ConflictClarifier

2026 Iran-Gulf Crisis Tracker
CC
Events Archive
strikeMay 7, 2026

From Deep Strikes To Indigenous Weapons: Op Sindoor's 6 Pillars That Rewrote India's Military Playbook

Summary

From Deep Strikes To Indigenous Weapons: Op Sindoor's 6 Pillars That Rewrote India's Military Playbook Officials describe Operation Sindoor as a culmination of the principle of JAI---Jointness, Aatmanirbharta and Indigenisation One year after Operation Sindoor, the operation is increasingly being viewed not merely as a military response, but as a defining shift in India’s strategic doctrine. From calibrated warfare and deep precision strikes to indigenous defence systems and whole-of-government coordination, the operation has come to represent a new template for how India intends to fight and manage future conflicts. Government and defence officials now describe the operation through six defining pillars that shaped both its execution and its long-term strategic significance. Recommended Stories - Opinion | Operation Sindoor: The Night India Decided Nuclear Blackmail Would No Longer Work - 'Totally Unconstitutional': Trump On Seeking Congressional Nod To Extend Iran War - US-Iran Ceasefire News LIVE: Israeli Military Issues Forced Displacement Order For Southern Lebanon - ‘Gasoline, Oil Prices Will Come Tumbling Down Once Iran War Ends’: Trump Amid Global Energy Crisis Pillar 1: India’s Strategy Of Controlled Warfare Many global conflicts today suffer from a lack of exit strategies, leading to regional instability and economic disruption. The Russia-Ukraine war has entered its fifth year with no clear resolution in sight. Similarly, conflicts in West Asia, initially expected to be swift, continue to expand in scope and cost. Estimates suggest United States’ engagements in these regions have already exceeded $27.68 billion with no definitive end. Operation Sindoor, officials argue, avoided this trap. India entered with clearly defined objectives: neutralise terrorists and their backers while ensuring no civilian casualties. The operation was described as a calibrated military response to asymmetric warfare, designed specifically to dismantle terror infrastructure allegedly used to launch attacks against India. According to the government’s assessment, nine targets were selected to inflict “maximum damage" on terrorist groups and their support structures. High-value Pakistani military installations were also targeted with precision strikes intended to degrade operational capability. Officials maintain that once the objectives were achieved, India exited the conflict on its own terms within four days, inflicting what they describe as “maximum damage in just 88 hours". By pushing the adversary toward a ceasefire within that timeframe, India believes it demonstrated a model of controlled warfare rarely witnessed in modern conflicts. Pillar 2: Striking The Heart Of Pakistan A central feature of Operation Sindoor was the depth of India’s strikes. According to official accounts, India carried out coordinated attacks on nine high-value terrorist launchpads across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, targeting infrastructure linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed and Hizbul Mujahideen. The strikes extended beyond PoJK into mainland Punjab areas such as Sialkot and Bahawalpur, signalling both operational reach and strategic intent. Critical Pakistani military installations, including Nur Khan Airbase and Sargodha Airbase, were also brought within striking range. Government sources have described the scale of these operations as historically unprecedented. More than 100 terrorists were reportedly eliminated, including Yusuf Azhar, linked to the IC-814 hijacking, Abdul Malik Rauf and Mudassir Ahmad, who was associated with the Pulwama attack. Officials argue that the operation also effectively “called the bluff" on Pakistan’s nuclear deterrence posture by demonstrating India’s willingness to conduct deep precision strikes despite longstanding concerns over escalation. Pillar 3: Maximum Damage There, Minimal Impact Here One of the most heavily emphasised aspects of Operation Sindoor has been what officials describe as the asymmetry of the conflict’s impact. While Indian forces inflicted severe damage on Pakistani terror and military infrastructure, government assessments maintain that India suffered almost no direct damage at home. Officials say there was no successful Pakistani missile impact causing major destruction, no prolonged economic disruption and no wider regional destabilisation. This, according to military planners, was made possible through deliberate planning, technological superiority and precise execution. The Indian Air Force reportedly bypassed and jammed Pakistan’s Chinese-supplied air defence systems during a 23-minute mission involving Rafale fighter aircraft, SCALP missiles and HAMMER precision-guided bombs. The operation expanded significantly on May 10, when India reportedly targeted 11 Pakistani military installations in rapid succession. These included Noor Khan Airbase, Rafiqui Airbase, Murid Airbase, Sukkur Airbase, Sialkot Airbase, Pasrur Airbase, Chunian Airbase, Sargodha Airbase, Skardu Airbase, Bholari Airbase and Jacobabad Airbase. Officials claim the strikes degraded key Pakistani air and operational capabilities. Government sources further state that India became the first country to strike 11 airbases of a nuclear-armed nation during a single operation, allegedly destroying nearly 20 per cent of Pakistan’s air force assets. At Bholari Airbase, officials claim heavy casualties were inflicted, including the reported death of Squadron Leader Usman Yusuf and destruction of fighter aircraft. On the defensive side, India’s multi-layered air defence network, anchored by the indigenous Akashteer command-and-control system, reportedly intercepted hundreds of incoming Pakistani drones and missiles. Officials say the performance demonstrated the operational maturity of India’s indigenous defence systems while strengthening the country’s credentials as a global exporter of advanced military technology. Government strategists now argue that Operation Sindoor established a new benchmark in modern warfare: that with sufficient planning, technology and precision, it is possible to absorb near-zero domestic impact while inflicting decisive damage on a nuclear-armed adversary. Pillar 4: Jointness, Aatmanirbharata, Indigenisation (JAI) Officials describe Operation Sindoor as a culmination of the principle of JAI—Jointness, Aatmanirbharta and Indigenisation. The Army, Navy and Air Force operated in close coordination throughout the mission. While the Navy maintained pressure at sea and monitored Pakistani naval movement, the Air Force and Army jointly targeted terror infrastructure, Pakistani military assets and incoming aerial threats. Defence officials say the operation reflected years of institutional reforms, particularly the creation of the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) position in 2019, aimed at improving tri-service coordination. The operation also highlighted the transformation of India’s domestic defence manufacturing ecosystem. Government data shows India’s defence production rising from Rs 46,429 crore in 2014-15 to Rs 1,27,434 crore in 2023-24, before reaching a record Rs 1.54 lakh crore in 2024-25. Officials state that over 65 per cent of India’s defence equipment is now manufactured domestically. A series of policy measures, including the 2021 ban on imported drones, Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes, liberalised FDI norms and defence industrial corridors, are credited with accelerating indigenous research and manufacturing capabilities. Operation Sindoor became the first major demonstration of these reforms in live combat conditions. Systems such as BrahMos missiles, Akash air defence systems, Akashteer, Tejas aircraft, loitering munitions, SkyStriker drones and DRDO’s D-4 anti-drone system were extensively deployed during the operation. Officials argue that these indigenous systems provided the armed forces with precision, survivability and operational dominance across air, land and sea. The operation, according to government sources, marked a transition from “Made for India" to “Made by India". Pillar 5: The Political Will Behind Operation Sindoor Officials also describe the operation as a reflection of political decision-making that differed sharply from previous responses to terrorism. Unlike earlier periods where military action was often tempered by diplomatic caution, the government says the armed forces were given full operational authority with clear political backing. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is described by officials as having provided both strategic clarity and restraint under pressure. Government sources say decisions ranging from the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty to the sequencing of military strikes were carefully calibrated. The mandate issued to the armed forces, according to officials, was direct: strike terrorists and their backers wherever they are while ensuring civilians are not harmed. As Pakistan escalated, officials say the armed forces retained standing authority to respond with whatever means were operationally necessary. Government sources contrast this with earlier approaches that relied heavily on diplomatic protests and dossiers submitted to Pakistan after terror attacks. Officials argue that Operation Sindoor permanently altered that approach by authorising strikes not only in PoJK but also deep within Pakistani mainland territory. Alongside military operations, India simultaneously launched a diplomatic campaign aimed at isolating Pakistan internationally and framing the strikes as legitimate self-defence before global counter-narratives could emerge. Pillar 6: Whole-Of-Nation Approach Operation Sindoor also showcased what officials describe as a “whole-of-nation approach" to conflict management. Rather than functioning as a purely military campaign, the operation involved close coordination between the armed forces, private industry, technology start-ups, intelligence agencies, civilian administration and diplomatic channels. Private companies and start-ups contributed significantly to the deployment of loitering munitions and counter-drone systems. Officials also highlighted the growing importance of the iDEX innovation framework, through which private firms reportedly provided real-time technological solutions during combat. ISRO played a major role by dedicating at least 10 satellites for round-the-clock surveillance support to the Army, Navy and Air Force. Simultaneously, multiple agencies coordinated efforts to counter misinformation and propaganda online, including media literacy campaigns intended to help citizens identify fake news during the conflict. The office of the Chief of Defence Staff also reportedly centralised procurement and logistics planning, ensuring that Army intelligence, Air Force targeting and Naval surveillance operated using a common data network. Civilian administration was integrated into planning as well. Civil servants and district officials were reportedly briefed alongside military planners to manage public communication, maintain domestic stability and conduct mock drills aimed at preventing panic. The government also sought bipartisan political support by sending seven parliamentary delegations, including opposition representatives, to 32 countries to communicate India’s anti-terror position internationally. Officials say the operation ultimately demonstrated that modern warfare is no longer viewed solely as the responsibility of individual military services, but as a fully integrated national effort involving military, political, technological and civilian institutions acting together.

Actors involved

USIsraelIranRussia

Sources

  • Apoorva Misra; News DeskBy Apoorva Misra; News Desk

    From Deep Strikes To Indigenous Weapons: Op Sindoor's 6 Pillars That Rewrote India's Military Playbook Officials describe Operation Sindoor as a culmination of the principle of JAI---Jointness, Aatmanirbharta and Indigenisation One year after Operation Sindoor, the operation is i…

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
○ 1 source

President Donald Trump has made another bombastic pronouncement amid the war with Iran. On Tuesday, he shared a map labeling the Strait of Hormuz “NEW U.S. Territory,” via his Truth Social platform. Iran has continued to stress that the strait will not be fully reopened until Washington meets its slew of demands, including ending its blockade on Iranian shipping and scrapping oil sanctions.

Ship Hit in Strait Just hours before Trump’s latest post, a vessel exiting the Strait of Hormuz was struck by an unidentified projectile off the coast of Oman. According to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations, the ship’s engine room was hit, resulting in a “crew casualty.

” Officials did not immediately identify the vessel or its cargo. The Omani Coast Guard said it was assisting the remaining crew as authorities investigated the incident. Iran’s Stranglehold on the Strait Since the United States and Israel launched attacks on the Islamic Republic on February 28, Iran has tightly restricted shipping through the waterway.

Prior to the war, around one-fifth of globally traded oil passed through Hormuz. Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf said Tuesday that Tehran would maintain its restrictions until Washington fulfilled what Iran considers its commitments under the interim U.

S.-Iran agreement struck in June. Those demands include lifting the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports, releasing frozen Iranian assets, removing sanctions on Iranian oil and gas exports, and ending U.S. military threats and operations. “Until the United States fulfills its commitments under the agreement … the Strait of Hormuz will not reopen,” Qalibaf said.

Blockade Vs. Territory Asked in the Oval Office on Monday about his earlier suggestion that Hormuz could become American territory, the president said he liked the idea. “We control it with the blockade, and I like the idea of declaring it a territory,” Trump told reporters, adding: “We have total control over the strait now.

” Washington’s blockade is hitting Iranian shipping hard. U.S. Central Command said Monday that American forces had redirected 64 commercial vessels, disabled three ships, and boarded another two as part of the renewed blockade. That does not mean Washington has eliminated Iran’s ability to disrupt other shipping.

Tuesday’s unexplained attack came after a string of strikes on vessels attempting to navigate the area. Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi also rejected Trump’s territorial claim on Tuesday, describing it as a “delusion.” Tehran has repeatedly maintained that it, rather than Washington, will determine when normal passage through the strait resumes.

Iran and Oman Near Deal Complicating matters further are separate negotiations between Iran and Oman, the two countries sitting on opposite sides of the strait. Iran said Monday that the two governments were finalizing details of an agreement concerning shipping routes through Hormuz.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said an “understanding has been reached regarding the map of the transit route.” Trump responded by threatening Oman, a longstanding U.S. partner, telling Fox News that Washington would “bomb the shit out of them” if Muscat “gets in the way.

” The diplomatic clock has already run down. The 60-day negotiating period established by the June memorandum between Washington and Tehran expired on Monday without a broader agreement being reached. Trump has said the United States is not seeking an extension.

Tehran Likely to Double Down Columnist Melanie Phillips slammed President Trump’s plans for a ceasefire last month, complaining that it had given Tehran the upper hand and showed that “everyone can now see America is not prepared to make the sacrifices necessary to defend itself.

” Trump has claimed Iran has essentially lost this war and that the blockade is massively damaging its economy. However, he has also instructed his team to pursue a “low-key” approach to talks. On July 7, Trump said the agreement was “over”, while Iran’s Foreign Ministry said it was “suspended” the following week.

“They should put up the white flag of surrender,” Trump told Fox News on Monday, claiming that backchannel talks with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) were ongoing. The IRGC has denied these claims. On Tuesday, Trump dramatically changed his tune, stating that no talks with Iran were ongoing, and that no discussions were scheduled.

About the Author: Georgia Gilholy Georgia Gilholy is a journalist based in the United Kingdom who has been published in Newsweek, The Times of Israel, and the Spectator. Gilholy writes about international politics, culture, and education.

Location: Tehran
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy
○ 1 source

Iran War Day 172: ‘No Talks’ Scheduled with Tehran, Trump Says In a post on Truth Social Tuesday President Donald Trump said that “there are no talks or conversations going on, or scheduled, with the Islamic Republic of Iran.” Trump added that the U.

S. naval blockade on the Strait of Hormuz “remains in full force and effect” and that the waterway “is open and operating.” In a separate post, Trump published an image labelling the strait as “NEW U.S. Territory.” Only six commodity ships transited the Strait of Hormuz on Monday, according to Kpler data cited by Reuters.

Iran’s Speaker of Parliament Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said Tuesday, Until the commitments made by the United States in the memorandum of understanding, including the lifting of the blockade, the release of frozen assets, the lifting of oil sanctions, the end of threats and military operations on all fronts, and other conditions to which America agreed in the memorandum, are implemented, the strait will not be opened.

The deadline for that memorandum of understanding—signed by Trump and Iran’s president in June—expired on Monday. The two nations had agreed to negotiate a final peace deal over a 60-day period, but the framework agreement quickly fell apart, and the deadline seemingly wasn’t extended, despite mixed reporting.

Subscribe Today Get daily emails in your inbox Ghalibaf will lead a “high-level parliamentary delegation” to Iraq on Wednesday, Iran’s Fars news agency reported. The visit comes as pro-Iran militia groups face a September 30 deadline set by the Iraqi government to disarm.

Syria condemned reported Israeli strikes against Abu Duhur airbase on Tuesday, while the U.S. expressed concern over the incident. U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria and Iraq Tom Barrack wrote on X that “we are deeply concerned that the confirmed Israeli airstrikes on Abu al-Duhur Airbase constitute an unnecessary escalation that does not advance regional stability.

” The price of Brent Crude oil was over $91 per barrel on Tuesday morning. AAA recorded the national average price of regular gas at $4.07.

Location: Tehran
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
○ 1 source

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday no talks were taking place with Iran and none were scheduled, and he insisted that the Strait of Hormuz was open, contradicting an earlier Iranian assertion that the critical waterway remained shut to shipping.

The receding prospects of a deal to end the nearly six-month conflict drove up oil prices again on Tuesday, while stock markets sagged and borrowing costs for major economies including the U.S. hit multi-decade highs, amid concerns about the long-term inflationary and fiscal impact of the crisis.

A temporary ceasefire agreement expired on Monday and a senior Iranian official told Reuters that his country was moving to a “fully offensive” military posture due to the diplomatic stalemate, though there were no reports of fresh strikes by either side on Tuesday.

“There are no talks or conversations going on, or scheduled, with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Tuesday. “The Naval Blockade remains in full force and effect. The Hormuz Strait is open and operating. All water mines have been removed or detonated,” he added.

On Monday, Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law and special envoy, had sounded an optimistic note, saying talks with Iran were still under way and were “probably more robust” than they had ever been. Despite Trump's typically ebullient remarks about the situation in the Gulf, preliminary shipping data on Tuesday showed ship crossings via the Strait of Hormuz were still in single digits on Monday.

The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations said it received a report on Tuesday that a vessel was struck by an unknown projectile while transiting outbound in the Strait of Hormuz, causing engine room damage and a crew casualty. The remaining crew were being assisted by the Omani Coast Guard, according to the report.

Top Iranian negotiator Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf said in comments published by state media that the strait would remain shut until the U.S. met the conditions of an interim deal signed with Iran in June. These conditions include the U.S. lifting its blockade of Iranian ports, lifting oil sanctions, releasing Tehran's frozen assets, and ending threats and military operations on all fronts, Qalibaf told parliament.

A memorandum of understanding signed on June 17 had set a 60-day time frame for a broader deal on Iran's nuclear programme and U.S. sanctions. That period elapsed on Monday and Trump said he had no plans to extend it. The agreement, which declared the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts,” had quickly unravelled over a dispute about control of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway through which a fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas flowed before the war.

Both Trump and Tehran have frequently switched between threats and more emollient rhetoric as they seek a way out of the crisis, which erupted when the U.S. and Israel launched strikes against Iran on February 28. Iran remains open to dialogue with the U.

S. but does not confuse negotiations with surrender, Mohammad Mokhber, an adviser to Iran's supreme leader, said on Tuesday, according to the semi-official Fars news agency. Mokhber said military pressure and sanctions would not break Iran's resolve and that the country would defend its security, dignity and allies while not seeking war.

Even as Iran projects resilience in the war, its leaders are worried that a threat of more economic punishment could increase hardships, reignite unrest and further erode the Islamic Republic’s legitimacy, according to three Iranian officials. Thousands of people have been killed in the conflict, mainly in Iran and Lebanon.

Iran has bombed U.S. military bases and infrastructure in countries including Oman, Jordan, Kuwait, Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Benchmark Brent crude oil futures have surged during the conflict, hitting a peak of $126 a barrel, roughly 75% above pre-war levels.

Brent crude futures settled up 20 cents on Tuesday at just over $91 a barrel. For Americans who will vote in November congressional elections, gasoline prices have risen above $4 per gallon, up from less than $3 before the war, according to the automotive group AAA.

Location: Tehran
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUN
○ 1 source

Iran is rebuilding the upper ranks of its military and security establishment after months of wartime losses by turning largely to familiar veterans — figures whose careers in some cases stretch back to the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the Iran-Iraq War and previous domestic crackdowns.

The appointments follow the deaths of several senior Iranian commanders in U.S.-Israeli strikes since the war began Feb. 28, The National reported Aug. 11. For Washington, the stakes go beyond who fills the vacancies. The reshuffle puts veteran hardliners atop institutions that shape Iran’s military operations, national-security policy and internal security at a time of renewed confrontation with the United States.

The appointments do not prove that Tehran has run out of younger commanders or that loyalty was the sole criterion, but the reliance on figures whose careers stretch back decades is raising a broader question for U.S. policymakers: whether wartime losses have left Iran increasingly dependent on a smaller circle of trusted ideologues — potentially narrowing the room for compromise even as Washington tries to pressure Tehran back toward a deal.

IRAN’S REVOLUTIONARY GUARD SIDELINES PRESIDENT AS MILITARY GRIP EXPANDS Former American prisoner Morad Tahbaz, who was detained in Iran in 2018 and freed in a U.S.-Iran prisoner exchange in September 2023, told Fox News Digital that he views the latest appointments as evidence of Tehran's continued dependence on longtime loyalists.

"They keep rotating the same old people, most of whom are fairly inept but are loyal to the Khamenei father and son," Tahbaz told Fox News Digital. The reshuffle spans Iran's conventional military, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, its naval arm, the Basij paramilitary force and the country's highest national-security council.

Iran's state-run IRNA reported Aug. 10 that Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei appointed Ali Abdollahi chief of staff of the Armed Forces, Kioumars Heydari his deputy, Ahmad Vahidi commander of the IRGC, Mostafa Izadi deputy IRGC commander, Ali Ozmaei commander of the IRGC Navy and Hossein Taeb head of the Basij.

The previous day, former IRGC commander Mohsen Rezaei, 71, was named secretary of the Supreme National Security Council and Khamenei's representative on the powerful body. Reuters reported Aug. 10 that the SNSC coordinates Iran's security and foreign policy and that Rezaei replaced Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr, who had been appointed secretary in late March following the death of his predecessor, Ali Larijani.

The appointments do not establish that Iran has run out of younger or less familiar commanders. But the reliance on longtime military and security figures has fueled assessments that wartime losses have narrowed the regime's pool of officials it regards as sufficiently experienced and politically trustworthy.

Erfan Fard wrote for the Middle East Forum on Aug. 15 that Khamenei was not promoting a new generation but turning to veterans of the revolution, the Iran-Iraq War, intelligence operations and domestic repression, arguing that an architecture based on "institutional memory, loyalty, and coercive power" was taking shape.

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies argued in an Aug. 12 policy brief that the reshuffle looked "less like renewal than a game of musical chairs among regime veterans." The appointments also formalized the position of Ahmad Vahidi, a veteran hardliner who had already emerged near the center of wartime decision-making.

Vahidi was a major player in shaping Tehran's wartime policy and had risen through the IRGC's early intelligence and external-operations apparatus before later serving as defense and interior minister. As interior minister, Vahidi oversaw police units involved in the crackdown on the 2022 protests.

IRNA confirmed Aug. 10 that Khamenei promoted Vahidi to major general and formally appointed him commander-in-chief of the IRGC. WHO IS AHMAD VAHIDI? IRAN’S NEW IRGC CHIEF TIED TO GLOBAL ATTACKS AND ‘DEATH TO AMERICA’ IDEOLOGY Hossein Taeb: The intelligence veteran returns to the Basij to build a ‘20-million-strong Basij force.

’ One of the most closely watched appointments is Hossein Taeb, the cleric and veteran security official tapped to lead the Basij, the IRGC's volunteer paramilitary force that has repeatedly been used against domestic dissent. The National reported that the Basij has been used to suppress internal dissent, while The Times reported Aug.

12 that the force is embedded in neighborhoods, universities, workplaces, factories, ministries and mosques and has played a central role in suppressing successive uprisings. For Tahbaz, Taeb's return is personal. Tahbaz was detained in 2018, while Taeb was leading the IRGC Intelligence Organization.

"Ta’eb is extremely close to Mojtaba Khamenei but was very unceremoniously fired from his former position as head of the IRGC Intelligence Organization," Tahbaz told Fox News Digital. "He was personally responsible for my and my colleagues' arrests and detentions.

He lives and breathes conspiracy theories." The Times reported Aug. 12 that Taeb and Mojtaba Khamenei's relationship dates back more than four decades and that both served in the Habib Battalion during the Iran-Iraq War. The newspaper also reported that IRGC intelligence arrested environmentalists and dual nationals during Taeb's tenure.

Taeb previously commanded the Basij before moving into IRGC intelligence. The Times reported that months after the disputed 2009 election, the Guards' intelligence division was elevated into an independent organization with Taeb as its first chief. Taeb's earlier leadership of the Basij also drew U.

S. sanctions. In a Sept. 29, 2010 Treasury Department fact sheet, the U.S. government said that while Taeb commanded the Basij during the June 2009 election, forces under his command participated in "beatings, murder, and arbitrary arrests and detentions of peaceful protestors.

" According to IRNA, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf congratulated Taeb on his appointment as head of the Basij Organization, saying his tenure could mark a new chapter for the volunteer force. Ghalibaf said the Basij now needs a more comprehensive and forward-looking approach and argued that Taeb’s appointment by the supreme leader could help advance what he described as one of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s longstanding goals: building a 20-million-strong Basij force.

UN WATCHDOG SLAMS POTENTIAL ELECTION OF IRAN TO PANEL WITH HUMAN RIGHTS SWAY: 'LUNATICS RUNNING THE ASYLUM' Mohsen Rezaei: Back at the center after four decades Few appointments better illustrate the return of Iran's old guard than Mohsen Rezaei, who was named secretary of the Supreme National Security Council.

Reuters reported Aug. 10 that Rezaei joined the IRGC shortly after the 1979 revolution, became its commander in 1981 at age 27 and led the force for 16 years, including through most of the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War. He later served as secretary of Iran's Expediency Discernment Council for more than two decades and as vice president for economic affairs from 2021 to 2023 under President Ebrahim Raisi.

Now, at 71, he is secretary of the SNSC and Khamenei's representative on the body. Beni Sabti, an Iran expert at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies, argued that bringing back longtime figures such as Rezaei reflects weakness rather than renewal.

"This is, again, another evidence that they don't have anyone else," Sabti told Fox News Digital. "So they have to bring him out again from the desk and put him somewhere. These are the guys that they have." Rezaei and Vahidi were also among six people for whom INTERPOL authorized Red Notices requested by Argentina in 2007 in connection with the investigation into the 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires.

INTERPOL said in November 2007 that its General Assembly upheld the publication of notices for six individuals, including Ahmad Vahidi and Mohsen Rezaei, after Iran challenged Argentina's requests. Sabti argued that Rezaei's re-emergence is particularly telling because Tehran's decision-making circle has become less ideologically diverse.

"Today, there is only one opinion, and this is the main problem," Sabti said. "This is why you think that there is unity and the system is stronger. No, it's not stronger. Actually, it's weaker also because of that." TRADE VESSEL STRUCK BY PROJECTILE IN STRAIT OF HORMUZ AMID US-IRAN TALKS Ali Abdollahi: A wartime commander takes the top military job Ali Abdollahi was elevated to chief of staff of Iran's Armed Forces, putting him at the top of the country's military command structure.

IRNA confirmed the appointment Aug. 10. Abdollahi had previously commanded the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, Iran's joint operational command responsible for coordinating its armed forces in wartime, according to Iran International on Aug. 10.

His appointment also comes amid an effort to integrate the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters more closely with the Armed Forces General Staff. Le Monde reported Aug. 11 that Abdollahi's task includes completing that integration in an effort to further centralize command and coordination.

Fard argued in his Aug. 15 Middle East Forum analysis that Abdollahi's elevation exemplifies Tehran's reliance on longstanding revolutionary-security figures rather than a generational break. FREED AMERICAN REVEALS BRUTAL IRAN PRISON ORDEAL, WARNS HOSTAGES FACE GREATER DANGER Kioumars Heydari: The regular army moves closer to the center Former Army Ground Forces commander Kioumars Heydari was appointed deputy chief of staff of the Armed Forces, bringing a senior officer from Iran's conventional military into the new command structure.

The National reported that Heydari formerly commanded the Army Ground Forces and has held senior positions in Iran's regular army, known as the Artesh. IRNA independently confirmed his appointment. His inclusion also demonstrates that the reshuffle is not limited to the IRGC.

Fard argued in the Middle East Forum that Heydari's previous public rhetoric surrounding protest suppression indicates that Tehran has increasingly integrated the regular army into its domestic-security posture. Mostafa Izadi: Another veteran rises inside the IRGC Mostafa Izadi was appointed Vahidi's deputy, putting another longtime commander near the top of the IRGC hierarchy.

IRNA confirmed Izadi's appointment Aug. 10, while The National described him Aug. 11 as a veteran commander who has held a number of senior positions in Iran's military and security establishment. Iran International reported that Izadi previously commanded the Cyber and New Threats Headquarters within the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters.

IRAN HARDLINER BEHIND US DEAL WARNS TEHRAN WON’T HONOR AGREEMENT IF TRUMP FAILS TO DELIVER Ali Ozmaei: A new commander at one of Iran's most sensitive fronts Rear Adm. Ali Ozmaei was appointed commander of the IRGC Navy, putting him in charge of a force central to Iran's military posture in the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz.

The National reported Aug. 11 that Ozmaei replaced Alireza Tangsiri, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike in March, and that the IRGC Navy is responsible for Iran's military operations in the Gulf and around the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian state media also highlighted Ozmaei's longstanding maritime experience.

IRNA reported Aug. 11 that Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf praised Ozmaei's years in maritime defense and his familiarity with the current conflict and the Strait of Hormuz. The appointment came one day before Rezaei said the Strait of Hormuz would remain closed unless the United States changed its behavior and accepted Iran's conditions.

Reuters reported that Rezaei said Washington would have to end the war and unfreeze Iranian funds overseas, with other conditions relayed through mediators. Taken together, the seven personnel changes show Tehran moving to fill and reshuffle critical military and security posts after significant wartime losses.

What remains an assessment rather than an established fact is whether the identities of those chosen reveal a deeper shortage of trusted successors. Sabti said the return of veteran figures reflected what he sees as a shrinking bench of trusted officials and a less diverse decision-making circle.

Tahbaz offered a less academic version of that assessment. CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP "They keep rotating the same old people," he said.

Location: Tehran