ردیاب بحران ایران-خلیج فارس ۲۰۲۶
CC
Events Archive
strikeMay 7, 2026

Trump administration mulls drilling for oil under military bases – Bloomberg

Summary

US mulls drilling for oil under military bases – Bloomberg The administration of US President Donald Trump is considering extracting oil from beneath military bases to refill the depleted Strategic Petroleum Reserve, according to Bloomberg. Created in the mid-1970s, the SPR is an emergency stockpile meant to alleviate oil price spikes in times of supply disruptions. Global oil prices have soared above $100 a barrel in the wake of the US-Israeli aggression against Iran that began in late February, as Tehran has closed the Strait of Hormuz to “enemy ships.” Before the war broke out, the strategically important waterway accounted for roughly 20% of global crude trade. While Trump has downplayed the impact of the Strait of Hormuz blockade on the US economy, gasoline prices topped $4.50 a gallon this week on average for the first time since 2022. On Thursday, Bloomberg, citing an anonymous source, claimed that the Trump administration is looking into “innovative” ways to replenish the national emergency reserves, including the use of Department of Defense sites. Speaking at a forum hosted by the Wall Street Journal in mid-April, Energy Secretary Chris Wright said that “we are going to do pragmatic things [regarding] energy resources” on federally owned lands. “We have military bases or facilities that are in the middle of oil fields, but there’s no development under those resources. That’s crazy. It’s right there,” he said. “We need creative ways to fill the strategic petroleum reserve all the way up,” Wright added. According to Bloomberg, drilling under military bases is unlikely to have any immediate impact on energy prices, but it could allow the US government to directly own the extracted oil instead of purchasing crude from private producers to replenish reserves. It was not immediately clear which sites were under consideration, Bloomberg noted, adding that last September, the Trump administration sold drilling rights for oil and gas beneath nearly 2,000 acres at Louisiana’s Barksdale Air Force Base, which hosts B-52 strategic bombers. In March, Trump authorized the Department of Energy to release 172 million barrels from the SPR throughout this year and into 2027, in a bid to mitigate soaring energy prices. Under the scheme, crude is being loaned to energy companies, which are to return the “borrowed oil to the DOE with additional barrels as a premium” at a later date. The administration of ex-President Joe Biden, too, tapped into the SPR following the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022 when oil prices skyrocketed. According to DOE estimates, the national emergency reserves currently hold approximately 415 million barrels, the lowest level since the mid-1980s.

Perspectives

Iranian Official

In response to the US-Israeli aggression against Iran that began in late February, Tehran has exercised its sovereign right to close the Strait of Hormuz to enemy vessels, disrupting 20% of global crude trade and driving oil prices above $100 a barrel. This act of resistance has exposed the vulnerabilities of the American economy, forcing the Trump administration to consider desperate measures such as extracting oil from beneath its own military bases to replenish the depleted Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Iran stands firm in defending its territorial integrity against foreign aggression.

Israeli

In the face of Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz and activation of proxy networks following necessary US-Israeli defensive strikes on Tehran's nuclear infrastructure, surging oil prices above $100 a barrel threaten critical energy supplies vital to Israel's survival. The Trump administration's consideration of drilling under military bases to replenish the depleted Strategic Petroleum Reserve highlights the defensive imperative of securing domestic reserves against such existential disruptions. This pragmatic step counters the regime's maritime aggression, which accounts for 20% of global crude flows, ensuring sustained support for frontline allies.

Neutral

According to Bloomberg, citing an unnamed source, the Trump administration is considering oil extraction under certain US military bases as one option to replenish the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The reserve was established in the 1970s as an emergency stockpile. Energy Secretary Chris Wright has publicly discussed pursuing energy development on federal lands, including sites near military facilities.

Western

The Trump administration is evaluating targeted oil extraction beneath select U.S. military installations to swiftly replenish the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, bolstering energy security and operational readiness amid supply disruptions. This approach prioritizes precision development on federal lands already situated within existing oil fields, enabling efficient threat mitigation from Iranian closure of the Strait of Hormuz without compromising base functions. Such measures support broader strategic objectives to stabilize global markets and sustain NATO-aligned energy resilience following recent price spikes.

Pro-Peace

The US-Israeli military campaign against Iran has triggered a humanitarian crisis, with soaring global oil prices and gasoline costs exceeding $4.50 per gallon exacerbating economic hardship for civilians worldwide amid the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Rather than pursuing further resource extraction on military bases to replenish strategic reserves depleted by this aggression, diplomatic negotiations to de-escalate tensions and reopen vital trade routes offer a path to avert additional civilian suffering and environmental risks from expanded drilling.

Global South

The US push to tap oil under military bases for its depleted Strategic Petroleum Reserve highlights the institutional failure of Washington’s energy policies, which have long relied on neo-colonial interventions in the Global South rather than genuine energy sovereignty. By provoking the closure of the Strait of Hormuz through aggression against Iran, the Trump administration has triggered price spikes that expose how US bases and resource grabs undermine the autonomy of oil-producing nations. This “innovative” domestic fix merely recycles the same extractive logic that destabilizes global trade routes accounting for 20% of crude flows.

Actors involved

USIsraelIran

Sources

  • Russia TodayBy Russia Today

    US mulls drilling for oil under military bases – Bloomberg The administration of US President Donald Trump is considering extracting oil from beneath military bases to refill the depleted Strategic Petroleum Reserve, according to Bloomberg. Created in the mid-1970s, the SPR is an

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIranRussiaChina
1 source

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth posted social media images showing damage to a maritime control tower at Iran’s Chabahar port following reported US military strikes, accompanied by the caption “Iran does not control the Strait of Hormuz.” India’s Ministry of External Affairs stated that the Shahid Beheshti terminal operated by India at the port sustained no damage.

The ministry reiterated its position that civilian infrastructure should not be targeted during conflicts.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy
1 source

U.S. strikes Iran and Houthis threaten Saudi Arabia shipping as mediators push 10-day ceasefire - The U.S. has carried out its tenth consecutive evening of attacks against Iran. - Iran attacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz early Tuesday, while Houthi militants in Yemen declared a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia.

- Rystad Energy has warned about the risk of a significant rebound in oil prices. The U.S. completed a fresh round of strikes against Iran on Monday evening as Yemen's Iran-backed Houthis threatened to impose a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia, potentially opening a new front in the Middle East conflict.

The latest cycle of tit-for-tat strikes comes amid reports that regional mediators have presented Washington and Tehran with a proposal for a 10-day ceasefire, a pitch that could put last month's Memorandum of Understanding back on track. The U.S. Central Command said overnight that it had carried out another round of strikes on Iran at 9 p.

m. ET on Monday. "U.S. forces struck Iranian military command centers, maritime capabilities, missile and drone launch sites, and air defense systems to degrade Iran's ability to continue attacking commercial vessels flowing through the Strait of Hormuz," Centcom said in a statement.

It added that commercial vessel transits through the strategically vital waterway were continuing. Centcom forces, the statement said, had facilitated the transit of around 900 commercial vessels and 450 million barrels of crude oil through the strait since early May.

Iran, meanwhile, attacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz early Tuesday, forcing its crew to abandon the vessel as it seeks to tighten its control over the waterway, one that typically handles around 20% of the world's oil traffic. Houthi militants in Yemen on Monday declared a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia effective immediately, a move that could substantially threaten Middle East oil supplies.

The Houthis have repeatedly threatened to close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait during the U.S.-Iran war. The strait is a choke point for commercial ship traffic that connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and global markets. The militants, in a statement carried by state news, accused the Saudis of laying an "aggressive siege" against them.

Tensions escalated last week after they claimed that Riyadh had bombed Sanaa International Airport. The Saudi-led coalition in Yemen said that it would respond to the Houthis naval blockade with force, reportedly describing such threats as "a blatant violation of international law.

" 10-day ceasefire 'won't be an easy task' Oil prices rose briefly on news of the Houthi statement but later pared gains as energy market participants closely monitored the prospect of a diplomatic breakthrough. International benchmark Brent crude futures with September delivery were last seen trading 0.

5% lower at $88.77 per barrel, having surpassed $90 in the previous session. U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures with August delivery, meanwhile, stood 0.4% lower at $82.88. Strategists at ING said there's some hope of de-escalation between the U.S.

and Iran given the reports that mediators are proposing a 10-day ceasefire. "This won't be an easy task," ING's Warren Patterson and Ewa Manthey said in a research note published Tuesday. "Large divisions remain between the US and Iran. And President Trump said the US would retaliate following the deaths of several American troops," they added.

In a post on Truth Social on Monday, President Donald Trump said: "Every time Iran kills an American Soldier they will pay for that killing many times over!" He added that this directive had been passed on to every leader in the military. Saudi Arabia oil risk Jorge León, senior vice president and head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy, said the Houthis' threat puts approximately 2.

5 million barrels per day of Saudi Arabian oil at risk at a time when traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is at a standstill. "With the Gulf's primary maritime outlet largely closed, the market is increasingly dependent on Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline and Red Sea terminals to maintain export flows," León said Monday in a research note.

Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline network, or Petroline, is a roughly 750-mile system that transports crude across Saudi Arabia, connecting Abqaiq on the oil-rich kingdom's eastern Gulf coast to the port of Yanbu on the Red Sea. "Any disruption at Bab el-Mandeb would therefore threaten not only Saudi shipments but one of the few remaining routes capable of compensating for the severe reduction in Hormuz traffic," León said.

"If a ceasefire does not materialize and Hormuz remains largely closed while the Houthi threat to Red Sea shipping intensifies, the risk of a significant rebound in oil prices would be substantial," he added. — CNBC's Chloe Taylor and Spencer Kimball both contributed to this report.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy
1 source

A tanker identified as the Kaifan was struck by an unknown projectile northeast of Oman’s Limah in the Strait of Hormuz, according to a July 21 report from UK Maritime Trade Operations. No ships were observed transiting the strait that day. Attribution of the strike and links to prior incidents have not been confirmed by the vessel’s owner.

Location: Strait of Hormuz
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy
1 source

Goldman Sachs has projected Brent crude averaging $80 per barrel in the fourth quarter and $75 in the following year, conditional on reduced Middle East tensions, while noting upside risks from potential shipping disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz or Red Sea.

Brent prices rose above $91 per barrel amid recent U.S.-Iran exchanges and Houthi threats to Saudi shipments before edging lower on Tuesday. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that mediators had proposed a 10-day ceasefire to preserve an interim agreement.

Location: Tehran