ConflictClarifier

2026 Iran-Gulf Crisis Tracker
CC
Events Archive
militaryMay 15, 2026

Senior US military commander highlights 'thousands of lessons' from operation in Iran

Summary

WASHINGTON, May 15. /TASS/. The United States has learned `thousands of lessons’ from its operation in Iran, which resulted in tactical adjustments and allowed the US military to improve defenses, US Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Admiral Brad Cooper said in a statement. "It’s fair to say that we have captured thousands of lessons, mostly tactical. I think there's no military in the world that makes adjustments as well as the United States military does," the senior US military commander said at a Senate hearing on Thursday. "We took a very hard look inward to see where can we improve our defenses," Cooper continued. "We made a significant number of adjustments to enhance what was already a very effective air defense umbrella," he added. The United States and Israel launched the war against Iran on February 28. On April 7, US President Donald Trump announced a two-week mutual ceasefire. According to Iran, 3,375 Iranians have been killed in US-Israeli strikes during the 40 days of the hostilities. On April 11, Tehran and Washington held talks in Islamabad, but the parties failed to reach an agreement on a long-term settlement to the conflict due to a number of disagreements. On April 21, the US leader announced his intention to extend the ceasefire with Iran. According to Iran’s state television, Tehran does not intend to recognize Washington’s unilateral ceasefire extension and will act in accordance with its own interests.

Perspectives

Iranian Official

The Iranian government condemns the US-Israeli aggression launched on February 28 as a flagrant violation of its sovereignty, which killed 3,375 Iranians over 40 days of hostilities. Despite the occupiers' claims of tactical adjustments to their defenses, Iran's resolute resistance exposed the limits of foreign intervention and compelled them to pursue a ceasefire they now seek to extend unilaterally. Tehran rejects Washington's imposed terms outright, acting solely in defense of its national interests following failed talks in Islamabad.

Israeli

The US-Iran conflict underscores Israel's acute vulnerability to Tehran's direct missile barrages and its vast proxy network—Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis—which together form an existential ring of fire aimed at the Jewish state's annihilation. Israel's defensive necessity in striking Iranian assets alongside the US has driven essential tactical refinements to air defenses, enabling rapid adjustments that preserve the nation's survival against an enemy openly committed to its elimination. These lessons reinforce the imperative for unyielding vigilance and superior protective capabilities in the face of Iran's unrelenting aggression.

Neutral

US Central Command chief Admiral Brad Cooper stated at a Senate hearing that the US military derived thousands of tactical lessons from its operations involving Iran, resulting in adjustments to enhance existing air defenses. The US and Israel began military actions against Iran on February 28, after which President Trump announced a two-week ceasefire on April 7; Iran reported 3,375 deaths from the strikes, a figure that has not been independently verified. Talks in Islamabad on April 11 did not produce a long-term agreement, and Iran indicated it would not recognize a unilateral US extension of the ceasefire announced on April 21.

Western

US Central Command has rapidly incorporated thousands of tactical lessons from its precision operations against Iranian targets, implementing targeted adjustments to strengthen air defenses and enhance threat neutralization. Admiral Brad Cooper highlighted the US military’s unmatched adaptability in refining an already effective defensive umbrella following the February 28 joint strikes with Israel. These enhancements reflect a strategic emphasis on operational superiority and safeguarding regional stability amid the subsequent ceasefire period.

Pro-Peace

The US and Israeli strikes on Iran, launched February 28 and halted by a fragile April ceasefire, have killed at least 3,375 Iranians in just 40 days, inflicting immense civilian suffering and humanitarian devastation. US Central Command’s focus on “thousands of tactical lessons” and air-defense tweaks stands in stark contrast to the human cost and the collapse of diplomacy, including failed talks in Islamabad and Iran’s dismissal of Washington’s unilateral ceasefire extension. Renewed, good-faith negotiations are urgently needed to end the cycle of violence and spare further lives.

Global South

The US and Israeli assault on Iran, launched amid longstanding neo-colonial rivalries over regional influence, has inflicted over 3,300 Iranian deaths while exposing the hollowness of Western claims to defensive legitimacy. CENTCOM’s boasts of “thousands of tactical lessons” and air-defense tweaks merely illustrate how external powers refine their capacity to violate sovereign states when multilateral mechanisms, including the Islamabad talks, prove unable or unwilling to restrain aggression. Tehran’s rejection of Washington’s unilateral ceasefire extension underscores Iran’s insistence on terms consistent with its own security rather than imposed diktats.

Actors involved

USIran

Sources

  • CurrentsAPI

    WASHINGTON, May 15. /TASS/. The United States has learned `thousands of lessons’ from its operation in Iran, which resulted in tactical adjustments and allowed the US military to improve defenses, US Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Admiral Brad Cooper said in a statement. "It’s f

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

militaryUnverifiedRussiaUkraine
1 source

Dozens detained in Russia as only anti-war party struck from election Russia's Supreme Court rejected an appeal by the anti-war party Yabloko against a ban on it taking part in September's parliamentary elections. Minutes earlier, the party's prominent anti-war politician Lev Shlosberg was sentenced to 11 years and one month in a penal colony for "discrediting" the country's armed forces and "spreading false information" about them.

Yabloko was struck off the ballots earlier this month over accusations that the party publicly supports the "international LGBT movement", which Russia's Supreme Court designates as extremist. The party rejects the accusations. Yabloko was the only registered party to oppose Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine launched in 2022.

militaryUnverifiedRussiaUkraine
1 source

Kremlin critic jailed in Russia for 11 years for opposing the war in Ukraine Lev Shlosberg is a senior member of the Yabloko party which Russia has barred from the ballot in next month’s parliamentary election A Russian court on Monday convicted a prominent opposition politician for speaking out against the war in Ukraine and sentenced him to 11 years and one month in prison in the latest crackdown leading up to next month’s parliamentary election.

The verdict against Lev Shlosberg, a senior member of the Yabloko party, was another step by the Kremlin to stifle dissent since Russia invaded its neighbour in February 2022. Yabloko is the only official political party overtly opposing the war. In a separate ruling on Monday, Russia’s Supreme Court upheld its earlier decision to bar Yabloko from the ballot in the September 18-20 parliamentary vote, denying an appeal by the party.

The moves against Shlosberg and Yabloko highlight the Kremlin’s intolerance towards any criticism of the war, now in its fifth year. Shlosberg, 63, is Yabloko’s deputy chairman and served in the regional legislature of Pskov from 2016 to 2021. He stood trial in the city of Pskov, some 600km (370 miles) northwest of Moscow, on charges of “discrediting” and spreading “false information” about the Russian military.

The charges stemmed from a debate in which he called for ending the war and from posting on his Telegram channel a British tabloid front page featuring an image of a bloodied woman next to one of Russian President Vladimir Putin, with the headline: “Her blood … his hands.

” Shlosberg has rejected the charges as unfounded.

Location: Oman
militaryUnverifiedRussiaUkraine
1 source

Russian court jails a Kremlin critic for 11 years for opposing the war in Ukraine Russian court jails a Kremlin critic for 11 years for opposing the war in Ukraine Lev Shlosberg senior member of the Yabloko party, stands in the defendant’s box prior to a verdict in the case against him is delivered, in a court in Pskov, Russia, Monday, Aug.

17, 2026. (AP Photo) Lev Shlosberg, left, senior member of the Yabloko party, waves standing in the defendant’s box after a verdict in the case against him is delivered, in a court in Pskov, Russia, Monday, Aug. 17, 2026, with his wife Zhanna Shlosberg on the right.

(AP Photo) Lev Shlosberg, center, senior member of the Yabloko party, is being led out of the court room after a judge convicted him and sentenced him to more than 11 years in prison, in a court in Pskov, Russia, Monday, Aug. 17, 2026. (AP Photo) Chairman of the Appellate Board of the Supreme Court judge Vladimir Zaitsev, background center, his deputy Igor Zinchenko, and Judge Denis Tyutin, attend a reading of the court decision on an appeal against its ruling to bar the Yabloko party from the upcoming parliamentary elections, at the Russia’s Supreme Court, in Moscow, Monday, Aug.

17, 2026. (AP Photo/Pavel Bednyakov) Yabloko party leader Nikolai Rybakov carries a box with documents leaving the Russia’s Supreme Court after hearing an appeal on a lawsuit to bar the party from the upcoming parliamentary elections, in Moscow, Monday, Aug.

17, 2026. (AP Photo/Pavel Bednyakov) Yabloko party leader Nikolai Rybakov speaks to his supporters and journalists after hearing an appeal on a lawsuit to bar the party from the upcoming parliamentary elections, at the Russia’s Supreme Court, in Moscow, Monday, Aug.

17, 2026. (AP Photo/Pavel Bednyakov) A Russian court on Monday convicted a prominent opposition politician for speaking out against the war in Ukraine and sentenced him to 11 years and one month in prison in the latest crackdown leading up to next month’s parliamentary election.

The verdict against Lev Shlosberg, a senior member of the Yabloko party, was another step by the Kremlin to stifle dissent since Russia invaded its neighbor in February 2022. Yabloko is the only official political party overtly opposing the war. In a separate ruling Monday, Russia’s Supreme Court upheld its earlier decision to bar Yabloko from the ballot in the Sept.

18-20 parliamentary vote, denying an appeal by the party. The moves against Shlosberg and Yabloko highlight the Kremlin’s intolerance toward any criticism of the war, now in its fifth year. It was Shlosberg’s second trial in 2 years Shlosberg, 63, is Yabloko’s deputy chairman and served in the regional legislature of Pskov from 2016-21.

He stood trial in the city of Pskov, some 600 kilometers (370 miles) northwest of Moscow, on charges of “discrediting” and spreading “false information” about the Russian military. The charges stemmed from a debate in which he called for ending the war and from posting on his Telegram channel a British tabloid front page featuring an image of a bloodied woman next to one of Russian President Vladimir Putin, with the headline: “Her blood ...

his hands.” Shlosberg has rejected the charges as unfounded. It was the second trial for Shlosberg in the last two years. He has also been designated a “foreign agent,” a label that carries strong pejorative connotations in Russia and brings additional government scrutiny.

He was convicted of violating the foreign agent regulations. In December 2025, he was placed in pretrial detention on the new charges and has been behind bars ever since. He is one of several prominent Yabloko members in recent years to be jailed or designated a “foreign agent” as Kremlin pressure on the party has mounted.

Yabloko called the sentence ‘barbaric’ In his final statement to the court Friday, Shlosberg said that for 30 years, Russia has traveled “a path from hopes for freedom to the almost complete destruction of human and civil rights and freedoms.” He said the war in Ukraine has “changed the lives of every Russian citizen without exception,” and predicted that once its true death toll becomes known, “the entire country will shudder.

” Yabloko said Shlosberg received a “barbaric sentence” for “love of the Motherland and calls for a ceasefire.” In a statement on Telegram, the party said Shlosberg will appeal. Amnesty International denounced the verdict against Shlosberg. “His arbitrary prosecution and sentencing are blatant reprisals for exercising his right to freedom of expression to call for peace,” said Marie Struthers, the group’s Eastern Europe and Central Asia director.

“The Russian authorities must immediately and unconditionally release Lev Shlosberg and quash his conviction,” her statement added. “They must repeal legislation criminalizing peaceful anti-war expression, end the persecution of Yabloko members and supporters, and respect the rights to freedom of expression, association, peaceful assembly and political participation for all Russians.

” Supreme Court upholds removing Yabloko from the ballot In Moscow, the Supreme Court upheld its ruling of a week ago to remove Yabloko from the ballot in the election for the State Duma, Russia’s lower house of parliament, denying an appeal by the party.

The Central Election Commission in July had allowed Yabloko on the ballot along with 10 other parties. Young social media users and many Russian opposition figures in exile have since come out in support of Yabloko, urging voters to back the party, once a leading liberal voice in parliament that later lost its bloc of seats as the Kremlin tightened its grip on politics.

In recent years, Yabloko was the only registered opposition party that opposed Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Its campaign slogans for this year’s election included, “For a ceasefire agreement, diplomacy and peace!” “Our goal is to prevent nuclear war!

” and “For a Russia free from fear and political repression!” Several Kremlin parties publicly assailed Yabloko for its anti-war stance after it got a slot on the ballot. The Motherland Party filed a lawsuit with the Supreme Court, demanding its removal from the ballot, accusing Yabloko of copyright infringement and exceeding campaign spending limits.

The party also viewed Yabloko’s stance on Ukraine as unlawful and tantamount to calling for the violation of Russia’s territorial integrity. Yabloko rejected these accusations, but the Supreme Court sided with the Motherland Party. As the court met Monday on Yabloko’s appeal, the party’s supporters gathered outside the courthouse and Russian media reported that several dozen people were detained.

Liberal politician Grigory Yavlinsky, who co-founded Yabloko in the 1990s and chairs its political committee, deplored the court’s ruling in an online statement. It marked “a serious, deepening crisis in the Russian political system and a lack of understanding of a desired future,” he said.

“People begin to feel this more acutely, regardless of their political views and positions,” he said, adding that Yabloko’s campaign “for peace and freedom” hit this particular “sore point.” Yabloko chairman Nikolai Rybakov told reporters after the ruling that the party will continue its fight by lodging a complaint to the Presidium of the Supreme Court and possibly going to the Constitutional Court.

“We achieved the main thing: The whole world knows how many people in Russia want peace, want to live normally and to raise children under a peaceful sky in their country,” Rybakov said. Regarding the prison term handed to Shlosberg, Rybakov said that “our feelings are with Lev and other political prisoners who have fought and are fighting for peace, for people to not die.

Location: Oman