ConflictClarifier

מעקב משבר איראן-המפרץ 2026
CC
Main
Live Data
Analytics
Tools
Reference
Events Archive
strikeApr 30, 2026

Congress presses Hegseth on Iran war justification, spending, and conduct

Summary

Congress presses Hegseth on Iran war justification, spending, and conduct | Washington When President Donald Trump initiated strikes against Iran in late February, he did so without explicit backing from Congress, which holds the constitutional authority to declare war. Since then, members have argued over whether Mr. Trump illegally bypassed them. Now, even some Republicans are showing unease about the length and cost of the war, just as a deadline approaches that could test Mr. Trump’s control over military action – and whether Congress has the will to push back. Under the 1973 War Powers Resolution, the president is legally required to notify Congress within 48 hours of military action and is barred from deploying armed forces for more than 60 days without Congress’s permission. On May 1, that 60-day deadline will expire. Why We Wrote This A U.S. law from 1973 sets a 60-day limit for military operations that haven’t been approved by Congress. The Iran conflict is hitting that deadline. It’s the latest test of how Congress – and the president – view the war and their respective powers. On Wednesday, tensions between the White House and Congress came into sharp relief when Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth answered questions from the House Armed Services Committee, which pressed him on the administration’s strategy and the war’s costs to taxpayers. Democratic Rep. John Garamendi of California told Mr. Hegseth that the war is a “quagmire” and criticized the administration. “You and the president have offered ever-changing reasons for this war. ... The strategy has been an astounding example of incompetence,” Mr. Garamendi said. “You call it a quagmire, handing propaganda to our enemies? Shame on you for that statement,” Mr. Hegseth responded. Ahead of this week’s authorization deadline, Democrats have increased focus on the War Powers Resolution. They have forced weekly votes – with the help of Republicans Rand Paul of Kentucky in the Senate and Thomas Massie in the House – to require the president to withdraw armed forces absent congressional authorization. These efforts have all failed, though a recent House resolution came within two votes of passing. Republicans in the House and Senate have broadly supported the president’s Iran strategy, though a few have expressed a desire for a faster end to the conflict. Most have not expressed urgency about the 60-day deadline. Republican Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana told reporters on Tuesday that the War Powers Resolution was not a priority. “Nobody is walking around the United States Senate” – he pantomimed checking a watch – “going, ‘Oh, it’s 20 seconds till 60 days!’” Mr. Hegseth is scheduled to appear before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday, one day before the deadline’s expiration. “More Republicans” eyeing the deadline Under the law, a president can use a 30-day extension if there’s an “unavoidable military necessity” for extra time to withdraw forces. The president must certify the decision, in writing, to Congress. The law also directs a president to “consult” with Congress “in every possible instance” before initiating hostilities. When the United States struck Iran on Feb. 28, Secretary of State Marco Rubio called some members to alert them immediately beforehand. Mr. Trump officially notified Congress of the strikes two days later, on March 2. Some Republicans have since indicated that the 60-day authorization deadline matters. Republican Sen. John Curtis of Utah wrote in an op-ed this month that he would not support the war beyond that timeline without congressional approval. “A period of 60 days is a fully sufficient window for presidents to take emergency measures in response to a national threat and then remit a decision to the duly elected representatives of the people,” he wrote in the Deseret News. A number of Republican senators – including Susan Collins of Maine, Josh Hawley of Missouri, and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska – have indicated that, by May 1, they would either like to see action by Congress or more communication from the administration. “I think there are more Republicans that are talking about, with the 60-day deadline, that they may consider invoking the War Powers Act,” Senator Paul, a rare and vocal GOP critic of the Iran war, said in an interview on Tuesday. Many more Republicans aren’t taking a hard line. Several GOP senators told the Monitor on Tuesday that they would support a 30-day extension. Moderate Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania told Punchbowl News on April 23 that he respects the 60-day deadline, but thinks the clock should be stopped when there are ceasefires. A ceasefire began on April 7, though the U.S. is maintaining a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Other members refused to say whether the president needs Congress’s permission to continue military operations in Iran beyond this week. “There are varying opinions on that,” said GOP Rep. Buddy Carter of Georgia on Wednesday. “That’s something we’re discussing. I don’t have a yes or no answer for you on that,” said Republican Rep. Celeste Maloy of Utah. Meanwhile, many Democrats say the War Powers Resolution has already been violated, and that Secretary Rubio’s call to members immediately before the strikes did not fulfill the administration’s responsibility to “consult” with members of Congress. “The war’s already illegal,” said Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut in an interview. “The president doesn’t have 60 days to wage war without the consent of Congress.” War powers then and now In 2011, President Barack Obama allowed U.S. hostilities in Libya to extend beyond the 60-day mark despite not having authorization from Congress. When Republican Speaker John Boehner wrote to Mr. Obama warning that he was running out of time on the War Powers Resolution deadline, the White House claimed U.S. support of NATO intervention in Libya was not “sustained fighting” and thus not subject to the deadline. A bipartisan group of lawmakers filed a lawsuit at the time, accusing the president of violating the law, but a federal judge later ruled they did not have standing. Mr. Trump might attempt to make similar arguments now, as American troops are not deployed on the ground. Tens of thousands of troops have been deployed to the Middle East as part of the conflict, and at least 13 U.S. service members have died so far. During Wednesday’s House committee hearing, Massachusetts Rep. Seth Moulton and other Democrats focused on the potential length of the war as well as its cost. After Pentagon comptroller Jules Hurst III had said that the war had so far cost $25 billion, Mr. Moulton pressed Mr. Hegseth multiple times on how much the war would cost average taxpayers. “I’m just asking if you know what your war cost the average American taxpayer,” said Mr. Moulton. “What is the cost of Iran having a nuclear weapon that they wield over us?” shot back Mr. Hegseth. Mr. Moulton said the average cost to taxpayers was $600. “I’m just wondering if they have an extra six hundred bucks lying around to pay for your war, [and that is] a question that we ought to ask.”

Actors involved

USIran

Sources

  • The Christian Science MonitorBy The Christian Science Monitor

    Congress presses Hegseth on Iran war justification, spending, and conduct | Washington When President Donald Trump initiated strikes against Iran in late February, he did so without explicit backing from Congress, which holds the constitutional authority to declare war. Since the…

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran

US and Iran trade strikes as tensions escalate amid renewed conflict

○ 1 source

US and Iran trade strikes as tensions escalate amid renewed conflict - US Central Command has struck three Iranian oil tankers, including one near the Kharg Island export hub, after Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps fired ballistic missiles at two US Navy vessels.

- Admiral Brad Cooper declared that the US would exact a higher economic cost for attacks on its ships, confirming that no American personnel were harmed during the strike. - Iran's Revolutionary Guard retaliated by threatening further attacks on US military ships, claiming to have targeted three US-linked vessels and three tankers navigating unauthorised routes in the Strait of Hormuz.

- The Iranian Red Crescent has requested an International Criminal Court investigation into a suspected US strike on an Iranian wedding that left at least five people dead, accusing Washington of war crimes. - The recent exchanges represent a dangerous deepening of the wider conflict between the US, Israel, and Iran, which has flared repeatedly since initial strikes in February.

Location: Iran
Dan Haygarth
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran

Iran retaliates after US strikes oil tankers

○ 1 source

Iran said its forces attacked a US naval drone trying to enter the Strait of Hormuz, hours after targeting ships in retaliation for American strikes on three oil tankers. The latest round of clashes, which began with US raids last week, comes amid a deadlock in their six-month war.

Iran has maintained its stranglehold on the strategic Strait of Hormuz while Washington continues a counter-blockade of Iranian ports. Washington is also seeking to choke Iran's economy, rolling out sanctions on entities with financial links to the Islamic republic in a bid to force it into submission.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the ideological arm of Iran's military, said today that it "attacked an American military unmanned surface vessel" attempting to enter the strait, according to a statement carried by state television. Hours earlier, the IRGC said its naval forces "targeted three oil tankers on the unauthorised route of the Strait of Hormuz and three vessels affiliated with the child-killing America in other areas".

It warned ships not to attempt to transit by unapproved routes. Yesterday, US Central Command (CENTCOM), which oversees American military operations in the region, said it struck tankers linked to the Iranian Guards, accusing the most powerful arm of the Iranian military of unsuccessfully firing at American warships.

"Following Iran's failed attacks, CENTCOM permanently disabled the IRGC crude oil carriers M/T Downy off the coast of Kharg Island and M/T Stark 1 near Jask," it said. "American forces also completely destroyed the unladen crude oil carrier M/T Kylo ...

in the Gulf of Oman, striking the vessel in multiple critical locations to render it inoperable after the crew was directed to abandon ship," he said. Video posted by CENTCOM showed large fireballs and billowing flames after projectiles slammed into the ships.

The three vessels were "part of a multibillion-dollar shadow network that funds the IRGC and its regional proxies", it said. 'Higher economic cost' The IRGC meanwhile claimed the two American warships they targeted had been "forced to retreat" after "suffering damage", but CENTCOM said those ships successfully evaded Iranian attacks.

CENTCOM commander Admiral Brad Cooper said after the operation: "If you shoot at two of our ships, we will impose an even higher economic cost - taking out three of yours." The Iranian foreign ministry hit out at Washington over the strikes on oil tankers, calling them "illegal and aggressive actions".

A correspondent for Iranian state TV in Jask in the southern province of Hormozgan said one of the tankers was empty and the second was carrying oil. The crews were transported to shore on lifeboats, they said. Another state TV correspondent on Kharg Island said the attack there caused no casualties.

Iran's Khatam-al Anbiya central military command warned that if the US continued its attacks, then Tehran's retaliation against US warships would be "more severe than before, and there is a possibility of their expansion". The administration of US President Donald Trump has tried to downplay the significance of the six-month conflict, which has proven increasingly unpopular at home as midterm elections near.

US Vice President JD Vance went so far as to say that he "wouldn't call it a war". Mr Trump reiterated that view on Friday, calling the war "small potatoes" for Washington. Iran's Security Chief Mohsen Rezaei warned this week that the Islamic republic had adopted a "new strategy" against Washington that "will shatter your foundations".

The US has been trying to step up pressure on Tehran in a bid to wrestle control of the Hormuz strait, through which one-fifth of world oil supplies previously flowed. A fragile ceasefire between the two sides collapsed in July after attacks on commercial ships in the strategic waterway.

Mr Trump has in recent weeks repeatedly threatened to claim sovereignty over the strait, even posting a map showing it as "new US territory". Mr Vance has insisted the US will not reopen talks with Iran until it ends attacks on commercial shipping in Hormuz.

CurrentsAPI
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUN

Iran claims strike on US ship in Strait of Hormuz as fighting escalates

○ 1 source

CAIRO (AP) — Iran said Sunday it struck an unmanned U.S. vessel trying to enter the Strait of Hormuz, the latest salvo in a new flare-up of fighting between the two countries. The U.S. did not immediately confirm the purported attack, which came a day after the U.

S. military said forces struck three Iranian oil tankers in response to a missile attack on Navy warships. The war began with U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28. But since a ceasefire agreement was announced in June, on-and-off fighting has persisted with both sides trying to inflict military and economic pain as negotiations have collapsed.

Strikes come about a week after fighting resumed The U.S. and Iran resumed attacks last week, following a month of relative calm, with the Strait of Hormuz and Iranian communities along it again being targeted. At least five people were killed earlier in the week during a U.

S. bombardment of southern Iran. The Trump administration appears to have adopted a dual-prong approach to the conflict, responding militarily to attacks on the strait while going after foreign financial institutions that handle Iran’s money.

But Tehran's hard-line new senior leaders have signaled the willingness to dig in after weathering decades of sanctions. Iran has found ways over the years to circumvent sanctions, and now the U.S. blockade, and get its oil to buyers to help ease growing economic pressures.

That relies in part on a shadow fleet transporting its oil. Meanwhile, Iran's nuclear program, the issue that contributed to the outbreak of the war, was meant to be addressed in negotiations that fell apart soon after the U.S. and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding in mid-June.

Diplomats say the U.S., Britain, France and Germany seek to refer Iran to the U.N. Security Council for failure to comply with its nuclear nonproliferation obligations. Instead, Tehran's new leverage focuses on the Strait of Hormuz that is crucial to global oil and natural gas shipments and was seen as an international waterway before the war began.

___ Magdy reported from Cairo and Frankel reported from Jerusalem.

SAMY MAGDY and JULIA FRANKEL, Associated Press
strikeUnverifiedUSIran

Iran attacks naval drone near Hormuz after US strikes 3 oil tankers

○ 1 source

Iran attacks naval drone near Hormuz after US strikes 3 oil tankers The latest round of clashes, which began with US raids last week, comes amid a deadlock in the six-month war Iran said on Sunday that its forces attacked a US naval drone trying to enter the Strait of Hormuz, hours after targeting ships in retaliation for American strikes on three oil tankers.

The latest round of clashes, which began with US raids last week, comes amid a deadlock in their six-month war. Iran has maintained its stranglehold on the strategic Strait of Hormuz while Washington continues a counter-blockade of Iranian ports. Washington is also seeking to choke Iran’s economy, rolling out sanctions on entities with financial links to the Islamic Republic in a bid to force it into submission.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the ideological arm of Iran’s military, said on Sunday it “attacked an American military unmanned surface vessel” attempting to enter the strait, according to a statement carried by state television. Hours earlier, the IRGC said its naval forces “targeted three oil tankers on the unauthorised route of the Strait of Hormuz and three vessels affiliated with the child-killing America in other areas”.

Location: Iran
Agence France-Presse