ردیاب بحران ایران-خلیج فارس ۲۰۲۶
CC
Events Archive
humanitarianMay 29, 2026

Civilians in Lebanon hit hardest as Israel targets Hezbollah

Summary

Civilians in Lebanon hit hardest as Israel targets HezbollahMay 29, 2026 The latest escalation between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah group is exacerbating Lebanon's dire humanitarian situation. "Lebanon is in a state of panic," Kelly Petillo, program manager for Middle East and North Africa at the European Council on Foreign Relations, told DW. "Thirty-one people were killed on the eve of this week's Eid holiday." Lebanon was drawn into the wider Middle East war on March 2, 2026, when Hezbollah fired at Israel two days after the US and Israel attacked Iran. According to Lebanon's Health Ministry, more than 3,213 people have been killed and more than 1 million people remain displaced following nearly three months of Israeli strikes. This week, hopes for an end of the fighting were further dimmed after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Hezbollah's increased use of explosive drones threatens the lives of civilians in Israel's north and "requires of us now to increase the blows, to increase the intensity. We will smite them hip and thigh." Israel has been attacking Hezbollah infrastructure and building up a growing military presence further into southern Lebanon. Hezbollah meanwhile has been targeting Israel's north and Israeli military in Lebanon's south. This current escalation is likely to play a role in the ongoing US-Iran negotiations. The US and Israel view the conflict in Lebanon as separate from peace negotiations with Tehran, while Iranian officials insist on including this front in a deal. "Israel and Hezbollah have entered a very dangerous escalatory cycle," David Wood, a Beirut-based senior analyst for Lebanon at the International Crisis Group, told DW. "If the situation continues along this path, it could have disastrous consequences for Lebanon." Beirut under domestic pressure as well Hezbollah's military wing is classified as a terrorist organization by the US, Germany and many other countries. The Lebanese government under President Joseph Aoun already banned all military action by Hezbollah in March 2026 and continues to push for Hezbollah's disarmament. This was stipulated in the November 2024 ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, which ended more than a year of skirmishes and two months of full-scale war with around 4,000 killed and major destruction in Lebanon. However, tensions and attacks between Israel and Hezbollah continued until the situation escalated again in early March. "Hezbollah feels the net tightening around it on the domestic scene," Wood points out. "Hezbollah sees not only Israel waging a war on it, but also believes that the Lebanese government is waging a confrontation against both the group's military and social institutions." Naim Qassem, the secretary-general of the Iran-backed Hezbollah group in Lebanon, meanwhile warned Beirut that his group would confront any government attempt to shut down the Hezbollah-linked Al-Qard Al-Hassan financial institution. "The people have the right to go down onto the streets and to bring down the government," he said. In regard to the growing Israeli military presence in the country's south, Qassem added that "if this government is incapable of guaranteeing sovereignty, it should go." Sami Halabi, director of policy at the Lebanese think tank The Alternative Policy Institute, says that Hezbollah might indeed believe that another government would serve its interests better. "Hezbollah is now floating the idea of taking down the government through popular revolt," he told DW. In his view, this proposition is a dangerous one, even though "at the moment it is more tongue-in-cheek than anything else." However, he added that this could develop into a more serious option if plans proceeded to disarm Hezbollah by force, rather than through a process. "Disarmament by force would almost certainly lead to civil strife in Lebanon," he warned. Lebanese diplomacy Nominally, also the most recent US-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon that took effect on April 17, 2026, remains in place and was extended by 45 days on May 15, 2026. However, despite being a signatory, the Lebanese government is not a party to the conflict while Hezbollah, on the other hand, did not sign the agreement. In turn, the ceasefire has been fragile with almost daily attacks by Israel and Hezbollah. The situation is also likely to continue until the third round of direct Lebanese-Israeli peace talks in Washington on June 2-3, 2026. Lebanese President Aoun meanwhile defended holding the next round of direct talks between Israel and Lebanon, saying that a permanent peace and his demand for a complete Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon was non-negotiable. "The liberation of the south is a duty borne by the state with the support of its people," Aoun said. However, as David Wood notes, Hezbollah points to developments on the ground as justification for keeping its weapons, arguing that diplomacy is ineffective. Hezbollah has long said that its weapons are necessary to deter Israeli attacks, while critics say the group undermines Lebanese state sovereignty by operating an independent armed force. "While Hezbollah also needs to stand down under any ceasefire agreement, Israel, by intensifying its operations in Lebanon rather than observing the ceasefire, is undermining the Lebanese government's ability to deliver meaningful progress in the talks that are still ongoing in Washington," Wood said. Rising hunger across Lebanon Amid this escalating standoff between the Lebanese government, Hezbollah and Israel, conditions for Lebanon's civilians are becoming increasingly dire. A recent analysisfrom the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) warned that almost one in four people in Lebanon — around 1.24 million — are expected to face acute food insecurity between April and August 2026. The Lebanese Agriculture Ministry also warned that about 22% of agricultural land in affected areas has been damaged, further undermining food production and livelihoods. Furthermore, the United Nations $308.3 million (€264m) Flash Appeal for March to May 2026 secured only 51.3% of the required funding by May 26, 2026, the UN said in a statement this week. In turn, aid agencies warnthat funding shortages are not only forcing humanitarian groups to scale back essential services for Lebanon's population, but also for hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees in the country. "As all water service provision to Syrian refugees will stop as of June 1, 2026, the risk of waterborne disease outbreaks, such as hepatitis A, typhoid and cholera are enormous," Suzanne Takkenberg, regional director for Lebanon at Action Against Hunger, told DW. Edited by: Carla Bleiker

Perspectives

Iranian Official

The Iranian government condemns Israel's relentless aggression against Lebanon, launched in coordination with the United States following their unprovoked strikes on Iran, as a blatant violation of Lebanese sovereignty and a direct assault on regional resistance forces. Hezbollah's defensive operations, responding to this foreign incursion that began on March 2, 2026, have been met with intensified Israeli bombardments that have killed over 3,213 people and displaced more than a million, exacerbating civilian suffering ahead of Eid. Tehran asserts that such expansionist attacks, including threats of further escalation by Netanyahu, will only strengthen the axis of resistance in defense of national independence.

Israeli

Israel confronts an existential threat from Iran's Hezbollah proxy network, whose escalated drone and rocket barrages on northern communities since March 2026 have already forced mass evacuations and require decisive defensive strikes on launch infrastructure in southern Lebanon. Netanyahu has made clear that Hezbollah's expanding attacks, launched in coordination with Tehran, leave Israel no choice but to intensify operations to restore security for its citizens.

Neutral

On March 2, 2026, Hezbollah fired at Israel two days after US and Israeli strikes on Iran, initiating exchanges in which Israeli forces have targeted Hezbollah infrastructure in southern Lebanon and Hezbollah has struck northern Israel and Israeli positions in Lebanon. Lebanon's Health Ministry has reported more than 3,213 deaths and over 1 million people displaced after nearly three months of strikes. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that Hezbollah's use of explosive drones requires increased operations, while US and Israeli officials have described the Lebanon conflict as separate from negotiations with Iran.

Western

Israel's precision strikes on Hezbollah infrastructure and command nodes in southern Lebanon aim to neutralize the Iran-backed group's escalating rocket and explosive drone threats to northern Israeli civilians and military positions. These operations respond to Hezbollah's initiation of cross-border attacks following the US-Israel campaign against Iran, with Netanyahu underscoring the need to intensify efforts against the group's military capabilities. While the fighting has displaced over a million Lebanese and caused significant casualties, the focus remains on degrading Hezbollah's operational capacity amid stalled regional de-escalation efforts.

Pro-Peace

The latest Israeli strikes on Hezbollah targets have devastated Lebanese civilians, killing over 3,213 people—including 31 on the eve of Eid—and displacing more than a million amid widespread panic and infrastructure collapse. This escalation, triggered by cross-border exchanges following the US and Israeli attacks on Iran, has deepened Lebanon's humanitarian crisis with no end in sight as both sides intensify operations. Renewed diplomatic efforts through US-Iran negotiations offer the only viable path to halt the suffering and prevent further civilian losses on all sides.

Global South

Lebanon's sovereignty has been further undermined by Israeli incursions deep into its southern territory, framed as strikes on Hezbollah but resulting in over 3,213 deaths and one million displaced since the March 2026 escalation triggered by US-Israel actions against Iran. This conflict reflects classic neo-colonial dynamics, with external powers—Washington, Tel Aviv, and Tehran—using Lebanese soil as a proxy arena while disregarding Beirut's autonomy. Lebanon's fractured institutions and the impotence of international bodies have left civilians bearing the brunt, exposing the limits of a state unable to assert control amid great-power rivalries.

Actors involved

IsraelProxy

Sources

  • currentsapi(Mixed)By Jennifer Holleis

    Civilians in Lebanon hit hardest as Israel targets HezbollahMay 29, 2026 The latest escalation between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah group is exacerbating Lebanon's dire humanitarian situation. "Lebanon is in a state of panic," Kelly Petillo, program manager for Middle Eas

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

humanitarianUnverifiedUSIsraelIranRussiaChina
1 source

Tuesday, June 16, 2026 75° Today's Paper Today Already a Honolulu Star-Advertiser subscriber? Log in now to continue reading. From as low as $12.95 /mo. A recent comprehensive global survey study of tens of thousands of people in nearly 100 countries found the vast majority see the United States as the biggest threat to the world.

At the same time, more nations say they prefer China over the U.S. China’s approval rating has risen dramatically in the Global South, where support for the U.S. has plummeted. These were the results of the 2026 Democracy Perception Index, an annual study conducted by a group called the Alliance of Democracies.

The survey asked 23,968 respondents in 84 countries which nation they consider to be “the biggest threat to the world.” Most people in 65 out of 84 countries said the United States is the largest danger. Another 10 countries (almost all in Europe) said Russia is the biggest threat.

Seven (in West Asia and North Africa) said Israel. Israel said Iran. Japan said China. Trevor Tyler Halawa Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It's FREE! EXPRESS YOURSELF The Honolulu Star-Advertiser welcomes all opinions.

Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor. >> Write us: We welcome letters up to 150 words, and guest columns of 500-600 words. We reserve the right to edit for clarity and length. Include your name, address and daytime phone number.

>> Mail: Letters to the Editor, Honolulu Star-Advertiser 7 Waterfront Plaza, 500 Ala Moana, Suite #7-500 Honolulu, HI 96813 >> Contact: 529-4831 (phone), [email protected], staradvertiser.

humanitarianUnverifiedUSIsraelIranRussiaChina
1 source

“We want them [Iran] to behave like a normal country,” said US Vice President JD Vance regarding the US-Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU) during a Monday night interview with CBS News. Vance explained that if Tehran complies with the points outlined in the MoU, including giving up its stockpile of enriched uranium, stopping funding to terrorist organizations, and making the country investible, then “benefits will float to them.

” Uranium stockpile at center of deal The most important thing to focus on, said Vance, is the enriched uranium, which, according to the MoU, would be destroyed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the US. “We want them to have a successful country, but only if they do what's necessary to commit long-term to not building a nuclear weapon,” said Vance.

Vance rejects Obama comparison In a video shown to Vance by the CBS interviewer, former US President Barack Obama is seen saying that any agreement that arises between the US and Iran is “not going to be significantly different, or a significant improvement from the deal that we had in the first place and that we had worked for for a long stretch of time.

” Vance responded that Obama’s claims are “fundamentally not right.” “If you go back to the Obama JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), what it did was it took an Iranian nuclear program that it accelerated. It basically bribed the Iranians to stop that program.

The JCPOA was an Obama-led multilateral agreement between Iran and the US, UK, France, China, Russia, and Germany to limit Iran’s nuclear development. Vance argued that Trump’s administration is in a different position. “The Iranian nuclear program has been completely destroyed, and what we’re saying is: make the long-term commitment to not rebuild it, and you will get the benefits that come with that.

” Vance addresses Israeli concerns The vice president also noted that the Gulf States, whom he claims have been threatened by the Iranian regime for 47 years, “hated the JCPOA because they felt that it empowered Iran to be a bad regional actor.” The same countries, argued Vance, have called Trump’s plan “amazing because it transforms the Middle East in a way that makes them more peaceful and more prosperous.

” When asked about Israeli involvement in the MoU, Vance responded that it is normal for close allies to have disagreements. “What we know,” he said, “is that this agreement is going to make Israel safer, going to make the entire region safer. We feel quite confident that the Israelis are going to be brought in on this agreement once we get a little further down the road.

Location: Jerusalem
humanitarianPartialIsraelUN
1 source

The United Nations Secretary-General has issued a statement condemning Israel's decision to establish military facilities at a UN Relief and Works Agency compound for Palestinian refugees. The statement characterizes the move in the strongest terms.

No additional details on the specific location or verification of the facilities have been released.