ردیاب بحران ایران-خلیج فارس ۲۰۲۶
CC
Events Archive
humanitarianMar 30, 2026

‘No Kings’ Rallies — Paid For By A King

Summary

Eight million people just took to the streets to stop a king who does not exist. They say they are protesting tyranny. But if you look at who’s actually holding the megaphone — and more importantly, who’s signing the checks — this grassroots movement starts looking a lot less grassroots and a lot more like a sophisticated and coordinated operation by Hollywood elites and radical activists having public meltdowns demanding labor militancy. The real story isn’t the useful idiots on the streets. It’s the apparent $3 billion web of funding tied to a tech tycoon living in Shanghai and a wedding-turned-mysterious summit in Jamaica. Who are these shadowy figures funding the chaos? Why are America’s enemies cheering from the sidelines? These people are not turning out because they suddenly oppose centralized government. You think Democrats are anti-centralized government? Against a bigger federal government run by the executive branch? No way. Presidents Obama and Biden radically expanded the power of the executive branch. Funny, there were no protests then. They’re also not turning out in the streets because they oppose an intervention such as what’s going on in Iran or because they oppose tyrants. They were fine with Barack Obama’s interventions in Libya, Syria, and in the drone wars. They were totally fine with Joe Biden’s funding of the war in Ukraine. They’re not anti-tyranny, the “No Kings” people; they’re perfectly pro-tyranny in foreign countries, and they tolerate their friends’ tyranny at home. We all know the real reason: A lot of people hate President Trump, and they hate the American system. How do they get this many people organized? A lot of money. Where exactly is that money coming from? Fox News reported: A network of about 500 groups with an estimated $3 billion in combined annual revenues is behind the coordinated nationwide “No Kings” protest Saturday, including communist groups who are using the day to call for a “revolution,” according to a Fox Digital News investigation. According to a copy of the permit for the “flagship” march in St. Paul, Minn., Indivisible, a national well-heeled Democratic political advocacy organization funded by billionaire George Soros, is the lead coordinator for the protest. But Fox News Digital has also identified key participation by a network of radical socialist and communist organizations funded by Neville Roy Singham, an American tech tycoon and avowed communist living in China. Over nearly a decade, Singham has financed a constellation of activist institutions that promote revolutionary socialist politics and frequently collaborate in protest campaigns, including the People’s Forum in New York, the Party for Socialism and Liberation, the ANSWER Coalition and CodePink, whose co-founder Jodie Evans is married to Singham. These groups work closely with the Freedom Road Socialist Organization. So there’s a communist living in China who is funneling hundreds of millions of dollars into various protest groups. Fox News also noted: As far-left American activists flood Cuba to support its flailing communist regime, U.S. officials have opened a sprawling investigation into an anti-America, pro-China nonprofit network forged during a wedding celebration in late February 2017, off Runaway Bay on Jamaica’s northern coast. There, beneath a canopy of palm trees, an elite cadre of activists, intellectuals, celebrities, political organizers and comrades in a global Marxist-Leninist-Maoist movement assembled to celebrate the “Revolutionary Love” of two luminaries, both 62 at the time: Neville Roy Singham, an American-born tech tycoon living in Shanghai, and Jodie Evans, a red-haired veteran activist and co-founder of CodePink Women for Peace. Like the opening scene of “The Godfather,” where powerful families consolidate power, the wedding celebration was about much more than the union of two people. Over four days of dancing, lectures and late-night conversations in venues from the Flavor Beach Bar to Sharkey’s Seafood, celebrating the bond of “Roy and Jodie,” alliances were formed that would shape protests, unrest and political agitation over the next decade, from the fiery 2020 scenes in Minneapolis to demonstrations today supporting the regimes in Cuba and Iran. Apparently, Singham has pushed some $278 million into organizations that sow discord in the United States. None of these protests are innocent. They are not happening by accident. It takes an awful lot of money to make this magic happen. Singham said in 2025: “If we want to therefore have a new world order that is based on multilateralism that President XI and CPC and China have proposed, we have to undo the ideological damage that has been done by the narrative of World War II. … China has a very important role, and we in this forum have a very important role, that to envision a new multi-polarity order requires that, quite frankly, this deconstruction or restoration, a history of what really happened.” He said there should be a multipolar world order with China and Russia as leading forces and that we need to rewrite the history of World War II in order to achieve this new world order. Outside forces are trying to destroy America — and President Trump. And it’s our job to make sure that does not happen.

Actors involved

Other

Sources

  • Ben ShapiroBy Ben Shapiro

    Eight million people just took to the streets to stop a king who does not exist. They say they are protesting tyranny. But if you look at who’s actually holding the megaphone — and more importantly, who’s signing the checks — this grassroots movement starts looking a lot less gra

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

humanitarianUnverifiedUSIsraelIranRussiaChina
1 source

Tuesday, June 16, 2026 75° Today's Paper Today Already a Honolulu Star-Advertiser subscriber? Log in now to continue reading. From as low as $12.95 /mo. A recent comprehensive global survey study of tens of thousands of people in nearly 100 countries found the vast majority see the United States as the biggest threat to the world.

At the same time, more nations say they prefer China over the U.S. China’s approval rating has risen dramatically in the Global South, where support for the U.S. has plummeted. These were the results of the 2026 Democracy Perception Index, an annual study conducted by a group called the Alliance of Democracies.

The survey asked 23,968 respondents in 84 countries which nation they consider to be “the biggest threat to the world.” Most people in 65 out of 84 countries said the United States is the largest danger. Another 10 countries (almost all in Europe) said Russia is the biggest threat.

Seven (in West Asia and North Africa) said Israel. Israel said Iran. Japan said China. Trevor Tyler Halawa Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It's FREE! EXPRESS YOURSELF The Honolulu Star-Advertiser welcomes all opinions.

Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor. >> Write us: We welcome letters up to 150 words, and guest columns of 500-600 words. We reserve the right to edit for clarity and length. Include your name, address and daytime phone number.

>> Mail: Letters to the Editor, Honolulu Star-Advertiser 7 Waterfront Plaza, 500 Ala Moana, Suite #7-500 Honolulu, HI 96813 >> Contact: 529-4831 (phone), [email protected], staradvertiser.

humanitarianUnverifiedUSIsraelIranRussiaChina
1 source

“We want them [Iran] to behave like a normal country,” said US Vice President JD Vance regarding the US-Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU) during a Monday night interview with CBS News. Vance explained that if Tehran complies with the points outlined in the MoU, including giving up its stockpile of enriched uranium, stopping funding to terrorist organizations, and making the country investible, then “benefits will float to them.

” Uranium stockpile at center of deal The most important thing to focus on, said Vance, is the enriched uranium, which, according to the MoU, would be destroyed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the US. “We want them to have a successful country, but only if they do what's necessary to commit long-term to not building a nuclear weapon,” said Vance.

Vance rejects Obama comparison In a video shown to Vance by the CBS interviewer, former US President Barack Obama is seen saying that any agreement that arises between the US and Iran is “not going to be significantly different, or a significant improvement from the deal that we had in the first place and that we had worked for for a long stretch of time.

” Vance responded that Obama’s claims are “fundamentally not right.” “If you go back to the Obama JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), what it did was it took an Iranian nuclear program that it accelerated. It basically bribed the Iranians to stop that program.

The JCPOA was an Obama-led multilateral agreement between Iran and the US, UK, France, China, Russia, and Germany to limit Iran’s nuclear development. Vance argued that Trump’s administration is in a different position. “The Iranian nuclear program has been completely destroyed, and what we’re saying is: make the long-term commitment to not rebuild it, and you will get the benefits that come with that.

” Vance addresses Israeli concerns The vice president also noted that the Gulf States, whom he claims have been threatened by the Iranian regime for 47 years, “hated the JCPOA because they felt that it empowered Iran to be a bad regional actor.” The same countries, argued Vance, have called Trump’s plan “amazing because it transforms the Middle East in a way that makes them more peaceful and more prosperous.

” When asked about Israeli involvement in the MoU, Vance responded that it is normal for close allies to have disagreements. “What we know,” he said, “is that this agreement is going to make Israel safer, going to make the entire region safer. We feel quite confident that the Israelis are going to be brought in on this agreement once we get a little further down the road.

Location: Jerusalem
humanitarianUnverifiedIsraelProxy
1 source

On March 2, 2026, Hezbollah fired at Israel two days after US and Israeli strikes on Iran, initiating exchanges in which Israeli forces have targeted Hezbollah infrastructure in southern Lebanon and Hezbollah has struck northern Israel and Israeli positions in Lebanon.

Lebanon's Health Ministry has reported more than 3,213 deaths and over 1 million people displaced after nearly three months of strikes. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that Hezbollah's use of explosive drones requires increased operations, while US and Israeli officials have described the Lebanon conflict as separate from negotiations with Iran.

Location: Tehran