ConflictClarifier

2026 Iran-Gulf Crisis Tracker
CC
Events Archive
strikeSep 18, 2026

Saudi Arabia has defence pacts with Pakistan, Turkey, US: Why aren’t they fighting the Houthis?

Summary

6 min readNew DelhiUpdated: Sep 18, 2026 07:09 AM IST The fighting between Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis has sharply escalated in the past two weeks, with the militia making their biggest territorial gains in years. On September 10, they captured the strategic Red Sea port of Mocha (after which Mocha the coffee is named) along with other territory along Yemen’s western coast. By September 17, Ansar Allah, the official name of the Houthi militia, effectively controlled much of Yemen’s Red Sea coast. Map: Wikimedia Commons Thus, while the Houthis are gaining more power against Yemen’s official government, which Riyadh backs, they are also in the position to disrupt Saudi oil flow on its western coast, at a time its eastern coast shipping is already suffering because of the Strait of Hormuz blockade. The global oil price has already crossed $100 per barrel, up from $70 in June 2026 The Houthis have also launched missiles and drones at Saudi territory, including attacks on energy infrastructure. Saudi Arabia has responded with airstrikes and warnings of stronger action. On paper, Saudi Arabia has defence partnerships with multiple key players in the region. The US-Saudi Strategic Defense Agreement was signed on November 18, 2025; Saudi Arabia and Pakistan signed their Strategic Mutual Defense Agreement (SMDA) on September 17, 2025; and Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Türkiye signed the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement on August 7, 2026. The Makkah agreement says an armed attack on any one of the three countries will be regarded as an attack on all three. So why have Pakistan, Turkey, or the US not joined the fighting against the Houthis? Why aren’t Pakistan and Türkiye fighting alongside Saudi Arabia? While the Makkah agreement is supposed to be a defence treaty, few details about its actual operational structure are available publicly. It does not delineate the escalation ladder, or what sort of response is expected from a member at which stage when another is facing attacks. Story continues below this ad Both Pakistan and Turkey have said that Saudi Arabia has not requested them to send combat forces to Yemen. Turkish officials have said their Parliament is yet to approve the defence treaty. Pakistan, of course, also has another mutual defence pact with Saudi Arabia. However, barring a few fighter jets it sent in April when Iran was attacking US military assets in the kingdom, Pakistan hasn’t intervened militarily. Nor has Saudi Arabia come to Pakistan’s aid against Afghanistan, with both countries prioritising their own immediate concerns. In the past few days, Pakistan has said it will extend all help to Saudi Arabia, but hasn’t given details. Recently, defence minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif told a Pakistani news channel that, “Under the trilateral agreement, if the territorial integrity of a country comes under threat, the agreement will be activated and the other two countries will proceed to protect it in fulfilment of their obligations.” But when asked specifically about military involvement against the Houthis, Asif said the government’s strategies couldn’t be made public at this stage. Both Pakistan and Turkey are using diplomatic channels to calm the fighting. Pakistan specially has asked Iran, the Houthis’ main benefactor, to rein in the militia. Story continues below this ad Why isn’t the US fighting the Houthis? US President Donald Trump has reportedly declined Saudi requests for direct military intervention against the Houthis. The US has participated in the Yemen conflict in the past. It reached an understanding with the Houthis in 2025, under which it stopped its bombing campaign in return for a Houthi commitment not to attack American vessels. That arrangement is still relevant. Right now, the Houthis are threatening only Saudi ships in the Red Sea, but they have the power to completely disrupt navigation in this crucial water body. With the world still reeling from the economic shock of the blocked Strait of Hormuz, the US would not want this. Also, US munitions are running low as the war with Iran grinds on. The Trump administration would not want to open another front in the Middle East when midterm elections are approaching and the Iran war is anyway unpopular. Then is the Iran factor. The Houthis have largely been trained and armed by Iran. If other countries were to enter active fighting on Saudi Arabia’s behalf, Iran and its allied militias might get behind the Houthis openly, adding another dimension to the US-Israel-Iran war and risking a much wider conflagration in the region. Story continues below this ad Why doesn’t Saudi Arabia simply fight the Houthis alone? Because Riyadh has already tried that. The Houthis are Zaidi Shias, and Yemen’s civil war began because they felt marginalised under the Sunni government. In 2014, they captured the capital, Sanaa. Saudi Arabia, a major Sunni power, intervened militarily in 2015. The rich Saudi Arabia has a modern, well-equipped military, but the Houthis survived years of pressure, while the war produced enormous humanitarian and political costs. A UN-mediated truce in 2022 significantly reduced the fighting, although it was never turned into a permanent settlement. The current escalation came because the Houthis want Saudi Arabia to remove its blockade of the territories they control. Today, the Houthis are far better trained and equipped, especially with missiles and drones. A direct confrontation, thus, could be prolonged and messy, with both economic and security costs for Saudi Arabia, at a time the Iran situation is anyway volatile and Riyadh would like to prioritise its growth ambitions.

Actors involved

USIsraelIranProxyUN

Sources

  • YasheeBy Yashee

    6 min readNew DelhiUpdated: Sep 18, 2026 07:09 AM IST The fighting between Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis has sharply escalated in the past two weeks, with the militia making their biggest territorial gains in years. On September 10, they captured the strategic Red…

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIranRussiaUkraine
○ 1 source

US President Donald Trump said that Washington could execute another military strike against the Islamic Republic of Iran, referencing prior combat actions amid ongoing regional hostilities, Reuters reported. Speaking at a campaign rally in Florida on Friday, Oct.

23, Trump addressed the armed conflict involving American forces and Tehran, suggesting that further kinetic operations remain an active policy option. JOIN US ON TELEGRAM Follow our coverage of the war on the @Kyivpost_official. “We may do another little Epic Fury,” Trump told supporters, referencing the operational code name associated with US military actions against Iranian assets.

The remarks were delivered during a broader address focused on international security and commercial trade policy ahead of the Nov. 3 US midterm elections. Middle East disruptions Trump’s statements arrive amid persistent transatlantic debate regarding the economic fallout of the conflict in the Middle East, particularly surrounding shipping lanes in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.

In an interview published on Thursday, Oct. 22, on “The Diary of a CEO” podcast, President Volodymyr Zelensky addressed the Trump administration’s foreign policy approach, arguing that energy market volatility stems directly from escalating military engagements in the Middle East rather than Ukrainian defense operations.

Zelensky rejected claims by the US administration asserting that Ukrainian long-range drone interdictions against Russian oil refineries were responsible for driving up domestic US retail diesel benchmarks. Trump Weighs 200% Tariffs on Ukraine and Russia, Doubts Impact “I think it’s wrong and unacceptable that he pins Russia’s aggression and Russia’s killings on me,” Zelensky said, pointing to disruptions across maritime bottlenecks in the Middle East as the primary source of international fuel benchmark pressures.

Zelensky observed that Kyiv had repeatedly proposed a verified, reciprocal suspension of attacks against energy infrastructure, but noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin had refused to formalize a ceasefire. Zelensky argued that criticism directed at Ukraine diverted attention from the structural drivers of inflation tied to Middle Eastern instability.

Moscow-Tehran military cooperation The prospect of expanded US operations against Iran coincides with assessments regarding technical and military cooperation between Moscow and Tehran. Speaking at a joint press conference in Oslo on Tuesday, Oct. 20, alongside Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre and Finnish President Alexander Stubb, Zelensky stated that Ukrainian defense agencies have identified evidence of Russian drone transfers and intelligence assistance provided to Iran.

“I think that Putin helps Iranians and helped, because we saw different details from the drones which Russia delivered to Iran,” Zelensky stated. “I think also they shared with them intelligence, I mean from satellites and other information. This is what we know.

” Responding to questions regarding whether the Kremlin is leveraging its ties with Tehran to influence Washington’s foreign policy calculations, Zelensky emphasized that Moscow has aligned itself with Iranian strategic interests. “I don’t know too much, yes, but I know that Russia stays on the side of Iranians,” Zelensky added.

Ukrainian security authorities previously indicated that Russian electronic warfare units and space-based reconnaissance assets have provided signals intelligence to Iranian command centers, reflecting an expanding axis of bilateral defense cooperation while the US evaluates operational countermeasures across the region.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSRussiaUkraine
○ 1 source

Ukraine and Russia announced a ceasefire agreement for the occupied town of Oleshky, effective October 27, which reportedly facilitates humanitarian aid and evacuations under the coordination of U.S. First Lady Melania Trump. Concurrently, President Zelensky stated that technical-level negotiations involving Ukraine, Russia, and the United States are scheduled for early November in Abu Dhabi, though a U.

S. official indicated the location could alternatively be Switzerland. These developments follow earlier U.S.-mediated talks that concluded in February without achieving a broader resolution to the conflict.

Location: Tyre
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
○ 1 source

US President Donald Trump stated on Friday that a further military operation against Iran, referred to as "Epic Fury," remains a possibility as the conflict approaches its eight-month mark, though he previously indicated no new attacks would occur before the November 3 midterm elections.

The ongoing war, which began with US and Israeli strikes on Iran in late February and has since displaced millions and increased global energy costs, has prompted Iranian officials to report that Tehran has developed detailed plans to target undersea communications cables in the Gulf in the event of renewed hostilities.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy
○ 1 source

President Trump stated at a Florida rally that the US may launch further military action against Iran, describing previous strikes as having "obliterated" the country's nuclear enrichment capacity. Concurrently, the State Department announced staffing reductions at four Middle Eastern embassies, citing security threats, while the Pentagon officially declared the prior "Operation Epic Fury" concluded in May despite ongoing hostilities.

Location: Iran