ConflictClarifier

2026伊朗-海湾危机追踪
CC
Events Archive
strikeApr 13, 2026

Iran war: Talks collapse is bad news for ordinary Iranians

Summary

Iran war: Talks collapse is bad news for ordinary IraniansApril 13, 2026 The US-Iran talks in Islamabad were seen as a test of whether the fragile ceasefire could lay the groundwork for a more durable peace. Instead, the negotiations ended without a deal. But even though no agreement was reached, the talks were not entirely in vain. They were the highest-level direct meetings between the two sides since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. And despite the talks' perceived failure, diplomatic channels appear to remain open, at least until the temporary ceasefire's deadline on April 22, with Pakistan urging both sides to uphold the truce. US Vice President JD Vance, who led the American delegation, called the US offer their "last proposal," which Iranian officials called "unreasonable" and "excessive." But while there is still a significant gap to bridge between Washington and Tehran, domestic pressure on the Iranian regime is also playing a major role. A pragmatic opening, but no breakthrough Public reporting on the details of the US proposal remains fragmentary and disputed. But hardline Iranian lawmaker Mahmoud Nabavian, who was part of the delegation in Islamabad, claimed on X that Washington wanted a share in revenues from the Strait of Hormuz, the removal of all 60% enriched uranium, and a 20-year halt to Iranian uranium enrichment. Those claims have not been independently verified, but they do show how quickly hardliners in Tehran moved to frame the US position as maximalist and humiliating. The tone struck by Iran's Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, who was also part of the Iranian negotiating team, was noticeably more measured. After the talks, he said that Iran had entered with "goodwill and the necessary will," but that past wars had left Tehran with "no trust in the other side." He added that the US had now understood Iran's principles, and that it was up to Washington to decide whether it could "earn our trust." The contrasting positions demonstrate that within the Iranian camp, there appear to be different priorities: one side trying to keep the door to diplomacy open, another trying to make clear that any agreement would come at too high a political cost. The real pressure is inside Iran The collapse of the talks was bad news for most ordinary Iranians, whose country and infrastructure have been battered by nearly six weeks of heavy bombings and airstrikes. One Tehran resident told DW that the company where he worked had been tied to Mobarakeh Steel and that after the plant was struck and shut down, some workers were told not to return. "Accounting staff is still there," he said, "but in sales, there is nobody left." He said he still hopes an agreement will be reached so that damaged factories can be rebuilt and people can return to work. Another Tehran resident described a deeper sense of economic collapse. "Hundreds of thousands have become unemployed," they told DW, adding that many people now cannot even afford basic goods, exacerbating an economic crisis that fueled huge protests across Iran earlier this year. "A product that cannot be bought is worthless," they said. They also pointed out that the internet shutdown since the outbreak of the war on February 28 had impacted countless jobs and strained family life. "Society is in a deep economic, political and social crisis," they said. That sense of unease in a country still reeling from the massive, nationwide anti-government demonstrations this year is one reason the clerical regime might still try to keep diplomatic channels open and return to the negotiating table. Iran's government might still have coercive power, but the economic and social costs of returning to full confrontation are rising fast Is a deal still possible? Despite the failure in Islamabad, some are hopeful that diplomatic efforts will eventually yield some form of meaningful outcome. Nazila Golestan, a political activist based in Paris, told DW that a longer war is neither in the interests of the increasingly isolated regime in Tehran, nor of the Iranian people, who have seen their cities, factories, energy facilities and other infrastructure bombed to destruction. "Continuing the war is harmful to the people, while continuing negotiations is in their interest," she said. Golestan added that the core issue is not simply whether Iran and the United States can strike a deal. "The main problem is Israel," she said. Her statement reflects a wider concern among Iranian observers: even if Tehran and Washington do find some common ground, regional actors and competing agendas could still complicate or weaken peace efforts. What leverage does Tehran still have? While Iran still has cards to play, namely its threats over the Strait of Hormuz, the war has significantly weakened its hand. But even the option of closing the strategic waterway or attacking ships trying to sail through it has arguably become even riskier. Shortly after the talks in Islamabad ended, President Donald Trump announced a US naval blockade of Iranian ports due to take effect on Monday afternoon. The escalatory rhetoric used by Trump just hours after the Islamabad talks ended shows how delicate this moment is for Iran. The ceasefire is still holding, and neither side appears ready to close the door to further talks. But inside Iran, people are no longer measuring events only in terms of strategy or prestige. They are measuring them in terms of jobs lost, rising prices, factories closing and the fear that if diplomacy fails again, the next round of war could be even harder to survive. Edited by: Karl Sexton

Actors involved

USIsraelIran

Sources

  • Daniel AmeriBy Daniel Ameri

    Iran war: Talks collapse is bad news for ordinary IraniansApril 13, 2026 The US-Iran talks in Islamabad were seen as a test of whether the fragile ceasefire could lay the groundwork for a more durable peace. Instead, the negotiations ended without a deal. But even though no agree

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranEUChina
1 source

Japan’s Defense Ministry said Friday that Iran used its geographical advantage to “inflict unbearable costs at a relatively low military expense,” effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz by indicating that it had laid naval mines, Kyodo News reported.

The ministry said Japan would strengthen its defense capabilities based on lessons from the US-Iran war, including by using defense equipment also operated by allies and like-minded partners to help ensure rapid supplies from other countries. It also stressed the need to maintain sufficient missile stockpiles and be prepared to quickly increase defense equipment production in an emergency, according to its first report analyzing the Iran war since February.

The US-Israeli war against Iran began on Feb. 28, with attacks targeting military, nuclear and infrastructure sites across the country. Iran responded with missile and drone strikes against Israel and US military facilities across the region. READ: EU joins US-led campaign to isolate Iran financially: Treasury chief Bessent Washington and Tehran signed a memorandum of understanding on June 18 concerning freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, but its implementation has stalled amid disagreements over security arrangements in the strait.

The Japanese report also said the country should take its own geographical characteristics into account when developing combat strategies, including the fact that it is surrounded by sea. The report noted the US use of AI to accelerate decision-making and operations, citing attacks on around 1,000 targets within 24 hours, while also highlighting the risk of AI making incorrect judgments.

“It is important to establish a process that maximizes the benefits of AI while ensuring appropriate human involvement,” the ministry said. The report comes ahead of a planned revision of Japan’s key security documents by the end of this year.

strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy
1 source

A major offensive by Yemen's Houthis to seize control of the gateway to the Red Sea has left more than 120 people dead, sources told AFP Friday, the country's deadliest clashes in years. Fighting erupted on Thursday, after the Iran-backed Houthis launched a ground assault along with rocket and drone attacks near coastal areas, vying for control of the narrow Bab al-Mandab strait at the Red Sea's southern entrance.

Yemen, embroiled in more than a decade of civil conflict, in July became the latest country to be drawn into the Middle East war as the Houthis upended a 2022 truce with the Saudi-backed government. Since then, the Houthis have imposed a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia and repeatedly attacked its ships in the Red Sea -- a vital alternative route for oil exports after Iran all but halted Gulf shipments by blockading the Strait of Hormuz.

The rebels are now trying to tighten their hold over the Red Sea, one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, which they have disrupted with attacks on passing vessels since the Gaza war broke out in 2023. The Houthi offensive aims to cut off the government-held port city of Mokha, under fire for weeks, and advance towards areas bordering the Bab al-Mandab, military sources told AFP.

The rebels have seized elevated sites overlooking government positions near the Red Sea and the city of Taiz further inland, a military source and a Taiz official told AFP, requesting anonymity. The Houthis could target ships from these elevated positions, they said.

The toll rose to 129 on Friday, according to an AFP tally compiled from several sources, up from an earlier count of 81. A Yemeni military official speaking on condition of anonymity told AFP that 66 of his men had been killed, while medical and military sources close to the Houthis said at least 62 militants had died.

Another medical source said a civilian had also been killed. Although the Houthis do not control areas bordering Bab al-Mandab, they hold the key port city of Hodeida north of Mokha. "They are going for Bab al-Mandab," said Mohammed al-Basha, of the US-based risk advisory Basha Report.

The Houthis want to control the hills overlooking Bab al-Mandab and Mokha before attacking the coast, a Yemeni official in Aden, the government's base since it was ousted from the rebel-held capital, Sanaa, in 2014. The government has sent reinforcements to Taiz from Aden on Saudi orders, he said.

"The Houthis feel that if they capture Bab al-Mandab or Mokha port they will be in a better position of power to negotiate with the government and the Saudis," Basha added. With Iran's closure of Hormuz, the Bab al-Mandab chokepoint has gained increased importance as a transit route for oil from Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest exporter of crude.

The narrow waterway connects the Red Sea -- and, via the Suez Canal, the Mediterranean -- to the Indian Ocean. In July, a fragile truce between the Houthis and the government fell apart after the rebels welcomed an Iranian plane to Sanaa, setting off a spate of attacks.

They later announced a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia and began hitting its ships and territory.

Location: Tyre
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUNRussiaChina
1 source

If passed, the resolution would follow up on one adopted on June 12 of last year declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for not fully cooperating with an investigation into uranium traces found at undeclared sites. Israel started bombing Iran's nuclear facilities the next day, soon joined by the U.

S. Iran's uranium-enrichment plants were destroyed or badly damaged. Iran has not let International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors return to the bombed sites since then or verify what remains of its stocks of enriched uranium, some of which was enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade.

FRESH DIPLOMATIC ESCALATION A resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation board reporting Iran to the Security Council would also be the culmination of a standoff over IAEA access to those sites, since the board has passed two resolutions in the past year demanding Iran declare its enriched uranium stocks and grant the IAEA full access to verify them.

"(The board) requests the (IAEA) Director General to transmit this resolution and the previously adopted resolutions ... to all Members of the Agency and to the Security Council and the General Assembly of the United Nations," said the latest resolution draft seen by Reuters.

It also "reiterates its call upon Iran to urgently remedy its non-compliance with its Safeguards Agreement by taking all steps deemed necessary by the Agency and the Board, so that the Director General can provide the necessary assurances regarding the correctness and completeness of Iran's declarations".

The draft has not yet been formally submitted to the board and negotiations over the exact wording are ongoing, diplomats said. Whenever the four powers have submitted a draft resolution on Iran in recent years, it has passed. Concrete action by the Security Council against Iran is unlikely since Tehran's allies Russia and China are permanent, veto-wielding members.

IAEA CONCERNS OVER ENRICHMENT Iran has often retaliated following IAEA board resolutions against it by escalating its nuclear activities or scaling back cooperation with the IAEA, but its options for both are currently extremely limited. It is unclear what other repercussions there might be on Tehran's conflict with the U.

S. As a party to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran has the right to develop nuclear technology, including enrichment, for peaceful purposes. Iran says it would never produce nuclear weapons. It is, however, the only country to enrich to 60% without making a bomb.

The IAEA has said the amount it has enriched to that level is of serious concern. The IAEA estimates Iran had 440.9 kg of uranium enriched to that level before its sites were bombed. That is enough, if enriched further, for 10 nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick.

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUN
1 source

The US and its allies Britain, France and Germany are pushing other countries on the UN nuclear watchdog's board to pass a resolution next week reporting Iran to the UN Security Council for the first time in 20 years, diplomats said on Friday. If passed, the resolution would follow up on one adopted on June 12 of last year declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for not fully cooperating with an investigation into uranium traces found at undeclared sites.

The US launched an air war against Tehran on February 28 in which, together with Israel, it destroyed or badly damaged Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities. Iran has not let International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors return to the bombed sites since then or verify what remains of its stocks of enriched uranium, some of which was enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade.

Resolution would be culmination of standoff over IAEA's access to nuclear sites A resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation board reporting Iran to the Security Council would also be the culmination of a standoff over IAEA access to those sites, since the board has passed two resolutions in the past year demanding Iran declare its enriched uranium stocks and grant the IAEA full access to verify them.

A draft text for the resolution has yet to be formally submitted to the board and negotiations between countries over the exact wording are ongoing, diplomats said. A draft is usually formally submitted early in the week of a board meeting. As a party to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran has the right to develop nuclear technology, including enrichment, for peaceful purposes.

Iran says it would never produce nuclear weapons. It is, however, the only country to enrich to 60% without making a bomb. The amount it has enriched to that level is "a matter of serious concern" to the IAEA. The IAEA believes well over 200 kg of that highly enriched uranium has survived the bombardments and is held in a tunnel complex at Isfahan and at the Natanz facility.

Location: Jerusalem