ConflictClarifier

מעקב משבר איראן-המפרץ 2026
CC
Events Archive
strikeMay 11, 2026

Oil prices rise as Trump rejects 'unacceptable' Iran plan

Summary

US President Donald Trump's swift rejection of Iran's response to a US peace proposal has sent oil prices surging amid concerns the 10-week-old conflict will drag on, keeping shipping through the Strait of Hormuz paralysed. Days after the US floated an offer in the hopes of re-opening negotiations, Iran yesterday released a response focused on ending the war on all fronts, especially Lebanon, where US ally Israel is fighting Iran-backed Hezbollah militants. Tehran also included a demand for compensation for war damage and emphasised Iranian sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, Iranian state TV said. It also called on the US to end its naval blockade, guarantee no further attacks, lift sanctions and end a US ban on Iranian oil sales, the semi-official Tasnim news agency said. Within hours, Mr Trump dismissed Iran's proposal with a post on social media. "I don't like it - TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE," Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, without giving further detail. The US had proposed an end to fighting before starting talks on more contentious issues, including Iran's nuclear programme. "I have just read the response from Iran's so-called 'Representatives.' I don’t like it — TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE! Thank you for your attention to this matter." -President DONALD J. TRUMP pic.twitter.com/MIQDS9Ujjy— The White House (@WhiteHouse) May 10, 2026 Speaking this morning, Iran's foreign ministry said it had called for an end to the war across the region and the release of frozen assets abroad. "We did not demand any concessions. The only thing we demanded was Iran's legitimate rights," said ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei in a weekly press briefing. He said Iran's demands included "an end to the war in the region", ending the US naval blockade, and the "release of assets belonging to the Iranian people, which have for years been unjustly trapped in foreign banks". Oil prices jumped more than $4 a barrel this morning following news of the continued stalemate that leaves the narrow Strait of Hormuz largely closed. Before the war began on 28 February, the waterway carried one-fifth of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas flows, and has emerged as one of the central pressure points in the war. "The oil market continues to trade like a geopolitical headline machine, with prices swinging sharply based on every comment, rejection, or warning coming from Washington and Tehran," said Priyanka Sachdeva, senior market analyst at Phillip Nova. While traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is at a trickle compared to before the war, shipping data on Kpler and LSEG showed three tankers laden with crude exited the waterway last week, with trackers switched off to avoid Iranian attack. Surveys show the war is unpopular with US voters facing sharply higher gasoline prices less than six months before nationwide elections that will determine whether Mr Trump's Republican party retains control of Congress. The US has also found little international support, with NATO allies refusing calls to send ships to open the Strait of Hormuz without a full peace deal and an internationally mandated mission. It is not clear what fresh diplomatic or military steps may be ahead. Mr Trump is expected to arrive in Beijing on Wednesday. With mounting pressure to draw a line under the war and the global energy crisis it has ignited, Iran is among the topics Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are set to discuss. Mr Trump has been leaning on China to use its influence to push Tehran to make a deal with Washington. Addressing whether combat operations against Iran were over, Mr Trump said in remarks aired yesterday: "They are defeated, but that doesn't mean they're done." Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the war was not over because there was "more work to be done" to remove enriched uranium from Iran, dismantle enrichment sites and address Iran's proxies and ballistic missile capabilities. The best way to remove the enriched uranium would be through diplomacy, Mr Netanyahu said in an interview that aired Sunday on CBS News' 60 Minutes. But he did not rule out removing it by force. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said in a social media post that Iran would "never bow down to the enemy" and would" defend national interests with strength". Despite diplomatic efforts to break a deadlock, the threat to shipping lanes and the economies of the region remained high. Recent days have seen the biggest flare-ups in fighting in and around the strait since a ceasefire began in early April. The United Arab Emirates said it yesterday intercepted two drones coming from Iran, while Qatar condemned a drone attack that hit a cargo ship coming from Abu Dhabi in its waters. Kuwait said its air defences had dealt with hostile drones that entered its airspace. Clashes have also continued in southern Lebanon between Israel and Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah, despite a US-brokered ceasefire announced on 16 April. An end to hostilities with Iran would not necessarily bring an end to the war in Lebanon, Mr Netanyahu said in the 60 Minutes interview, in which he also said Israeli planners had underestimated Iran's ability to choke off traffic through the Hormuz Strait. "It took a while for them to understand how big that risk is, which they understand now," he said.

Perspectives

Iranian Official

Iran firmly asserted its sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz and rejected any foreign interference, demanding an immediate end to the US naval blockade, sanctions, and aggression supporting Israeli attacks on Hezbollah in Lebanon as prerequisites for regional peace. The Islamic Republic's response called for comprehensive war termination across fronts, compensation for damages inflicted by US-backed forces, and guarantees against further hostilities, framing these as essential resistance to external domination. Washington's swift dismissal of this sovereign position only prolongs the conflict and exposes ongoing American aggression.

Israeli

Trump's rejection of Iran's proposal exposes Tehran's bid to preserve its proxy network, especially Hezbollah in Lebanon, as an existential threat to Israel's survival. By conditioning any deal on ending Israeli operations, securing Hormuz control, and lifting sanctions without dismantling its militant infrastructure, the regime seeks to sustain its multi-front war of attrition against the Jewish state. Defensive necessity demands continued pressure to neutralize these Iranian-orchestrated dangers rather than reward aggression with concessions.

Neutral

US President Donald Trump posted on social media that Iran's response to a US proposal was "TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE," without providing details. Iranian state media reported that the response sought an end to fighting across fronts including Lebanon, compensation for war damage, an end to a naval blockade, lifted sanctions, and guarantees regarding the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices rose following the exchange, amid concerns over extended disruption to shipping in the area.

Western

President Trump's rejection of Iran's counterproposal reinforces US strategic priorities of neutralizing Iranian proxy threats, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, and restoring secure maritime access through the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran's demands for sanctions relief, an end to the blockade, and regional war termination without concessions on its nuclear program or compensation issues were deemed totally unacceptable. This approach sustains targeted pressure to deter further escalation and protect global energy routes.

Pro-Peace

President Trump's rejection of Iran's proposal for a regional ceasefire, including an end to fighting in Lebanon, risks extending a conflict whose mounting civilian toll and humanitarian devastation—from displacement to disrupted aid—continue to mount. Tehran's overtures for ending hostilities on all fronts, lifting sanctions, and addressing war damages offered a diplomatic off-ramp that could have eased suffering and restored access through the Strait of Hormuz. Embracing such talks, rather than dismissal, remains essential to halting further loss of life.

Global South

US rejection of Iran's proposal—centered on ending regional hostilities, lifting sanctions, and affirming sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz—exposes Washington's neo-colonial grip on energy routes and its refusal to tolerate independent assertions by Global South nations. The swift dismissal, amid ongoing naval blockades and demands for compensation over war damage, underscores how unilateral US actions bypass multilateral institutions and prolong conflicts that disproportionately burden developing economies through surging oil costs. This dynamic prioritizes American strategic dominance over equitable negotiations respecting Iranian territorial rights.

Actors involved

USIsraelIranProxyChina

Sources

  • CurrentsAPI

    US President Donald Trump's swift rejection of Iran's response to a US peace proposal has sent oil prices surging amid concerns the 10-week-old conflict will drag on, keeping shipping through the Strait of Hormuz paralysed. Days after the US floated an offer in the hopes of re-op

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIranRussiaChina
1 source

According to the semi-official Mehr News Agency, more than 3,700 cargo trucks are reportedly stalled at Iran’s borders with Turkey and Pakistan, with truckers alleging delays of up to 20 days amidst extreme heat and logistical shortages. Coinciding with a reported nearly 30% decline in non-oil exports to $15 billion, these trade disruptions occur against the backdrop of a US naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and recent cross-border attacks affecting Iraq-Saudi Arabia pipeline operations.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxyUN
1 source

Pakistan’s Defence Minister stated that the country is prepared to activate the Mecca defence pact with Saudi Arabia and Turkey amid intensifying Houthi attacks on the kingdom. While Islamabad emphasized its commitment to protecting Saudi Arabia and its holy cities, Houthi officials disputed claims of targeting Mecca, asserting that their operations are limited to Saudi oil facilities and military bases.

Location: Mecca
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxyChina
1 source

Analyst Mark Almond argues that Houthi drone strikes on Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline and Red Sea shipping routes pose a significant threat to global supply chains. While the Houthis state they are targeting only Saudi forces and their proxies, the article notes that confidence in this limitation is currently low.

Location: Strait of Hormuz
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUN
1 source

A UN fact-finding mission reported having reasonable grounds to believe U.S. forces conducted strikes on a school in Iran that officials said killed more than 150 people, while also alleging Iranian authorities committed crimes against humanity during recent protests.

The report is being submitted to the UN Human Rights Council, and while U.S. officials stated their operations complied with the law of armed conflict, Iran has rejected allegations of systematic rights violations.

Location: Iran