ردیاب بحران ایران-خلیج فارس ۲۰۲۶
CC
Events Archive
strikeMay 11, 2026

Trump rejects 'totally unacceptable' Iranian response to US peace proposal: 'I don’t like it'

Summary

Trump rejects 'totally unacceptable' Iranian response to US peace proposal: 'I don’t like it' WASHINGTON, DC: After a major wait, Iran finally sent its response to a US proposal for peace talks, only for President Donald Trump to swiftly reject it, crushing hopes of a near-term breakthrough in the brutal 10-week conflict. Days after the US floated an offer in hopes of reopening negotiations, Iran sent a proposal through mediators in Pakistan, focused on ending the war on all fronts, especially Lebanon, and on the safety of shipping through the blockaded Strait of Hormuz, Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency said. The proposal called for the US Office of Foreign Assets Control to lift sanctions on Iranian oil exports for 30 days and demanded an end to the naval blockade imposed on Iran. The reports also claimed that Iran’s demands include “Iranian management of the Strait of Hormuz if certain commitments are undertaken by the US.” Further details about the response were given by the Wall Street Journal, which claimed that Iran has rejected US demands tied to its nuclear program and stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Instead, Iran reportedly pushed for separate negotiations on nuclear issues, proposing that part of its highly enriched uranium be diluted while the remaining portion be transferred to a third country. Trump rejects response from Iran’s 'so-called representatives' Trump, on Sunday, May 10, said that he had examined Iran’s reply to the US peace proposal for ending the Middle East conflict, but ultimately rejected it, calling the response “totally unacceptable.” “I have just read the response from Iran’s so-called 'Representatives.' I don’t like it — TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!” he wrote in a post on Truth Social. "I have just read the response from Iran’s so-called 'Representatives.' I don’t like it — TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE! Thank you for your attention to this matter." -President DONALD J. TRUMP pic.twitter.com/MIQDS9Ujjy— The White House (@WhiteHouse) May 10, 2026 However, the POTUS did not provide specifics about Iran’s response or disclose the rationale behind his decision to reject it. This came after Trump blasted the rogue Mideast country for "playing games" by delaying the historic negotiations. “Iran has been playing games with the United States, and the rest of the World, for 47 years (DELAY, DELAY, DELAY!” he wrote. “For 47 years the Iranians have been “tapping” us along, keeping us waiting, killing our people with their roadside bombs, destroying protests, and recently wiping out 42,000 innocent, unarmed protestors, and laughing at our now GREAT AGAIN Country. They will be laughing no longer!” he added. BREAKING: Trump on Truth Social: Iran has been playing games with the United States, and the rest of the World, for 47 years (DELAY, DELAY, DELAY!).. pic.twitter.com/HDve5gdZhW— Insider Paper (@TheInsiderPaper) May 10, 2026 Trump also took aim at former President Barack Obama, claiming he was “great” for Tehran as he gave them “a major and very powerful new lease on life.” Trump maintains Iran wouldn’t be allowed to develop nuclear weapons On Sunday, Trump repeated his sentiments of not allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons, vowing to do whatever possible to confiscate the Islamic Republic’s nuclear materials. Question: Where are we in the war if we've not yet gotten the nuclear materials, the enriched uranium from Iran?— Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial (@TruthTrumpPost) May 10, 2026 President Trump: we'll get that at some point, whatever we want. We'll have it surveilled. You know, I did a thing called Space Force...If somebody walked in, they… pic.twitter.com/DQAShMwH5Y “We’ll get that at some point,” the commander-in-chief told 'Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson'. "We have it surveilled. You know, I did a thing called Space Force, and they are watching." “If somebody walked in, they can tell you his name, his address, the number of his badge,” he said of the technology’s capability, adding, “We have that very well surveilled. If anybody got near the place, we will know about it, and we’ll blow them up.” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu echoed Trump’s stance, arguing that the war with Iran cannot truly end as long as Tehran retains an operational nuclear program. “It’s not over because there’s still nuclear material — enriched uranium — that has to be taken out of Iran,” Netanyahu told CBS News’ '60 Minutes'. “All that is still there, and there’s work to be done,” he said, noting that to get rid of the nuclear material, “you go in, and you take it out.”

Perspectives

Iranian Official

Iran firmly asserted its sovereign rights by submitting a measured proposal through Pakistani mediators, calling for an end to the US-imposed naval blockade, a temporary lifting of sanctions on its oil exports, and responsible management of the Strait of Hormuz to ensure safe international shipping. This response also rejected intrusive US demands on Iran's nuclear program, instead advocating separate talks while offering to dilute part of its enriched uranium stockpile. The swift US rejection exposes ongoing foreign aggression and unwillingness to respect Iran's legitimate security concerns amid the conflict.

Israeli

President Trump's rejection of Iran's demands for sanctions relief, Hormuz management, and decoupled nuclear talks exposes Tehran's bid to ease pressure sustaining its proxy networks—Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis—that launch existential threats against Israel through relentless border attacks and maritime disruption. From Israel's perspective, any easing of sanctions or naval constraints would only empower the regime's nuclear breakout potential and proxy war machine, making firm rejection a core defensive necessity to prevent further encirclement and attrition.

Neutral

US President Donald Trump rejected Iran's response to a US proposal for ending the conflict, describing it as "totally unacceptable." Iranian state media reported that the response, transmitted via Pakistani mediators, sought a 30-day suspension of sanctions on Iranian oil exports and an end to the naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, along with Iranian management of the strait under unspecified conditions. The Wall Street Journal reported that Iran declined US demands regarding its nuclear program and instead proposed separate talks involving dilution of some highly enriched uranium and transfer of the remainder to a third country.

Western

President Trump rejected Iran's counterproposal—delivered via Pakistani mediators—as totally unacceptable, citing its failure to address core US demands on nuclear stockpile reductions and its insistence on sanctions relief plus Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz. The response prioritized temporary oil export waivers and an end to naval restrictions over verifiable limits on highly enriched uranium, undermining efforts to neutralize Iran's nuclear and maritime threats. This reinforces the US focus on precise, conditional diplomacy to secure strategic stability across fronts including Lebanon.

Pro-Peace

As the brutal 10-week conflict drags on, President Trump's swift rejection of Iran's proposals— including ending hostilities across fronts like Lebanon, easing the blockade on the Strait of Hormuz, and pursuing separate nuclear talks—risks extending devastating civilian casualties and humanitarian suffering on all sides. Iran's offers, conveyed through mediators and focused on sanctions relief for oil exports alongside diluted uranium arrangements, represented a potential opening for de-escalation that could have alleviated blockades and restored vital shipping routes critical to regional stability. Prioritizing sustained diplomacy over dismissal remains essential to spare further loss of innocent lives and address the mounting human costs of prolonged war.

Global South

Trump rejected Iran’s counter-proposal—channeled through Pakistani mediators—which sought a temporary lift of U.S. sanctions on oil exports, an end to the naval blockade, and Iranian oversight of the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for de-escalation across Lebanon and regional shipping lanes. The U.S. dismissal, framed around Iran’s refusal to concede on its nuclear stockpile under American terms, underscores persistent neo-colonial leverage through sanctions and blockades that erode sovereign control over resources and waterways. Separate talks on highly enriched uranium dilution and third-country transfer were floated by Tehran, yet rebuffed, exposing the failure of U.S.-centric institutions to accommodate non-aligned priorities.

Actors involved

USIsraelIran

Sources

  • Piyush AroraBy Piyush Arora

    Trump rejects 'totally unacceptable' Iranian response to US peace proposal: 'I don’t like it' WASHINGTON, DC: After a major wait, Iran finally sent its response to a US proposal for peace talks, only for President Donald Trump to swiftly reject it, crushing hopes of a near-term b

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxyRussia
1 source

According to Kpler data, four commodity vessels crossed the Strait of Hormuz on Monday—two exiting (one carrying petrochemicals and one empty) and two entering (a bitumen tanker and an oil tanker)—down from seven the prior day, with no very large crude carriers or liquefied natural gas tankers observed.

Yemen's Houthis stated they were imposing a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia. The UK Maritime Trade Operations agency reported receiving multiple accounts of a tanker struck by an unknown projectile in the strait, while Greek shipping company Dynacom Tankers stated that two of its vessels were hit by projectiles off Oman and a third by a drone at Russia's Novorossiysk terminal.

Location: Strait of Hormuz
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy
1 source

U.S. and Iranian forces have conducted daily strikes in the Strait of Hormuz region following the collapse of an interim ceasefire, according to reports. The Trump administration has stated openness to diplomacy while announcing further retaliation for attacks on U.

S. personnel, and gasoline prices have risen amid the renewed exchanges. An analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies described the escalations as reflecting possible miscalculations by both sides, without confirmed evidence of their long-term effects.

Location: Strait of Hormuz
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
1 source

According to reports citing unnamed sources, mediators including Qatar, Egypt, and Pakistan presented a 10-day ceasefire proposal to the United States and Iran. The proposal reportedly calls for a halt to hostilities, resumption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, and efforts to preserve a memorandum of understanding signed by Washington and Tehran on June 18.

The US administration is reviewing the plan while preparing for possible failure, and Israel has been placed on high alert.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedIran
1 source

Vessel transits through the Strait of Hormuz totaled 53 in the week through July 20, according to Lloyd's List Intelligence data, down from 157 the previous week, with tanker and gas carrier movements falling to 30 from 90. Kpler tracking showed daily crossings declining from averages above 20 vessels before July 15 to single digits by July 16 and remaining low thereafter.

These figures followed the reported start of a U.S. blockade and related maritime restrictions announced by Iranian authorities.

Location: Strait of Hormuz