ConflictClarifier

2026伊朗-海湾危机追踪
CC
Events Archive
strikeMar 14, 2026

Iranian ambassador warns of Korean security vacuum if U.S. redirects assets to Middle East

Summary

Iranian ambassador warns of Korean security vacuum if U.S. redirects assets to Middle East Published: 15 Mar. 2026, 07:00 - - SEO JI-EUN - [email protected] Audio report: written by reporters, read by AI [INTERVIEW] Iran’s top diplomat to Seoul warned that any redeployment of U.S. strategic assets from South Korea to the Middle East would leave a security gap on the peninsula — while defending Tehran's nuclear program as strictly peaceful and dismissing allegations of military cooperation with Pyongyang. "The U.S. forces and various military systems stationed in Korea are considered a crucial part of South Korea's defense capabilities," Ambassador Saeed Koozechi said through an interpreter in an exclusive two-hour interview with the Korea JoongAng Daily at the Iranian Embassy in central Seoul on Friday, nearly two weeks after the United States and Israel launched airstrikes on his country. "Therefore, if some of this equipment and capability were to be relocated to the Middle East, it could be perceived as a vacuum to some degree or a weakening of Korea's defense capabilities. In this respect, the concerns being raised can be considered reasonable worries that are fully understandable from the perspectives of many military and security experts." However, he noted that he did not see U.S. bases in Korea as "directly participating in military attacks against Iran" at this stage. Koozechi held his first press conference on the situation one week ago, but this marks his first one-on-one media interview since the initial attacks, which killed former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and, according to Tehran, hit civilian infrastructure including an elementary school, prompting Iran to retaliate. What Tehran asks of Seoul, Koozechi stressed, is for South Korea to ensure that those assets are not turned against Iran. "We expect the South Korean government to ensure that its own facilities and capabilities are not used for the continuation of this attack or the expansion of such military adventures," he said. Koozechi expressed little confidence that Washington would heed Seoul's objections. President Lee Jae Myung said Wednesday his government has expressed opposition to the relocation of some U.S. air-defense weapons, but acknowledged that Seoul cannot actually stop or fully “impose” its position on the U.S. military. "As far as I know, the Korean government has also expressed dissatisfaction and concern regarding this issue," Koozechi said. "However, the U.S. side does not seem to have shown sufficient interest in this position." "The initial calculations at the time this military adventure began appear to differ significantly from how the actual situation has unfolded over the past two weeks," he continued. "As a result, rather than helping to resolve the crisis, this trend is imposing a burden and damage even on the friends and allies of the United States, and consequently resulting in them becoming involved in this situation to some extent." The conflict has already rattled global energy markets. The South Korean government announced a cap on the price of oil at midnight Friday, setting maximum supply prices at 1,724 won per liter ($4.40 per gallon) for gasoline and 1,713 won for diesel, to be reviewed every two weeks depending on conditions in the Middle East. At one point during the interview, a voice cut through from the street outside, amplified through a megaphone, demanding that Tehran "lift the blockade" of the vital Strait of Hormuz. Iran's new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, ordered the oil shipping lane through the Strait to remain closed on Thursday. While Koozechi acknowledged that the turmoil had "sent great shock waves" across the global energy market, he pushed back on characterizations of Tehran's posture in the Strait of Hormuz — a vital artery for South Korea's crude oil imports — as a blockade. "Control and monitoring," he said, was the appropriate description. He attributed the maritime paralysis — marked by soaring insurance premiums and vessels rerouting away from the strait — to U.S. and Israeli "adventurism." As for the safety of South Korean vessels, Koozechi said his embassy had not yet received guidelines on protective measures. Addressing claims raised by the Israeli ambassador to Seoul — who has argued that the strikes on Iran were the result of a lesson learned from the international community's failure to halt North Korea's nuclear program — Koozechi insisted that Tehran's atomic activities serve purely civilian purposes. "This program is for various civilian purposes such as power generation, application in the agricultural sector and the production of radiopharmaceuticals," he said. "Currently, there are over 1 million cancer patients in Iran, and many of them require radiopharmaceuticals for treatment. The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran continuously produces these medicines and supplies them to domestic medical institutions." Despite acknowledging that Iran "maintains friendly relations" with North Korea, he dismissed reports of missile cooperation, attributing them to a coordinated influence campaign by Israel. Koozechi characterized the current U.S. administration's priorities: "First Israel, not America, not allies." The ambassador called the strikes an act of "state terrorism" — a position he had briefly walked back in his press conference one week ago. "I think it is difficult to describe these acts other than as state terrorism," he said, referencing the killing of the country's supreme leader and the strike on a girls' elementary school. "Even in a war, it is usually normal for residences, families and the private spaces of political leaders to be respected." He further suggested the military campaign was designed to distract the American public from President Donald Trump's domestic legal vulnerabilities, specifically citing the Jeffrey Epstein files. "Some analysts argue that calling it 'Operation Epstein Fury' better explains the political motivations behind this action," he said. "Donald Trump has essentially handed over the capabilities, resources and assets of the American people to be used by the Israeli government," Koozechi continued. "Nevertheless, he has yet to provide a convincing explanation to the American people as to why he has embarked on such a military adventure." Outside of the embassy, a large banner read: "When will the world hold war criminals accountable?" — displayed alongside an image of the late Supreme Leader Khamenei and photographs of students killed in strikes across Iran, which has prompted some local critics to argue that a diplomatic mission is being served as a platform for political advocacy. Koozechi defended the banner as a "small light against the darkness" of misinformation and questioned the intensity of the backlash. "Behind the spread of these distorted claims lie some giant media outlets run by forces with enormous capital, and they seek to shape public opinion in the way they desire," he said regarding the banner. "Many Korean media outlets are also influenced to some extent by the flow and narrative of Western media reporting." "In some countries, the diplomatic missions of the Islamic Republic of Iran have held exhibitions displaying photos and materials to increase public understanding of these events," he added. "One of the important roles of an embassy is to convey facts to the citizens of the host country. In other words, part of that role is to share how civilians in Iran are being exposed to threats and attacks." Addressing who in Iran holds the actual authority to end this war, Koozechi answered that it is "the new leader" who was recently elected in Iran's Assembly of Experts, referring to Mojtaba Khamenei. The ambassador, however, stopped short of articulating any concrete conditions under which Tehran would consider the conflict resolved. BY SEO JI-EUN [[email protected]]

Actors involved

USIranIsrael

Sources

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranEUChina
1 source

Japan’s Defense Ministry said Friday that Iran used its geographical advantage to “inflict unbearable costs at a relatively low military expense,” effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz by indicating that it had laid naval mines, Kyodo News reported.

The ministry said Japan would strengthen its defense capabilities based on lessons from the US-Iran war, including by using defense equipment also operated by allies and like-minded partners to help ensure rapid supplies from other countries. It also stressed the need to maintain sufficient missile stockpiles and be prepared to quickly increase defense equipment production in an emergency, according to its first report analyzing the Iran war since February.

The US-Israeli war against Iran began on Feb. 28, with attacks targeting military, nuclear and infrastructure sites across the country. Iran responded with missile and drone strikes against Israel and US military facilities across the region. READ: EU joins US-led campaign to isolate Iran financially: Treasury chief Bessent Washington and Tehran signed a memorandum of understanding on June 18 concerning freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, but its implementation has stalled amid disagreements over security arrangements in the strait.

The Japanese report also said the country should take its own geographical characteristics into account when developing combat strategies, including the fact that it is surrounded by sea. The report noted the US use of AI to accelerate decision-making and operations, citing attacks on around 1,000 targets within 24 hours, while also highlighting the risk of AI making incorrect judgments.

“It is important to establish a process that maximizes the benefits of AI while ensuring appropriate human involvement,” the ministry said. The report comes ahead of a planned revision of Japan’s key security documents by the end of this year.

strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy
1 source

A major offensive by Yemen's Houthis to seize control of the gateway to the Red Sea has left more than 120 people dead, sources told AFP Friday, the country's deadliest clashes in years. Fighting erupted on Thursday, after the Iran-backed Houthis launched a ground assault along with rocket and drone attacks near coastal areas, vying for control of the narrow Bab al-Mandab strait at the Red Sea's southern entrance.

Yemen, embroiled in more than a decade of civil conflict, in July became the latest country to be drawn into the Middle East war as the Houthis upended a 2022 truce with the Saudi-backed government. Since then, the Houthis have imposed a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia and repeatedly attacked its ships in the Red Sea -- a vital alternative route for oil exports after Iran all but halted Gulf shipments by blockading the Strait of Hormuz.

The rebels are now trying to tighten their hold over the Red Sea, one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, which they have disrupted with attacks on passing vessels since the Gaza war broke out in 2023. The Houthi offensive aims to cut off the government-held port city of Mokha, under fire for weeks, and advance towards areas bordering the Bab al-Mandab, military sources told AFP.

The rebels have seized elevated sites overlooking government positions near the Red Sea and the city of Taiz further inland, a military source and a Taiz official told AFP, requesting anonymity. The Houthis could target ships from these elevated positions, they said.

The toll rose to 129 on Friday, according to an AFP tally compiled from several sources, up from an earlier count of 81. A Yemeni military official speaking on condition of anonymity told AFP that 66 of his men had been killed, while medical and military sources close to the Houthis said at least 62 militants had died.

Another medical source said a civilian had also been killed. Although the Houthis do not control areas bordering Bab al-Mandab, they hold the key port city of Hodeida north of Mokha. "They are going for Bab al-Mandab," said Mohammed al-Basha, of the US-based risk advisory Basha Report.

The Houthis want to control the hills overlooking Bab al-Mandab and Mokha before attacking the coast, a Yemeni official in Aden, the government's base since it was ousted from the rebel-held capital, Sanaa, in 2014. The government has sent reinforcements to Taiz from Aden on Saudi orders, he said.

"The Houthis feel that if they capture Bab al-Mandab or Mokha port they will be in a better position of power to negotiate with the government and the Saudis," Basha added. With Iran's closure of Hormuz, the Bab al-Mandab chokepoint has gained increased importance as a transit route for oil from Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest exporter of crude.

The narrow waterway connects the Red Sea -- and, via the Suez Canal, the Mediterranean -- to the Indian Ocean. In July, a fragile truce between the Houthis and the government fell apart after the rebels welcomed an Iranian plane to Sanaa, setting off a spate of attacks.

They later announced a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia and began hitting its ships and territory.

Location: Tyre
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUNRussiaChina
1 source

If passed, the resolution would follow up on one adopted on June 12 of last year declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for not fully cooperating with an investigation into uranium traces found at undeclared sites. Israel started bombing Iran's nuclear facilities the next day, soon joined by the U.

S. Iran's uranium-enrichment plants were destroyed or badly damaged. Iran has not let International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors return to the bombed sites since then or verify what remains of its stocks of enriched uranium, some of which was enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade.

FRESH DIPLOMATIC ESCALATION A resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation board reporting Iran to the Security Council would also be the culmination of a standoff over IAEA access to those sites, since the board has passed two resolutions in the past year demanding Iran declare its enriched uranium stocks and grant the IAEA full access to verify them.

"(The board) requests the (IAEA) Director General to transmit this resolution and the previously adopted resolutions ... to all Members of the Agency and to the Security Council and the General Assembly of the United Nations," said the latest resolution draft seen by Reuters.

It also "reiterates its call upon Iran to urgently remedy its non-compliance with its Safeguards Agreement by taking all steps deemed necessary by the Agency and the Board, so that the Director General can provide the necessary assurances regarding the correctness and completeness of Iran's declarations".

The draft has not yet been formally submitted to the board and negotiations over the exact wording are ongoing, diplomats said. Whenever the four powers have submitted a draft resolution on Iran in recent years, it has passed. Concrete action by the Security Council against Iran is unlikely since Tehran's allies Russia and China are permanent, veto-wielding members.

IAEA CONCERNS OVER ENRICHMENT Iran has often retaliated following IAEA board resolutions against it by escalating its nuclear activities or scaling back cooperation with the IAEA, but its options for both are currently extremely limited. It is unclear what other repercussions there might be on Tehran's conflict with the U.

S. As a party to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran has the right to develop nuclear technology, including enrichment, for peaceful purposes. Iran says it would never produce nuclear weapons. It is, however, the only country to enrich to 60% without making a bomb.

The IAEA has said the amount it has enriched to that level is of serious concern. The IAEA estimates Iran had 440.9 kg of uranium enriched to that level before its sites were bombed. That is enough, if enriched further, for 10 nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick.

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUN
1 source

The US and its allies Britain, France and Germany are pushing other countries on the UN nuclear watchdog's board to pass a resolution next week reporting Iran to the UN Security Council for the first time in 20 years, diplomats said on Friday. If passed, the resolution would follow up on one adopted on June 12 of last year declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for not fully cooperating with an investigation into uranium traces found at undeclared sites.

The US launched an air war against Tehran on February 28 in which, together with Israel, it destroyed or badly damaged Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities. Iran has not let International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors return to the bombed sites since then or verify what remains of its stocks of enriched uranium, some of which was enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade.

Resolution would be culmination of standoff over IAEA's access to nuclear sites A resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation board reporting Iran to the Security Council would also be the culmination of a standoff over IAEA access to those sites, since the board has passed two resolutions in the past year demanding Iran declare its enriched uranium stocks and grant the IAEA full access to verify them.

A draft text for the resolution has yet to be formally submitted to the board and negotiations between countries over the exact wording are ongoing, diplomats said. A draft is usually formally submitted early in the week of a board meeting. As a party to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran has the right to develop nuclear technology, including enrichment, for peaceful purposes.

Iran says it would never produce nuclear weapons. It is, however, the only country to enrich to 60% without making a bomb. The amount it has enriched to that level is "a matter of serious concern" to the IAEA. The IAEA believes well over 200 kg of that highly enriched uranium has survived the bombardments and is held in a tunnel complex at Isfahan and at the Natanz facility.

Location: Jerusalem