strikeMay 12, 2026

OPINION | The Iran conflict shifts to a high-stakes battle for control over Hormuz

Summary

The Strait of Hormuz has emerged as the central battleground of the Iran conflict. The passage of a handful of oil and gas tankers in recent days, apparently with Tehran’s consent, hints at tacit acceptance of its control. This foreshadows a more dangerous phase in what is fast turning into a Hormuz war. Tehran’s near-complete closure of the vital trade artery since the joint Israeli-US airstrikes on February 28 and the reciprocal US naval blockade imposed last month have sent shockwaves through global energy markets. Countries, particularly in Asia, have struggled with the sudden loss of more than 13 per cent of global oil supply and roughly a fifth of liquefied natural gas flows. Thus, many welcomed the news that three very large crude carriers (VLCC), each hauling around two million barrels of Iraqi oil headed for Asia, slipped through last week with their tracking systems switched off, according to Kpler shipping data, with some indications the transits were coordinated with Tehran. Qatar also shipped its first two LNG cargoes since the war began. The LNG is being sold to Pakistan - the primary mediator in US-Iran negotiations - under a government-to-government deal, according to sources familiar with the matter. They said Iran had approved the shipment to help build confidence with Qatar and Pakistan. There are also signs that other vessels, including oil tankers, have transited the strait in recent weeks with their transponders switched off. It remains unclear whether those passages were sanctioned by Iran or whether shipowners paid informal tolls to secure safe passage. Several, however, appeared to have travelled along shipping lanes close to Iran's coastline. While this trickle of cargoes offers badly needed relief to import-dependent economies, it is not a signal that the global energy system is returning to normal – quite the opposite. The movements represent a mere fraction of the roughly 140 vessels that crossed Hormuz daily before the conflict, meaning global markets remain tight and vulnerable. More importantly, they point to an emerging new order. Iran is beginning to dictate not whether Hormuz is open or closed, but who gets to use it - an arrangement that could outlast the current conflict and sow the seeds of the next. Persian Gulf exporters like Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain and Iraq - whose economies depend on the unhindered flow of hydrocarbons - will be alarmed by any system in which Tehran determines which cargoes reach global markets and on what terms. Buyers will be equally uneasy. Asian importers, already reeling from supply disruptions, will likely resist any framework that gives Tehran a direct lever over their energy security and economic stability. Above all, the US is unlikely to tolerate a settlement that cedes Tehran such sweeping political and economic leverage. President Donald Trump has insisted that transit return to its pre-war status as a condition for any permanent ceasefire. Allowing Iran to manage access to the strait would undermine Washington’s stated war aims and make any claim of victory hollow. Iran, for its part, will not be eager to relinquish its control over the chokepoint – and, by extension, the global economy. It is by far Tehran's most powerful weapon. With the US blockade having reportedly cost Iran roughly $3 billion so far, it will also need the revenue that selective transit fees can generate. The logic points to a bleak conclusion. If this selective, Iran-mediated transit pattern becomes entrenched, it risks hardening into a new normal that may persist even if a ceasefire is hammered out. Tehran may agree to reopen the strait to secure US concessions, but restoring full, unconditional freedom of navigation looks unlikely. Such a stasis would be inherently unstable - institutionalising disruption rather than resolving it. Renewed confrontation between Tehran and Washington - and potentially with gulf states - would become increasingly likely, as all sides tested the limits of who controls the flow of energy through the strait. US war aims have shifted repeatedly in recent months. Yet the conflict has essentially coalesced around a single defining question: who controls the Strait of Hormuz? That answer will likely shape the future of the gulf. (Reporting by Ron Bousso; Editing by Marguerita Choy)

Perspectives

Iranian Official

The Islamic Republic of Iran has asserted its sovereign control over the Strait of Hormuz in legitimate defense against foreign aggression, closing the vital artery following the joint Israeli-US airstrikes of February 28 and the unlawful US naval blockade. This act of resistance has exposed the vulnerability of global energy supplies to such provocations. Selective transits by certain tankers, approved by Tehran, reflect Iran's measured exercise of authority rather than any concession to external pressure.

Israeli

Iran's near-total closure of the Strait of Hormuz after joint Israeli-US defensive strikes on February 28 exposes Tehran's strategy of leveraging proxy networks and maritime control to choke global energy supplies, directly threatening Israel's survival amid existential Iranian aggression. Selective tanker transits coordinated with Tehran, including Iraqi oil and Qatari LNG routed via Pakistan, reveal manipulative tactics to sustain pressure while evading accountability. These developments underscore the necessity of sustained Israeli actions to neutralize Iran's expanding threats.

Neutral

Reports indicate that tanker transits through the Strait of Hormuz have included three VLCCs carrying Iraqi crude to Asia last week, with tracking systems disabled according to Kpler data, as well as initial Qatari LNG shipments to Pakistan under a government-to-government arrangement. Iranian approval for these movements has been cited by unnamed sources as a confidence-building measure, though such coordination remains unverified. These transits occurred amid restrictions on the strait following Israeli-US airstrikes on February 28 and a subsequent US naval blockade, which have reduced global oil and LNG flows.

Western

The Strait of Hormuz has become the focal point of efforts to neutralize Iranian threats to global energy transit following joint US-Israeli precision strikes on February 28 and the subsequent naval blockade. Limited transits by VLCCs carrying Iraqi crude and Qatari LNG shipments to Pakistan, executed with disabled transponders, reflect Tehran’s constrained concessions under sustained pressure to reopen the vital artery. These operations prioritize strategic objectives of securing maritime access and mitigating the disruption of over 13% of global oil and 20% of LNG supplies.

Pro-Peace

The US-Israeli airstrikes and subsequent naval blockade have triggered a near-total closure of the Strait of Hormuz, slashing global oil and LNG supplies and inflicting severe energy shortages on civilians across Asia, where households and essential services face rising costs and potential blackouts. These military moves risk further escalation and humanitarian fallout, even as limited tanker transits and Qatar’s LNG shipments to Pakistan—facilitated with Iranian approval—signal tentative confidence-building. Such steps underscore the urgent need for sustained diplomatic mediation by Pakistan and others to avert wider suffering and restore safe passage without violence.

Global South

Iran’s sovereign assertion of control over the Strait of Hormuz, in response to joint Israeli-US airstrikes and a subsequent American naval blockade, exposes the neo-colonial pattern of Western powers weaponizing energy routes against the Global South. The resulting cutoff of over 13% of global oil and a fifth of LNG flows has inflicted acute hardship on Asian economies, while selective tanker transits—including Iraqi crude to Asia and Qatari LNG routed via Pakistan—reveal how Tehran navigates these pressures through bilateral understandings rather than deference to ineffective multilateral institutions. Such dynamics underscore the failure of global governance to shield developing nations from externally imposed supply shocks.

Actors involved

USIsraelIran

Sources

ReutersBy Reuters
The Strait of Hormuz has emerged as the central battleground of the Iran conflict. The passage of a handful of oil and gas tankers in recent days, apparently with Tehran’s consent, hints at tacit acceptance of its control. This foreshadows a more dangerous phase in what is fast t…

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

Jul 21, 2026strikeUnverifiedUSIranRussiaChina

How the US-Iran conflict has thrown India’s Chabahar plans into doubt

○ 1 source

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth posted social media images showing damage to a maritime control tower at Iran’s Chabahar port following reported US military strikes, accompanied by the caption “Iran does not control the Strait of Hormuz.” India’s Ministry of External Affairs stated that the Shahid Beheshti terminal operated by India at the port sustained no damage.

The ministry reiterated its position that civilian infrastructure should not be targeted during conflicts.

Location: Iran

Divya A

Jul 21, 2026strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy

U.S. strikes Iran and Houthis threaten Saudi Arabia shipping as mediators push 10-day ceasefire

○ 1 source

U.S. strikes Iran and Houthis threaten Saudi Arabia shipping as mediators push 10-day ceasefire - The U.S. has carried out its tenth consecutive evening of attacks against Iran. - Iran attacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz early Tuesday, while Houthi militants in Yemen declared a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia.

- Rystad Energy has warned about the risk of a significant rebound in oil prices. The U.S. completed a fresh round of strikes against Iran on Monday evening as Yemen's Iran-backed Houthis threatened to impose a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia, potentially opening a new front in the Middle East conflict.

The latest cycle of tit-for-tat strikes comes amid reports that regional mediators have presented Washington and Tehran with a proposal for a 10-day ceasefire, a pitch that could put last month's Memorandum of Understanding back on track. The U.S. Central Command said overnight that it had carried out another round of strikes on Iran at 9 p.

m. ET on Monday. "U.S. forces struck Iranian military command centers, maritime capabilities, missile and drone launch sites, and air defense systems to degrade Iran's ability to continue attacking commercial vessels flowing through the Strait of Hormuz," Centcom said in a statement.

It added that commercial vessel transits through the strategically vital waterway were continuing. Centcom forces, the statement said, had facilitated the transit of around 900 commercial vessels and 450 million barrels of crude oil through the strait since early May.

Iran, meanwhile, attacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz early Tuesday, forcing its crew to abandon the vessel as it seeks to tighten its control over the waterway, one that typically handles around 20% of the world's oil traffic. Houthi militants in Yemen on Monday declared a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia effective immediately, a move that could substantially threaten Middle East oil supplies.

The Houthis have repeatedly threatened to close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait during the U.S.-Iran war. The strait is a choke point for commercial ship traffic that connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and global markets. The militants, in a statement carried by state news, accused the Saudis of laying an "aggressive siege" against them.

Tensions escalated last week after they claimed that Riyadh had bombed Sanaa International Airport. The Saudi-led coalition in Yemen said that it would respond to the Houthis naval blockade with force, reportedly describing such threats as "a blatant violation of international law.

" 10-day ceasefire 'won't be an easy task' Oil prices rose briefly on news of the Houthi statement but later pared gains as energy market participants closely monitored the prospect of a diplomatic breakthrough. International benchmark Brent crude futures with September delivery were last seen trading 0.

5% lower at $88.77 per barrel, having surpassed $90 in the previous session. U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures with August delivery, meanwhile, stood 0.4% lower at $82.88. Strategists at ING said there's some hope of de-escalation between the U.S.

and Iran given the reports that mediators are proposing a 10-day ceasefire. "This won't be an easy task," ING's Warren Patterson and Ewa Manthey said in a research note published Tuesday. "Large divisions remain between the US and Iran. And President Trump said the US would retaliate following the deaths of several American troops," they added.

In a post on Truth Social on Monday, President Donald Trump said: "Every time Iran kills an American Soldier they will pay for that killing many times over!" He added that this directive had been passed on to every leader in the military. Saudi Arabia oil risk Jorge León, senior vice president and head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy, said the Houthis' threat puts approximately 2.

5 million barrels per day of Saudi Arabian oil at risk at a time when traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is at a standstill. "With the Gulf's primary maritime outlet largely closed, the market is increasingly dependent on Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline and Red Sea terminals to maintain export flows," León said Monday in a research note.

Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline network, or Petroline, is a roughly 750-mile system that transports crude across Saudi Arabia, connecting Abqaiq on the oil-rich kingdom's eastern Gulf coast to the port of Yanbu on the Red Sea. "Any disruption at Bab el-Mandeb would therefore threaten not only Saudi shipments but one of the few remaining routes capable of compensating for the severe reduction in Hormuz traffic," León said.

"If a ceasefire does not materialize and Hormuz remains largely closed while the Houthi threat to Red Sea shipping intensifies, the risk of a significant rebound in oil prices would be substantial," he added. — CNBC's Chloe Taylor and Spencer Kimball both contributed to this report.

Location: Iran

Sam Meredith

Jul 21, 2026strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy

Another ship hit in Hormuz as Houthis add to regional risks

○ 1 source

A tanker identified as the Kaifan was struck by an unknown projectile northeast of Oman’s Limah in the Strait of Hormuz, according to a July 21 report from UK Maritime Trade Operations. No ships were observed transiting the strait that day. Attribution of the strike and links to prior incidents have not been confirmed by the vessel’s owner.

Location: Strait of Hormuz

The Business Times

Jul 21, 2026strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy

Oil prices to hit $120 soon? Goldman Sachs makes big prediction as Hormuz concerns loom

○ 1 source

Goldman Sachs has projected Brent crude averaging $80 per barrel in the fourth quarter and $75 in the following year, conditional on reduced Middle East tensions, while noting upside risks from potential shipping disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz or Red Sea.

Brent prices rose above $91 per barrel amid recent U.S.-Iran exchanges and Houthi threats to Saudi shipments before edging lower on Tuesday. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that mediators had proposed a 10-day ceasefire to preserve an interim agreement.

Location: Tehran

Veer Sharma