Saudi ambitions to become a central organizer of regional security while reducing reliance on a single outside power. Turkey and Pakistan, meanwhile, stand to gain additional political influence as well as potential access to Saudi investment. The signing was accompanied by high-level meetings in the kingdom. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan met Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in Mecca on Friday, according to the Turkish presidency. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and army chief Asim Munir also traveled to Saudi Arabia for the agreement. The three-country pact builds on an earlier Saudi-Pakistani mutual defense agreement announced in 2025. That arrangement attracted particular attention because Pakistan is the only nuclear-armed country in the Muslim world. Saudi officials have now stressed that the expanded agreement with Turkey should not be interpreted as part of a nuclear weapons strategy or regional arms race. The worsening conflict with the Houthis has added another layer of urgency for Riyadh. A truce between Saudi Arabia and the Iran-backed movement in neighboring Yemen has broken down, with Houthi forces once again attacking Saudi territory and declaring a maritime blockade against the kingdom. The Houthis have attempted to enforce that blockade through attacks on Saudi tankers, adding new dangers to commercial shipping already affected by Iran's actions in the Strait of Hormuz. Saudi Arabia has led a military coalition supporting Yemen's internationally recognized government against the Houthis since 2015. A truce reached four years ago largely restrained the conflict until fighting intensified again in recent weeks. The renewed hostilities have produced some of the heaviest casualties seen in years. On Thursday, Houthi missile and drone strikes killed at least 58 Yemeni government troops, according to a military source, making it one of the deadliest days in the conflict in recent years. Against that backdrop, the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement gives Saudi Arabia another formal layer of military cooperation as it confronts threats from Iran, renewed Houthi operations and increasingly vulnerable maritime trade routes. Turkey and Pakistan insist the pact is not aimed at any single state, while Saudi Arabia says it is intended to build durable defensive capabilities rather than establish a new military axis.

Actors involved

USIranProxy

Sources

  • CurrentsAPI

    The new mutual defense agreement commits the three countries to treat an attack on one member as an attack on all, deepening military cooperation as war with Iran and renewed Houthi attacks place growing pressure on regional security. The agreement, formally named the "Mecca Join

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxyRussiaUkraine
1 source

Iran and Ukraine wars: Why ship fuel is running short, and why it matters There’s less crude in the market, and refiners prefer to produce diesel. The result: Ships are running short of fuel. And that could impact global trade. The shipping industry, already heavily constrained by restrictions on transit through key waterways such as the Strait of Hormuz, faces another challenge stemming from the US-Israel war on Iran and Russia’s war on Ukraine: a shortage of fuel oil used by ships and power plants.

The fuel used by ships powers the transport of large cargoes around the world. Any shortage of this fuel could drive up global freight costs, which could in turn affect consumers and manufacturers of goods and commodities. Recommended Storieslist of 3 items - list 1 of 3US envoys hold ‘substantive’ talks with Zelenskyy in first visit to Kyiv - list 2 of 3Iran touts military response as US maintains blockade, hits tankers - list 3 of 3Trump official says ‘there may not be a nuclear agreement’ with Iran Most ships and oil tankers mainly use heavy fuel oil (HFO), commonly known as bunker fuel, to power their engines.

This fuel is produced when crude oil is refined. Other commonly used marine fuels include marine gas oil (used by smaller vessels), marine diesel oil (used in marine engines) and less polluting fuels like very low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO). Why is ship fuel running low and why does it matter?

Here’s what we know: Why is ship fuel running low? According to analysts, the wars in West Asia and Europe, along with refiners opting to produce more profitable fuels, have contributed to the shortage. Middle East fuel oil exports were down by 45 percent year on year to an average of 447,000 barrels per day from March to August, data from energy trade analytics firm Kpler shows.

Energy consultancy Energy Aspects told Reuters news agency that it expects the fuel oil market to face a deficit of 218,000 bpd in the third quarter. This is the first shortfall it has estimated since the third quarter of 2025, when it was a marginal 6,000 bpd.

How have wars in West Asia and the Russia-Ukraine war impacted fuel oil? The US-Israel war on Iran has paralysed key maritime trade routes like the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20 percent of global oil and gas passed before the start of the war.

Iran has also hit multiple oil facilities in the Gulf in retaliation against the US. Attacks by Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis on shipping in the Red Sea and around the strategic Bab al-Mandeb Strait, one of the world’s most important shipping routes, have also disrupted shipping and constrained supply routes.

Besides the war on Iran, Russia’s ongoing war on Ukraine has also impacted oil supplies. Ukraine has in recent weeks bombed multiple major Russian refineries. Russia is the world’s second-largest exporter of crude oil. Ukrainian drone attacks have affected Russia’s refinery output, with its fuel oil exports in August hitting a record low 591,000 bpd, down from an average of over 860,000 bpd in 2025, according to Kpler data going back to 2017.

The net result: less crude is being shipped out from key oil-producing regions, especially the Gulf and Russia. That has meant an overall shortage in supplies of crude. And oil companies aren’t prioritising fuel oil as their product of choice. What are refiners prioritising with the crude oil they’re getting?

Petrol, diesel and jet fuel, which are also produced when crude oil is refined, have all been impacted. But products like diesel tend to help suppliers generate higher profits, and they prioritise it over products like fuel oil. According to Kpler, Nigeria’s 650,000-bpd Dangote refinery, for instance, has ramped up diesel, petrol and jet fuel exports, while its fuel oil exports have dropped.

Market observer Sunil Reddy said in a post on X on Monday that one of the key reasons for a global ship-fuel shortage is “the extraordinary profitability of diesel”. “When diesel cracks [or] spreads become extremely high, refiners have a powerful incentive to squeeze as much diesel and [petrol] as possible out of every barrel.

That changes what happens to the heavier part of crude,” he said. He explained that in the refining process, instead of “allowing more of that heavy [oil] residue to remain as fuel oil for ships, refiners will send it through secondary processing units and upgrade it into higher-value products such as diesel”.

“So, extremely strong diesel margins effectively start pulling barrels away from the bunker-fuel market,” he said, adding that this would increase ship-fuel prices as well. Which regions will be most impacted? While a drop in ship fuel will have a large-scale impact on global shipping, Asia could be particularly affected because of its dependence on the Gulf.

According to Kpler data, Singapore, the world’s largest bunker hub, imports more than half of the nearly one million bpd of fuel oil it consumes. A drop in fuel oil supplies has also led to a rise in the price of shipping fuels like VLSFO. In Singapore, the price of this fuel is up 76 percent since the war on Iran began to just less than $825 per metric tonne, or $130 a barrel, as of September 1, according to data from bunker price platform ZeroNorth.

Besides Singapore, fuel oil stocks in Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp in the Netherlands and Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates are also about 30 percent below their three-year seasonal averages, according to Reuters. Market observer Reddy said on X: “The world economy is built on thousands of interdependent supply chains.

One product depends on another country for raw materials, another for processing, another for machinery, another for energy.” “Without ships, globalisation breaks. When ship fuel becomes too scarce or too expensive, many things don’t just become more expensive,” he added.

“At some point, some trade simply stops making economic sense.

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUN
1 source

Iranian Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei stated that Tehran intends to designate a new restricted shipping zone in the Persian Gulf, though details regarding the specific geographic boundaries and enforcement mechanisms of this declared area remain unverified.

This announcement follows recent escalations, including US airstrikes and Iranian missile attacks, amid conflicting claims from both governments regarding the current operational status of the Strait of Hormuz.

Location: Strait of Hormuz
strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy
1 source

Yemen’s Houthi movement accused Saudi Arabia of conducting airstrikes and missile attacks on multiple provinces, claims corroborated by unnamed government military sources but not officially acknowledged by Riyadh. These reported strikes coincide with intense fighting near the Red Sea coast that has resulted in over 300 casualties and widespread displacement, as Houthi forces advance toward the Bab al-Mandab strait.

Location: Saudi Arabia
strikeUnverifiedUSIran
1 source

Iranian state television has broadcast footage it said showed ballistic missile attacks on a US aircraft carrier and destroyer, as Iran and the United States exchanged strikes on military and oil-related targets in and around the Strait of Hormuz. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said the two US warships were targeted with Iranian-made Qasem Basir ballistic missiles, alleging that the vessels had participated in a naval blockade of Iranian shipping.

The IRGC claimed the missiles damaged both vessels and forced them to withdraw from the area. The footage broadcast by Iranian state media was presented as documenting the attacks, but the claims of direct hits and damage could not be independently verified.

The Iranian military described the strikes as retaliation for US attacks on three Iranian oil tankers. The US military said on Saturday that it had targeted three tankers linked to the Revolutionary Guard, permanently disabling two and destroying a third.

It described the vessels as part of a network generating funds for the IRGC and Iran-aligned groups in the region. READ: Iran shifting military doctrine toward preemptive attack: Army spokesman According to the US military, one tanker was targeted off Kharg Island, the site of Iran’s largest oil export terminal, another near the Strait of Hormuz, and the third in the Gulf of Oman.

The Revolutionary Guard confirmed that three Iranian tankers had been attacked and subsequently announced retaliatory operations against US naval assets. In a separate statement on Sunday, the IRGC said its naval forces had targeted a US unmanned surface vessel that it claimed was attempting to enter a restricted area of the Strait of Hormuz.

The outcome of that attack was not independently confirmed. Iranian authorities also said their forces had targeted three oil tankers that were allegedly transiting the strait without authorization, as well as several US warships in other locations.

The exchanges come amid heightened military tensions between Washington and Tehran and stalled diplomatic efforts to end the conflict. The United States has also intensified economic pressure on Iran through sanctions and restrictions targeting Iranian oil revenues and entities linked to the Revolutionary Guard.

Location: Iran