2026 Iran-Gulf Crisis Tracker
CC
Events Archive
strikeJul 23, 2026

Pakistan rejects Amnesty call for war crimes probe into Kabul airstrike

Summary

Pakistan on Thursday rejected Amnesty International's call for an investigation into a March airstrike on a drug rehabilitation center in the Afghan capital that the rights group said could amount to a war crime, dismissing the allegations as unsupported and describing the operation as a lawful act of self-defense. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Tahir Andrabi told a news briefing in Islamabad that Pakistan "completely rejects the allegations" made by Amnesty International, calling it "unfortunate" that such serious claims had been made "without any credible evidence." His remarks came a day after Amnesty International said it had found no evidence to support Pakistan's claim that Kabul's Omid drug rehabilitation center was being used for military purposes or to store weapons and ammunition when it was struck on March 16. Also Read: Iran strikes on CIA facilities prompt questions about possible Russian role Afghanistan has said the strike killed about 400 civilians. Pakistani officials dispute the death toll and maintain the strike targeted a legitimate military site. Amnesty said it analyzed more than 60 photos and videos, including footage released by Pakistan's military, reviewed more than 30 satellite images and interviewed witnesses and other sources. It said it asked Pakistan's Foreign Ministry on July 9 whether an investigation had been launched and requested evidence supporting Pakistan's justification for the strike but had received no response before publishing its report. Also Read: Trump warns Iran will be held 'responsible' for Houthi ship attacks The strike came amid months of escalating cross-border hostilities between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Pakistan accuses Afghanistan's Taliban government of harboring militants, particularly the Pakistani Taliban, known as Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, or TTP, who it says carry out deadly attacks inside Pakistan. The TTP is a separate group but a close ally of Afghanistan's Taliban rulers. Afghanistan denies the allegation. The U.N. mission in Afghanistan, UNAMA, said in May it had independently verified at least 269 civilian deaths and 122 injuries from the strike, while warning the actual toll could be significantly higher. Afghan authorities later held mass funerals for victims. Responding to Amnesty's findings, Andrabi said Afghanistan's Taliban authorities continued to provide a permissive environment for militant groups, including the TTP and the banned Baloch Liberation Army, allegations Kabul has previously denied. Thousands of Pakistanis were killed or wounded in attacks planned from Afghan territory, he said. "Any military strikes by Pakistan were undertaken in the exercise of its right to self-defense under the principles of necessity and as a measure of last resort and were directed only and exclusively against terrorists and their logistical support bases in Afghanistan," Andrabi said. Pakistan rejected Amnesty's conclusions, he said. He also called on the international community to hold Afghanistan's Taliban authorities accountable for preventing Afghan territory from being used to launch attacks against Pakistan, saying Islamabad reserved the right to take all necessary measures to safeguard its sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the security of its people. (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) Foreign Ministry spokesperson Tahir Andrabi told a news briefing in Islamabad that Pakistan "completely rejects the allegations" made by Amnesty International, calling it "unfortunate" that such serious claims had been made "without any credible evidence." His remarks came a day after Amnesty International said it had found no evidence to support Pakistan's claim that Kabul's Omid drug rehabilitation center was being used for military purposes or to store weapons and ammunition when it was struck on March 16. Also Read: Iran strikes on CIA facilities prompt questions about possible Russian role Afghanistan has said the strike killed about 400 civilians. Pakistani officials dispute the death toll and maintain the strike targeted a legitimate military site. Amnesty said it analyzed more than 60 photos and videos, including footage released by Pakistan's military, reviewed more than 30 satellite images and interviewed witnesses and other sources. It said it asked Pakistan's Foreign Ministry on July 9 whether an investigation had been launched and requested evidence supporting Pakistan's justification for the strike but had received no response before publishing its report. Also Read: Trump warns Iran will be held 'responsible' for Houthi ship attacks The strike came amid months of escalating cross-border hostilities between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Pakistan accuses Afghanistan's Taliban government of harboring militants, particularly the Pakistani Taliban, known as Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, or TTP, who it says carry out deadly attacks inside Pakistan. The TTP is a separate group but a close ally of Afghanistan's Taliban rulers. Afghanistan denies the allegation. The U.N. mission in Afghanistan, UNAMA, said in May it had independently verified at least 269 civilian deaths and 122 injuries from the strike, while warning the actual toll could be significantly higher. Afghan authorities later held mass funerals for victims. Responding to Amnesty's findings, Andrabi said Afghanistan's Taliban authorities continued to provide a permissive environment for militant groups, including the TTP and the banned Baloch Liberation Army, allegations Kabul has previously denied. Thousands of Pakistanis were killed or wounded in attacks planned from Afghan territory, he said. "Any military strikes by Pakistan were undertaken in the exercise of its right to self-defense under the principles of necessity and as a measure of last resort and were directed only and exclusively against terrorists and their logistical support bases in Afghanistan," Andrabi said. Pakistan rejected Amnesty's conclusions, he said. He also called on the international community to hold Afghanistan's Taliban authorities accountable for preventing Afghan territory from being used to launch attacks against Pakistan, saying Islamabad reserved the right to take all necessary measures to safeguard its sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the security of its people. (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)

Actors involved

IranProxyRussia

Sources

  • SECTIONS Pakistan rejects Amnesty callBy SECTIONS Pakistan rejects Amnesty call

    Pakistan on Thursday rejected Amnesty International's call for an investigation into a March airstrike on a drug rehabilitation center in the Afghan capital that the rights group said could amount to a war crime, dismissing the allegations as unsupported and describing the operat…

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxyRussia
○ 1 source

September WTI crude oil (CLU26) on Wednesday closed up +2.49 (+2.95%), and September RBOB gasoline (RBU26) closed up +0.0186 (+0.58%). WTI crude oil prices (CLU26) are up more than +6% today after the Iran-backed Houthis launched a missile and drone attack on two Saudi Arabian oil tankers in the Red Sea, expanding the oil disruptions beyond the Strait of Hormuz and threatening oil shipments in the Red Sea.

Sep Brent crude oil prices (CBU26) are trading above $100 per barrel.Don’t Miss a Day: From crude oil to coffee, sign up free for Barchart’s best-in-class commodity analysis. The Houthis have vowed to blockade shipping linked to Saudi Arabia and warned shipowners against calling at the nation's ports.

The move threatens Saudi oil exports from Yanbu, a Red Sea hub that the Saudi's are using to ship crude since the war brought shipping through the Strait of Hormuz to a near halt. President Trump said Tuesday that if there is a blockade in the Red Sea, the US “will take care of it.

” Meanwhile, the US and Iran exchanged attacks for the 12th straight day, and the US maintained its blockade of Iranian oil shipments in the Persian Gulf. Global crude oil supplies are tightening due to reduced flows through the Strait of Hormuz. The International Maritime Organization warned last Wednesday that it is too dangerous to cross the Strait of Hormuz at the moment, and visible transit through the strait has fallen sharply as Iran continues targeting tankers attempting to transit it.

Crude prices also have support as Ukraine intensifies drone attacks on Russian oil infrastructure. Russian crude production fell to 8.928 million bpd in June, the lowest in 2.5 years, according to monthly OPEC data. According to EA Analytics, Russian crude-processing rates will average 3.

51 million bpd in July, the lowest in 24 years, amid damage to Russian energy infrastructure caused by drone and missile attacks from Ukraine. According to Bloomberg, Ukrainian forces have attacked Russian fuel-producing facilities more than 50 times this year, hitting at least 24 of Russia’s 34 largest refineries.

As of the end of June, around 90% of Russian regions have imposed some form of fuel rationing or reported supply issues, as refining capacity has plunged following damage to facilities. The strikes have deepened a nationwide gasoline shortage, with several major refineries shut down and the government banning almost all gasoline, jet fuel and diesel exports.

Russia is the world’s number two diesel exporter, after the US, according to Vortexa. Stronger Russian crude exports are also adding to global oil supplies, which is bearish for prices. Data compiled by Bloomberg show the four-week average of Russian crude exports rose to 4.

13 million bpd through June 28, the highest since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Russia may be boosting its crude exports as the country’s refining capacity has plunged due to damage at its refining facilities from Ukraine drone and missile attacks.

The outlook for higher US crude output is negative for oil prices. The Department of Energy (DOE) on July 7 raised its US 2026 crude production estimate to 13.78 million bpd from a June estimate of 13.72 million bpd. As a bearish factor for crude, OPEC delegates said on May 14 that the cartel aims to continue a series of oil quota increases over the next few months, completing the return of halted oil production by the end of September.

The group already formally agreed to restore about two-thirds of the 1.65 million bpd supply cutback it made back in 2023 and said it plans to raise output targets further and to revive the final portion in three more monthly stages. On July 5, OPEC+ said it will boost its crude output by 188,000 bpd in August, though that increase might prove difficult due to revived US-Iran military attacks in the region.

OPEC’s June crude production rose by +2.34 million bpd to 18.75 million bpd. Vortexa reported on Monday that crude oil stored on tankers that have been stationary for at least 7 days rose +31% w/w to 90.03 million bbl in the week ended July 17. Wednesday’s weekly EIA report was mostly negative for crude oil and products.

EIA crude inventories unexpectedly rose +2.01 million bbl versus expectations of a -1.95 million bbl decline. Also, EIA gasoline supplies rose by +765,000 bbl versus expectations of a -1.9 million bbl decline. In addition, EIA distillate stockpiles rose by +1.

4 million bbl, a larger build than expectations of +825,000 bbl. On the positive side, crude supplies at Cushing, the delivery point for WTI futures, fell -624,000 bbl. Wednesday’s EIA report showed that (1) US crude oil inventories as of July 17 were -5.

3% below the seasonal 5-year average, (2) gasoline inventories were -7.1% below the seasonal 5-year average, and (3) distillate inventories were -9.6% below the 5-year seasonal average. US crude oil production in the week ending July 17 fell -0.5% w/w to 13.

798 million bpd, just below the record high of 13.862 million bpd posted in the week of November 7. Baker Hughes reported last Friday that the number of active US oil rigs in the week ended July 17 rose by +7 to a 13-month high of 452 rigs, up from the 4.

25-year low of 406 rigs posted in December 2025. However, the number of US oil rigs remains sharply below the 5.5-year high of 627 reported in December 2022. On the date of publication, Rich Asplund did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article.

All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here. The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
○ 1 source

According to Axios, US President Donald Trump stated he is considering a large-scale military operation against Iran and indicated that Israel could participate if requested, though US forces would not require assistance. The report references prior US-Israel actions against Iran beginning February 28, a June memorandum on halting hostilities, and renewed US strikes on July 8, without specifying any decision deadline.

These details remain attributed to the cited sources and have not been independently confirmed.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxyChina
○ 1 source

The U.S. dollar index rose 0.37%, supported by a 5 basis point increase in the 10-year Treasury yield to a 1.5-year high and oil prices surging more than 5%. Additional factors cited include U.S. unemployment claims data that came in slightly stronger than expected and reported safe-haven demand linked to Houthi missile and drone strikes on Saudi tankers in the Red Sea, along with related shipping threats.

The euro declined 0.39% against the dollar, while markets priced in a 36% probability of a 25 basis point rate hike at the next FOMC meeting.

Location: Strait of Hormuz
strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy
○ 1 source

Brent Crude Tops US$100 After Red Sea Attacks Markets Key Facts —The level. Brent crude rose above US$100 a barrel, its first time since May, up about 40% this month. —The trigger. Houthi missile and drone attacks on Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea, enforcing a declared blockade of Saudi ports.

—The wider risk. Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has slowed sharply, deepening supply fears. —The politics. The US said it would hold Iran responsible for further attacks; Iran warned it would retaliate. —The forecast. Analysts see room for more gains; Goldman Sachs projects Brent above US$120 by the fourth quarter if disruptions persist.

Oil is back in triple digits. Brent crude topped US$100 a barrel for the first time since May after attacks on shipping in the Red Sea, a jump with real consequences for Latin America’s oil exporters and importers alike. After months in the doldrums, oil prices have surged.

Brent crude climbed past US$100 a barrel, a level not seen since May, capping a rally of roughly 40% in July. The spark was violence at sea. What Happened Yemen’s Houthis fired missiles and drones at Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea to enforce a blockade of Saudi ports, with at least one tanker attacked and several diverting course.

The trouble compounded a near-halt in shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, the chokepoint for a large share of the world’s oil, sending traders scrambling to price in the risk. The Escalation Risk President Donald Trump said the United States would hold Iran responsible for further Houthi attacks and warned of strikes on Iranian infrastructure; Iran said it would retaliate against US-linked assets in the region.

Analysts warn prices could rise further if the conflict widens, with Goldman Sachs projecting Brent above US$120 a barrel by the fourth quarter should supply disruptions continue. Live Market IntelligenceCommodities — Live Market Board Rio Times · Live Market Intelligence Commodities — Live Market Board +7.

05% |Instrument||Last||Change||YoY||Prev.||High||Low||Volume| |GOLD||4,054||-2.25%||+19.43%||4,147||4,144||4,043||130,481| |SILVER||58.02||-3.34%||+47.70%||60.02||60.36||57.32||29,261| |BRENT||100.70||+7.05%||+46.99%||94.07||87.22||85.01||38,512| |WTI||92.

46||+6.48%||+41.70%||86.83||92.82||87.32||287,920| |COPPER||6.34||-1.71%||+9.42%||6.45||6.54||6.33||31,416| |LITHIUM||69.28||+0.41%||+59.37%||69.00||69.68||68.65||90,092| |IRON ORE||161.91||—||+64.76%||161.91||161.91||1| |SOY||1,244||+0.91%||+23.71%||1,233||1,249||1,236||105,716| |CORN||487.

25||+5.47%||+22.27%||462.00||489.50||483.00||155,223| |WHEAT||700.00||-0.81%||+29.51%||705.75||710.25||693.00||58,614| |COFFEE||308.90||-2.45%||+2.51%||316.65||321.30||308.25||11,172| |SUGAR||14.67||-0.47%||-9.67%||14.74||14.90||14.66||36,829| |COCOA||5,308||-0.

38%||-37.11%||5,328||5,411||5,165||12,463| |ORANGE JUICE||145.05||-3.49%||-56.90%||150.30||148.80||144.10||241| |COTTON||81.53||+2.08%||+22.38%||79.87||81.75||79.75||15,710| |BEEF||220.70||-1.12%||-2.79%||223.20||221.90||217.38||14,536| |CATTLE||339.

48||-0.50%||+2.40%||341.17||340.50||333.00||7,417| |USD/BRL||5.08||+0.56%||-8.65%||5.05||5.09||5.04||—| 100.70 +7.05% 92.46 +6.48% 487.25 +5.47% 145.05 -3.49% 58.02 -3.34% 308.90 -2.45% 4,054 -2.25% 81.53 +2.08% What It Means for Latin America For the region’s oil exporters, higher prices are a windfall.

Brazil, Guyana, Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela all earn more for every barrel they sell abroad. For importers, the math runs the other way: pricier crude feeds into fuel and freight costs across Central America, the Caribbean and beyond, adding to inflation pressures.

Why It Matters Oil at US$100 reshapes trade balances and budgets across Latin America in opposite directions, rewarding producers and squeezing consumers. How long the spike lasts will depend less on the region than on what happens next in the Red Sea and the Gulf.

Frequently Asked Questions Why did Brent crude rise above US$100? Prices jumped after Houthi missile and drone attacks on Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea, compounded by a sharp slowdown in shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, raising fears over global oil supply.

How high could oil go? Analysts say prices could climb further if the conflict continues. Goldman Sachs projects Brent above US$120 a barrel by the fourth quarter if supply disruptions persist. How does US$100 oil affect Latin America? It benefits exporters like Brazil, Guyana, Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela, which earn more per barrel, while raising fuel and freight costs for importers across Central America and the Caribbean.

Sources - The National – Oil hits $100 for the first time since May after Houthi attacks on Saudi ships - OilPrice – Brent Tops $100 as Houthi Attacks Push Oil Rally Into Triple Digits Connected Coverage - Spain’s Repsol Bets on Venezuela Oil, Parks $5.

4Bn Debt - Batista Brothers Expand Venezuela Oil Bet With PDVSA Stake - Brent Punches $111 After Trump Aims Arrows at Tehran on Truth Social Sources: Goldman Sachs.