ConflictClarifier

ردیاب بحران ایران-خلیج فارس ۲۰۲۶
CC
Events Archive
strikeMay 16, 2026

Operation Epic Fury 2.0 soon? US planning renewed strikes on Iran after China visit

Summary

Operation Epic Fury 2.0 soon? US planning renewed strikes on Iran after China visit However, Donald Trump faces a difficult political calculation ahead of the mid-term polls in November. The war is increasingly unpopular, and its financial cost is being felt by ordinary Americans. Allies have been pressing Trump to reach a compromise that would prompt Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and allow him to declare victory. With peace talks in limbo, US officials have drawn up plans to restart military strikes against Iran, The New York Times reported on Friday. The renewed push for a military solution comes after US President Donald Trump completed his two-day visit to China, where he is reported to have discussed the Iran war and the ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz — the primary flashpoints in the standoff. Aides told the publication that Trump is yet to decide on resuming strikes, which have been paused since a ceasefire was announced on April 7. Trump has been rejecting Iran's peace proposals, arguing they fall short of meeting US demands — no nuclear weapons for Iran and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. He reiterated his position while returning to Washington DC aboard Air Force One. However, Trump faces a difficult political calculation ahead of the mid-term polls in November. The war is increasingly unpopular, and its financial cost is being felt by ordinary Americans. Allies have been pressing Trump to reach a compromise that would prompt Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and allow him to declare victory. PREPARATIONS FOR OPERATION EPIC FURY 2.0 The prospects of a renewed offensive continue to loom large as the US has yet to achieve its primary goal of denuclearising Iran. The New York Times report noted that the Pentagon is planning for Operation Epic Fury 2.0 in the coming days. "We have a plan to escalate if necessary," Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers during congressional testimony this week. Two Middle East officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, told the publication that the United States and Israel are engaged in intense preparations for a possible resumption of attacks against Iran as early as next week. "They're either going to make a deal or they're going to be decimated. So, one way or another, we win," Trump said on Tuesday before departing for China. OPTIONS BEFORE PRESIDENT TRUMP US officials told the publication that Iranian military and infrastructure targets could be hit with greater force if Trump decides to resume strikes. Trump had previously vowed to target Iran's civilian infrastructure before the ceasefire — a threat widely condemned as a potential war crime. A second option would place Special Operations troops on the ground to pursue nuclear material buried deep underground. However, such an operation would entail thousands of support troops, raising the risk of direct engagement with Iranian forces and significant casualties. A third option involves using troops to seize Kharg Island, a major hub of Iranian oil exports. But holding the island would require a substantially larger ground presence, significantly escalating both the conflict and its cost. IRAN READY FOR CONFLICT Meanwhile, Iranian officials have signalled they are prepared for a return to hostilities. "Our armed forces are ready to deliver a well-deserved response to any aggression; mistaken strategy and mistaken decisions will always lead to mistaken results," Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the speaker of Iran's Parliament, posted on social media on Monday. "We are prepared for all options; they will be surprised," added Ghalibaf, who has emerged as a key negotiator for Iran. According to intelligence assessments, Iran has reportedly re-established operational access to most of its missile infrastructure, including launch sites and underground facilities. Officials say it has regained control of 30 out of 33 missile sites located along the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime chokepoint. The sites are considered capable of posing a threat to naval vessels and commercial tankers passing through the narrow waterway, which carries a significant share of global oil trade.

Perspectives

Iranian Official

The Iranian government condemns US plans for renewed strikes as blatant foreign aggression targeting its sovereignty, following Trump's China visit and rejection of Tehran's peace offers on nuclear issues and the Strait of Hormuz. Iran stands firm in resistance, defending its right to control strategic waterways and reject external dictates despite the paused ceasefire since April 7. This aggression highlights Washington's futile attempts to impose its will amid mounting US domestic costs.

Israeli

From an Israeli security standpoint, renewed US strikes on Iran remain essential to counter Tehran's existential nuclear threat and its expanding proxy network—including Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Hamas—that has encircled the Jewish state with sustained attacks. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz and stalled peace talks underscore Iran's refusal to abandon its aggressive posture, making any pause in military pressure a dangerous concession that endangers Israel's survival. While domestic US politics may delay action, defensive necessity demands coordinated steps to neutralize these multi-front threats before they escalate further.

Neutral

According to a report by The New York Times, US officials have prepared plans for renewed military strikes on Iran, which have remained paused since a ceasefire announced on April 7. The reported planning follows President Donald Trump’s two-day visit to China, during which discussions reportedly addressed the Iran conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Trump has rejected Iranian proposals that do not meet US conditions on nuclear weapons and reopening the strait, while facing domestic political considerations ahead of November mid-term elections.

Western

US officials are advancing contingency plans for precision strikes on Iranian targets to neutralize threats to freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz and enforce non-proliferation objectives following President Trump's China discussions. These targeted operations would address Tehran's failure to meet core demands after the April ceasefire, prioritizing strategic deterrence over stalled diplomacy. The approach balances alliance pressure for de-escalation with the need to secure vital energy routes amid ongoing Iranian non-compliance.

Pro-Peace

US plans for renewed strikes on Iran risk inflicting heavy civilian casualties and deepening the humanitarian toll on Iranian families already enduring economic hardship from the Strait of Hormuz closure and years of conflict. With peace talks stalled, allies continue pressing for diplomatic compromises that could reopen the waterway and allow both sides to step back from escalation, yet Trump has rejected Iranian proposals. As the war's costs mount for ordinary Americans ahead of midterms, renewed military action would only compound suffering rather than resolve the standoff.

Global South

US plans for renewed strikes on Iran after Trump's China visit represent classic neo-colonial interference, disregarding Iranian sovereignty over its nuclear program and the Strait of Hormuz while prioritizing American dominance. International institutions have failed to restrain such unilateral aggression, leaving Global South nations vulnerable to energy disruptions and economic fallout from prolonged conflict. Trump's domestic political calculations ahead of midterms underscore how US militarism externalizes costs onto non-aligned regions, even as allies push for face-saving compromises.

Actors involved

USIsraelIranChina

Sources

  • India Today World DeskBy India Today World Desk

    Operation Epic Fury 2.0 soon? US planning renewed strikes on Iran after China visit However, Donald Trump faces a difficult political calculation ahead of the mid-term polls in November. The war is increasingly unpopular, and its financial cost is being felt by ordinary Americans

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIranRussiaChina
1 source

According to the semi-official Mehr News Agency, more than 3,700 cargo trucks are reportedly stalled at Iran’s borders with Turkey and Pakistan, with truckers alleging delays of up to 20 days amidst extreme heat and logistical shortages. Coinciding with a reported nearly 30% decline in non-oil exports to $15 billion, these trade disruptions occur against the backdrop of a US naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and recent cross-border attacks affecting Iraq-Saudi Arabia pipeline operations.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxyUN
1 source

Pakistan’s Defence Minister stated that the country is prepared to activate the Mecca defence pact with Saudi Arabia and Turkey amid intensifying Houthi attacks on the kingdom. While Islamabad emphasized its commitment to protecting Saudi Arabia and its holy cities, Houthi officials disputed claims of targeting Mecca, asserting that their operations are limited to Saudi oil facilities and military bases.

Location: Mecca
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxyChina
1 source

Analyst Mark Almond argues that Houthi drone strikes on Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline and Red Sea shipping routes pose a significant threat to global supply chains. While the Houthis state they are targeting only Saudi forces and their proxies, the article notes that confidence in this limitation is currently low.

Location: Strait of Hormuz
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUN
1 source

A UN fact-finding mission reported having reasonable grounds to believe U.S. forces conducted strikes on a school in Iran that officials said killed more than 150 people, while also alleging Iranian authorities committed crimes against humanity during recent protests.

The report is being submitted to the UN Human Rights Council, and while U.S. officials stated their operations complied with the law of armed conflict, Iran has rejected allegations of systematic rights violations.

Location: Iran