ConflictClarifier

מעקב משבר איראן-המפרץ 2026
CC
Events Archive
strikeMar 27, 2026

One month on: How is China working to defuse Middle East tensions?

Summary

File photo of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Beijing, China. /VCG File photo of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Beijing, China. /VCG As the confrontation between the United States, Israel, and Iran hits the one-month mark on March 28, China has launched an intensive diplomatic push over the past four weeks – a mix of high-level phone calls, shuttle diplomacy, and face-to-face engagements – to defuse the spiraling tensions gripping the Middle East. By engaging all relevant parties – from bitter adversaries Iran and Israel, to regional heavyweights like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, as well as major global powers – Beijing has worked relentlessly to press for an immediate ceasefire, prevent conflict spillover, revive dialogue between key stakeholders, and build consensus around de-escalation. Intensive high-level diplomacy The scale of China's engagement is evident in the calendar of Foreign Minister Wang Yi. From March 1 to 27, Wang held 18 phone calls and three in-person meetings, forging a diplomatic network that stretched from the Gulf to the capitals of the West. Graphic by CGTN's Pei Zihan Graphic by CGTN's Pei Zihan In the immediate aftermath of the conflict, Wang characterized the hostilities as "a war that should not have happened – it is a war that does no one any good." He emphasized that all countries' territorial integrity and security must be respected, and unilateral military action without UN authorization must be rejected. He repeatedly called for an immediate halt to military operations, urging all sides to break the cycle of escalation and prevent the conflict from spilling across the broader region. This principled stance was consistently conveyed in his calls with the foreign ministers of Russia, Iran, Oman, France, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). As tensions threatened to trigger wider regional instability in mid-March, Wang held talks with his counterparts from Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, and Egypt. During these conversations, he stressed the critical need to protect civilians, key infrastructure, and maritime security, and to avoid further spillover that would harm all regional countries. Building on his communications with Russia, Wang also maintained close coordination with fellow UN Security Council permanent members France and the United Kingdom. This coordination included a phone call with the UK foreign minister, a conversation with the French president's diplomatic adviser, and an in-person meeting in Beijing with the UK prime minister's national security adviser – underscoring China's commitment to aligning with major countries in the push for peace. Since March 24, Wang has consistently delivered a core message during phone calls with Iran, as well as Egypt, Türkiye, Pakistan – three countries reported to be acting as mediators between the United States and Iran – and Canada: seize every window of opportunity for peace and restart the negotiation process as soon as possible. "Talking is always better than fighting," he has repeatedly stressed, urging all parties to seize the nascent peace opportunity to launch negotiations immediately, prioritize ceasefire and de-escalation to prevent further spillover and casualties, and restore normal navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical international energy and trade route that has faced severe disruptions amid the conflict. He has also called on the US and Iran to return to the negotiating table, voiced support for mediating efforts, and appealed to the international community to jointly facilitate a political settlement. Special envoy's shuttle diplomacy Parallel to Wang's high-level diplomatic push, China's special envoy for Middle East affairs, Zhai Jun, conducted a high-stakes shuttle mission across the region from early to mid-March, navigating wartime conditions, including disrupted air travel and security alerts, to engage directly with key capitals and advance peace efforts. During his trip, Zhai met with the foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Egypt, as well as the secretaries-general of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and the Arab League, and held a phone call with the minister of state for foreign affairs of Qatar, to coordinate de-escalation efforts. Upon his return to Beijing, Zhai held follow-up meetings with ambassadors from Iran, Israel, GCC countries and Russia, consolidating diplomatic outreach and exchanging views on Middle East tensions. Zhai later noted at a briefing that the trip was particularly challenging due to active hostilities: Some countries he visited had closed their airspace, forcing ground travel between nations, and his team witnessed the aftermath of missiles being shot down, underscoring the urgency of China's peace efforts. All visiting nations, he said, expressed deep concern over conflict spillover, emphasized the need to protect civilians and energy infrastructure, and welcomed China's impartial mediation as a critical stabilizing force. An 'irreplaceable' stabilizing role Analysts have lauded China's multi-pronged diplomacy as a stabilizing force in the volatile region, highlighting its constructive role as a responsible major power. China's multi-track diplomatic mediation demonstrates the constructive nature of its foreign policy, said Chen Yueyang, deputy secretary-general of the China-Arab Research Center on Reform and Development. "It is playing an irreplaceable stabilizing role in easing escalation." China has unique advantages and a strong foundation in playing a constructive role in the Middle East, as it adheres to an objective and impartial stance, takes no sides, and is committed to upholding international fairness and justice, Chen said. Zhu Feng, dean of the School of International Studies at Nanjing University, emphasized that China's diplomatic outreach has sent a clear and unequivocal message to the international community. "Confronted with the ongoing conflict involving Iran, China will not simply stand idly by," Zhu said. Instead, he added, China will coordinate and communicate with the majority of the international community, and on that basis, convey its solemn position and voice to the parties concerned. Niu Xinchun, director of the Institute of Middle East Studies at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, pointed out that by publicly articulating its positions and principles, China effectively speaks for the mainstream voice of the international community, especially representing the positions and interests of the Global South and developing countries. He added that a growing number of countries adopting China's approach in the period ahead would help encourage parties to the conflict return to the negotiating table at an early date and resolve disputes through political means, rather than military force. As the conflict enters a second month, the core message of China's diplomatic efforts remains consistent: dialogue is the only viable path to peace, and Beijing's commitment to mediating the conflict – rooted in impartiality and a dedication to regional stability – will not waver. As Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian noted, "As long as the conflict continues, China's diplomatic mediation efforts will not stop."

Actors involved

USIranIsrael

Sources

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranEUChina
1 source

Japan’s Defense Ministry said Friday that Iran used its geographical advantage to “inflict unbearable costs at a relatively low military expense,” effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz by indicating that it had laid naval mines, Kyodo News reported.

The ministry said Japan would strengthen its defense capabilities based on lessons from the US-Iran war, including by using defense equipment also operated by allies and like-minded partners to help ensure rapid supplies from other countries. It also stressed the need to maintain sufficient missile stockpiles and be prepared to quickly increase defense equipment production in an emergency, according to its first report analyzing the Iran war since February.

The US-Israeli war against Iran began on Feb. 28, with attacks targeting military, nuclear and infrastructure sites across the country. Iran responded with missile and drone strikes against Israel and US military facilities across the region. READ: EU joins US-led campaign to isolate Iran financially: Treasury chief Bessent Washington and Tehran signed a memorandum of understanding on June 18 concerning freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, but its implementation has stalled amid disagreements over security arrangements in the strait.

The Japanese report also said the country should take its own geographical characteristics into account when developing combat strategies, including the fact that it is surrounded by sea. The report noted the US use of AI to accelerate decision-making and operations, citing attacks on around 1,000 targets within 24 hours, while also highlighting the risk of AI making incorrect judgments.

“It is important to establish a process that maximizes the benefits of AI while ensuring appropriate human involvement,” the ministry said. The report comes ahead of a planned revision of Japan’s key security documents by the end of this year.

strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy
1 source

A major offensive by Yemen's Houthis to seize control of the gateway to the Red Sea has left more than 120 people dead, sources told AFP Friday, the country's deadliest clashes in years. Fighting erupted on Thursday, after the Iran-backed Houthis launched a ground assault along with rocket and drone attacks near coastal areas, vying for control of the narrow Bab al-Mandab strait at the Red Sea's southern entrance.

Yemen, embroiled in more than a decade of civil conflict, in July became the latest country to be drawn into the Middle East war as the Houthis upended a 2022 truce with the Saudi-backed government. Since then, the Houthis have imposed a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia and repeatedly attacked its ships in the Red Sea -- a vital alternative route for oil exports after Iran all but halted Gulf shipments by blockading the Strait of Hormuz.

The rebels are now trying to tighten their hold over the Red Sea, one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, which they have disrupted with attacks on passing vessels since the Gaza war broke out in 2023. The Houthi offensive aims to cut off the government-held port city of Mokha, under fire for weeks, and advance towards areas bordering the Bab al-Mandab, military sources told AFP.

The rebels have seized elevated sites overlooking government positions near the Red Sea and the city of Taiz further inland, a military source and a Taiz official told AFP, requesting anonymity. The Houthis could target ships from these elevated positions, they said.

The toll rose to 129 on Friday, according to an AFP tally compiled from several sources, up from an earlier count of 81. A Yemeni military official speaking on condition of anonymity told AFP that 66 of his men had been killed, while medical and military sources close to the Houthis said at least 62 militants had died.

Another medical source said a civilian had also been killed. Although the Houthis do not control areas bordering Bab al-Mandab, they hold the key port city of Hodeida north of Mokha. "They are going for Bab al-Mandab," said Mohammed al-Basha, of the US-based risk advisory Basha Report.

The Houthis want to control the hills overlooking Bab al-Mandab and Mokha before attacking the coast, a Yemeni official in Aden, the government's base since it was ousted from the rebel-held capital, Sanaa, in 2014. The government has sent reinforcements to Taiz from Aden on Saudi orders, he said.

"The Houthis feel that if they capture Bab al-Mandab or Mokha port they will be in a better position of power to negotiate with the government and the Saudis," Basha added. With Iran's closure of Hormuz, the Bab al-Mandab chokepoint has gained increased importance as a transit route for oil from Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest exporter of crude.

The narrow waterway connects the Red Sea -- and, via the Suez Canal, the Mediterranean -- to the Indian Ocean. In July, a fragile truce between the Houthis and the government fell apart after the rebels welcomed an Iranian plane to Sanaa, setting off a spate of attacks.

They later announced a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia and began hitting its ships and territory.

Location: Tyre
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUNRussiaChina
1 source

If passed, the resolution would follow up on one adopted on June 12 of last year declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for not fully cooperating with an investigation into uranium traces found at undeclared sites. Israel started bombing Iran's nuclear facilities the next day, soon joined by the U.

S. Iran's uranium-enrichment plants were destroyed or badly damaged. Iran has not let International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors return to the bombed sites since then or verify what remains of its stocks of enriched uranium, some of which was enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade.

FRESH DIPLOMATIC ESCALATION A resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation board reporting Iran to the Security Council would also be the culmination of a standoff over IAEA access to those sites, since the board has passed two resolutions in the past year demanding Iran declare its enriched uranium stocks and grant the IAEA full access to verify them.

"(The board) requests the (IAEA) Director General to transmit this resolution and the previously adopted resolutions ... to all Members of the Agency and to the Security Council and the General Assembly of the United Nations," said the latest resolution draft seen by Reuters.

It also "reiterates its call upon Iran to urgently remedy its non-compliance with its Safeguards Agreement by taking all steps deemed necessary by the Agency and the Board, so that the Director General can provide the necessary assurances regarding the correctness and completeness of Iran's declarations".

The draft has not yet been formally submitted to the board and negotiations over the exact wording are ongoing, diplomats said. Whenever the four powers have submitted a draft resolution on Iran in recent years, it has passed. Concrete action by the Security Council against Iran is unlikely since Tehran's allies Russia and China are permanent, veto-wielding members.

IAEA CONCERNS OVER ENRICHMENT Iran has often retaliated following IAEA board resolutions against it by escalating its nuclear activities or scaling back cooperation with the IAEA, but its options for both are currently extremely limited. It is unclear what other repercussions there might be on Tehran's conflict with the U.

S. As a party to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran has the right to develop nuclear technology, including enrichment, for peaceful purposes. Iran says it would never produce nuclear weapons. It is, however, the only country to enrich to 60% without making a bomb.

The IAEA has said the amount it has enriched to that level is of serious concern. The IAEA estimates Iran had 440.9 kg of uranium enriched to that level before its sites were bombed. That is enough, if enriched further, for 10 nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick.

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUN
1 source

The US and its allies Britain, France and Germany are pushing other countries on the UN nuclear watchdog's board to pass a resolution next week reporting Iran to the UN Security Council for the first time in 20 years, diplomats said on Friday. If passed, the resolution would follow up on one adopted on June 12 of last year declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for not fully cooperating with an investigation into uranium traces found at undeclared sites.

The US launched an air war against Tehran on February 28 in which, together with Israel, it destroyed or badly damaged Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities. Iran has not let International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors return to the bombed sites since then or verify what remains of its stocks of enriched uranium, some of which was enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade.

Resolution would be culmination of standoff over IAEA's access to nuclear sites A resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation board reporting Iran to the Security Council would also be the culmination of a standoff over IAEA access to those sites, since the board has passed two resolutions in the past year demanding Iran declare its enriched uranium stocks and grant the IAEA full access to verify them.

A draft text for the resolution has yet to be formally submitted to the board and negotiations between countries over the exact wording are ongoing, diplomats said. A draft is usually formally submitted early in the week of a board meeting. As a party to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran has the right to develop nuclear technology, including enrichment, for peaceful purposes.

Iran says it would never produce nuclear weapons. It is, however, the only country to enrich to 60% without making a bomb. The amount it has enriched to that level is "a matter of serious concern" to the IAEA. The IAEA believes well over 200 kg of that highly enriched uranium has survived the bombardments and is held in a tunnel complex at Isfahan and at the Natanz facility.

Location: Jerusalem