ConflictClarifier

מעקב משבר איראן-המפרץ 2026
CC
Events Archive
strikeJul 26, 2026

Israeli siblings who fear breaking law in Gaza under IDF owed protection by Australia, tribunal finds

Summary

Three Israeli citizens facing conscription into the Israel Defense Forces have been granted the right to reapply for protection visas in Australia, after a government tribunal found they held a genuine fear they would be forced to break international humanitarian law in Gaza. The Administrative Review Tribunal found the punishment the young adults could face from the state of Israel – including imprisonment as conscientious objectors – would amount to persecution. Part of a family group, three siblings faced mandatory national service if they were returned to Israel, and held a genuine belief they would be forced to “engage in breaches of international humanitarian law”. The tribunal found there were “credible allegations that Israel’s military operations in the Gaza Strip are in breach of international humanitarian law” and that international opinion was that the IDF’s actions in Gaza were disproportionate. It found the three siblings were refugees facing persecution from the state of Israel, and Australia had a legal obligation to protect them. The family’s case went before the tribunal in October last year. The decision was published in March. The family – a husband and wife and their children – arrived in Australia on the husband’s working visa a decade ago. That visa expired, and the family applied for protection visas in 2024, six months after the Hamas-led attacks of 7 October 2023 sparked the current conflict in Gaza and Israel. Their application for protection was rejected by the government. On appeal to the tribunal, the family claimed they were not safe from terrorist attacks anywhere in Israel and had “lost faith in the ability of the state of Israel to protect its citizens”, citing previous terrorist attacks by Hamas and being forced to live in bunkers for sustained periods. This argument was not accepted by the tribunal. While the tribunal found the family was at risk of being injured or killed by a Hamas rocket attack, it said any harm they suffered would not be the result of “discriminatory conduct aimed at them”. “Rather, it would be because they were a casualty of the armed conflict between Israel and Hamas. The applicants do not meet the refugee criterion in relation to this aspect of their claims.” However, the couple’s eldest child – who, along with two siblings, had reached the age of 18 – told the tribunal she and her siblings had vowed to refuse the national service compulsory for Israeli citizens. “She gave evidence that she and [her two siblings] had made a pact between themselves that they would refuse to serve in the Israel Defence Forces (the IDF). “The basis of their refusal to serve in the IDF was that they would be required to serve in the Israel-Palestinian conflict on the Gaza Strip, and as part of that conflict may be forced to engage in breaches of international humanitarian law. The tribunal accepts that these views are genuinely held.” The tribunal said it accepted that the three adult siblings “would be liable to terms of imprisonment of up to two years for refusing to serve in the IDF”. The tribunal noted that arrest warrants had been issued by the international criminal court against the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the former defence minister Yoav Gallant on allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity, including murder. The tribunal also noted the United Nations Commission of Inquiry had reported that “Israel authorities and Israeli security forces have committed and are continuing to commit genocide against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip”. “The International Criminal Court arrest warrant and the United Nations Commission of Inquiry report contain credible allegations that Israel’s military operations in the Gaza Strip are in breach of international humanitarian law,” the tribunal said. “This is a situation where Israel’s military operations are not currently considered by the international community to be proportionate in the means used to achieve a legitimate national objective of Israel.” The tribunal said it was not required to express any “concluded views” as to whether Israel had engaged in acts of genocide and noted Netanyahu and Gallant were “entitled to a presumption of innocence” before the ICC. The tribunal argued that the enforcement of Israel’s national service laws – and the expected punishment for refusing to serve – “would amount to persecution” of the adult siblings in the family. “The tribunal is satisfied that the risk of imprisonment faced by the [siblings] for refusal to do military service would involve a real chance of serious harm to them. The essential and significant reason for this persecution would be the political opinion underlying their refusal to do compulsory military service. “There are no reasonable steps the [siblings] could take to modify their behaviour to avoid the threat of serious harm. As the risk of persecution comes from the state itself, the tribunal finds that state protection is not available. The risk of harm also extends to all areas of Israel.” The tribunal ruled the three adult siblings facing conscription into the IDF met Australia’s obligations for protection under the refugees convention: that is, they faced a “well-founded fear of persecution” in their home country. The entire family should be afforded protection, the tribunal found. The tribunal ordered that the family’s application for protection visas be reconsidered. The Guardian sought comment from the Department of Home Affairs.

Actors involved

IsraelUNHamas

Sources

  • Ben DohertyBy Ben Doherty

    Three Israeli citizens facing conscription into the Israel Defense Forces have been granted the right to reapply for protection visas in Australia, after a government tribunal found they held a genuine fear they would be forced to break international humanitarian law in Gaza. The

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSUNRussiaUkraine
1 source

- Two US peace negotiators will visit Ukraine on Sunday after visiting Moscow, Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Friday. Ukraine’s president said Kyiv would guarantee the safety of Russian airspace during the visit of Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner to Moscow, after which they are expected to travel on to Kyiv.

He called on Russia to also halt its air attacks on Ukraine during the negotiators’ visit. Donald Trump, the US president, said: “We have an idea for peace … I sent Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, two great negotiators.” The New York Times reported that Washington has asked both sides for a ceasefire during the envoys’ visit.

Kushner is Trump’s son-in-law and Witkoff deals in real estate. - The headquarters of Ukraine’s SBU intelligence agency took a direct hit from a Russian drone on Friday, Amy Hawkins reports from Kyiv. Zelenskyy said he had instructed the SBU to deliver an “appropriate, tangible response” to the strike, while the foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, described it as a “major escalation”.

Zelenskyy said: “The drone was aimed directly at the office of the head of the security service in that building.” At least nine people were injured in Friday’s strike, according to Kyiv’s mayor, Vitali Klitschko. - Air Tanzania said it was suspending flights from Dar es Salaam to Moscow from Friday, becoming the first airline to do so after Zelenskyy warned this week that the skies over Russia were unsafe because of Ukraine’s retaliatory drone attacks.

The airline said on Facebook that it took the step after “a routine risk assessment of the operating environment along the route”. Vladimir Putin on Thursday falsely claimed that Ukraine was threatening to attack civilian aircraft. Moscow has protested to the UN’s aviation agency after Ukraine asked it to have member countries keep their airlines out of Russian airspace.

“Ukraine does not threaten civilian aviation as such – not a single civilian aircraft,” Zelenskyy said during the week. “There will simply be drones in Russia’s skies on a scale that has to be taken into account.” - A “massive” overnight Russian attack on the Odesa region killed one person and injured at least five others, including a child, regional head Oleh Kiper said on Friday.

The attacks damaged multiple residential buildings, including two multistorey blocks. Strikes elsewhere in Ukraine killed two police officers in Dnipro, officials said, while a drone attack in Kyiv wounded three people after hitting a residential building.

- In Russia, a large-scale Ukrainian drone strike hit the Black Sea resort city of Sochi and the nearby district of Sirius, regional officials said on Friday. They said the attack sparked a blaze at an oil depot. Russian media outlets reported two oil depots were hit, with one fire in Sochi and another in Sirius.

- Finnish authorities said they were investigating how a Russian-made drone ended up on the shore in the Pellinge archipelago east of Helsinki. Finland’s border guard said it appeared to be a Geoscan 701 drone, manufactured by a Russian company. “The device model in question is used by both state and civilian operators, and it is not possible at this stage to determine its intended use or identify the country or entity operating it.

” - A World Health Organization warehouse storing humanitarian medical supplies was struck during an air attack on the Kyiv region, continuing what the WHO said was a pattern of such attacks across Ukraine. In 2026, at least 20 attacks have affected depots storing humanitarian goods including healthcare supplies, said a WHO spokesperson in Geneva.

- A vice-president in the far-right party of French presidential contender Marine Le Pen has sparked a furore by saying France would “turn off the tap” to Ukraine if National Rally (RN) came to power. Louis Aliot claimed the RN “condemned the Russian aggression” but said the war had “weakened Europe”.

One of Le Pen’s leading rivals in the elections, centre-right politician Edouard Philippe, who served as Macron’s first prime minister, retorted that “turning off the tap to Ukraine is serving Russia”. “Weakening Ukraine, as Marine Le Pen wishes, is threatening the security of Europe and France.

I will do everything to prevent it.” Le Pen herself entered the fray, claiming that her party was pushing for a “diplomatic resolution of this abominable war”. - The head of Memorial, Russia’s Nobel peace prize-winning rights group, has told AFP she fears a fresh crackdown after September’s legislative elections, with more people arrested and sent to fight in Ukraine.

Elena Zhemkova also vowed to keep up the fight for human rights in Russia, despite her group being declared illegal and herself forced into exile. “Unfortunately, I think that now everything is getting worse, but not so fast,” the 65-year-old said. “But after the elections, there will be a very sharp deterioration.

” Ukraine war briefing: Zelenskyy calls air truce as Kushner and Witkoff head for Kyiv via Moscow Direct hit on SBU headquarters in Kyiv targeted intelligence chief; airline suspends Moscow flights after Zelenskyy warning.

Location: Kyiv
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
1 source

President Trump asserted that the US military campaign against Iran has prevented the development of a nuclear weapon, stating, "They're not going to have a nuclear weapon." He further warned of potential strikes on the Pickaxe Mountain facility, claiming US intelligence is closely monitoring the site despite earlier reports from The Wall Street Journal that Israeli intelligence believes Iran has relocated centrifuges there.

Location: Natanz
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
1 source

Following the resumption of US strikes on Iranian targets in early September, President Trump characterized the six-month-old confrontation as "small potatoes," noting that 18 US service members have been killed since operations began in February. While Trump asserted that US forces have significantly secured the Strait of Hormuz and that current attacks are intermittent, Central Command reported recent strikes on Iranian air-defense and maritime assets.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIran
1 source

Vice President JD Vance declined to use the term "war" to describe the U.S. military engagement with Iran, asserting that there is no active shooting despite recent exchanges of heavy fire. While the administration maintains that the operation is limited, the conflict has now continued for over six months, raising questions about its duration ahead of the November midterm elections.

Location: Iran