Rastreador de la Crisis Irán-Golfo 2026
CC
Events Archive
strikeMar 14, 2026

Inside F1’s decision to cancel Bahrain and Saudi Arabian GPs, and what comes next

Summary

Following confirmation that Formula 1 has cancelled its planned 2026 races in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia due to the unfolding conflict in the Middle East, a number of questions remain. It is the first time since 2023 that F1 has been forced to scrap a grand prix. That was at Imola, Italy, with the race unable to go ahead due to severe flooding in northern Italy. It was called off with four days’ notice. Advertisement But the unfolding situation in the Middle East amid the escalating conflict made this far more pressing for F1. Following airstrikes on Iran by the U.S. and Israel, Iranian forces launched retaliatory strikes on a number of United States military bases and other targets in the region, including some in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. Here’s how F1’s decision to call off the races unfolded, what it means for the sport, and what comes next. Why was canceling F1’s only option? Following the first strikes by Iran on U.S. military bases in late February, including one in Bahrain just 20 miles from its track, F1 said in a statement that it would “closely monitor” the situation. It noted its season would start with events in Australia, China and Japan, and that the Bahrain/Saudi Arabia races were “not for a number of weeks” — six and seven weeks, respectively. The closure of airspace in the Middle East and flight cancellations did contribute to some travel issues for F1 personnel getting to Australia for the opening race of the season on March 8. The F1 organization laid on charter flights to help ensure they arrived in time. Since the start of the conflict, F1 remained in close contact with local authorities in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, as well as the promoters of the races and the UK Foreign Office. The F1 organization and eight of the 11 teams have their primary headquarters in the UK. Although there was hope that military action would quickly de-escalate and allow the races to go ahead as planned, once the severity and scale of the conflict became evident, stretching into weeks rather than being resolved in a matter of days, the need to cancel both races grew clearer. When did F1 make its decision? Despite the paddock feeling there was only one likely outcome as early as the Australian GP race weekend, one week into the conflict, F1 still had to work through an array of matters before it could formally make the call. Advertisement Throughout the past two weeks, F1’s leadership, including CEO Stefano Domenicali, has been closely working with the respective race promoters in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia to discuss what may follow any cancellation. This includes the impact on their race contracts and the fees due to F1, plus what cancellation meant for ticket holders and paddock hospitality agreements. But the final cut-off was always going to be when freight had to be sent to Bahrain — in the days following this weekend’s Chinese GP. Ayao Komatsu, the team principal of the Haas team, said on Thursday that teams would have preferred to know “last week,” but they anticipated that a call would be made in China. The decision was communicated to the teams on Friday evening in Shanghai, ahead of everything being finalized by F1. This paved the way for the announcement to be made early on Sunday in Shanghai. Could Saudi Arabia’s race have gone ahead? It never seemed realistic that the Bahrain race would be able to go ahead, given its closer proximity to Iran and the strikes on the U.S. base that prompted the closure of its airspace. But there were suggestions that Saudi Arabia’s race, which is held in Jeddah on the country’s western side and away from the Gulf region, could have been viable. The UK Foreign Office had only advised against travel to certain parts of Saudi Arabia, as opposed to all of Bahrain. The Iranian strikes in Saudi Arabia have only reached as far as Riyadh, the capital in the center of the country. As recently as Monday, the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix’s X account was promoting ticket sales for the race, suggesting internal plans were still progressing as normal and that the organizer could still have delivered the grand prix. But while there is likely to be an understandable degree of disappointment for the organizers in Jeddah, given the grand prix stands as one of Saudi Arabia’s most prestigious annual sporting events, there will surely be respect for F1’s decision. Advertisement Even if F1 had managed to get security guarantees in place for the Saudi Arabian race to go ahead, the image of the sport pushing on with an event in the region would likely have been met with a very negative reaction. The optics would have been awful. One team source, speaking to The Athletic on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly on the subject, also highlighted the concern of getting F1 freight to Jeddah and missile strikes then occurring in the region — which was targeted by Houthi rebels in 2022 midway through the second Saudi Arabian GP — that could then compromise subsequent events on the calendar. Will F1 replace the canceled races? When F1 faced a slew of race cancellations in both 2020 and 2021 due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the sport drafted in a series of replacement events to bolster the calendar and ensure it delivered a decent season of racing to fulfill a minimum schedule length requirement. In 2020, F1 managed a 17-race season before running 22 races in 2021 despite travel restrictions around the world, with events at tracks such as Imola, Portimão in Portugal, and Istanbul Park in Turkey boosting the schedule. Keeping the calendar at a certain length helped satisfy important sources of F1 revenue, such as TV contracts and sponsorship deals, which required a certain number of races to be paid in full. Races that did take place behind closed doors paid either no race hosting fees or heavily reduced fees, as many countries did not allow spectator attendance due to lockdown restrictions. There was reason to expect F1 to seek replacement races for Bahrain and Saudi Arabia this time, however, as a five-week gap now sits in the calendar between Japan (March 29) and Miami (May 3). Stand-in events now had the potential to make up for the lost hosting fees from the two cancelled races. But, as The Athletic reported last week, replacement races were never a serious consideration for F1 in this scenario. This is because the short notice meant getting a reasonable hosting fee for a stand-in round was never realistic, as ticket sales and logistics would have been hard to arrange with only a few weeks’ notice. That would have meant the teams losing money after adding in new logistical costs to get to the races, without a share of F1’s hosting fees added into the annual prize money pool to cover their costs, as is usually the case with all planned races. Advertisement And that was before even considering the practical challenges of getting a venue ready to host a full F1 event with fans — something most of the Covid-19 stand-ins did not have to consider — in just a few weeks. Unlike the World Endurance Championship, which has already rescheduled its Qatar round for October, F1 also does not have space in its calendar to squeeze in any extra races later in the year. The calendar will be capped at 22 rounds. How much could this cost F1 and teams? Bahrain and Saudi Arabia are two of F1’s highest-paying races, with Saudi Arabia’s deal reportedly worth in excess of $50 million per year. Zak Brown, the CEO of McLaren Racing, said in Australia that the potential cancellations would likely have a small financial impact on teams in any case. Their prize money pool — which totalled $1.4 billion across the grid last year — is linked to F1’s revenue. This means any possible fall in hosting fee income would also dent team payments. But the nature of the cancellation means the financial impact of not having these races was never a significant issue for teams or F1 itself. “We’re not bothered if it does have a little bit of a financial impact,” said Brown. “So be it, with what’s going on.” One factor that will soften the lost revenue for 10 of the teams is the dilution fee that Cadillac, F1’s new team for 2026, paid to join the grid as compensation to make up for the prize money being cut an 11th way from now on. This payment was upwards of $400 million, giving each team a windfall of at least $40 million that will boost their finances this year only. There is also no real concern within the F1 paddock that this decision could harm the sport’s relationship with several key stakeholders in the Middle East. In an FIA statement released about the cancellations, FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem said, “Bahrain and Saudi Arabia are incredibly important to the ecosystem of our racing season, and I look forward to returning to both as soon as circumstances allow.” Advertisement Bahrain was F1’s first race in the region in 2004. Since then, the sport has laid down deeper roots there, adding events in Abu Dhabi (2009), Qatar, and Saudi Arabia (both 2021). Saudi Arabia’s national oil company, Aramco, is also a key F1 partner, as well as being the title sponsor of the Aston Martin team. F1 has long-standing deals to race in both Bahrain (to 2036) and Saudi Arabia (to 2030), pointing to the strength of those relationships. This was also indicated in the collaborative approach the race promoters have taken in talks over the cancellations. In a statement released on Sunday in China, Prince Khalid bin Sultan Al-Abdullah Al-Faisal, chairman of the Saudi Automobile and Motorcycle Federation, said: “SAMF respect the decision taken by Formula 1 regarding the 2026 race calendar. “Fans across the Kingdom were once again looking forward to the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix in Jeddah this April, but we understand the considerations behind this decision and remain in close partnership with Formula 1.” What will teams do with the five-week break? Although the lack of racing between Japan and Miami could have an impact on teams’ finances — and without downplaying the horror of the conflict — in some ways, the break will be welcomed. The start to the 2026 season has been one of the most demanding in recent F1 history. After the final 2025 race on December 8, teams got only a few weeks of rest, enforced by the regulations, before going into car build and launch preparations in early January. Because of the all-new cars for 2026, more preseason running was required, with three winter tests instead of one as in previous years. This brought forward all plans, with cars hitting the track almost a month earlier than normal. A shorter winter, added testing, and then going into an early run of races across Australia, China and Japan far from European bases has stretched team personnel to their limits. A five-week gap will offer some respite. One team staff member, speaking on condition of anonymity, expressed the keen feelings many have to take a break from traveling, even if there will still be plenty of work to complete at the factories during the new calendar gap. Advertisement Unlike the summer and winter shutdowns, which forbid any work being undertaken, teams will be able to use this period to try to develop their car designs, offering some time to catch up. For a team such as Aston, which has endured a miserable start to this season amid issues with its Honda engine, it will be a precious opportunity to regroup and try to resolve any problems. But the cancellation of two races also denies a chance for further car running, which is the most useful source of data and learning for any team. Are further races at risk of cancellation? Bahrain and Saudi Arabia are not the only countries on the F1 calendar that have been targeted by Iran, with strikes being reported in Azerbaijan, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. All three countries are slated to host grands prix later this year. The Azerbaijan Grand Prix is scheduled for September 26, while the 2026 season will conclude with consecutive rounds in Qatar and Abu Dhabi (part of the UAE) on November 29 and December 6. Right now, those races are so far out that it is difficult for F1 to give any significant consideration to their viability, especially given the fluidity of the conflict.

Actors involved

IranIsraelProxy

Sources

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy
1 source

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Iran attacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz early Tuesday, forcing its crew to abandon the ship, while the United States conducted yet another round of airstrikes targeting the Islamic Republic as they struggle over control of the key waterway.

The 10 consecutive nights of U.S. airstrikes haven’t compelled Tehran to loosen its grip on the strait, through which about a fifth of all crude oil and natural gas traded once passed in peacetime. Even as the U.S. and Iran inch closer to all-out war again, Iran’s interior minister traveled to Pakistan, a key mediator in the conflict, for talks.

However, it remains unclear just what new deal could be reached to end the fighting. The interim deal signed last month that was meant to end the fighting has crumbled. Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has largely stalled. And as fighting intensifies, both sides have targeted civilian infrastructure relied on by millions of people.

“Iran and groups supportive of Iran may target other U.S. interests overseas or at locations associated with the United States and Americans throughout the world,” the U.S. State Department said in a new warning to Americans. The escalation has pushed oil prices higher in recent weeks.

Benchmark Brent crude traded Tuesday above $88 a barrel and regular gasoline in the U.S. climbed to an average of $4 a gallon, keeping pressure on Americans’ wallets ahead of midterm elections this fall. Meanwhile, the U.S. military identified two soldiers who were killed in Jordan in attacks that left a third person missing.

Separately, the military confirmed another death in Iraq on Saturday during the “controlled detonation” of a downed Iranian drone. President Donald Trump took to social media on Monday to warn that “Every time Iran kills an American Soldier they will pay for that killing many times over!

” Trump was planning to attend a ceremony on Tuesday evening at Dover Air Force Base, where at least one service member’s remains were due to arrive. US strikes come as ships attacked The U.S. military’s Central Command said Tuesday it targeted “Iranian military command centers, maritime capabilities, missile and drone launch sites and air defense systems.

” It released more footage of bombings that targeted sites in Iran. “American forces remain postured and prepared to hold Iran accountable for unwarranted aggression toward civilian mariners seeking to freely and openly transit the strait,” the command said.

Iranian state media reported that explosions were heard in Fars, Hormozgan, Ilam, Kerman and Sistan and Baluchistan provinces. However, traffic through the strait has slowed to a crawl during the latest violence. Lloyd's List Intelligence said only three ships transited the strait on Sunday.

The British military’s United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center said a tanker came under attack early Tuesday in the strait off Oman, forcing the crew to abandon the vessel. Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard claimed the attack, as well as two other attacks on ships Monday in the waterway.

The route around Oman has been the one the U.S. military has encouraged ships to travel to avoid Iran’s control. The UKMTO separately reported Tuesday that another previously unknown attack on a ship took place early the previous day. Tehran also hit U.

S.-allied countries throughout the Middle East. Jordan military's said Tuesday that Iran targeted it with five drones and three missiles, all of which were shot down. Bahrain sounded its missile alert sirens Tuesday afternoon as another Iranian barrage targeted the island kingdom, which is home to the U.

S. Navy's 5th Fleet. Nearly 100 US injuries since early July The Pentagon’s chief spokesperson said nearly 100 U.S. service members have been injured since the U.S. restarted strikes on July 7, and 96% of them have returned to duty.

“The vast majority of injuries experienced were minor concussions,” Sean Parnell posted Monday on X in response to a New York Times report that the Pentagon has withheld information about troop injuries from Iranian strikes. He denied that the Pentagon was hiding data about injuries.

However, the Defense Casualty Analysis System, the military’s clearinghouse for reporting deaths and injuries in conflict, has not been updated as of Monday night with the latest attacks. Yemen rebels threaten attacks on other Mideast waterway Yemen’s Houthi rebels announced a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia on Monday.

The Houthis, who are backed by Iran, said they would block shipping between the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden by targeting the Bab el-Mandeb, a maritime chokepoint like the Strait of Hormuz, in response to an attack on Sanaa International Airport last week that they blamed on Saudi Arabia.

With the Strait of Hormuz blocked, Saudi Arabia has been relying on a pipeline to the Red Sea to get millions of barrels of oil out to market. The Houthis earlier demonstrated their ability to disrupt shipping there when they targeted ships for months over the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, with over 100 vessels attacked.

Saudi Arabia’s military said it would keep the waterway open. “All Houthi threats against transiting vessels will be dealt with swiftly and firmly, as such threats are a blatant violation of international law and fall under acts of maritime piracy,” said Maj.

Gen, Turki al-Malki, a Saudi military spokesman. A glimmer of hope for diplomacy Pakistan has intensified diplomatic efforts in recent days to resuscitate the interim deal. Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni arrived in Islamabad on Monday for two days of talks with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and others.

On Sunday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that the U.S. is still open to negotiating with Iran but that “it has to be real.” “If the door opens to diplomacy — if the guys that want to do something productive for Iran win and take control of that system, or take control of the negotiations — that’ll be a very positive development,” Rubio said.

“That’s not where we are tonight, unfortunately.” Iranian authorities on Sunday said at least 50 people have been killed and 517 wounded in the latest rounds of U.S. strikes. Since the war began on Feb. 28, 17 U.S. service members have been killed.

strikeUnverifiedUSIranRussiaChina
1 source

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth posted social media images showing damage to a maritime control tower at Iran’s Chabahar port following reported US military strikes, accompanied by the caption “Iran does not control the Strait of Hormuz.” India’s Ministry of External Affairs stated that the Shahid Beheshti terminal operated by India at the port sustained no damage.

The ministry reiterated its position that civilian infrastructure should not be targeted during conflicts.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy
1 source

U.S. strikes Iran and Houthis threaten Saudi Arabia shipping as mediators push 10-day ceasefire - The U.S. has carried out its tenth consecutive evening of attacks against Iran. - Iran attacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz early Tuesday, while Houthi militants in Yemen declared a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia.

- Rystad Energy has warned about the risk of a significant rebound in oil prices. The U.S. completed a fresh round of strikes against Iran on Monday evening as Yemen's Iran-backed Houthis threatened to impose a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia, potentially opening a new front in the Middle East conflict.

The latest cycle of tit-for-tat strikes comes amid reports that regional mediators have presented Washington and Tehran with a proposal for a 10-day ceasefire, a pitch that could put last month's Memorandum of Understanding back on track. The U.S. Central Command said overnight that it had carried out another round of strikes on Iran at 9 p.

m. ET on Monday. "U.S. forces struck Iranian military command centers, maritime capabilities, missile and drone launch sites, and air defense systems to degrade Iran's ability to continue attacking commercial vessels flowing through the Strait of Hormuz," Centcom said in a statement.

It added that commercial vessel transits through the strategically vital waterway were continuing. Centcom forces, the statement said, had facilitated the transit of around 900 commercial vessels and 450 million barrels of crude oil through the strait since early May.

Iran, meanwhile, attacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz early Tuesday, forcing its crew to abandon the vessel as it seeks to tighten its control over the waterway, one that typically handles around 20% of the world's oil traffic. Houthi militants in Yemen on Monday declared a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia effective immediately, a move that could substantially threaten Middle East oil supplies.

The Houthis have repeatedly threatened to close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait during the U.S.-Iran war. The strait is a choke point for commercial ship traffic that connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and global markets. The militants, in a statement carried by state news, accused the Saudis of laying an "aggressive siege" against them.

Tensions escalated last week after they claimed that Riyadh had bombed Sanaa International Airport. The Saudi-led coalition in Yemen said that it would respond to the Houthis naval blockade with force, reportedly describing such threats as "a blatant violation of international law.

" 10-day ceasefire 'won't be an easy task' Oil prices rose briefly on news of the Houthi statement but later pared gains as energy market participants closely monitored the prospect of a diplomatic breakthrough. International benchmark Brent crude futures with September delivery were last seen trading 0.

5% lower at $88.77 per barrel, having surpassed $90 in the previous session. U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures with August delivery, meanwhile, stood 0.4% lower at $82.88. Strategists at ING said there's some hope of de-escalation between the U.S.

and Iran given the reports that mediators are proposing a 10-day ceasefire. "This won't be an easy task," ING's Warren Patterson and Ewa Manthey said in a research note published Tuesday. "Large divisions remain between the US and Iran. And President Trump said the US would retaliate following the deaths of several American troops," they added.

In a post on Truth Social on Monday, President Donald Trump said: "Every time Iran kills an American Soldier they will pay for that killing many times over!" He added that this directive had been passed on to every leader in the military. Saudi Arabia oil risk Jorge León, senior vice president and head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy, said the Houthis' threat puts approximately 2.

5 million barrels per day of Saudi Arabian oil at risk at a time when traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is at a standstill. "With the Gulf's primary maritime outlet largely closed, the market is increasingly dependent on Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline and Red Sea terminals to maintain export flows," León said Monday in a research note.

Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline network, or Petroline, is a roughly 750-mile system that transports crude across Saudi Arabia, connecting Abqaiq on the oil-rich kingdom's eastern Gulf coast to the port of Yanbu on the Red Sea. "Any disruption at Bab el-Mandeb would therefore threaten not only Saudi shipments but one of the few remaining routes capable of compensating for the severe reduction in Hormuz traffic," León said.

"If a ceasefire does not materialize and Hormuz remains largely closed while the Houthi threat to Red Sea shipping intensifies, the risk of a significant rebound in oil prices would be substantial," he added. — CNBC's Chloe Taylor and Spencer Kimball both contributed to this report.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedIsraelIranProxy
1 source

Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis announced Monday they would impose a maritime blockade on Saudi Arabia, further throttling a global energy market already greatly restricted by Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz. This is why it matters and what it means for the Iran war and the global energy crisis.

It is not clear how the Houthis would carry out a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia, its northern neighbor along the Red Sea coast, or whether it would include a return to attacks on shipping. Yemen sits on the Bab el-Mandeb strait – the southern gateway to the Red Sea – and closing that would open up a new front in the energy crisis and Iran's overarching conflict with the U.

S. With the Strait of Hormuz already disrupted, the Red Sea has become a critical alternative outlet for Gulf oil and other products. A serious disruption would mean both of the Middle East's major oil export routes are shut simultaneously. Iran's partial blockade of the Strait of Hormuz after Israel and the U.

S. attacked it on Feb. 28 disrupted most oil and other exports from the Gulf, raising prices and delivering a global energy shock. Saudi Arabia responded by diverting more than 70% of its normal daily crude exports to the Red Sea port of Yanbu. Ships from Yanbu bound for Europe go north through the Suez Canal.

Those heading to Asia go south through Bab el-Mandeb. Shipments from Yanbu averaged 4 million barrels per day in recent weeks according to data from Kpler and Signal Ocean, up from around 973,000 bpd a year earlier. Total petroleum volumes transiting Bab el-Mandeb amounted to 7.

4 million bpd in June, or about 7% of global oil output, according to Kpler data, up from 4.2 million bpd last year. That has provided a lifeline for the energy market, helping to keep down global oil prices. Saudi Arabia is considering an expansion of its crude oil pipeline to the Red Sea coast, Reuters reported last week.

When the Houthis launched attacks on Red Sea shipping in November 2023, Gulf oil exports were flowing freely. The Houthis have been in a civil war against the Saudi-backed, internationally recognized government for more than a decade and have attacked Gulf neighbors with missiles and drones.

However, a 2022 truce between the country's warring sides largely held until last week, when Yemen's internationally recognized government said it had struck Sanaa airport to stop an Iranian plane landing. The Houthis said Saudi Arabia was responsible and, in response, fired missiles at Abha airport in the kingdom's mountainous southwest.

A senior Houthi official, politburo member Mohammad al-Farah, then warned in an interview on Iran's Press TV website that if the situation kept escalating, Bab el-Mandeb would be closed. The U.S. says Iran has armed, funded and trained the Houthis with help from Hezbollah.

The Houthis deny being an Iranian proxy and say they develop their own weapons. It is not clear how far the group's stance on Bab el-Mandeb and the Red Sea stems from its own strategic priorities or is being made on Iran's behalf. After Israel's genocidal campaign in Gaza, the Houthis began firing at Israel and on shipping in the Red Sea, saying they were doing so in support of Palestinians.

The attacks severely disrupted global shipping, prompting Maersk, Hapag-Lloyd and other major companies to divert around Africa – a far longer, more expensive route. Red Sea traffic has not recovered since, with traffic through the Suez Canal down 52% in 2025 versus 2023 levels and at its lowest in at least 50 years, Suez Canal Authority data shows.

A U.S.-led mission to restore free navigation in the Red Sea involved repeated strikes on Houthi targets and a campaign that shot down hundreds of drones and missiles. But some Houthi attacks continued until last summer, only ending completely with the Gaza cease-fire in October.

Last month, the Houthis said they would ban ships linked to Israel from the Red Sea after Israel renewed military attacks on Iran. However, that threat was never acted on and shipping groups Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd are resuming some Red Sea routes that they had abandoned during the Houthi attacks last year, Maersk said this month.

While Hezbollah and the Iraqi groups joined the war early with rocket and drone fire after the first U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, the Houthis had been comparatively quiet. The group's leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi said on March 5: "Our fingers are on the trigger at any moment should developments warrant it.

" Iranian commanders have repeatedly warned that the Houthis could join the war. The Houthis launched a few missile and drone attacks on Israel in late March and early April. Revolutionary Guards Quds Force commander Esmaeil Qaani said on June 1 they could choke off the Red Sea.

That may now have changed with their announcement of the blockade on Monday against Saudi Arabia in retaliation for what they called the kingdom's siege of its ports and airports, including last week's strike.