ConflictClarifier

2026 Iran-Gulf Crisis Tracker
CC
Events Archive
militaryMay 10, 2026

Local shepard uncovers secret Israeli military base in Iraqi desert

Summary

An intelligence expert said the desert in western Iraq is an ideal location for such secret bases, given its size and sparse population. The Wall Street Journal, citing US sources, has revealed that Israel set up a secret military base in the Iraqi desert before the outbreak of the war with Iran, with the aim of providing air cover for its operations. The move came last February, with the base in Anbar province hosting special forces and Israeli search-and-rescue units, set up to deal with the possible downing of warplanes inside Iran. According to the report, Tel Aviv offered the services of its secret facility after a US F-15 fighter jet was shot down near Isfahan, but US forces declined and carried out the rescue of the pilots independently, while Israel conducted parallel air raids to secure the area. How was the base discovered? Strikingly, the base was not uncovered by Iraqi security agencies but by a shepherd in the area who noticed unusual military activity, including helicopter movements and gunfire, and reported it, prompting Iraqi forces to launch an urgent investigation. Israel, however, moved quickly and carried out intensive strikes that left one Iraqi soldier dead. At the time, Iraq questioned the circumstances of the incident and held the United States responsible for the attack. Qais al-Mohammadi, deputy commander of Iraqi army operations, said: "This reckless operation was carried out without coordination or approval." By contrast, another Iraqi military official voiced unease about what had happened, saying: "It appears that a force was present on the ground before the strike, backed from the air and operating beyond the capabilities of our units." Israeli Air Force Chief of Staff Tomer Bar had previously stated that special forces were carrying out "exceptional operations" during the confrontation with Iran, without giving further details. Why the Iraqi desert in particular? An intelligence expert explained that the western Iraqi desert is an ideal environment for such secret bases because of its vast expanse and sparse population, adding: "It was essential for Baghdad to conduct reconnaissance and inspections before any moves." This desert, which stretches west of the Euphrates River in Anbar province and connects with the deserts of Syria and Jordan, is an extremely arid area inhabited by Bedouins and covers around 23% of Iraq’s territory. The region includes the towns of al-Qaim, Anah, Hit and Rutba, and is considered one of Iraq’s richest areas in natural resources, containing confirmed phosphate reserves estimated at about two billion tonnes, as well as free sulphur, silica sand and natural gas. These developments come against a highly complex political and military backdrop, as Baghdad strives to maintain a delicate balance between its two most powerful allies: Washington and Tehran. Amid this fragile balance, the United States continues to press Iraq to disarm Iran-backed groups that Washington designates as terrorist organisations. These groups target US interests inside Iraq, from its embassy in Baghdad to diplomatic and logistical facilities, and on to oil sites operated by foreign companies.

Perspectives

Iranian Official

The Zionist regime's covert establishment of a military base in Iraq's Anbar desert constitutes a blatant violation of Iraqi sovereignty and an act of foreign aggression designed to enable strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Local reports confirm this illegal outpost, discovered by civilians and defended through hasty Israeli strikes that killed an Iraqi soldier, was intended to support operations amid Iran's successful downing of hostile aircraft near Isfahan. Tehran condemns this interference and reaffirms its right to resist such threats to regional security.

Israeli

Israel established a covert forward base in Iraq’s Anbar desert to counter Iran’s existential threat and its expanding proxy network, enabling rapid search-and-rescue and air-support missions for strikes deep inside Iranian territory. The facility was a defensive necessity to protect pilots and maintain operational reach against Tehran’s missile and nuclear infrastructure, especially after a U.S. jet was downed near Isfahan. When local activity risked exposure, Israeli forces conducted limited strikes to safeguard the site and preserve the ability to operate against an enemy that uses Iraqi territory as an extension of its forward lines.

Neutral

A Wall Street Journal report citing US sources states that Israel established a secret base in Iraq’s Anbar province in February to support potential operations against Iran. The report indicates the site was identified after a shepherd reported unusual activity, leading Iraqi forces to investigate and Israel to conduct strikes that killed one soldier; Iraqi officials attributed the incident to uncoordinated US action.

Western

Israeli forces established a covert forward operating base in Iraq’s Anbar province to enable rapid search-and-rescue and provide precision air support for strikes neutralizing Iranian air defenses and related threats. When local activity risked compromising the site, Israeli units conducted targeted strikes to secure the area and protect ongoing operations, consistent with efforts to maintain operational security against Iranian capabilities. US forces separately executed a pilot recovery without utilizing the Israeli facility.

Pro-Peace

The secret Israeli base in Iraq’s Anbar desert, exposed when a local shepherd reported unusual helicopter movements and gunfire, triggered Israeli strikes that killed one Iraqi soldier and exposed how foreign military footholds endanger civilians and violate national sovereignty. These covert preparations for wider aerial warfare impose heavy humanitarian costs on sparse communities already strained by conflict, turning remote areas into potential battlegrounds. Coordinated diplomacy and respect for borders remain the only sustainable alternatives to such reckless escalations.

Global South

Israel’s covert base in Iraq’s Anbar desert, installed without Baghdad’s consent, represents a clear breach of Iraqi sovereignty by an external power acting with impunity. That the facility was exposed only by a shepherd’s report, not by national security agencies, exposes the hollow capacity of Iraqi state institutions to police their own territory. Subsequent Israeli strikes that killed an Iraqi soldier, met with official protests aimed at Washington rather than Tel Aviv, illustrate the persistent neo-colonial dynamics that subordinate Iraqi decision-making to foreign agendas.

Actors involved

Israel

Sources

  • Ekbal ZeinBy Ekbal Zein

    An intelligence expert said the desert in western Iraq is an ideal location for such secret bases, given its size and sparse population. The Wall Street Journal, citing US sources, has revealed that Israel set up a secret military base in the Iraqi desert before the outbreak of t

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

militaryUnverifiedRussiaUkraine
1 source

Dozens detained in Russia as only anti-war party struck from election Russia's Supreme Court rejected an appeal by the anti-war party Yabloko against a ban on it taking part in September's parliamentary elections. Minutes earlier, the party's prominent anti-war politician Lev Shlosberg was sentenced to 11 years and one month in a penal colony for "discrediting" the country's armed forces and "spreading false information" about them.

Yabloko was struck off the ballots earlier this month over accusations that the party publicly supports the "international LGBT movement", which Russia's Supreme Court designates as extremist. The party rejects the accusations. Yabloko was the only registered party to oppose Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine launched in 2022.

militaryUnverifiedRussiaUkraine
1 source

Kremlin critic jailed in Russia for 11 years for opposing the war in Ukraine Lev Shlosberg is a senior member of the Yabloko party which Russia has barred from the ballot in next month’s parliamentary election A Russian court on Monday convicted a prominent opposition politician for speaking out against the war in Ukraine and sentenced him to 11 years and one month in prison in the latest crackdown leading up to next month’s parliamentary election.

The verdict against Lev Shlosberg, a senior member of the Yabloko party, was another step by the Kremlin to stifle dissent since Russia invaded its neighbour in February 2022. Yabloko is the only official political party overtly opposing the war. In a separate ruling on Monday, Russia’s Supreme Court upheld its earlier decision to bar Yabloko from the ballot in the September 18-20 parliamentary vote, denying an appeal by the party.

The moves against Shlosberg and Yabloko highlight the Kremlin’s intolerance towards any criticism of the war, now in its fifth year. Shlosberg, 63, is Yabloko’s deputy chairman and served in the regional legislature of Pskov from 2016 to 2021. He stood trial in the city of Pskov, some 600km (370 miles) northwest of Moscow, on charges of “discrediting” and spreading “false information” about the Russian military.

The charges stemmed from a debate in which he called for ending the war and from posting on his Telegram channel a British tabloid front page featuring an image of a bloodied woman next to one of Russian President Vladimir Putin, with the headline: “Her blood … his hands.

” Shlosberg has rejected the charges as unfounded.

Location: Oman
militaryUnverifiedRussiaUkraine
1 source

Russian court jails a Kremlin critic for 11 years for opposing the war in Ukraine Russian court jails a Kremlin critic for 11 years for opposing the war in Ukraine Lev Shlosberg senior member of the Yabloko party, stands in the defendant’s box prior to a verdict in the case against him is delivered, in a court in Pskov, Russia, Monday, Aug.

17, 2026. (AP Photo) Lev Shlosberg, left, senior member of the Yabloko party, waves standing in the defendant’s box after a verdict in the case against him is delivered, in a court in Pskov, Russia, Monday, Aug. 17, 2026, with his wife Zhanna Shlosberg on the right.

(AP Photo) Lev Shlosberg, center, senior member of the Yabloko party, is being led out of the court room after a judge convicted him and sentenced him to more than 11 years in prison, in a court in Pskov, Russia, Monday, Aug. 17, 2026. (AP Photo) Chairman of the Appellate Board of the Supreme Court judge Vladimir Zaitsev, background center, his deputy Igor Zinchenko, and Judge Denis Tyutin, attend a reading of the court decision on an appeal against its ruling to bar the Yabloko party from the upcoming parliamentary elections, at the Russia’s Supreme Court, in Moscow, Monday, Aug.

17, 2026. (AP Photo/Pavel Bednyakov) Yabloko party leader Nikolai Rybakov carries a box with documents leaving the Russia’s Supreme Court after hearing an appeal on a lawsuit to bar the party from the upcoming parliamentary elections, in Moscow, Monday, Aug.

17, 2026. (AP Photo/Pavel Bednyakov) Yabloko party leader Nikolai Rybakov speaks to his supporters and journalists after hearing an appeal on a lawsuit to bar the party from the upcoming parliamentary elections, at the Russia’s Supreme Court, in Moscow, Monday, Aug.

17, 2026. (AP Photo/Pavel Bednyakov) A Russian court on Monday convicted a prominent opposition politician for speaking out against the war in Ukraine and sentenced him to 11 years and one month in prison in the latest crackdown leading up to next month’s parliamentary election.

The verdict against Lev Shlosberg, a senior member of the Yabloko party, was another step by the Kremlin to stifle dissent since Russia invaded its neighbor in February 2022. Yabloko is the only official political party overtly opposing the war. In a separate ruling Monday, Russia’s Supreme Court upheld its earlier decision to bar Yabloko from the ballot in the Sept.

18-20 parliamentary vote, denying an appeal by the party. The moves against Shlosberg and Yabloko highlight the Kremlin’s intolerance toward any criticism of the war, now in its fifth year. It was Shlosberg’s second trial in 2 years Shlosberg, 63, is Yabloko’s deputy chairman and served in the regional legislature of Pskov from 2016-21.

He stood trial in the city of Pskov, some 600 kilometers (370 miles) northwest of Moscow, on charges of “discrediting” and spreading “false information” about the Russian military. The charges stemmed from a debate in which he called for ending the war and from posting on his Telegram channel a British tabloid front page featuring an image of a bloodied woman next to one of Russian President Vladimir Putin, with the headline: “Her blood ...

his hands.” Shlosberg has rejected the charges as unfounded. It was the second trial for Shlosberg in the last two years. He has also been designated a “foreign agent,” a label that carries strong pejorative connotations in Russia and brings additional government scrutiny.

He was convicted of violating the foreign agent regulations. In December 2025, he was placed in pretrial detention on the new charges and has been behind bars ever since. He is one of several prominent Yabloko members in recent years to be jailed or designated a “foreign agent” as Kremlin pressure on the party has mounted.

Yabloko called the sentence ‘barbaric’ In his final statement to the court Friday, Shlosberg said that for 30 years, Russia has traveled “a path from hopes for freedom to the almost complete destruction of human and civil rights and freedoms.” He said the war in Ukraine has “changed the lives of every Russian citizen without exception,” and predicted that once its true death toll becomes known, “the entire country will shudder.

” Yabloko said Shlosberg received a “barbaric sentence” for “love of the Motherland and calls for a ceasefire.” In a statement on Telegram, the party said Shlosberg will appeal. Amnesty International denounced the verdict against Shlosberg. “His arbitrary prosecution and sentencing are blatant reprisals for exercising his right to freedom of expression to call for peace,” said Marie Struthers, the group’s Eastern Europe and Central Asia director.

“The Russian authorities must immediately and unconditionally release Lev Shlosberg and quash his conviction,” her statement added. “They must repeal legislation criminalizing peaceful anti-war expression, end the persecution of Yabloko members and supporters, and respect the rights to freedom of expression, association, peaceful assembly and political participation for all Russians.

” Supreme Court upholds removing Yabloko from the ballot In Moscow, the Supreme Court upheld its ruling of a week ago to remove Yabloko from the ballot in the election for the State Duma, Russia’s lower house of parliament, denying an appeal by the party.

The Central Election Commission in July had allowed Yabloko on the ballot along with 10 other parties. Young social media users and many Russian opposition figures in exile have since come out in support of Yabloko, urging voters to back the party, once a leading liberal voice in parliament that later lost its bloc of seats as the Kremlin tightened its grip on politics.

In recent years, Yabloko was the only registered opposition party that opposed Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Its campaign slogans for this year’s election included, “For a ceasefire agreement, diplomacy and peace!” “Our goal is to prevent nuclear war!

” and “For a Russia free from fear and political repression!” Several Kremlin parties publicly assailed Yabloko for its anti-war stance after it got a slot on the ballot. The Motherland Party filed a lawsuit with the Supreme Court, demanding its removal from the ballot, accusing Yabloko of copyright infringement and exceeding campaign spending limits.

The party also viewed Yabloko’s stance on Ukraine as unlawful and tantamount to calling for the violation of Russia’s territorial integrity. Yabloko rejected these accusations, but the Supreme Court sided with the Motherland Party. As the court met Monday on Yabloko’s appeal, the party’s supporters gathered outside the courthouse and Russian media reported that several dozen people were detained.

Liberal politician Grigory Yavlinsky, who co-founded Yabloko in the 1990s and chairs its political committee, deplored the court’s ruling in an online statement. It marked “a serious, deepening crisis in the Russian political system and a lack of understanding of a desired future,” he said.

“People begin to feel this more acutely, regardless of their political views and positions,” he said, adding that Yabloko’s campaign “for peace and freedom” hit this particular “sore point.” Yabloko chairman Nikolai Rybakov told reporters after the ruling that the party will continue its fight by lodging a complaint to the Presidium of the Supreme Court and possibly going to the Constitutional Court.

“We achieved the main thing: The whole world knows how many people in Russia want peace, want to live normally and to raise children under a peaceful sky in their country,” Rybakov said. Regarding the prison term handed to Shlosberg, Rybakov said that “our feelings are with Lev and other political prisoners who have fought and are fighting for peace, for people to not die.

Location: Oman