ConflictClarifier

Rastreador de la Crisis Irán-Golfo 2026
CC
Events Archive
strikeAug 17, 2026

Press review: US, Iran opt for war of attrition as Kiev diverts focus with Russia attacks

Summary

MOSCOW, August 17. /TASS/. The United States and Iran choose war of attrition as their 60-day ceasefire ends today, and Russia seeks clarification regarding potential re-exports of US-made weapons to Ukraine by Turkey. Meanwhile, Kiev is using attacks inside Russia to shift focus away from air defense shortages. These stories topped Monday's newspaper headlines across Russia. Izvestia: US, Iran opt for war of attrition The 60-day truce between the United States and Iran, concluded in Islamabad, ends on August 17. According to media reports, the two parties have already agreed to extend the ceasefire, even as neither Washington nor Tehran has officially confirmed this. Experts interviewed by Izvestia argue that Iran has a margin of safety for at least a year in the fight against the Americans, while Washington would not benefit from a new escalation ahead of the midterm elections in November. There has been a lull between the United States and Iran, with no new strikes, although the pace of negotiations has noticeably slowed. However, the degree of mutual threats remains high. US leader Donald Trump recently warned on Fox News that the United States is capable of "destroying the whole place," but it has so far relied on economic measures. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has announced "measures like have never been seen in the history of economic isolation on a country." At the same time, Washington continues to claim that it fully controls the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi retorted that the waterway "cannot be captured by either a Tweet or an aircraft carrier," while Spokesman for the Islamic Republic’s MFA Esmaeil Baghaei quoted Dostoevsky in his response to the latest American rhetoric. Tehran has already achieved its principal goal as the United States has failed to overthrow the Iranian leadership or split society, and the longer the pause, the more expensive any next strike will be for Washington. According to Vladimir Sazhin, a senior researcher at the Russian Academy of Sciences' Institute of Oriental Studies, today, Iran feels diplomatically stronger than its opponent and is unwilling to make concessions. Experts agree that Tehran can indeed afford prolonging the conflict. The country is not facing a food or resource crisis, Alexey Bogatyryov, the head of the Safir think-tank who specializes in international affairs, told Izvestia. The country is not in danger of a situation where the population would take to the streets, which means that the authorities have at least another 12 to 18 months to calmly ride out the current stage of pressure. Nor has its military industry stopped. According to Bogatyryov, Iran is currently producing 200 to 300 ballistic missiles per month. All this, the expert believes, makes Bessent's bet on "an economic Epic Fury" too long a game: Tehran has known how to live in the sanctions regime for decades. According to Sazhin, the entire narrative around Iran now comes down to the Hormuz Strait, with the nuclear program, sanctions, and regional alliances receding into the background: until the situation around the strait itself is resolved, the parties will most likely not return to the other issues. Nor does the expert expect a quick softening of Washington's stance: the White House will not alter the situation ahead of the midterm elections. The United States currently has limited military capabilities, Bogatyryov noted. The country is lacking enough rare earth metals and pure aluminum required for the production of high-precision systems, without which it is impossible to conduct large-scale military operations. In addition, the American media is increasingly filled with reports about the depletion of stocks of interceptor missiles for US air defense and missile defense systems, in particular, Patriots and THAADs, something that the White House has actively denied though. Therefore, the United States is actually forced to wait for a "black swan event" -- some kind of economic failure in Iran or another chance that would allow it to put the squeeze on Tehran without direct intervention, Bogatyryov believes. Vedomosti: What could Turkey’s potential re-exports of US-made weapons to Kiev mean for Moscow-Ankara ties Russia has requested clarifications regarding reports about plans by Turkey and the United States to transfer US-origin weapons from the Turkish army’s stockpiles to Ukraine, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on August 15. It is not clear who initiated potential re-exports or exactly how the transfer would be made, the diplomat said. However, Zakharova warned, this will not affect the course of hostilities but may deliver "a serious blow" to Moscow’s relations with the United States and Turkey. Even as Turkey has long maintained military cooperation with Ukraine, potential supplies of artillery from the Turkish army’s stocks would certainly strain the relations between Russia and Turkey, Ikbal Dyurre, an associate professor at Moscow State Linguistic University, told Vedomosti. Until recently, Ankara maintained a balance between the two warring sides in the Ukraine conflict, while the implementation of this plan would tip the balance toward the country that favors Kiev more and reducing its capacity as a mediator. "Turkey is indeed weighing its pros and cons. But amid a tough political and economic situation as well as regional circumstances, its reliance on the US administration’s stance has grown significantly. Therefore, today, Ankara is forced to act while taking Western countries’ interests into account. And Turkey’s position toward Russia further down the road will differ from its position in previous years," the analyst maintained. If potential Turkish re-exports to Kiev materialize, Ankara will simultaneously try to ease a potential response from Moscow, Dyurre continued. "In theory, Turkey could meet Russia halfway in the Caucasus where Ankara has a strong position. For its part, Russia could possibly resort to economic pressure. Nevertheless, no one will use this practice to their own detriment," the expert concluded. Turkey purchased the US weaponry that it could potentially transfer to Ukraine back in the 1990s, and today, it is planning to replace those weapons with domestic counterparts, Turkish political analyst Ali Emre Sucu argued. In other words, the expert noted, Ankara is viewing this process as an opportunity to both localize and modernize its defense industry. US and Turkish officials have not yet commented on this issue, Sucu said. "Besides, as a NATO ally, Ankara must honor its obligations to the alliance. I assume Moscow too understands this. Therefore, if a crisis arises in the Russia-Turkey relations, it would be advisable for the two sides to settle it through diplomatic channels," he said. Izvestia: Kiev uses attacks inside Russia to divert attention from air defense shortage On Saturday night, Ukraine launched a new massive drone attack on Russian regions as our country's air defenses intercepted and destroyed 822 Ukrainian UAVs. At the same time, the Russian Armed Forces carried out strikes on Ukrainian military-industrial plants, including those involved in the production of missiles and drones. Experts interviewed by Izvestia believe that Kiev is mostly seeking media attention with its large-scale attacks inside Russia as it tries to distract attention from the shortage of missiles for air defense systems and corruption scandals surrounding the Ukrainian military-industrial complex. Ukraine has either completely exhausted ammunition stocks for Western air defenses or it is conserving them to protect key infrastructure facilities and the government’s headquarters, military expert Boris Dzherelievsky believes. According to him, Kiev's public silence has been an instrument of exerting information and political pressure on its European partners. Thus, the Ukrainian side demonstrates a shortfall in its air defense system, hoping to force EU countries to share their remaining missiles, the expert argued. Military expert Dmitry Kornev highlighted the growing effectiveness of Russia’s combined attacks and the parallel weakening of Ukraine’s air defense system in an interview with Izvestia. "The Russian Armed Forces targeted not just infrastructure supporting Ukrainian troops but the Ukrainian backbone defense plants in its latest combined strike. The attack that struck a Firepoint plant, an UKR DEFENCE site and strategic facilities in Kremenchug and Krivoy Rog has significantly undermined the Ukrainian army’s autonomous production capabilities," he explained. Against this backdrop, the depletion of air defense systems is becoming a critical problem for Kiev. "This shortage is aggravated by large-scale corruption in the structure of the defense sector and the Ukrainian leadership’s close circle," the expert noted. Meanwhile, massive drone attacks on the Moscow Region have had a media and political impact only. Diverting the focus away from the line of engagement to the Russian capital and Russian region is explained by Kiev’s ambitions to address political tasks, with provoking social tensions, destabilizing the situation and spreading panic among the population being key goals, Dzherelievsky argued. Besides, Ukrainian attacks targeting Moscow and the Moscow Region directly contradict Vladimir Zelensky’s peace rhetoric, Bogdan Bezpalko, a political scientist who sits on the Russian Presidential Council for Interethnic Relations, told Izvestia. "Zelensky's whole desire for peace is simply a desire for respite so the West can take a break, produce as much ammunition as possible, and accumulate finances," he said. "On the one hand, Ukraine says that it stays `strong’ and is capable of delivering such attacks. On the other hand, they say how weak they are, without enough interceptor missiles. As a result, this paints quite a schizophrenic picture," he explained. Nezavisimaya Gazeta: China backs Russia’s position on Kurils Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has visited the Yasukuni Shrine without actually making any mention of `repentance’ which, among other things, triggered a protest in China. In turn, Japan has included Beijing’s direct backing of Russia’s position on the Kuril Islands among its list of claims to its western neighbor. Russian President Vladimir Putin recently traveled to Iturup on a visit that drew an extremely negative reaction in Japan which is now considering more anti-Russian sanctions. The Japanese head of government reacted quite strongly to the Russian leader’s first visit to the Kurils since 2010. In a post on social media, she wrote that Japan has asked Putin to refrain from visiting since 2024, when the trip was announced. And Takaichi described the visit to what she called the Northern Territories as "insultful for the feelings of the Japanese nation." Russian Ambassador Nikolay Nozdrev was summoned to the Japanese Foreign Ministry for a formal protest. The situation soon extended beyond the bilateral relations between Russia and Japan as US Ambassador to Japan George Glass reiterated the United States’ support for Japanese sovereignty over the Northern Territories on social media. And Spokesperson for the Chinese Defense Ministry Guo Jiakun voiced support for Russia’s sovereignty over the Kurils at a briefing on August 14. Valery Kistanov, Director of the Center for Japanese Studies at the Institute of China and Modern Asia at the Russian Academy of Sciences, recalled in a comment to Nezavisimaya Gazeta that under Mao Zedong, China explicitly recognized the Southern Kuril Islands as Japanese territory. The expert believes that Japan will disregard Guo’s remarks. "Japan will simply take note that cooperation between Russia and China, which the Japanese believe is based on anti-Japanese sentiment, has intensified. The Japanese are particularly concerned about the military cooperation between Russia and China. Takaichi has pledged to review the National Security Strategy, the National Defense Strategy, and the Defense Development Plan before the end of this year. The idea of a rapprochement between China and Russia will likely be given particular attention there," the expert believes. The coordination of efforts in the defense sphere between China, North Korea and Russia marks a separate concern for Tokyo, Kistanov added. "A rapprochement between China and Russia was feared by late Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. His idea to sign a peace accord with Russia originated from that. As we know, nothing came of that, and now Tokyo seems to have lost faith in this probability altogether," the expert concluded. Vedomosti: Export prices for Russian steel rise by 16% in 2026 In July, the average export price for Russian steel stood at $517 per metric ton, or a 16% rise from the beginning of the year, a report from the analytical firm Euler, seen by Vedomosti, showed. According to a forecast from Euler analysts, the average steel (hot-rolled coil) FOB (Free On Board) Black Sea price will rise to $510 per metric ton by the end of 2026, up 11% from last year. This year’s growth in Russian steel prices comes amid a decline in metals exports from China, the report reads. China is the world’s largest steel supplier, according to data from the World Steel Association: in 2025, it accounted for 53% of global steel supply. The decline in Chinese steel exports has supported global steel prices, Nikanor Khalin, a senior analyst at Euler, explained. Experts interviewed by Vedomosti cited another reason for rising steel prices in 2026, namely the armed conflict in the Middle East. The escalation in the region has caused a rise in iron ore prices, higher freight and shipping costs from Asia, and disruptions in steel exports from Iran, Sergey Suverov, an investment strategist at Aricaptal brokerage, explained. Yegor Vershinin, an analyst at Finam, and Vasily Danilov, a lead analyst at Veles Capital, share this view. Future price dynamics for Russian steel will depend on the actions of Chinese producers amid weakening demand for the metal domestically and the return of supply from Iran, Vershinin argued. He estimates that the average export price for Russian steel in 2026 will range between $495 and $500 per metric ton, representing an 8-9% increase. Suverov expects the price to reach $500 per metric ton. TASS is not responsible for the material quoted in these press reviews

Actors involved

USIranEURussiaChinaUkraine

Sources

  • CurrentsAPI

    MOSCOW, August 17. /TASS/. The United States and Iran choose war of attrition as their 60-day ceasefire ends today, and Russia seeks clarification regarding potential re-exports of US-made weapons to Ukraine by Turkey. Meanwhile, Kiev is using attacks inside Russia to shift focus

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
1 source

President Donald Trump has made another bombastic pronouncement amid the war with Iran. On Tuesday, he shared a map labeling the Strait of Hormuz “NEW U.S. Territory,” via his Truth Social platform. Iran has continued to stress that the strait will not be fully reopened until Washington meets its slew of demands, including ending its blockade on Iranian shipping and scrapping oil sanctions.

Ship Hit in Strait Just hours before Trump’s latest post, a vessel exiting the Strait of Hormuz was struck by an unidentified projectile off the coast of Oman. According to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations, the ship’s engine room was hit, resulting in a “crew casualty.

” Officials did not immediately identify the vessel or its cargo. The Omani Coast Guard said it was assisting the remaining crew as authorities investigated the incident. Iran’s Stranglehold on the Strait Since the United States and Israel launched attacks on the Islamic Republic on February 28, Iran has tightly restricted shipping through the waterway.

Prior to the war, around one-fifth of globally traded oil passed through Hormuz. Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf said Tuesday that Tehran would maintain its restrictions until Washington fulfilled what Iran considers its commitments under the interim U.

S.-Iran agreement struck in June. Those demands include lifting the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports, releasing frozen Iranian assets, removing sanctions on Iranian oil and gas exports, and ending U.S. military threats and operations. “Until the United States fulfills its commitments under the agreement … the Strait of Hormuz will not reopen,” Qalibaf said.

Blockade Vs. Territory Asked in the Oval Office on Monday about his earlier suggestion that Hormuz could become American territory, the president said he liked the idea. “We control it with the blockade, and I like the idea of declaring it a territory,” Trump told reporters, adding: “We have total control over the strait now.

” Washington’s blockade is hitting Iranian shipping hard. U.S. Central Command said Monday that American forces had redirected 64 commercial vessels, disabled three ships, and boarded another two as part of the renewed blockade. That does not mean Washington has eliminated Iran’s ability to disrupt other shipping.

Tuesday’s unexplained attack came after a string of strikes on vessels attempting to navigate the area. Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi also rejected Trump’s territorial claim on Tuesday, describing it as a “delusion.” Tehran has repeatedly maintained that it, rather than Washington, will determine when normal passage through the strait resumes.

Iran and Oman Near Deal Complicating matters further are separate negotiations between Iran and Oman, the two countries sitting on opposite sides of the strait. Iran said Monday that the two governments were finalizing details of an agreement concerning shipping routes through Hormuz.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said an “understanding has been reached regarding the map of the transit route.” Trump responded by threatening Oman, a longstanding U.S. partner, telling Fox News that Washington would “bomb the shit out of them” if Muscat “gets in the way.

” The diplomatic clock has already run down. The 60-day negotiating period established by the June memorandum between Washington and Tehran expired on Monday without a broader agreement being reached. Trump has said the United States is not seeking an extension.

Tehran Likely to Double Down Columnist Melanie Phillips slammed President Trump’s plans for a ceasefire last month, complaining that it had given Tehran the upper hand and showed that “everyone can now see America is not prepared to make the sacrifices necessary to defend itself.

” Trump has claimed Iran has essentially lost this war and that the blockade is massively damaging its economy. However, he has also instructed his team to pursue a “low-key” approach to talks. On July 7, Trump said the agreement was “over”, while Iran’s Foreign Ministry said it was “suspended” the following week.

“They should put up the white flag of surrender,” Trump told Fox News on Monday, claiming that backchannel talks with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) were ongoing. The IRGC has denied these claims. On Tuesday, Trump dramatically changed his tune, stating that no talks with Iran were ongoing, and that no discussions were scheduled.

About the Author: Georgia Gilholy Georgia Gilholy is a journalist based in the United Kingdom who has been published in Newsweek, The Times of Israel, and the Spectator. Gilholy writes about international politics, culture, and education.

Location: Tehran
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy
1 source

Iran War Day 172: ‘No Talks’ Scheduled with Tehran, Trump Says In a post on Truth Social Tuesday President Donald Trump said that “there are no talks or conversations going on, or scheduled, with the Islamic Republic of Iran.” Trump added that the U.

S. naval blockade on the Strait of Hormuz “remains in full force and effect” and that the waterway “is open and operating.” In a separate post, Trump published an image labelling the strait as “NEW U.S. Territory.” Only six commodity ships transited the Strait of Hormuz on Monday, according to Kpler data cited by Reuters.

Iran’s Speaker of Parliament Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said Tuesday, Until the commitments made by the United States in the memorandum of understanding, including the lifting of the blockade, the release of frozen assets, the lifting of oil sanctions, the end of threats and military operations on all fronts, and other conditions to which America agreed in the memorandum, are implemented, the strait will not be opened.

The deadline for that memorandum of understanding—signed by Trump and Iran’s president in June—expired on Monday. The two nations had agreed to negotiate a final peace deal over a 60-day period, but the framework agreement quickly fell apart, and the deadline seemingly wasn’t extended, despite mixed reporting.

Subscribe Today Get daily emails in your inbox Ghalibaf will lead a “high-level parliamentary delegation” to Iraq on Wednesday, Iran’s Fars news agency reported. The visit comes as pro-Iran militia groups face a September 30 deadline set by the Iraqi government to disarm.

Syria condemned reported Israeli strikes against Abu Duhur airbase on Tuesday, while the U.S. expressed concern over the incident. U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria and Iraq Tom Barrack wrote on X that “we are deeply concerned that the confirmed Israeli airstrikes on Abu al-Duhur Airbase constitute an unnecessary escalation that does not advance regional stability.

” The price of Brent Crude oil was over $91 per barrel on Tuesday morning. AAA recorded the national average price of regular gas at $4.07.

Location: Tehran
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
1 source

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday no talks were taking place with Iran and none were scheduled, and he insisted that the Strait of Hormuz was open, contradicting an earlier Iranian assertion that the critical waterway remained shut to shipping.

The receding prospects of a deal to end the nearly six-month conflict drove up oil prices again on Tuesday, while stock markets sagged and borrowing costs for major economies including the U.S. hit multi-decade highs, amid concerns about the long-term inflationary and fiscal impact of the crisis.

A temporary ceasefire agreement expired on Monday and a senior Iranian official told Reuters that his country was moving to a “fully offensive” military posture due to the diplomatic stalemate, though there were no reports of fresh strikes by either side on Tuesday.

“There are no talks or conversations going on, or scheduled, with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Tuesday. “The Naval Blockade remains in full force and effect. The Hormuz Strait is open and operating. All water mines have been removed or detonated,” he added.

On Monday, Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law and special envoy, had sounded an optimistic note, saying talks with Iran were still under way and were “probably more robust” than they had ever been. Despite Trump's typically ebullient remarks about the situation in the Gulf, preliminary shipping data on Tuesday showed ship crossings via the Strait of Hormuz were still in single digits on Monday.

The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations said it received a report on Tuesday that a vessel was struck by an unknown projectile while transiting outbound in the Strait of Hormuz, causing engine room damage and a crew casualty. The remaining crew were being assisted by the Omani Coast Guard, according to the report.

Top Iranian negotiator Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf said in comments published by state media that the strait would remain shut until the U.S. met the conditions of an interim deal signed with Iran in June. These conditions include the U.S. lifting its blockade of Iranian ports, lifting oil sanctions, releasing Tehran's frozen assets, and ending threats and military operations on all fronts, Qalibaf told parliament.

A memorandum of understanding signed on June 17 had set a 60-day time frame for a broader deal on Iran's nuclear programme and U.S. sanctions. That period elapsed on Monday and Trump said he had no plans to extend it. The agreement, which declared the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts,” had quickly unravelled over a dispute about control of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway through which a fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas flowed before the war.

Both Trump and Tehran have frequently switched between threats and more emollient rhetoric as they seek a way out of the crisis, which erupted when the U.S. and Israel launched strikes against Iran on February 28. Iran remains open to dialogue with the U.

S. but does not confuse negotiations with surrender, Mohammad Mokhber, an adviser to Iran's supreme leader, said on Tuesday, according to the semi-official Fars news agency. Mokhber said military pressure and sanctions would not break Iran's resolve and that the country would defend its security, dignity and allies while not seeking war.

Even as Iran projects resilience in the war, its leaders are worried that a threat of more economic punishment could increase hardships, reignite unrest and further erode the Islamic Republic’s legitimacy, according to three Iranian officials. Thousands of people have been killed in the conflict, mainly in Iran and Lebanon.

Iran has bombed U.S. military bases and infrastructure in countries including Oman, Jordan, Kuwait, Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Benchmark Brent crude oil futures have surged during the conflict, hitting a peak of $126 a barrel, roughly 75% above pre-war levels.

Brent crude futures settled up 20 cents on Tuesday at just over $91 a barrel. For Americans who will vote in November congressional elections, gasoline prices have risen above $4 per gallon, up from less than $3 before the war, according to the automotive group AAA.

Location: Tehran
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUN
1 source

Iran is rebuilding the upper ranks of its military and security establishment after months of wartime losses by turning largely to familiar veterans — figures whose careers in some cases stretch back to the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the Iran-Iraq War and previous domestic crackdowns.

The appointments follow the deaths of several senior Iranian commanders in U.S.-Israeli strikes since the war began Feb. 28, The National reported Aug. 11. For Washington, the stakes go beyond who fills the vacancies. The reshuffle puts veteran hardliners atop institutions that shape Iran’s military operations, national-security policy and internal security at a time of renewed confrontation with the United States.

The appointments do not prove that Tehran has run out of younger commanders or that loyalty was the sole criterion, but the reliance on figures whose careers stretch back decades is raising a broader question for U.S. policymakers: whether wartime losses have left Iran increasingly dependent on a smaller circle of trusted ideologues — potentially narrowing the room for compromise even as Washington tries to pressure Tehran back toward a deal.

IRAN’S REVOLUTIONARY GUARD SIDELINES PRESIDENT AS MILITARY GRIP EXPANDS Former American prisoner Morad Tahbaz, who was detained in Iran in 2018 and freed in a U.S.-Iran prisoner exchange in September 2023, told Fox News Digital that he views the latest appointments as evidence of Tehran's continued dependence on longtime loyalists.

"They keep rotating the same old people, most of whom are fairly inept but are loyal to the Khamenei father and son," Tahbaz told Fox News Digital. The reshuffle spans Iran's conventional military, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, its naval arm, the Basij paramilitary force and the country's highest national-security council.

Iran's state-run IRNA reported Aug. 10 that Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei appointed Ali Abdollahi chief of staff of the Armed Forces, Kioumars Heydari his deputy, Ahmad Vahidi commander of the IRGC, Mostafa Izadi deputy IRGC commander, Ali Ozmaei commander of the IRGC Navy and Hossein Taeb head of the Basij.

The previous day, former IRGC commander Mohsen Rezaei, 71, was named secretary of the Supreme National Security Council and Khamenei's representative on the powerful body. Reuters reported Aug. 10 that the SNSC coordinates Iran's security and foreign policy and that Rezaei replaced Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr, who had been appointed secretary in late March following the death of his predecessor, Ali Larijani.

The appointments do not establish that Iran has run out of younger or less familiar commanders. But the reliance on longtime military and security figures has fueled assessments that wartime losses have narrowed the regime's pool of officials it regards as sufficiently experienced and politically trustworthy.

Erfan Fard wrote for the Middle East Forum on Aug. 15 that Khamenei was not promoting a new generation but turning to veterans of the revolution, the Iran-Iraq War, intelligence operations and domestic repression, arguing that an architecture based on "institutional memory, loyalty, and coercive power" was taking shape.

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies argued in an Aug. 12 policy brief that the reshuffle looked "less like renewal than a game of musical chairs among regime veterans." The appointments also formalized the position of Ahmad Vahidi, a veteran hardliner who had already emerged near the center of wartime decision-making.

Vahidi was a major player in shaping Tehran's wartime policy and had risen through the IRGC's early intelligence and external-operations apparatus before later serving as defense and interior minister. As interior minister, Vahidi oversaw police units involved in the crackdown on the 2022 protests.

IRNA confirmed Aug. 10 that Khamenei promoted Vahidi to major general and formally appointed him commander-in-chief of the IRGC. WHO IS AHMAD VAHIDI? IRAN’S NEW IRGC CHIEF TIED TO GLOBAL ATTACKS AND ‘DEATH TO AMERICA’ IDEOLOGY Hossein Taeb: The intelligence veteran returns to the Basij to build a ‘20-million-strong Basij force.

’ One of the most closely watched appointments is Hossein Taeb, the cleric and veteran security official tapped to lead the Basij, the IRGC's volunteer paramilitary force that has repeatedly been used against domestic dissent. The National reported that the Basij has been used to suppress internal dissent, while The Times reported Aug.

12 that the force is embedded in neighborhoods, universities, workplaces, factories, ministries and mosques and has played a central role in suppressing successive uprisings. For Tahbaz, Taeb's return is personal. Tahbaz was detained in 2018, while Taeb was leading the IRGC Intelligence Organization.

"Ta’eb is extremely close to Mojtaba Khamenei but was very unceremoniously fired from his former position as head of the IRGC Intelligence Organization," Tahbaz told Fox News Digital. "He was personally responsible for my and my colleagues' arrests and detentions.

He lives and breathes conspiracy theories." The Times reported Aug. 12 that Taeb and Mojtaba Khamenei's relationship dates back more than four decades and that both served in the Habib Battalion during the Iran-Iraq War. The newspaper also reported that IRGC intelligence arrested environmentalists and dual nationals during Taeb's tenure.

Taeb previously commanded the Basij before moving into IRGC intelligence. The Times reported that months after the disputed 2009 election, the Guards' intelligence division was elevated into an independent organization with Taeb as its first chief. Taeb's earlier leadership of the Basij also drew U.

S. sanctions. In a Sept. 29, 2010 Treasury Department fact sheet, the U.S. government said that while Taeb commanded the Basij during the June 2009 election, forces under his command participated in "beatings, murder, and arbitrary arrests and detentions of peaceful protestors.

" According to IRNA, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf congratulated Taeb on his appointment as head of the Basij Organization, saying his tenure could mark a new chapter for the volunteer force. Ghalibaf said the Basij now needs a more comprehensive and forward-looking approach and argued that Taeb’s appointment by the supreme leader could help advance what he described as one of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s longstanding goals: building a 20-million-strong Basij force.

UN WATCHDOG SLAMS POTENTIAL ELECTION OF IRAN TO PANEL WITH HUMAN RIGHTS SWAY: 'LUNATICS RUNNING THE ASYLUM' Mohsen Rezaei: Back at the center after four decades Few appointments better illustrate the return of Iran's old guard than Mohsen Rezaei, who was named secretary of the Supreme National Security Council.

Reuters reported Aug. 10 that Rezaei joined the IRGC shortly after the 1979 revolution, became its commander in 1981 at age 27 and led the force for 16 years, including through most of the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War. He later served as secretary of Iran's Expediency Discernment Council for more than two decades and as vice president for economic affairs from 2021 to 2023 under President Ebrahim Raisi.

Now, at 71, he is secretary of the SNSC and Khamenei's representative on the body. Beni Sabti, an Iran expert at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies, argued that bringing back longtime figures such as Rezaei reflects weakness rather than renewal.

"This is, again, another evidence that they don't have anyone else," Sabti told Fox News Digital. "So they have to bring him out again from the desk and put him somewhere. These are the guys that they have." Rezaei and Vahidi were also among six people for whom INTERPOL authorized Red Notices requested by Argentina in 2007 in connection with the investigation into the 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires.

INTERPOL said in November 2007 that its General Assembly upheld the publication of notices for six individuals, including Ahmad Vahidi and Mohsen Rezaei, after Iran challenged Argentina's requests. Sabti argued that Rezaei's re-emergence is particularly telling because Tehran's decision-making circle has become less ideologically diverse.

"Today, there is only one opinion, and this is the main problem," Sabti said. "This is why you think that there is unity and the system is stronger. No, it's not stronger. Actually, it's weaker also because of that." TRADE VESSEL STRUCK BY PROJECTILE IN STRAIT OF HORMUZ AMID US-IRAN TALKS Ali Abdollahi: A wartime commander takes the top military job Ali Abdollahi was elevated to chief of staff of Iran's Armed Forces, putting him at the top of the country's military command structure.

IRNA confirmed the appointment Aug. 10. Abdollahi had previously commanded the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, Iran's joint operational command responsible for coordinating its armed forces in wartime, according to Iran International on Aug. 10.

His appointment also comes amid an effort to integrate the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters more closely with the Armed Forces General Staff. Le Monde reported Aug. 11 that Abdollahi's task includes completing that integration in an effort to further centralize command and coordination.

Fard argued in his Aug. 15 Middle East Forum analysis that Abdollahi's elevation exemplifies Tehran's reliance on longstanding revolutionary-security figures rather than a generational break. FREED AMERICAN REVEALS BRUTAL IRAN PRISON ORDEAL, WARNS HOSTAGES FACE GREATER DANGER Kioumars Heydari: The regular army moves closer to the center Former Army Ground Forces commander Kioumars Heydari was appointed deputy chief of staff of the Armed Forces, bringing a senior officer from Iran's conventional military into the new command structure.

The National reported that Heydari formerly commanded the Army Ground Forces and has held senior positions in Iran's regular army, known as the Artesh. IRNA independently confirmed his appointment. His inclusion also demonstrates that the reshuffle is not limited to the IRGC.

Fard argued in the Middle East Forum that Heydari's previous public rhetoric surrounding protest suppression indicates that Tehran has increasingly integrated the regular army into its domestic-security posture. Mostafa Izadi: Another veteran rises inside the IRGC Mostafa Izadi was appointed Vahidi's deputy, putting another longtime commander near the top of the IRGC hierarchy.

IRNA confirmed Izadi's appointment Aug. 10, while The National described him Aug. 11 as a veteran commander who has held a number of senior positions in Iran's military and security establishment. Iran International reported that Izadi previously commanded the Cyber and New Threats Headquarters within the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters.

IRAN HARDLINER BEHIND US DEAL WARNS TEHRAN WON’T HONOR AGREEMENT IF TRUMP FAILS TO DELIVER Ali Ozmaei: A new commander at one of Iran's most sensitive fronts Rear Adm. Ali Ozmaei was appointed commander of the IRGC Navy, putting him in charge of a force central to Iran's military posture in the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz.

The National reported Aug. 11 that Ozmaei replaced Alireza Tangsiri, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike in March, and that the IRGC Navy is responsible for Iran's military operations in the Gulf and around the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian state media also highlighted Ozmaei's longstanding maritime experience.

IRNA reported Aug. 11 that Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf praised Ozmaei's years in maritime defense and his familiarity with the current conflict and the Strait of Hormuz. The appointment came one day before Rezaei said the Strait of Hormuz would remain closed unless the United States changed its behavior and accepted Iran's conditions.

Reuters reported that Rezaei said Washington would have to end the war and unfreeze Iranian funds overseas, with other conditions relayed through mediators. Taken together, the seven personnel changes show Tehran moving to fill and reshuffle critical military and security posts after significant wartime losses.

What remains an assessment rather than an established fact is whether the identities of those chosen reveal a deeper shortage of trusted successors. Sabti said the return of veteran figures reflected what he sees as a shrinking bench of trusted officials and a less diverse decision-making circle.

Tahbaz offered a less academic version of that assessment. CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP "They keep rotating the same old people," he said.

Location: Tehran