ConflictClarifier

ردیاب بحران ایران-خلیج فارس ۲۰۲۶
CC
Events Archive
strikeAug 24, 2026

Granate Kim: End the use of AI in warfare

Summary

The world’s militaries are locked in an arms race to develop the use of artificial intelligence in warfare. They’ve been at it for more than a decade — despite calls from civil society and AI experts to ban its use in military operations, given the devastation that inaccurate AI targeting can cause. In Gaza, AI has helped accelerate the death toll to more than 72,000 people. In Iran, a U.S. airstrike on the first day of the war killed between 175 and 180 people, mostly girls between the ages of 7 and 12. The strike was said to be AI-assisted, with outdated intelligence data and human error playing pivotal roles. The Pentagon is ignoring such red flags over the use of AI to identify targets, direct drones and analyze battlefields. In July, the U.S. military tested an AI-operated drone controlled entirely by its own onboard software, with no human pilot or remote operator involved. The International Committee of the Red Cross has called for new rules and restrictions seeking to reduce the harm this emerging technology can cause. Concerns around AI’s growing role in war have also spurred resistance efforts from tech workers, policymakers and other human rights organizations. But we need to do a lot more, because the use of AI in war is the most harmful use of this technology. Heidy Khlaaf, chief AI scientist at the AI Now Institute, a New York-based nonprofit that produces policy recommendations, has argued, as the Washington Post put it in a 2024 article, that “AI systems have built-in inaccuracies that make them inappropriate for a life-and-death context such as war.” In late July, the institute and the transparency watchdog Airwars released “Anatomy of a Kill Chain,” a powerful visualization of how “cascading errors” in data and AI analysis can wrongfully bring death and destruction to large numbers of civilians. The Washington Post investigation into Israel’s use of AI revealed how the military dangerously relaxed its oversight of AI use when bombing Gaza. Its normal rules mandated two pieces of human intelligence to validate, but at the outset of the war, the rule was dropped to require only one. And, astonishingly, at times the only corroboration required was that the target be male. The American public is broadly in agreement about opposing the use of AI in war. According to polling last spring by Public Citizen, three-quarters of respondents feel AI technology isn’t reliable enough to be trusted with life-or-death military decisions. More than 200 organizations and individuals are now calling on governments and companies to halt the use of AI systems in the military “kill chain.” MPower Change’s recently launched No AI for War campaign compiles actions that everyday people can take to advocate for the ethical use of AI technologies, like petitioning Congress to ban autonomous weapons and pressuring big tech companies to end defense contracts that supply cloud computing and predictive AI. We’re at a critical moment, when the actions being taken by tech companies and governments may decide the fate of humanity. Governments must end the use of AI in military targeting and create meaningful oversight of its other military uses. Companies must stop selling AI technologies and services for use in military targeting, autonomous weapons systems and mass surveillance.

Actors involved

USIsraelIran

Sources

  • Granate KimBy Granate Kim

    The world’s militaries are locked in an arms race to develop the use of artificial intelligence in warfare. They’ve been at it for more than a decade — despite calls from civil society and AI experts to ban its use in military operations, given the devastation that inaccurate AI

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIranRussiaChina
1 source

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced a new initiative, "Operation Economic Outcast," that would impose expanded secondary sanctions on foreign entities conducting business with Iran, particularly in sectors such as digital assets, technology, and shipping.

U.S. officials described the measures as a primary pressure tool during the current diplomatic standstill, with Bessent stating that the administration lacks a specific compliance deadline and emphasized that no country, including China, would be exempt from the sanctions.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSRussiaUkraine
1 source

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced in Kyiv that the U.K. will share classified technical specifications for SCALP missile components with Ukraine to facilitate domestic assembly by defense firm MBDA. However, experts have cautioned that this measure may not immediately address Ukraine's pressing operational needs or result in a rapid increase in functional missile production.

Location: London
strikeUnverifiedUSIranRussiaUkraine
1 source

Pouyanne said TotalEnergies was benefiting from the sharp discounts offered by Middle Eastern crude producers, with oil being sold at $50-$60 a barrel, significantly below Brent crude prices, which were trading above $90 a barrel on Monday. The discounts were helping offset the sharply higher cost of transporting cargoes through the Strait of Hormuz, he said.

Also read: Fewer than 20 ships cross Strait of Hormuz over weekend as US-Iran blockades choke key oil route The additional freight costs for a supertanker are almost about $10 a barrel, he said. “Crude oil is sold to you at $50, $60 per barrel, not the Brent price, because the producers are desperate to push their oil into the market,” Pouyanne said.

The French petrochem giant is one of the largest traders of oil from Iraq and Qatar, two nations that have continued to move barrels through Hormuz in recent weeks, TotalEnergies boss added. A growing number of producers are moving cargoes through the critical waterway, which accounted for about a fifth of global oil flows before the Iran war.

These shipments have helped keep global oil prices from rising sharply beyond $100 a barrel, while also creating lucrative trading opportunities for shipowners and intermediaries. While some cargoes are transported directly to refineries worldwide, others are first loaded onto vessels in the Gulf of Oman before being shipped to their final destinations.

Pouyanne said the crude and fuel markets are increasingly diverging. Crude markets remain bearish, partly due to continued flows through the Strait of Hormuz, while fuel markets remain tight. Prices of products such as gasoline and diesel have risen following Ukrainian attacks on Russian refineries, while the predominance of crude shipments through Hormuz has further constrained fuel supplies.

Also read: Iran threatens 45 tankers with fines, confiscation in Hormuz escalation However, he said the economics were far less favourable for refined petroleum products. Smaller product tankers meant that transportation costs could add as much as $50 a barrel, making shipments commercially unviable.

As a result, refined products such as gasoline and diesel are largely not being transported through the Strait of Hormuz, creating supply shortages and contributing to the divergence between crude and refined fuel markets, Pouyanne said. Despite the profitability of moving crude through the strait, TotalEnergies continues to pursue alternative export routes from the Middle East.

The company plans to become a partner in a proposed pipeline linking Baghdad to Syria and also intends to invest in expanding pipeline infrastructure in the UAE, Pouyanne said. He said TotalEnergies would invest in doubling the capacity of the Fujairah pipeline, which connects Abu Dhabi's oil fields to the UAE's eastern coast, allowing crude exports to bypass the Strait of Hormuz.

The existing Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline, also known as the Habshan-Fujairah pipeline, has a capacity of up to 1.8 million barrels per day and has become increasingly important as the UAE seeks to maximise oil exports from the Gulf of Oman coast. The UAE aims to double this export capacity by next year.

Also read: Strikes in the Gulf changing rules behind India’s big-money bets Iran threatens tankers with fines, confiscationThe Iranian authorities blacklisted 45 tankers that had broken its rules for crossing the Strait of Hormuz, and would take action against any vessels transferring loads with them, escalating its threats over the key waterway six months into the war.

The named vessels could be fined, detained and have their cargoes confiscated, according to an X post from the Persian Gulf Strait Authority, a new body set up by Iran to manage the strait. The restricted list of vessels includes very large crude carriers, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) tankers, and clean product vessels, among others.

Location: Strait of Hormuz