2026伊朗-海湾危机追踪
CC
Events Archive
strikeJun 2, 2026

David Axelrod says Trump was ‘not wrong’ after lashing out at Benjamin Netanyahu in phone call

Summary

David Axelrod says Trump was ‘not wrong’ after lashing out at Benjamin Netanyahu in phone call WASHINGTON, DC: Democratic strategist David Axelrod said President Donald Trump was “not wrong” after reports surfaced that the latter lashed out at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a heated phone call over Israel’s military actions in Lebanon. According to an Axios report published Monday, June 1, Trump and Netanyahu had a tense conversation in which the US president put the Israeli leader on blast as fighting continues in Lebanon. The conflict is unfolding alongside ongoing efforts by US and Iranian officials to negotiate an end to the war involving Iran, which began in February. Iran has maintained that any agreement must include a halt to Israeli military operations in Lebanon. Israel, however, launched another invasion in March. Furthermore, Netanyahu recently ramped up the campaign by ordering strikes in Beirut’s suburbs. David Axelrod says Trump’s outburst reflects growing frustration Citing two US officials familiar with the conversation, Axios reported that Trump erupted during the call. “You’re f***ing crazy,” Trump reportedly told Netanyahu. “Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this.” Another source told the outlet that Trump was “pissed” and demanded of the Israeli leader, “What the f**k are you doing?” The report quickly became a topic of discussion on CNN’s OutFront, where host Erin Burnett read portions of the article and asked Axelrod for his reaction. “It doesn’t sound like a very friendly call,” Axelrod said. “Look, I think that the president, his analysis is not wrong. You know, Bibi Netanyahu has done tremendous damage, in my view, to Israel and to Israel’s standing in the world.” Axelrod argued that Netanyahu’s actions have significantly harmed Israel’s international reputation and suggested that Trump’s frustration goes beyond the immediate military situation. Netanyahu’s role in selling Iran strategy Axelrod pointed to a New York Times report from April detailing a February 11 briefing Netanyahu gave to Trump and senior US officials in the White House Situation Room. According to the report, Netanyahu presented Iran as vulnerable to regime change and argued that a sustained bombing campaign could help bring it about. Seventeen days later, the United States and Israel launched a joint bombing operation. “Bibi had a lot to do with talking the president into thinking this was a good idea,” Axelrod said. “And that’s what he’s really mad about. What he’s mad about is Bibi has created a huge political problem for him because the economy is the thing that is on the minds of Americans, and he has made it worse. And he promised to make it better. And that was his calling card. He was Mr Economy, and now their costs are going up, and we’re mired in this war.” Not long after the Axios report was published, Trump publicly revealed that he had urged Netanyahu to avoid a major military operation in Beirut. “I asked him not to go into a major raid of Beirut,” Trump said. “He turned his Troops around,” the president added. Trump allies also clash with Netanyahu The reported tension between Trump and Netanyahu comes as several of the President’s allies have also expressed concerns about the Israeli leader’s handling of the conflict. Reports from March indicated that Vice President JD Vance and Netanyahu had their own strained phone conversation. Vance reportedly challenged Netanyahu over predictions he had made to Trump regarding the war. “Before the war, Bibi really sold it to the President as being easy, as regime change being a lot likelier than it was,” one source told Axios. “And the VP was clear-eyed about some of those statements.” Former Trump strategist Steve Bannon has gone even further. During a March episode of his War Room podcast, Bannon argued that family members of regional leaders should be sent to the front lines before the United States commits additional troops. Trump's former advisor, Steve Bannon, called for Yair Netanyahu, son of Benjamin Netanyahu who lives in Miami, to be deported and sent to fight in the war against Iran. pic.twitter.com/YNUmaeGJpt— The Resonance (@Partisan_12) March 31, 2026 He specifically targeted Netanyahu’s son, Yair Netanyahu, who is reported to be living in Florida. “Throw in a couple of Qatar princes, throw the Saudi princes in there too. Get them out of London,” Bannon said. “Netanyahu’s kid down in Miami? Turf him out tomorrow. Where’s DHS? We need him. Get him. Throw him out. Get him back there,” Bannon added. “Put a uniform on him. Let’s have him in the first wave.”

Perspectives

Iranian Official

The Iranian government maintains that any resolution to the conflict must compel an immediate end to Israel's repeated aggressions against Lebanon, including its March invasion and strikes on Beirut, as a prerequisite for safeguarding regional sovereignty. Tehran views the ongoing war, which began in February, as a direct response to foreign occupation and interference, rejecting any deal that tolerates such violations. Even US officials' reported frustration with Netanyahu reflects the growing isolation of Israel's expansionist policies amid Iran's principled resistance.

Israeli

From Israel's perspective, Prime Minister Netanyahu's military operations in Lebanon represent a necessary defense against existential threats posed by Iran's extensive proxy network, particularly Hezbollah, which continues to launch attacks aimed at Israel's destruction. US pressure during Iran negotiations, including reported criticisms of Israel's strikes in Beirut suburbs following the March invasion, risks undermining these defensive efforts essential to counter Tehran's regional aggression. Such tensions highlight the challenges of aligning American diplomacy with Israel's imperative to neutralize Iran-backed forces threatening its survival.

Neutral

According to an Axios report citing two unnamed US officials, President Trump expressed frustration with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu during a phone call regarding ongoing Israeli military operations in Lebanon, with one official attributing to Trump the statements “You’re f***ing crazy” and “What the f**k are you doing?” Democratic strategist David Axelrod stated that Trump was “not wrong” in his reported remarks. The Axios account remains unverified by other sources, and details of the conversation have not been confirmed by the White House or Israeli officials.

Western

President Trump voiced sharp concerns to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu over the pace of operations in Lebanon, underscoring the need to align military pressure with broader Western efforts to curb Iranian influence and secure a durable end to hostilities that began in February. Israeli forces have conducted precision strikes and a March incursion aimed at neutralizing Hezbollah threats embedded in civilian areas, including Beirut suburbs, as part of a strategy to degrade Iranian proxy capabilities. Axios reporting on the call prompted Democratic strategist David Axelrod to observe that Trump’s frustration was not misplaced given the imperative of coordinated threat reduction.

Pro-Peace

Amid the ongoing war in Lebanon that began in February, Israeli strikes—including recent assaults on Beirut’s suburbs—have caused mounting civilian deaths, displacement, and humanitarian devastation. As US and Iranian officials pursue diplomatic talks to end the fighting, with calls for halting military operations, President Trump reportedly rebuked Prime Minister Netanyahu, declaring the actions make “everybody hate Israel.” Democratic strategist David Axelrod agreed Trump was “not wrong,” highlighting how escalation undermines peace efforts and exacts an intolerable human cost.

Global South

Reports of US President Trump's outburst against Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu during talks over Israel's March invasion and Beirut strikes in Lebanon expose Washington's neo-colonial leverage over allies to salvage faltering Iran negotiations, while Lebanese sovereignty remains collateral. Iran's insistence on halting operations clashes with Tel Aviv's escalations, underscoring how US-brokered diplomacy sidelines non-aligned voices and regional autonomy. Strategist David Axelrod's view that Trump was "not wrong" further illustrates institutional failures in curbing such proxy conflicts.

Actors involved

USIsraelIran

Sources

  • Kunal DeyBy Kunal Dey

    David Axelrod says Trump was ‘not wrong’ after lashing out at Benjamin Netanyahu in phone call WASHINGTON, DC: Democratic strategist David Axelrod said President Donald Trump was “not wrong” after reports surfaced that the latter lashed out at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Neta

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy
1 source

Goldman Sachs has projected Brent crude averaging $80 per barrel in the fourth quarter and $75 in the following year, conditional on reduced Middle East tensions, while noting upside risks from potential shipping disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz or Red Sea.

Brent prices rose above $91 per barrel amid recent U.S.-Iran exchanges and Houthi threats to Saudi shipments before edging lower on Tuesday. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that mediators had proposed a 10-day ceasefire to preserve an interim agreement.

Location: Tehran
strikeUnverifiedUSIranUN
1 source

US forces struck the tanker Settebello in the Gulf of Oman on June 10, killing three Indian crew members when munitions hit the engine room and adjacent areas. Maritime tracking data indicate the vessel had transported Iranian oil under US sanctions for several years and conducted offshore transfers prior to the strike.

The US military described the action as a precision operation, while reports note the ship was stationary at the time.

Location: Strait of Hormuz
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy
1 source

Iranian officials reported strikes on US radar and air defense sites in Kuwait and Bahrain, along with the interception of two oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz. The United States conducted strikes on Iranian targets following the deaths of three US soldiers, with the Pentagon stating the actions aimed to degrade capabilities affecting shipping.

Houthi forces in Yemen announced plans to blockade Saudi ports, while both US and Iranian leaders issued statements on further escalation.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIranChina
1 source

The Andaman and Nicobar Islands are the site of Indian infrastructure projects, including the Great Nicobar Project and a proposed greenfield airport intended for civilian and naval use. An analysis published by the Indian defence portal IDRW states that U.

S. officials regard the developments as strengthening maritime security, surveillance and logistics in the Indo-Pacific. The islands’ location has long been cited in Indian statements as relevant to New Delhi’s maritime responsibilities in the Indian Ocean region.

Location: Strait of Hormuz