ConflictClarifier

2026伊朗-海湾危机追踪
CC
Main
Live Data
Analytics
Tools
Reference
Events Archive
diplomacyAug 17, 2026

Can the AU make its current Sudan mission count?

Summary

Can the AU make its current Sudan mission count? The African Union is seeking progress in Sudan, but must overcome deep battlefield and diplomatic divisions. A delegation from the African Union (AU) began a two-day field visit to Sudan on Sunday, seeking to push efforts towards a ceasefire, improve humanitarian access and revive a political process to end the war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions in the past three years. The AU Peace and Security Council (PSC) is engaging with Sudanese authorities and other parties in the conflict, addressing humanitarian aid access and prospects for a political settlement. The PSC decided earlier this year to undertake the mission to contribute to efforts towards lasting peace and stability. The delegation arrives at a difficult point in the war. The Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) have regained control of much of the capital, Khartoum while the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) remain entrenched across much of Darfur in western Sudan. Kordofan, the region linking central, western and southern parts of the country, has become another major theatre for fighting. The SAF’s gains around the capital have changed the military balance, but neither side has achieved a decisive victory. That leaves the AU trying to advance diplomacy while both forces still believe they can improve their positions on the battlefield. What is the AU trying to achieve? The PSC’s priorities are closely connected: pushing the SAF and RSF towards a ceasefire, improving humanitarian access and preserving a political process that can determine Sudan’s future beyond the two armed groups. The AU has repeatedly called for an inclusive, Sudanese-led political process because stopping the fighting alone would not resolve the crisis that preceded the war. Sudan’s transition after the 2019 overthrow of longtime ruler Omar al-Bashir collapsed amid disputes between civilian groups and the military. In October 2021, the military dissolved the civilian-military power-sharing arrangement, deepening tensions over the country’s future. The war began in April 2023 after months of rivalry between the SAF and RSF over the proposed transition to civilian rule. The AU faces a two-track challenge: reducing the fighting enough to allow humanitarian assistance and negotiations, while ensuring any settlement is not simply an agreement between two armed factions over power and territory. Where does the war stand? The SAF’s recapture of much of Khartoum strengthened the army’s position throughout central Sudan. But the RSF’s setbacks in the capital did not amount to defeat. It remains a powerful military force with control over large parts of Darfur and the ability to continue fighting elsewhere. Kordofan has become particularly important because of its location between areas controlled by the two sides and the strategic routes that connect them. Fighting around el-Obeid shows the war remains active, despite the army’s gains around Khartoum. Control of Kordofan could affect supply routes linking SAF-held areas with western Sudan, while also influencing the RSF’s ability to move fighters and equipment between Darfur and other parts of the country. That battlefield reality is central to the diplomatic challenge. If either side believed it was close to victory, it would have little incentive to compromise. But neither has been able to decisively defeat the other. Why have previous efforts failed? The AU has been involved in Sudan diplomacy since the beginning of the war. In May 2023, the PSC adopted a roadmap calling for a permanent and inclusive ceasefire, humanitarian access, civilian protection and a return to a credible political transition. The SAF and RSF signed commitments in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in May 2023 on civilian protection, a short-term ceasefire and humanitarian arrangements. But those agreements failed to stop the fighting. In October 2024, the PSC undertook another field mission to Cairo and Port Sudan, pressing for a ceasefire, humanitarian access and a return to a political process. The problem has therefore not been a shortage of diplomatic initiatives. The difficulty has been persuading the warring parties to make concessions when both continue to believe they can gain more on the battlefield. The wider mediation effort has also involved the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), an East African regional organisation, the United Nations (UN) and the United States and Saudi Arabia through the Jeddah process. The AU has repeatedly called for greater coordination between these efforts. African-led mediation has succeeded in other crises, but Sudan presents a far harder challenge. Unlike Kenya’s post-election crisis, where AU-backed mediation helped produce a power-sharing agreement after the disputed 2007 election, Sudan’s conflict involves two heavily armed forces that control territory and still believe they can improve their positions through force. Does the AU have enough leverage? The PSC has diplomatic weight, but that does not necessarily give it the leverage needed to compel the SAF and RSF to stop fighting. Dennis Amachree, a former deputy director of Nigeria’s Department of State Services (DSS), told Al Jazeera that the AU lacks the leverage to compel the two sides to end the war. “Unfortunately, the AU does not have the leverage on its own to compel the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) to stop fighting.” He argued that the AU lacks “an enforcement mechanism, financial leverage and a standby military force” to pressure the main warring parties. That leaves the AU dependent on diplomatic pressure and coordination with regional and international actors. Its challenge is to turn political legitimacy into enough pressure to make negotiations more attractive to the SAF and RSF than another offensive. Can this visit break the deadlock? Benjamin Dowmoh-Doyen of the African Chamber of Content Producers (ACCP) told Al Jazeera that the visit was a step towards an African-led solution. “This AU visit is a step in the right direction. Africa must own its own affairs and an African-led, African-owned solution is the only path to a lasting resolution in Sudan.” But African ownership alone will not resolve the deadlock. The AU needs the SAF and RSF to accept that a political process offers something that continued fighting cannot. The two-day visit will not resolve those problems. Its significance will depend on whether the AU can secure commitments that survive after the delegation leaves and create enough space for negotiations to move forward. Kabir Amadu, a security analyst in Nigeria and founder of Beacon Consulting Limited, argues that the Sudan war has produced exhaustion rather than a resolution, with both sides receiving enough internal and external support to continue fighting but not enough to secure a decisive victory. “The AU delegation’s challenge is to convert this battlefield stalemate into diplomatic momentum before it hardens into a permanent partition of Sudan,” he told Al Jazeera.

Actors involved

USUNSudan

Sources

  • Al Jazeera staffBy Al Jazeera staff

    Can the AU make its current Sudan mission count? The African Union is seeking progress in Sudan, but must overcome deep battlefield and diplomatic divisions. A delegation from the African Union (AU) began a two-day field visit to Sudan on Sunday, seeking to push efforts towards a…

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

diplomacyUnverifiedUSIran

Metaplanet expands Bitcoin treasury strategy to US with 2,100-BTC Nasdaq play

○ 1 source

Key points: Bitcoin diverges from US stocks as Trump says Strait of Hormuz “open” Data from TradingView showed BTC/USD building on the week’s gains as the S&P 500 bounced from 7,696, its lowest level since Aug. 4. BTC/USD four-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView This came after US president Donald Trump posted a map of the closed Strait of Hormuz oil route to Truth Social where it was labeled “new US territory.

” Both the US and Iran lay claim to control of Hormuz, with Trump threatening US ally Oman with military action over its plans to work with Iran on charging tolls to shipping traffic. In a subsequent post, Trump confirmed that further diplomacy with Iran was not on the agenda.

“There are no talks or conversations going on, or scheduled, with the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Naval Blockade remains in full force and effect. The Hormuz Strait is open and operating. All water mines have been removed or detonated,” he wrote. S&P 500 one-day chart.

Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView As on Monday, oil avoided major volatility, with WTI crude down 1% at the time of writing at $84 per barrel. US government bonds continued to show strain, with the 30-year yield hitting 5.34%, its highest since January 2007.

“Bond prices are sending warnings,” BNY Mellon analyst Geoff Yu wrote in a research note quoted by the New York Times. Yu said that the surge came as “investors demand more compensation for inflation risk,” while also attributing the upside to government borrowing.

US 30-year bond yields one-month chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView BTC price faces crunch rebound test Updating X followers on BTC/USD, trader and analyst Aksel Kibar eyed the culmination of a potential reverse head-and-shoulders pattern at $62,300.

Related: Bitcoin price spike to $64.5K was ‘low-volume liquidity trap’: Analysis “If $BTCUSD is going to rebound, it has to come from here,” he argued on Monday. Kibar offered a $53,000 target in the event of the head-and-shoulders structure failing, with $76,000 a potential upside target should the rebound sustain.

BTC/USD one-day chart. Source: Aksel Kibar on X.com Previously, Cointelegraph reported that underwater investors were contributing to Bitcoin’s inability to break higher. Its rebound to $64,500 also stopped short of an overhead trend line, the 50-month exponential moving average (EMA).

This moving average is now in place as resistance at $65,827.

Location: Strait of Hormuz
CurrentsAPI
diplomacyUnverifiedUSIran

Trump says no talks underway with Iran, Hormuz blockade remains in place

○ 1 source

Trump says no talks underway with Iran, Hormuz blockade remains in place US president says no discussions are taking place or planned with Tehran and reiterates that the naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz remains fully operational Washington: US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that no talks are taking place with Iran and that no discussions are currently scheduled between the two countries.

In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump also said the naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz remains "in full force and effect." The president did not provide further details regarding US policy towards Iran or any potential future diplomatic engagement.

Trump's comments come amid continued tensions between Washington and Tehran and renewed focus on security and navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important oil shipping routes.

Location: Tehran
CurrentsAPI
diplomacyUnverifiedUSIran

Iran ‘won war and diplomacy,’ foreign minister says after Trump’s call for Tehran to surrender

○ 1 source

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tuesday that Iran had “won both the war and diplomacy,” claiming those who initially sought Tehran’s “unconditional surrender” later sought negotiations. Speaking at an event, Araghchi said Iran resisted for days against what he described as “the world’s largest apparent military,” alongside another army claiming military power and with the support of nearly all Western countries and some other states inside and outside the region, according to the Tasnim news agency.

“Those who were seeking unconditional surrender, shortly after the war began, begged for negotiations,” Araghchi said. He claimed Tehran initially rejected a ceasefire and continued fighting until reaching a point where the other side accepted a ceasefire and negotiations “on Iran’s terms.

” “We fought with strength, and we negotiated with strength,” he said, adding that many foreign ministers had told him: “You won both the war and diplomacy.” Araghchi’s remarks came after US President Donald Trump called on Iran on Monday to give up and “raise the white flag.

Location: Tehran
Anadolu
diplomacyUnverifiedUSIran

Hormuz To Remain Closed Until US Releases Frozen Assets, Meets Interim Deal Conditions: Iran's Ghalibaf

○ 1 source

- Iran demands US lift sanctions and return frozen assets to reopen Strait of Hormuz - Iran's Parliament Speaker warns closure of Strait continues until US ends military threats - Around 20% of global oil supply passes through the Strait, impacting energy security Iran has warned that the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until the US meets a set of conditions, including the release of frozen Iranian assets, an end to oil sanctions and what Tehran describes as a US blockade and military threats.

Al-Arabiya English reported that Iran's Parliament Speaker and top negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said the Trump administration must meet the conditions before Tehran considers reopening the strategic waterway. “Until the Trump regime removes the blockade, ends the wars across the region, returns Iran's stolen assets, lifts the oil sanctions, and ceases its military threats, the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed,” Ghalibaf said.

Until the Trump regime removes the blockade, ends the wars across the region, returns Iran's stolen assets, lifts the oil sanctions, and ceases its military threats, the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed. pic.twitter.com/fl2RrKnT1R— Seyed Mohammad Marandi (@s_m_marandi) August 18, 2026 Ghalibaf also warned that Iran was prepared to respond more forcefully depending on the actions of its adversaries.

ALSO READ: 'We Control Hormuz': Trump To Declare Strait As US Territory? Here's What President Says The comments add a new condition to an already fragile diplomatic environment, with the Strait of Hormuz at the centre of concerns over global energy supplies.

Around one-fifth of global oil supply typically passes through the waterway, making any prolonged disruption a major risk for crude markets, shipping and energy security. Earlier, Press TV reported that Ghalibaf is scheduled to travel to Baghdad on Wednesday at the head of a high-level Iranian delegation for discussions with Iraqi leaders.

The talks are expected to cover regional developments and bilateral cooperation, including border security, counterterrorism, economic ties and implementation of existing agreements. Iraqi media have also reported that the agenda could include a proposal concerning Iraqi oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz.

The visit comes as regional governments grapple with the implications of continued disruption in one of the world's most important energy corridors. ALSO READ: Hormuz Tensions: Another Ship Hit By Unknown Projectile, Says UKMTO Centre The security situation in the waterway has also remained tense.

The UK's Maritime Trade Operations agency, or UKMTO, said a vessel reported being struck by an unknown projectile while conducting an outbound transit of the Strait of Hormuz. “The Company Security Officer has reported that the vessel was struck by an unknown projectile while conducting an outbound transit of the Strait of Hormuz,” UKMTO said.

The impact damaged the vessel's engine room and resulted in a crew casualty, the agency said. The remaining crew was being assisted by the Omani coastguard. Essential Business Intelligence, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice, Daily Fuel, Gold and Silver Prices and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.

Location: Tehran
Noor Ul Haq