מעקב משבר איראן-המפרץ 2026
CC
Events Archive
strikeApr 12, 2026

The art of the table: Pakistan’s history of making adversaries talk | The Express Tribune

Summary

The art of the table: Pakistan’s history of making adversaries talk Fifty years of brokering peace for others, can the 'Islamabad Talks' mark a turning point for Pakistan’s diplomacy? For a country long typecast as a source of regional instability, Pakistan pulled off something for the books. After almost six weeks of conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran, it was Islamabad that brokered a two-week ceasefire – maintaining a careful balancing act throughout, avoiding alignment with either side while quietly working to open channels for de-escalation. With less than two hours before US President Donald Trump's deadline for Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, who warned “a whole civilisation will die tonight, never to be brought back again”, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced that both sides had agreed to an immediate ceasefire. The praise that followed was swift and global, with world leaders lined up to congratulate Pakistan. The Malaysian prime minister called Islamabad's efforts "tireless and courageous" while Kazakhstan's president attributed the agreement directly to the mediation of Prime Minister Shehbaz and Chief of Defence Forces and Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir. However, for those who have watched Pakistan's diplomatic history closely, it is not the first time Pakistan has found itself at the centre of a geopolitical breakthrough – and that pattern, as much as the ceasefire itself, is worth examining. We’ve been here before "Pakistan's peace initiative will go down in diplomatic history as a milestone," said Masood Khalid, former ambassador of Pakistan to China. "The international community is fully supportive of Pakistan's peace efforts," he stated. He added, "Pakistan wants the two parties to realise the cost of their failure to reach a modus vivendi" but said that regardless, Pakistan would not be a loser "as it has made sincere efforts to provide a platform for Iran and the US to resolve their issues." However, the former ambassador remains measured regarding what comes next. "As regards the future trajectory, that depends on the US and Iran to find a middle ground, which is no doubt challenging, but still doable. Flexibility, maturity and rationality is needed in these talks to avoid a future crisis from erupting," he noted. Meanwhile, major general (retired) Inam ul Haque urges restraint in how the moment is interpreted. "We should not be too early to jump to conclusions," he said. "We should wait for the process to run its full course and then make an opinion as to where it is leading," he stated before the talks ended without an agreement on Sunday. Responding to whose diplomatic achievement it was, he remained cautious. "We should not give verdicts like whose big diplomatic achievement this is. It is the diplomatic achievement for peace, for Pakistan, for the US, for Iran, for all the stakeholders," Haque maintained. The quiet facilitator Brokering peace in a time of heightened global tensions is, in many ways, a familiar role for Pakistan. The country has a quiet but consequential history of making itself indispensable at moments when the world's great powers cannot, or will not, talk to each other directly. One such example was in 1971, when Washington and Beijing had not spoken in over two decades. It was through Islamabad that the first signals were passed – Pakistan's back channels to China gave then-US secretary of state Henry Kissinger a secret route to Beijing. His covert flight, routed through Islamabad, made Nixon's historic 1972 visit to China possible. This led to Nixon's famous handshake with Mao Zedong and the broader detente between the two countries, accompanied with the US' recognition of communist China. Pakistan hadn't just facilitated a meeting, it had helped rewire the global order. Read More: One message tipped the scales According to Ambassador Khalid, "In 1971, Pakistan played a seminal role in bringing about a rapprochement between the USA and China, and that changed global politics." He added, "Chinese leaders even today acknowledge our contribution. American leaders like Dr Kissinger also acknowledged our role." Major general Haque went further: "Pakistan was instrumental in patching up between China and the US in the 1970s. As far as our balancing act between China and the US is concerned, our foreign office and our establishment is very experienced in doing that. We have been walking this tight diplomatic road for a long time and we have been doing it very successfully." A decade and a half after aiding the US-China rapprochement, Pakistan was again at the centre of history. The 1988 Geneva Accords, which ended the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, were made possible in large part by Pakistan's role as a key conduit for the Afghan mujahideen and key interlocutor between Washington and the Afghan factions. The accords, a bilateral agreement between Afghanistan and Pakistan, included the US and the Soviet Union as guarantors. It laid out the terms and timeline for the return of refugees and the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan. Although Afghan unrest continued after the Soviet withdrawal, Pakistan, through strategic maneuvering of its diplomatic relationships, had managed to bring together the US and Soviet Union during the tense Cold War period, with both powers remaining guarantors of non-interference and non-intervention. The cost Pakistan paid for that role was concrete and lasting. Pakistan's economy was burdened by feeding millions of Afghan refugees for nearly a decade, while the country absorbed the narcotics trade and arms factionalism that the war had seeded across its western border – consequences that would define Pakistani society for a generation. Then came Doha in 2020, when Pakistan was again quietly instrumental in bringing the Taliban to the table, facilitating the agreement that was celebrated internationally as a landmark diplomatic achievement. The Doha Accords, known also as the Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan, saw Pakistan leverage its relationship with Washington and its influence with Taliban leadership to help end the long-running war. The agreement laid out fighting restrictions for both parties as well as the withdrawal of all NATO forces from Afghanistan in return for counter-terrorism commitments from the Taliban. "Be it the Geneva Accords or the Doha Accords, Pakistan has shown its commitment to peace and its capacity to deliver," said Ambassador Khalid. Also Read: How Pakistan brokered a two-week ceasefire deal between US, Iran? Pakistan's former permanent representative to the United Nations Dr Maleeha Lodhi, in a 2021 interview, also credited Islamabad for its role in the negotiation process. She stated that Pakistan kept the channel of communication open with the Taliban, adding, "If we hadn't, Pakistan would not have been able to play the constructive role it played in helping in the sequence of events that led to the Doha agreement between the US and the Taliban." The commitments of the accords, however, did not hold. Part of the Doha pact was an assurance that Afghanistan would not allow any terrorist group to use its soil to attack a foreign country, yet in the years that followed, the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan grew stronger, not weaker, operating from Afghan territory with training camps across Kunar, Nangarhar and Khost. Pakistan had helped broker a deal whose blowback landed squarely on itself. The dividend question Three moments, three generations, a strikingly consistent pattern – and a question that refuses to go away: what has Pakistan actually walked away with? The Geneva Accords left Pakistan managing millions of Afghan refugees and a narco-arms economy that would haunt it for decades. Doha produced neither security nor economic reward, only a more emboldened Taliban on its border and a deepening insurgency at home. By 2025, Pakistan was experiencing six times as many terrorist incidents as it did in 2020, the year the Doha Accords were signed. Nixon's opening to China also reshaped the world, but Pakistan remained on the margins of what followed. According to Khalid, "Whether Pakistan reaped strategic dividends or not is debatable." "I don't think it can be gauged in net loss or gain, it depended on the obtaining situation and geopolitical dynamics of the time," he said. In the current context, he argued, the measure should be different. "The biggest dividend would be if Pakistan's peace efforts are crowned with success. Pakistan is not a party in this conflict. Pakistan is a facilitator, mediator, and an honest broker." Haque, meanwhile, rejected the premise of the question: "I don't agree that Pakistan could not reap the strategic dividends of earlier diplomatic achievements," he said, adiing, "The mere fact that you are acknowledged as a big player which is influential at the global stage, that is important." He also draws a pointed analogy: "When Norway goes for mediation on the Afghanistan issue, it doesn't expect any diplomatic dividends or windfalls." For Haque, the recognition itself is the reward. "Pakistan is one of 200 United Nations members singly handling a very complex issue on which global peace is dependent. The mere fact that Pakistan is in the limelight for the right reasons globally; that is a great achievement," he maintained. The "Islamabad Talks" What makes Pakistan's brokering between Tehran and Washington different from its past endeavours is not just what Pakistan did – it is what everyone else didn't. Major powers including Russia, China, the European Union, Egypt, and Turkiye had resigned to fate and taken a backseat, leaving a vacuum that Islamabad chose to fill. In previous episodes, Pakistan was a corridor through which great powers moved. This time, it moved on its own. That movement did not happen overnight. Two turning points had rebuilt Pakistan's trust with Washington in the years prior: the capture of a suspect linked to the 2021 Kabul airport bombing, which prompted public thanks from President Trump, and the four-day war with India in May of 2025, which analysts said gave Pakistan's military leadership a significant boost in diplomatic credentials. By the time the Iran war began, CDF Munir, whom Trump had taken to calling his "favourite field marshal", had become the only serving military chief at the World Economic Forum in Davos, and had spoken with Vice President JD Vance multiple times since hostilities began. The groundwork for Pakistan's emergence as a key channel for peace was, thus, laid carefully. Before the "Islamabad Talks" even began, Islamabad had hosted a quadrilateral foreign ministers' meeting with representatives from Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, building a regional coalition behind its mediation efforts rather than simply offering itself as a venue. The role itself had also changed in kind. Islamabad transitioned from crisis mediator to host of high-stakes negotiations, with Vance travelling alongside senior envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, and Iran sending Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to negotiate on Pakistani soil. What followed were the highest-level direct talks between the US and Iran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution – 21 hours of negotiations that the world watched. However, they ended without a deal. Vance departed, crediting Pakistan directly, saying, "whatever shortcomings of the negotiation, it wasn't because of the Pakistanis who did an amazing job and really tried to help us and the Iranians bridge the gap and get to a deal." Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar, in the aftermath of the talks, urged both sides to uphold the ceasefire and maintain the talks' positive spirit. "Pakistan has been and will continue to play its role to facilitate engagement and dialogue," he said. It was a sentence Pakistan has, in different words, said before; after Geneva, after Doha, after 1971. What Pakistan has consistently demonstrated is its ability to bring adversaries to the table. Where it has struggled, over decades of quiet diplomacy, is sustaining influence once the talks move beyond the room. That, perhaps, is the question the “Islamabad Talks” leave behind: not whether Pakistan can convene dialogue, but whether it can shape what endures after it.

Actors involved

USIsraelIranUNRussiaChina

Sources

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy
1 source

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Iran attacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz early Tuesday, forcing its crew to abandon the ship, while the United States conducted yet another round of airstrikes targeting the Islamic Republic as they struggle over control of the key waterway.

The 10 consecutive nights of U.S. airstrikes haven’t compelled Tehran to loosen its grip on the strait, through which about a fifth of all crude oil and natural gas traded once passed in peacetime. Even as the U.S. and Iran inch closer to all-out war again, Iran’s interior minister traveled to Pakistan, a key mediator in the conflict, for talks.

However, it remains unclear just what new deal could be reached to end the fighting. The interim deal signed last month that was meant to end the fighting has crumbled. Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has largely stalled. And as fighting intensifies, both sides have targeted civilian infrastructure relied on by millions of people.

“Iran and groups supportive of Iran may target other U.S. interests overseas or at locations associated with the United States and Americans throughout the world,” the U.S. State Department said in a new warning to Americans. The escalation has pushed oil prices higher in recent weeks.

Benchmark Brent crude traded Tuesday above $88 a barrel and regular gasoline in the U.S. climbed to an average of $4 a gallon, keeping pressure on Americans’ wallets ahead of midterm elections this fall. Meanwhile, the U.S. military identified two soldiers who were killed in Jordan in attacks that left a third person missing.

Separately, the military confirmed another death in Iraq on Saturday during the “controlled detonation” of a downed Iranian drone. President Donald Trump took to social media on Monday to warn that “Every time Iran kills an American Soldier they will pay for that killing many times over!

” Trump was planning to attend a ceremony on Tuesday evening at Dover Air Force Base, where at least one service member’s remains were due to arrive. US strikes come as ships attacked The U.S. military’s Central Command said Tuesday it targeted “Iranian military command centers, maritime capabilities, missile and drone launch sites and air defense systems.

” It released more footage of bombings that targeted sites in Iran. “American forces remain postured and prepared to hold Iran accountable for unwarranted aggression toward civilian mariners seeking to freely and openly transit the strait,” the command said.

Iranian state media reported that explosions were heard in Fars, Hormozgan, Ilam, Kerman and Sistan and Baluchistan provinces. However, traffic through the strait has slowed to a crawl during the latest violence. Lloyd's List Intelligence said only three ships transited the strait on Sunday.

The British military’s United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center said a tanker came under attack early Tuesday in the strait off Oman, forcing the crew to abandon the vessel. Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard claimed the attack, as well as two other attacks on ships Monday in the waterway.

The route around Oman has been the one the U.S. military has encouraged ships to travel to avoid Iran’s control. The UKMTO separately reported Tuesday that another previously unknown attack on a ship took place early the previous day. Tehran also hit U.

S.-allied countries throughout the Middle East. Jordan military's said Tuesday that Iran targeted it with five drones and three missiles, all of which were shot down. Bahrain sounded its missile alert sirens Tuesday afternoon as another Iranian barrage targeted the island kingdom, which is home to the U.

S. Navy's 5th Fleet. Nearly 100 US injuries since early July The Pentagon’s chief spokesperson said nearly 100 U.S. service members have been injured since the U.S. restarted strikes on July 7, and 96% of them have returned to duty.

“The vast majority of injuries experienced were minor concussions,” Sean Parnell posted Monday on X in response to a New York Times report that the Pentagon has withheld information about troop injuries from Iranian strikes. He denied that the Pentagon was hiding data about injuries.

However, the Defense Casualty Analysis System, the military’s clearinghouse for reporting deaths and injuries in conflict, has not been updated as of Monday night with the latest attacks. Yemen rebels threaten attacks on other Mideast waterway Yemen’s Houthi rebels announced a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia on Monday.

The Houthis, who are backed by Iran, said they would block shipping between the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden by targeting the Bab el-Mandeb, a maritime chokepoint like the Strait of Hormuz, in response to an attack on Sanaa International Airport last week that they blamed on Saudi Arabia.

With the Strait of Hormuz blocked, Saudi Arabia has been relying on a pipeline to the Red Sea to get millions of barrels of oil out to market. The Houthis earlier demonstrated their ability to disrupt shipping there when they targeted ships for months over the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, with over 100 vessels attacked.

Saudi Arabia’s military said it would keep the waterway open. “All Houthi threats against transiting vessels will be dealt with swiftly and firmly, as such threats are a blatant violation of international law and fall under acts of maritime piracy,” said Maj.

Gen, Turki al-Malki, a Saudi military spokesman. A glimmer of hope for diplomacy Pakistan has intensified diplomatic efforts in recent days to resuscitate the interim deal. Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni arrived in Islamabad on Monday for two days of talks with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and others.

On Sunday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that the U.S. is still open to negotiating with Iran but that “it has to be real.” “If the door opens to diplomacy — if the guys that want to do something productive for Iran win and take control of that system, or take control of the negotiations — that’ll be a very positive development,” Rubio said.

“That’s not where we are tonight, unfortunately.” Iranian authorities on Sunday said at least 50 people have been killed and 517 wounded in the latest rounds of U.S. strikes. Since the war began on Feb. 28, 17 U.S. service members have been killed.

strikeUnverifiedUSIranRussiaChina
1 source

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth posted social media images showing damage to a maritime control tower at Iran’s Chabahar port following reported US military strikes, accompanied by the caption “Iran does not control the Strait of Hormuz.” India’s Ministry of External Affairs stated that the Shahid Beheshti terminal operated by India at the port sustained no damage.

The ministry reiterated its position that civilian infrastructure should not be targeted during conflicts.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy
1 source

U.S. strikes Iran and Houthis threaten Saudi Arabia shipping as mediators push 10-day ceasefire - The U.S. has carried out its tenth consecutive evening of attacks against Iran. - Iran attacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz early Tuesday, while Houthi militants in Yemen declared a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia.

- Rystad Energy has warned about the risk of a significant rebound in oil prices. The U.S. completed a fresh round of strikes against Iran on Monday evening as Yemen's Iran-backed Houthis threatened to impose a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia, potentially opening a new front in the Middle East conflict.

The latest cycle of tit-for-tat strikes comes amid reports that regional mediators have presented Washington and Tehran with a proposal for a 10-day ceasefire, a pitch that could put last month's Memorandum of Understanding back on track. The U.S. Central Command said overnight that it had carried out another round of strikes on Iran at 9 p.

m. ET on Monday. "U.S. forces struck Iranian military command centers, maritime capabilities, missile and drone launch sites, and air defense systems to degrade Iran's ability to continue attacking commercial vessels flowing through the Strait of Hormuz," Centcom said in a statement.

It added that commercial vessel transits through the strategically vital waterway were continuing. Centcom forces, the statement said, had facilitated the transit of around 900 commercial vessels and 450 million barrels of crude oil through the strait since early May.

Iran, meanwhile, attacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz early Tuesday, forcing its crew to abandon the vessel as it seeks to tighten its control over the waterway, one that typically handles around 20% of the world's oil traffic. Houthi militants in Yemen on Monday declared a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia effective immediately, a move that could substantially threaten Middle East oil supplies.

The Houthis have repeatedly threatened to close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait during the U.S.-Iran war. The strait is a choke point for commercial ship traffic that connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and global markets. The militants, in a statement carried by state news, accused the Saudis of laying an "aggressive siege" against them.

Tensions escalated last week after they claimed that Riyadh had bombed Sanaa International Airport. The Saudi-led coalition in Yemen said that it would respond to the Houthis naval blockade with force, reportedly describing such threats as "a blatant violation of international law.

" 10-day ceasefire 'won't be an easy task' Oil prices rose briefly on news of the Houthi statement but later pared gains as energy market participants closely monitored the prospect of a diplomatic breakthrough. International benchmark Brent crude futures with September delivery were last seen trading 0.

5% lower at $88.77 per barrel, having surpassed $90 in the previous session. U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures with August delivery, meanwhile, stood 0.4% lower at $82.88. Strategists at ING said there's some hope of de-escalation between the U.S.

and Iran given the reports that mediators are proposing a 10-day ceasefire. "This won't be an easy task," ING's Warren Patterson and Ewa Manthey said in a research note published Tuesday. "Large divisions remain between the US and Iran. And President Trump said the US would retaliate following the deaths of several American troops," they added.

In a post on Truth Social on Monday, President Donald Trump said: "Every time Iran kills an American Soldier they will pay for that killing many times over!" He added that this directive had been passed on to every leader in the military. Saudi Arabia oil risk Jorge León, senior vice president and head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy, said the Houthis' threat puts approximately 2.

5 million barrels per day of Saudi Arabian oil at risk at a time when traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is at a standstill. "With the Gulf's primary maritime outlet largely closed, the market is increasingly dependent on Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline and Red Sea terminals to maintain export flows," León said Monday in a research note.

Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline network, or Petroline, is a roughly 750-mile system that transports crude across Saudi Arabia, connecting Abqaiq on the oil-rich kingdom's eastern Gulf coast to the port of Yanbu on the Red Sea. "Any disruption at Bab el-Mandeb would therefore threaten not only Saudi shipments but one of the few remaining routes capable of compensating for the severe reduction in Hormuz traffic," León said.

"If a ceasefire does not materialize and Hormuz remains largely closed while the Houthi threat to Red Sea shipping intensifies, the risk of a significant rebound in oil prices would be substantial," he added. — CNBC's Chloe Taylor and Spencer Kimball both contributed to this report.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedIsraelIranProxy
1 source

Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis announced Monday they would impose a maritime blockade on Saudi Arabia, further throttling a global energy market already greatly restricted by Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz. This is why it matters and what it means for the Iran war and the global energy crisis.

It is not clear how the Houthis would carry out a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia, its northern neighbor along the Red Sea coast, or whether it would include a return to attacks on shipping. Yemen sits on the Bab el-Mandeb strait – the southern gateway to the Red Sea – and closing that would open up a new front in the energy crisis and Iran's overarching conflict with the U.

S. With the Strait of Hormuz already disrupted, the Red Sea has become a critical alternative outlet for Gulf oil and other products. A serious disruption would mean both of the Middle East's major oil export routes are shut simultaneously. Iran's partial blockade of the Strait of Hormuz after Israel and the U.

S. attacked it on Feb. 28 disrupted most oil and other exports from the Gulf, raising prices and delivering a global energy shock. Saudi Arabia responded by diverting more than 70% of its normal daily crude exports to the Red Sea port of Yanbu. Ships from Yanbu bound for Europe go north through the Suez Canal.

Those heading to Asia go south through Bab el-Mandeb. Shipments from Yanbu averaged 4 million barrels per day in recent weeks according to data from Kpler and Signal Ocean, up from around 973,000 bpd a year earlier. Total petroleum volumes transiting Bab el-Mandeb amounted to 7.

4 million bpd in June, or about 7% of global oil output, according to Kpler data, up from 4.2 million bpd last year. That has provided a lifeline for the energy market, helping to keep down global oil prices. Saudi Arabia is considering an expansion of its crude oil pipeline to the Red Sea coast, Reuters reported last week.

When the Houthis launched attacks on Red Sea shipping in November 2023, Gulf oil exports were flowing freely. The Houthis have been in a civil war against the Saudi-backed, internationally recognized government for more than a decade and have attacked Gulf neighbors with missiles and drones.

However, a 2022 truce between the country's warring sides largely held until last week, when Yemen's internationally recognized government said it had struck Sanaa airport to stop an Iranian plane landing. The Houthis said Saudi Arabia was responsible and, in response, fired missiles at Abha airport in the kingdom's mountainous southwest.

A senior Houthi official, politburo member Mohammad al-Farah, then warned in an interview on Iran's Press TV website that if the situation kept escalating, Bab el-Mandeb would be closed. The U.S. says Iran has armed, funded and trained the Houthis with help from Hezbollah.

The Houthis deny being an Iranian proxy and say they develop their own weapons. It is not clear how far the group's stance on Bab el-Mandeb and the Red Sea stems from its own strategic priorities or is being made on Iran's behalf. After Israel's genocidal campaign in Gaza, the Houthis began firing at Israel and on shipping in the Red Sea, saying they were doing so in support of Palestinians.

The attacks severely disrupted global shipping, prompting Maersk, Hapag-Lloyd and other major companies to divert around Africa – a far longer, more expensive route. Red Sea traffic has not recovered since, with traffic through the Suez Canal down 52% in 2025 versus 2023 levels and at its lowest in at least 50 years, Suez Canal Authority data shows.

A U.S.-led mission to restore free navigation in the Red Sea involved repeated strikes on Houthi targets and a campaign that shot down hundreds of drones and missiles. But some Houthi attacks continued until last summer, only ending completely with the Gaza cease-fire in October.

Last month, the Houthis said they would ban ships linked to Israel from the Red Sea after Israel renewed military attacks on Iran. However, that threat was never acted on and shipping groups Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd are resuming some Red Sea routes that they had abandoned during the Houthi attacks last year, Maersk said this month.

While Hezbollah and the Iraqi groups joined the war early with rocket and drone fire after the first U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, the Houthis had been comparatively quiet. The group's leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi said on March 5: "Our fingers are on the trigger at any moment should developments warrant it.

" Iranian commanders have repeatedly warned that the Houthis could join the war. The Houthis launched a few missile and drone attacks on Israel in late March and early April. Revolutionary Guards Quds Force commander Esmaeil Qaani said on June 1 they could choke off the Red Sea.

That may now have changed with their announcement of the blockade on Monday against Saudi Arabia in retaliation for what they called the kingdom's siege of its ports and airports, including last week's strike.