Republican lawmaker moves to impeach Pete Hegseth over Iran war - Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky filed a privileged resolution to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, forcing a House vote within two days. - Massie accused Hegseth of high crimes and misdemeanors, citing military operations in Iran, Caribbean boat strikes, and violations of constitutional duties regarding war powers.

- The move marks a historic first where a lawmaker has introduced impeachment articles against a Cabinet member from their own political party. - The impeachment resolution follows an ongoing feud after Hegseth campaigned against Massie during his Republican primary in Kentucky.

- Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson defended Hegseth, stating the Department of Defense is unified and performing strongly under Hegseth and President Trump.

Republican Representative Thomas Massie has filed a privileged resolution seeking the impeachment of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a move that mandates a House vote within two days and represents the first known attempt to impeach a Cabinet member from the same party.

Massie cited alleged violations of his constitutional oath regarding military operations and speech disputes, claims that have not yet been substantiated by judicial or administrative review. This action follows a public dispute stemming from Hegseth's May visit to Kentucky, where he campaigned against Massie in the Republican primary.

Republican Representative Thomas Massie introduced eight articles of impeachment against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, including unverified allegations that the Secretary violated the War Powers Resolution regarding military actions in Iran and an operation in Venezuela that resulted in the capture of Nicolas Maduro.

Additionally, the resolution contains allegations that Hegseth retaliated against Senator Mark Kelly for protected speech and pursued these actions without necessary legal authorization.

The Trump administration is reportedly preparing a potential $2.8 billion arms deal for Israel, which would involve the sale of approximately 40,000 bombs. This information originates from a machine-translated Turkish-language headline that includes editorial characterizations not present in the underlying logistical details.