ConflictClarifier

2026 Iran-Gulf Crisis Tracker
CC
Events Archive
diplomacyApr 13, 2026

What the US-Iran talks collapse says about their approach to negotiations

Summary

The collapse of US-Iran talks at Islamabad on April 11-12 was not totally unexpected, given the maximalist position taken by the opposing sides. However, the very fact that the two sides agreed to sit on the negotiation table after 47 years in itself was seen as a major diplomatic breakthrough. In diplomacy, dialogue is seen as a process, wherein the opening rounds generally seek to create a frame work, lower tension and stabilise the trajectory of the negotiations, rather than the quantified outcomes. Given the high-level composition of delegations — the US led by Vice Present JD Vance and Iran by the Assembly speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf along with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi — it was apparent that both sides were serious about negotiations. The talks got deadlocked due to a wide divergence in the stance adopted by the two sides. Iran was pushing for a comprehensive package, i.e. ceasefire in Lebanon, sanctions relief, unfreezing of the assets (around $ 120 billion), sovereignty over Strait of Hormuz and recognition of Tehran’s regional role, beside the security guarantees. The US on the other hand sought a narrower frame work — roll back of nuclear programme, take control of the enriched Uranium (around 440 kg) and opening of Hormuz, adopting accretive approach with respect to sanctions and frozen assets. The deep trust deficit proved to be an unsurmountable impediment. Iran’s past experience, particularly with regards to the ‘Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action’ (JCPOA) agreement — its abrogation, followed by the mutual accusations — continue to overshadow every engagement initiative with America. There are of course domestic constraints as well. In Tehran, yielding under pressure risks undermining the Regime’s legitimacy. Moreover, the Iranian leadership has repeatedly declared its refusal to negotiate under threat. In Washington, any perceived concession would certainly invite political backlash. Israel maintaining a hard line stance against any deal that does not seek curtailment of Iran’s nuclear potential also acts as strategic pressure on the US. After the talks fell apart, both sides have come out with statements to project their respective positions and put the ball in the opponent’s court. On Sunday, April 12, Vance announced that after marathon 21 hours talks, his negotiation team was leaving Pakistan without reaching the deal. “America had put forward its ‘best and final’ proposal; We need to see an affirmative commitment that they (Iran) will not seek a nuclear weapon,” said Vance. As per the Iranian State media, the talks failed over ‘unreasonable’ demands by the American side. Ghalibaf said, “It is time for the US to decide whether it gain our trust or not.” Outside the White House, US President Donald Trump told the reporters that, “Whether we make a deal or not with Iran, it made no difference”. “Regardless of what happens, we win,” he further added. A few hours later, Trump threatened to blockade the Strait of Hormuz. Immediate impact With the collapse of the negotiations, the ceasefire would come under stress. Both sides will try to exert pressure by aggressive posturing through deterrence, which could lead to graduated escalation. It may not return to the full- scale war, which both sides would like to avoid, but could shift towards grey zone confrontations. With no diplomatic breakthrough, the energy markets are faced with new volatility, given the uncertainty over Strait of Hormuz. Even limited threat of disruption will lead to spike in the oil prices and consequent inflationary pressures. What will Iran and the US do next? While it is difficult to predict, most probably the conflict is likely to witness controlled escalation. With Hormuz having emerged as the centre of gravity-decisive leverage with Iran, US focus of operations will now be towards this critical water way. Any military action in the Strait by the US is likely to be contested by Iran, which will definitely heighten the tension in the area. Alongside military escalation, there could be negotiation reset; resumption of talks, with some flexibility in the current stated positions. The US may agree to limited lifting of sanctions and also unfreeze some assets and ensure ceasefire on the Lebanon front. Iran may reciprocate favourably on Hormuz and the nuclear issue, making measured concessions. The chances of conflict now spiralling into full war is unlikely, lest there is a major miscalculation. China and Russia will continue to influence the future course of action, albeit in restrained manner — superpower rivalry bounded by shared caution. Control of choke points is the new geopolitical reality. India has high stakes in the stability of the region, given its political and maritime interests. It is reaching out all the countries in the Gulf and around to remain in sync with rapidly evolving geo political dynamics. Diplomacy remains the best option The talks at Islamabad collapsed due to incompatibility of the expectations and not owing to the absence of dialogue. Both sides seek off ramp, without making major concessions. The window of diplomacy is still open- while the strategic gap between the two still is too wide and political cost of bridging remains very high. The world is watching anxiously as to how this paradox will be resolved, and how long the global economic uncertainty lasts.

Actors involved

USIsraelIranRussiaChina

Sources

  • Maj Gen Prof G G Dwivedi; YasheeBy Maj Gen Prof G G Dwivedi; Yashee

    The collapse of US-Iran talks at Islamabad on April 11-12 was not totally unexpected, given the maximalist position taken by the opposing sides. However, the very fact that the two sides agreed to sit on the negotiation table after 47 years in itself was seen as a major diplomati…

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

diplomacyUnverifiedUSIran
○ 1 source

Key points: Bitcoin diverges from US stocks as Trump says Strait of Hormuz “open” Data from TradingView showed BTC/USD building on the week’s gains as the S&P 500 bounced from 7,696, its lowest level since Aug. 4. BTC/USD four-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView This came after US president Donald Trump posted a map of the closed Strait of Hormuz oil route to Truth Social where it was labeled “new US territory.

” Both the US and Iran lay claim to control of Hormuz, with Trump threatening US ally Oman with military action over its plans to work with Iran on charging tolls to shipping traffic. In a subsequent post, Trump confirmed that further diplomacy with Iran was not on the agenda.

“There are no talks or conversations going on, or scheduled, with the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Naval Blockade remains in full force and effect. The Hormuz Strait is open and operating. All water mines have been removed or detonated,” he wrote. S&P 500 one-day chart.

Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView As on Monday, oil avoided major volatility, with WTI crude down 1% at the time of writing at $84 per barrel. US government bonds continued to show strain, with the 30-year yield hitting 5.34%, its highest since January 2007.

“Bond prices are sending warnings,” BNY Mellon analyst Geoff Yu wrote in a research note quoted by the New York Times. Yu said that the surge came as “investors demand more compensation for inflation risk,” while also attributing the upside to government borrowing.

US 30-year bond yields one-month chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView BTC price faces crunch rebound test Updating X followers on BTC/USD, trader and analyst Aksel Kibar eyed the culmination of a potential reverse head-and-shoulders pattern at $62,300.

Related: Bitcoin price spike to $64.5K was ‘low-volume liquidity trap’: Analysis “If $BTCUSD is going to rebound, it has to come from here,” he argued on Monday. Kibar offered a $53,000 target in the event of the head-and-shoulders structure failing, with $76,000 a potential upside target should the rebound sustain.

BTC/USD one-day chart. Source: Aksel Kibar on X.com Previously, Cointelegraph reported that underwater investors were contributing to Bitcoin’s inability to break higher. Its rebound to $64,500 also stopped short of an overhead trend line, the 50-month exponential moving average (EMA).

This moving average is now in place as resistance at $65,827.

Location: Strait of Hormuz
diplomacyUnverifiedUSIran
○ 1 source

Trump says no talks underway with Iran, Hormuz blockade remains in place US president says no discussions are taking place or planned with Tehran and reiterates that the naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz remains fully operational Washington: US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that no talks are taking place with Iran and that no discussions are currently scheduled between the two countries.

In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump also said the naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz remains "in full force and effect." The president did not provide further details regarding US policy towards Iran or any potential future diplomatic engagement.

Trump's comments come amid continued tensions between Washington and Tehran and renewed focus on security and navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important oil shipping routes.

Location: Tehran
diplomacyUnverifiedUSIran
○ 1 source

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tuesday that Iran had “won both the war and diplomacy,” claiming those who initially sought Tehran’s “unconditional surrender” later sought negotiations. Speaking at an event, Araghchi said Iran resisted for days against what he described as “the world’s largest apparent military,” alongside another army claiming military power and with the support of nearly all Western countries and some other states inside and outside the region, according to the Tasnim news agency.

“Those who were seeking unconditional surrender, shortly after the war began, begged for negotiations,” Araghchi said. He claimed Tehran initially rejected a ceasefire and continued fighting until reaching a point where the other side accepted a ceasefire and negotiations “on Iran’s terms.

” “We fought with strength, and we negotiated with strength,” he said, adding that many foreign ministers had told him: “You won both the war and diplomacy.” Araghchi’s remarks came after US President Donald Trump called on Iran on Monday to give up and “raise the white flag.

Location: Tehran
diplomacyUnverifiedUSIran
○ 1 source

- Iran demands US lift sanctions and return frozen assets to reopen Strait of Hormuz - Iran's Parliament Speaker warns closure of Strait continues until US ends military threats - Around 20% of global oil supply passes through the Strait, impacting energy security Iran has warned that the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until the US meets a set of conditions, including the release of frozen Iranian assets, an end to oil sanctions and what Tehran describes as a US blockade and military threats.

Al-Arabiya English reported that Iran's Parliament Speaker and top negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said the Trump administration must meet the conditions before Tehran considers reopening the strategic waterway. “Until the Trump regime removes the blockade, ends the wars across the region, returns Iran's stolen assets, lifts the oil sanctions, and ceases its military threats, the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed,” Ghalibaf said.

Until the Trump regime removes the blockade, ends the wars across the region, returns Iran's stolen assets, lifts the oil sanctions, and ceases its military threats, the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed. pic.twitter.com/fl2RrKnT1R— Seyed Mohammad Marandi (@s_m_marandi) August 18, 2026 Ghalibaf also warned that Iran was prepared to respond more forcefully depending on the actions of its adversaries.

ALSO READ: 'We Control Hormuz': Trump To Declare Strait As US Territory? Here's What President Says The comments add a new condition to an already fragile diplomatic environment, with the Strait of Hormuz at the centre of concerns over global energy supplies.

Around one-fifth of global oil supply typically passes through the waterway, making any prolonged disruption a major risk for crude markets, shipping and energy security. Earlier, Press TV reported that Ghalibaf is scheduled to travel to Baghdad on Wednesday at the head of a high-level Iranian delegation for discussions with Iraqi leaders.

The talks are expected to cover regional developments and bilateral cooperation, including border security, counterterrorism, economic ties and implementation of existing agreements. Iraqi media have also reported that the agenda could include a proposal concerning Iraqi oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz.

The visit comes as regional governments grapple with the implications of continued disruption in one of the world's most important energy corridors. ALSO READ: Hormuz Tensions: Another Ship Hit By Unknown Projectile, Says UKMTO Centre The security situation in the waterway has also remained tense.

The UK's Maritime Trade Operations agency, or UKMTO, said a vessel reported being struck by an unknown projectile while conducting an outbound transit of the Strait of Hormuz. “The Company Security Officer has reported that the vessel was struck by an unknown projectile while conducting an outbound transit of the Strait of Hormuz,” UKMTO said.

The impact damaged the vessel's engine room and resulted in a crew casualty, the agency said. The remaining crew was being assisted by the Omani coastguard. Essential Business Intelligence, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice, Daily Fuel, Gold and Silver Prices and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.

Location: Tehran