ConflictClarifier

2026 Iran-Gulf Crisis Tracker
CC
Events Archive
strikeMar 25, 2026

"They Attacked Us While We Were Talking": Iran Says US Betrayed Diplomacy Twice, Rules Out New Talks

Summary

"They Attacked Us While We Were Talking": Iran Says US Betrayed Diplomacy Twice, Rules Out New Talks In an exclusive interview with India Today Global, Iran's Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmail Baghaei delivers a scathing indictment of US diplomacy, reveals that American strikes hit Iran mid-negotiation- twice- and warns that any ceasefire ultimatum is nothing but a cover for further war crimes against the Iranian people. The war between Iran, Israel, and the United States has now entered its 25th day — and Tehran is in no mood for diplomacy. In a rare and candid exclusive interview with India Today Global's Senior Executive Editor Geeta Mohan, Iran's Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmail Baghaei pulled no punches, painting a picture of a nation that believes it has been systematically deceived, bombed, and betrayed- not once, but twice- while sitting at the negotiating table. Baghaei revealed that Iran and the United States were deep in a structured diplomatic process, with technical talks on a possible nuclear agreement scheduled for Vienna, when American strikes hit Iranian soil on 28 February. It was not an isolated incident. In June, US forces had struck Iran just two days before a sixth round of negotiations was set to begin. "This was a betrayal of diplomacy," he said- a phrase he noted has now entered the common lexicon inside Iran. With Iranian cities under sustained bombardment, the Strait of Hormuz weaponised, and a school in Minab struck by two Tomahawk missiles that killed more than 170 children, Baghaei was unequivocal: Iran will defend itself for as long as the attacks continue, reparations will be sought, and no ultimatum from Washington will be treated as anything other than a declaration of intent to commit war crimes. On India, on Khamenei's health, on regime change, and on the future of the nuclear deal- Tehran speaks. And it speaks with fury. Q Are Iran and the U.S. currently in talks- direct or indirect? A There are no talks or negotiations between Iran and the United States, as there have been none throughout the past 25 days of what we consider their illegal war against Iran. We have a very catastrophic experience with US diplomacy. We were attacked twice within a span of nine months while we were in the middle of a negotiating process to resolve the nuclear issue. This was a betrayal of diplomacy- a phrase now widely used in Iran- and it happened not once but twice. No one can trust U.S. diplomacy. Our brave armed forces are currently focused on defending Iran's territory and sovereignty against this brutal, illegal war. Q Is there any room for mediation- perhaps through Oman, Pakistan, or other regional actors? A You can ask Oman's Foreign Minister about his experience mediating between Iran and the United States. The institution of mediation was also badly betrayed by the United States. Many countries in the region and beyond have reached out to Iran offering to mediate. We have received messages requesting negotiations, and we have responded- our position is clear: we will continue to defend ourselves. Iran is under constant bombardment by the United States and Israel. So can anyone believe their claims of diplomacy or mediation are credible when they started this war and continue attacking us? Pakistan is our neighbour. We have good relations with Pakistan, as we do with other neighbours, and we believe they have good intentions. Our Foreign Minister has been in contact with his Pakistani counterpart and with other neighbouring foreign ministers. These contacts are ongoing, and we understand that regional countries are concerned and are trying to help ease the situation. Q Who speaks for Iran diplomatically? Is there a coordinated diplomatic voice- the Foreign Minister, the Speaker of Parliament, or others? A The Foreign Minister is responsible for Iran's foreign diplomacy, and he is fulfilling that role. The system is absolutely coordinated, and decisions are made as and when necessary, at the appropriate time. The Speaker of Parliament, Mr. Ghalibaf, is a high-profile politician who functions within the mandates and authorities given under the constitution. The division of labour among our authorities is clear-cut and transparent. For now, we are 100% focused on defending Iran's sovereignty and territory against these brutal attacks. Q President Trump has spoken with Prime Minister Modi, who called for de-escalation and for keeping the Strait of Hormuz open. What is Iran's reaction? Is the U.S. looking to India to use its good offices with Iran? A I wish everyone who has the opportunity to speak with the United States would use it to remind them that their war is illegal and criminal, and that they are responsible for the threat to the Strait of Hormuz and all the resulting economic consequences for the international community. As for India, we have good relations. Our ministers have been in close contact in recent days. Indian vessels have been passing through the Strait of Hormuz after coordination with Iranian authorities, and we have facilitated their safe passage. India has not been participating in or assisting the aggression against Iran. Our bilateral relationship is one of mutual respect and mutual interest. Q The U.S. cited an 'imminent threat' from Iran as justification for its attack. What do you make of that- especially since the Pentagon itself later rejected that claim? A They know very well there was no imminent threat from Iran to the United States. They have changed their justifications multiple times. First they claimed an imminent threat; then they said it was because of an alleged Iranian nuclear weapon- even though in June they had claimed to have obliterated Iran's nuclear programme. Iran's nuclear programme is fully safeguarded by the IAEA, and there is not a single piece of evidence from the IAEA indicating it has been or is being weaponised. Then Marco Rubio said they attacked because they had intelligence that Israel was about to strike Iran and wanted to pre-empt. This is a whimsical war built on lies. It is not only a brutal assault on the Iranian nation, but an attack on the entire fabric of international law and the United Nations Charter. Q Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the GCC countries are worried about their energy infrastructure. Has Israel's energy infrastructure been struck? What is Iran's position on President Trump's proposed five-day moratorium? A Threatening to attack Iran's civilian infrastructure is itself a war crime. The United States is expanding the war across the whole region. From the outset, the U.S. used the airspace, military bases, and logistical assets stationed in Persian Gulf countries to attack Iran- effectively dragging the entire region into their war of choice. We have called on our neighbours: please do not allow the United States and Israel to abuse your soil and your territory to attack Iran. We have no intention of engaging in any hostility with our neighbours- we have been in a friendly mode with all of them and remain committed to those relationships. But their territories are being used by the United States to attack us, and under international law we are entitled to defend ourselves. Any ultimatum is a sign of deception and a clear intent to commit war crimes. Q Iran has stated that attacks on Gulf state bases were justified because those facilities were used to launch strikes on Iran. Does that mean Iran holds those countries responsible? A It is quite evident that a major part of U.S. attacks are being launched from the territories of Persian Gulf countries- their military bases and assets stationed there. President Trump himself tweeted about tanker aircraft stationed at a military base in Saudi Arabia. The missiles that struck the desalination facility on Qeshm Island came from one of the Persian Gulf countries. I wish the countries of the region had not allowed this U.S. military presence, because it has now proven to be a liability rather than a source of security or stability. Under international law, what other choice do we have but to fight back? Q What was the origin of the Tomahawk missiles that struck the school in Minab, killing more than 170 children? A It was one of the countries of the region. Two Tomahawk missiles struck this elementary school within 14 minutes of each other- clearly intended to maximise casualties. This was a war crime. No one can deny it was intentional and premeditated, carried out by the United States. I prefer not to name the country. Q Even if President Trump calls for a complete ceasefire, do you think Israel will stop? Is Netanyahu listening to Trump? A We are not in the business of distinguishing between the United States and Israel. They started this together. Even in June, when Israel initiated its aggression against Iran, the United States followed. Both are jointly responsible for all the atrocities being committed against Iranians. Q Iran is reportedly demanding reparations. What would those look like in terms of numbers? A Billions of dollars of damage have already been incurred, and many lives have been lost. Our authorities will tally the full accounting. But any aggressor must be held accountable and pay the cost of the war. More important to us, however, is ensuring that this vicious cycle- war, negotiations, ceasefire, then war again- does not repeat. The United Nations and the general membership must shoulder their responsibility and hold the United States and Israel accountable for what they have done to the world economy and to the peace and security of the Persian Gulf region. Q Your Foreign Minister has indicated openness to a nuclear deal. Are we looking at a revival of the JCPOA? A It is very difficult for anyone to believe such claims given our clear experience. We had the nuclear deal in 2015; the United States withdrew unilaterally. We then attempted several times to reach a new agreement on the nuclear issue. On both occasions, they torpedoed the negotiating table and attacked Iran in the middle of the process. They are not serious about diplomacy. Iran, by contrast, has consistently demonstrated its seriousness about negotiation as a means of resolving disputes. But the trust has been badly damaged- even though we were previously negotiating in an atmosphere of near-zero trust. Iran's sincerity was betrayed. I would urge you to speak with our Omani friends as well; their Foreign Minister mediated for over a year and knows precisely how much progress was made before the United States chose to torpedo the process. Q Iran has announced it will accept payment in Chinese yuan rather than U.S. dollars- effectively challenging the petrodollar. How significant is this, and are you not concerned about the fate of countries that previously challenged dollar dominance? A Our number-one priority right now is to protect our national security and defend our people against this barbaric act of aggression. We cannot allow speculation to distract us from that. What I will say is that the United States itself has weaponised its currency against the entire world economy for decades- sanctioning countries, pressuring states across the Global South. That is what they have been doing for years against almost every country. Q Will Iran continue to charge vessels or countries a fee for passing through the Strait of Hormuz? A Absolutely. A series of measures is in place for passage through the Strait of Hormuz due to the war situation imposed on Iran. Under international law, a coastal state cannot allow its enemies- the aggressors- to use these straits to further their acts of aggression. What Iran is doing is ensuring that vessels belonging to or associated with the United States, Israel, or other countries that are in any manner participating in or assisting the aggression are not permitted passage. Other states that have nothing to do with this act of aggression may pass through the Strait of Hormuz after the necessary coordination with Iranian authorities, to ensure that passage is conducted safely and securely. This is part of a responsible approach. Q Is the Trump administration's proposed five-day moratorium a genuine offer, or a decoy to buy time while the U.S. amphibious strike group moves toward the theater- with Kharg Island as the ultimate objective? A We cannot underestimate any scenario. We have experience with deception and with the abuse of diplomatic processes as cover for preparing aggression. Our armed forces and authorities take all possibilities into account. What is clear is that such ultimatums are a sign of deception and a declaration of intent to commit war crimes. Threatening to attack civilian targets is a clear intent to commit war crimes. And everyone knows that Iran has the will, the capacity, and the capability to fight back against any such acts. Q President Trump has spoken of controlling the Strait of Hormuz 'with the next Ayatollah,' implying regime change is a goal. What is the status of Supreme Leader Khamenei's health? And looking ahead, who leads Iran- Mojtaba Khamenei, President Pezeshkian, Foreign Minister Araghchi, or Speaker Ghalibaf? A American authorities say whatever they wish to say- this is not the first time we have heard such things. It is for the world audience to make their own judgement. What matters is that Iran has a sophisticated, well-established system rooted in a popular revolution, grounded in Iran's identity and in the people's right to self-determination. The Supreme Leader is fine. Our system is working efficiently. Our armed forces are acting in accordance with their plans to defend Iran. Most importantly, our people are united against this barbaric act of aggression. As for leadership structure: every person in our system acts within the mandates and authorities granted by the constitution. The division of labour is clear-cut and transparent. Q What are Iran's expectations from India? And what does peace ultimately look like from Iran's perspective? A Every country has responsibilities under international law. India is a pioneering country in the developing world and a very important member of the Non-Aligned Movement. We have good bilateral and historic relations. If we want a future based on the rule of law- not on the rule of wind and force- then everyone must stand up against this clear injustice against a civilisational state and call out the culprits. I understand the different relationships various countries have with the United States and Israel, but what is at stake here is the rule of international law and of morality itself. India and other countries can play a very important role in de-escalating the situation. The clear fact is that the Iranian nation is under a brutal attack. Those who started this war must stop it. We are defending ourselves, and we will continue to do so for as long as it takes- because this is not a war of Iran's choosing. Q Are talks completely off the table? A We were in talks with the United States. We were in a serious diplomatic process when they attacked Iran- when they betrayed that process. Please remember: we were attacked on 28 February. We were supposed to meet the following Monday. We had agreed to continue our talks in Vienna to discuss the technical details of a possible deal, and they attacked Iran. This was not the first time. In June, they attacked Iran just two days before the sixth round of negotiations. Iran is defending itself and will continue to do so as long as these attacks continue.

Actors involved

USIranIsrael

Sources

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
○ 1 source

President Donald Trump has made another bombastic pronouncement amid the war with Iran. On Tuesday, he shared a map labeling the Strait of Hormuz “NEW U.S. Territory,” via his Truth Social platform. Iran has continued to stress that the strait will not be fully reopened until Washington meets its slew of demands, including ending its blockade on Iranian shipping and scrapping oil sanctions.

Ship Hit in Strait Just hours before Trump’s latest post, a vessel exiting the Strait of Hormuz was struck by an unidentified projectile off the coast of Oman. According to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations, the ship’s engine room was hit, resulting in a “crew casualty.

” Officials did not immediately identify the vessel or its cargo. The Omani Coast Guard said it was assisting the remaining crew as authorities investigated the incident. Iran’s Stranglehold on the Strait Since the United States and Israel launched attacks on the Islamic Republic on February 28, Iran has tightly restricted shipping through the waterway.

Prior to the war, around one-fifth of globally traded oil passed through Hormuz. Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf said Tuesday that Tehran would maintain its restrictions until Washington fulfilled what Iran considers its commitments under the interim U.

S.-Iran agreement struck in June. Those demands include lifting the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports, releasing frozen Iranian assets, removing sanctions on Iranian oil and gas exports, and ending U.S. military threats and operations. “Until the United States fulfills its commitments under the agreement … the Strait of Hormuz will not reopen,” Qalibaf said.

Blockade Vs. Territory Asked in the Oval Office on Monday about his earlier suggestion that Hormuz could become American territory, the president said he liked the idea. “We control it with the blockade, and I like the idea of declaring it a territory,” Trump told reporters, adding: “We have total control over the strait now.

” Washington’s blockade is hitting Iranian shipping hard. U.S. Central Command said Monday that American forces had redirected 64 commercial vessels, disabled three ships, and boarded another two as part of the renewed blockade. That does not mean Washington has eliminated Iran’s ability to disrupt other shipping.

Tuesday’s unexplained attack came after a string of strikes on vessels attempting to navigate the area. Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi also rejected Trump’s territorial claim on Tuesday, describing it as a “delusion.” Tehran has repeatedly maintained that it, rather than Washington, will determine when normal passage through the strait resumes.

Iran and Oman Near Deal Complicating matters further are separate negotiations between Iran and Oman, the two countries sitting on opposite sides of the strait. Iran said Monday that the two governments were finalizing details of an agreement concerning shipping routes through Hormuz.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said an “understanding has been reached regarding the map of the transit route.” Trump responded by threatening Oman, a longstanding U.S. partner, telling Fox News that Washington would “bomb the shit out of them” if Muscat “gets in the way.

” The diplomatic clock has already run down. The 60-day negotiating period established by the June memorandum between Washington and Tehran expired on Monday without a broader agreement being reached. Trump has said the United States is not seeking an extension.

Tehran Likely to Double Down Columnist Melanie Phillips slammed President Trump’s plans for a ceasefire last month, complaining that it had given Tehran the upper hand and showed that “everyone can now see America is not prepared to make the sacrifices necessary to defend itself.

” Trump has claimed Iran has essentially lost this war and that the blockade is massively damaging its economy. However, he has also instructed his team to pursue a “low-key” approach to talks. On July 7, Trump said the agreement was “over”, while Iran’s Foreign Ministry said it was “suspended” the following week.

“They should put up the white flag of surrender,” Trump told Fox News on Monday, claiming that backchannel talks with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) were ongoing. The IRGC has denied these claims. On Tuesday, Trump dramatically changed his tune, stating that no talks with Iran were ongoing, and that no discussions were scheduled.

About the Author: Georgia Gilholy Georgia Gilholy is a journalist based in the United Kingdom who has been published in Newsweek, The Times of Israel, and the Spectator. Gilholy writes about international politics, culture, and education.

Location: Tehran
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy
○ 1 source

Iran War Day 172: ‘No Talks’ Scheduled with Tehran, Trump Says In a post on Truth Social Tuesday President Donald Trump said that “there are no talks or conversations going on, or scheduled, with the Islamic Republic of Iran.” Trump added that the U.

S. naval blockade on the Strait of Hormuz “remains in full force and effect” and that the waterway “is open and operating.” In a separate post, Trump published an image labelling the strait as “NEW U.S. Territory.” Only six commodity ships transited the Strait of Hormuz on Monday, according to Kpler data cited by Reuters.

Iran’s Speaker of Parliament Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said Tuesday, Until the commitments made by the United States in the memorandum of understanding, including the lifting of the blockade, the release of frozen assets, the lifting of oil sanctions, the end of threats and military operations on all fronts, and other conditions to which America agreed in the memorandum, are implemented, the strait will not be opened.

The deadline for that memorandum of understanding—signed by Trump and Iran’s president in June—expired on Monday. The two nations had agreed to negotiate a final peace deal over a 60-day period, but the framework agreement quickly fell apart, and the deadline seemingly wasn’t extended, despite mixed reporting.

Subscribe Today Get daily emails in your inbox Ghalibaf will lead a “high-level parliamentary delegation” to Iraq on Wednesday, Iran’s Fars news agency reported. The visit comes as pro-Iran militia groups face a September 30 deadline set by the Iraqi government to disarm.

Syria condemned reported Israeli strikes against Abu Duhur airbase on Tuesday, while the U.S. expressed concern over the incident. U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria and Iraq Tom Barrack wrote on X that “we are deeply concerned that the confirmed Israeli airstrikes on Abu al-Duhur Airbase constitute an unnecessary escalation that does not advance regional stability.

” The price of Brent Crude oil was over $91 per barrel on Tuesday morning. AAA recorded the national average price of regular gas at $4.07.

Location: Tehran
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
○ 1 source

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday no talks were taking place with Iran and none were scheduled, and he insisted that the Strait of Hormuz was open, contradicting an earlier Iranian assertion that the critical waterway remained shut to shipping.

The receding prospects of a deal to end the nearly six-month conflict drove up oil prices again on Tuesday, while stock markets sagged and borrowing costs for major economies including the U.S. hit multi-decade highs, amid concerns about the long-term inflationary and fiscal impact of the crisis.

A temporary ceasefire agreement expired on Monday and a senior Iranian official told Reuters that his country was moving to a “fully offensive” military posture due to the diplomatic stalemate, though there were no reports of fresh strikes by either side on Tuesday.

“There are no talks or conversations going on, or scheduled, with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Tuesday. “The Naval Blockade remains in full force and effect. The Hormuz Strait is open and operating. All water mines have been removed or detonated,” he added.

On Monday, Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law and special envoy, had sounded an optimistic note, saying talks with Iran were still under way and were “probably more robust” than they had ever been. Despite Trump's typically ebullient remarks about the situation in the Gulf, preliminary shipping data on Tuesday showed ship crossings via the Strait of Hormuz were still in single digits on Monday.

The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations said it received a report on Tuesday that a vessel was struck by an unknown projectile while transiting outbound in the Strait of Hormuz, causing engine room damage and a crew casualty. The remaining crew were being assisted by the Omani Coast Guard, according to the report.

Top Iranian negotiator Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf said in comments published by state media that the strait would remain shut until the U.S. met the conditions of an interim deal signed with Iran in June. These conditions include the U.S. lifting its blockade of Iranian ports, lifting oil sanctions, releasing Tehran's frozen assets, and ending threats and military operations on all fronts, Qalibaf told parliament.

A memorandum of understanding signed on June 17 had set a 60-day time frame for a broader deal on Iran's nuclear programme and U.S. sanctions. That period elapsed on Monday and Trump said he had no plans to extend it. The agreement, which declared the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts,” had quickly unravelled over a dispute about control of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway through which a fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas flowed before the war.

Both Trump and Tehran have frequently switched between threats and more emollient rhetoric as they seek a way out of the crisis, which erupted when the U.S. and Israel launched strikes against Iran on February 28. Iran remains open to dialogue with the U.

S. but does not confuse negotiations with surrender, Mohammad Mokhber, an adviser to Iran's supreme leader, said on Tuesday, according to the semi-official Fars news agency. Mokhber said military pressure and sanctions would not break Iran's resolve and that the country would defend its security, dignity and allies while not seeking war.

Even as Iran projects resilience in the war, its leaders are worried that a threat of more economic punishment could increase hardships, reignite unrest and further erode the Islamic Republic’s legitimacy, according to three Iranian officials. Thousands of people have been killed in the conflict, mainly in Iran and Lebanon.

Iran has bombed U.S. military bases and infrastructure in countries including Oman, Jordan, Kuwait, Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Benchmark Brent crude oil futures have surged during the conflict, hitting a peak of $126 a barrel, roughly 75% above pre-war levels.

Brent crude futures settled up 20 cents on Tuesday at just over $91 a barrel. For Americans who will vote in November congressional elections, gasoline prices have risen above $4 per gallon, up from less than $3 before the war, according to the automotive group AAA.

Location: Tehran
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUN
○ 1 source

Iran is rebuilding the upper ranks of its military and security establishment after months of wartime losses by turning largely to familiar veterans — figures whose careers in some cases stretch back to the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the Iran-Iraq War and previous domestic crackdowns.

The appointments follow the deaths of several senior Iranian commanders in U.S.-Israeli strikes since the war began Feb. 28, The National reported Aug. 11. For Washington, the stakes go beyond who fills the vacancies. The reshuffle puts veteran hardliners atop institutions that shape Iran’s military operations, national-security policy and internal security at a time of renewed confrontation with the United States.

The appointments do not prove that Tehran has run out of younger commanders or that loyalty was the sole criterion, but the reliance on figures whose careers stretch back decades is raising a broader question for U.S. policymakers: whether wartime losses have left Iran increasingly dependent on a smaller circle of trusted ideologues — potentially narrowing the room for compromise even as Washington tries to pressure Tehran back toward a deal.

IRAN’S REVOLUTIONARY GUARD SIDELINES PRESIDENT AS MILITARY GRIP EXPANDS Former American prisoner Morad Tahbaz, who was detained in Iran in 2018 and freed in a U.S.-Iran prisoner exchange in September 2023, told Fox News Digital that he views the latest appointments as evidence of Tehran's continued dependence on longtime loyalists.

"They keep rotating the same old people, most of whom are fairly inept but are loyal to the Khamenei father and son," Tahbaz told Fox News Digital. The reshuffle spans Iran's conventional military, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, its naval arm, the Basij paramilitary force and the country's highest national-security council.

Iran's state-run IRNA reported Aug. 10 that Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei appointed Ali Abdollahi chief of staff of the Armed Forces, Kioumars Heydari his deputy, Ahmad Vahidi commander of the IRGC, Mostafa Izadi deputy IRGC commander, Ali Ozmaei commander of the IRGC Navy and Hossein Taeb head of the Basij.

The previous day, former IRGC commander Mohsen Rezaei, 71, was named secretary of the Supreme National Security Council and Khamenei's representative on the powerful body. Reuters reported Aug. 10 that the SNSC coordinates Iran's security and foreign policy and that Rezaei replaced Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr, who had been appointed secretary in late March following the death of his predecessor, Ali Larijani.

The appointments do not establish that Iran has run out of younger or less familiar commanders. But the reliance on longtime military and security figures has fueled assessments that wartime losses have narrowed the regime's pool of officials it regards as sufficiently experienced and politically trustworthy.

Erfan Fard wrote for the Middle East Forum on Aug. 15 that Khamenei was not promoting a new generation but turning to veterans of the revolution, the Iran-Iraq War, intelligence operations and domestic repression, arguing that an architecture based on "institutional memory, loyalty, and coercive power" was taking shape.

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies argued in an Aug. 12 policy brief that the reshuffle looked "less like renewal than a game of musical chairs among regime veterans." The appointments also formalized the position of Ahmad Vahidi, a veteran hardliner who had already emerged near the center of wartime decision-making.

Vahidi was a major player in shaping Tehran's wartime policy and had risen through the IRGC's early intelligence and external-operations apparatus before later serving as defense and interior minister. As interior minister, Vahidi oversaw police units involved in the crackdown on the 2022 protests.

IRNA confirmed Aug. 10 that Khamenei promoted Vahidi to major general and formally appointed him commander-in-chief of the IRGC. WHO IS AHMAD VAHIDI? IRAN’S NEW IRGC CHIEF TIED TO GLOBAL ATTACKS AND ‘DEATH TO AMERICA’ IDEOLOGY Hossein Taeb: The intelligence veteran returns to the Basij to build a ‘20-million-strong Basij force.

’ One of the most closely watched appointments is Hossein Taeb, the cleric and veteran security official tapped to lead the Basij, the IRGC's volunteer paramilitary force that has repeatedly been used against domestic dissent. The National reported that the Basij has been used to suppress internal dissent, while The Times reported Aug.

12 that the force is embedded in neighborhoods, universities, workplaces, factories, ministries and mosques and has played a central role in suppressing successive uprisings. For Tahbaz, Taeb's return is personal. Tahbaz was detained in 2018, while Taeb was leading the IRGC Intelligence Organization.

"Ta’eb is extremely close to Mojtaba Khamenei but was very unceremoniously fired from his former position as head of the IRGC Intelligence Organization," Tahbaz told Fox News Digital. "He was personally responsible for my and my colleagues' arrests and detentions.

He lives and breathes conspiracy theories." The Times reported Aug. 12 that Taeb and Mojtaba Khamenei's relationship dates back more than four decades and that both served in the Habib Battalion during the Iran-Iraq War. The newspaper also reported that IRGC intelligence arrested environmentalists and dual nationals during Taeb's tenure.

Taeb previously commanded the Basij before moving into IRGC intelligence. The Times reported that months after the disputed 2009 election, the Guards' intelligence division was elevated into an independent organization with Taeb as its first chief. Taeb's earlier leadership of the Basij also drew U.

S. sanctions. In a Sept. 29, 2010 Treasury Department fact sheet, the U.S. government said that while Taeb commanded the Basij during the June 2009 election, forces under his command participated in "beatings, murder, and arbitrary arrests and detentions of peaceful protestors.

" According to IRNA, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf congratulated Taeb on his appointment as head of the Basij Organization, saying his tenure could mark a new chapter for the volunteer force. Ghalibaf said the Basij now needs a more comprehensive and forward-looking approach and argued that Taeb’s appointment by the supreme leader could help advance what he described as one of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s longstanding goals: building a 20-million-strong Basij force.

UN WATCHDOG SLAMS POTENTIAL ELECTION OF IRAN TO PANEL WITH HUMAN RIGHTS SWAY: 'LUNATICS RUNNING THE ASYLUM' Mohsen Rezaei: Back at the center after four decades Few appointments better illustrate the return of Iran's old guard than Mohsen Rezaei, who was named secretary of the Supreme National Security Council.

Reuters reported Aug. 10 that Rezaei joined the IRGC shortly after the 1979 revolution, became its commander in 1981 at age 27 and led the force for 16 years, including through most of the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War. He later served as secretary of Iran's Expediency Discernment Council for more than two decades and as vice president for economic affairs from 2021 to 2023 under President Ebrahim Raisi.

Now, at 71, he is secretary of the SNSC and Khamenei's representative on the body. Beni Sabti, an Iran expert at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies, argued that bringing back longtime figures such as Rezaei reflects weakness rather than renewal.

"This is, again, another evidence that they don't have anyone else," Sabti told Fox News Digital. "So they have to bring him out again from the desk and put him somewhere. These are the guys that they have." Rezaei and Vahidi were also among six people for whom INTERPOL authorized Red Notices requested by Argentina in 2007 in connection with the investigation into the 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires.

INTERPOL said in November 2007 that its General Assembly upheld the publication of notices for six individuals, including Ahmad Vahidi and Mohsen Rezaei, after Iran challenged Argentina's requests. Sabti argued that Rezaei's re-emergence is particularly telling because Tehran's decision-making circle has become less ideologically diverse.

"Today, there is only one opinion, and this is the main problem," Sabti said. "This is why you think that there is unity and the system is stronger. No, it's not stronger. Actually, it's weaker also because of that." TRADE VESSEL STRUCK BY PROJECTILE IN STRAIT OF HORMUZ AMID US-IRAN TALKS Ali Abdollahi: A wartime commander takes the top military job Ali Abdollahi was elevated to chief of staff of Iran's Armed Forces, putting him at the top of the country's military command structure.

IRNA confirmed the appointment Aug. 10. Abdollahi had previously commanded the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, Iran's joint operational command responsible for coordinating its armed forces in wartime, according to Iran International on Aug. 10.

His appointment also comes amid an effort to integrate the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters more closely with the Armed Forces General Staff. Le Monde reported Aug. 11 that Abdollahi's task includes completing that integration in an effort to further centralize command and coordination.

Fard argued in his Aug. 15 Middle East Forum analysis that Abdollahi's elevation exemplifies Tehran's reliance on longstanding revolutionary-security figures rather than a generational break. FREED AMERICAN REVEALS BRUTAL IRAN PRISON ORDEAL, WARNS HOSTAGES FACE GREATER DANGER Kioumars Heydari: The regular army moves closer to the center Former Army Ground Forces commander Kioumars Heydari was appointed deputy chief of staff of the Armed Forces, bringing a senior officer from Iran's conventional military into the new command structure.

The National reported that Heydari formerly commanded the Army Ground Forces and has held senior positions in Iran's regular army, known as the Artesh. IRNA independently confirmed his appointment. His inclusion also demonstrates that the reshuffle is not limited to the IRGC.

Fard argued in the Middle East Forum that Heydari's previous public rhetoric surrounding protest suppression indicates that Tehran has increasingly integrated the regular army into its domestic-security posture. Mostafa Izadi: Another veteran rises inside the IRGC Mostafa Izadi was appointed Vahidi's deputy, putting another longtime commander near the top of the IRGC hierarchy.

IRNA confirmed Izadi's appointment Aug. 10, while The National described him Aug. 11 as a veteran commander who has held a number of senior positions in Iran's military and security establishment. Iran International reported that Izadi previously commanded the Cyber and New Threats Headquarters within the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters.

IRAN HARDLINER BEHIND US DEAL WARNS TEHRAN WON’T HONOR AGREEMENT IF TRUMP FAILS TO DELIVER Ali Ozmaei: A new commander at one of Iran's most sensitive fronts Rear Adm. Ali Ozmaei was appointed commander of the IRGC Navy, putting him in charge of a force central to Iran's military posture in the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz.

The National reported Aug. 11 that Ozmaei replaced Alireza Tangsiri, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike in March, and that the IRGC Navy is responsible for Iran's military operations in the Gulf and around the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian state media also highlighted Ozmaei's longstanding maritime experience.

IRNA reported Aug. 11 that Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf praised Ozmaei's years in maritime defense and his familiarity with the current conflict and the Strait of Hormuz. The appointment came one day before Rezaei said the Strait of Hormuz would remain closed unless the United States changed its behavior and accepted Iran's conditions.

Reuters reported that Rezaei said Washington would have to end the war and unfreeze Iranian funds overseas, with other conditions relayed through mediators. Taken together, the seven personnel changes show Tehran moving to fill and reshuffle critical military and security posts after significant wartime losses.

What remains an assessment rather than an established fact is whether the identities of those chosen reveal a deeper shortage of trusted successors. Sabti said the return of veteran figures reflected what he sees as a shrinking bench of trusted officials and a less diverse decision-making circle.

Tahbaz offered a less academic version of that assessment. CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP "They keep rotating the same old people," he said.

Location: Tehran