ConflictClarifier

2026伊朗-海湾危机追踪
CC
Events Archive
strikeAug 11, 2026

Is the Mecca Agreement Israel's worst nightmare come true?

Summary

Is the Mecca Agreement Israel's worst nightmare come true? The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, a trilateral pact announced last week between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey, marks a significant and hugely symbolic step for the region. Penned in the holy city of Mecca rather than the Saudi capital, and accompanied by visuals of the leaders of the three nations praying, the agreement sent a clear message to the world. Yet while the Saudis swiftly denied that the deal aimed to establish a sectarian or military bloc, there has been much speculation as to what purpose it ultimately serves, especially after Riyadh recently announced the formation of an international axis to protect Red Sea shipping. In addition, the Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition (IMCTC), dubbed “Muslim Nato”, had already brought dozens of states together in an alliance a decade ago. The Mecca pact comes at a time when uncertainty reigns over the future of several ongoing conflicts, including the US-Iran war; Israel’s aggressive military occupation and slaughter in Lebanon, Syria and the occupied Palestinian territories; and indeed, Saudi Arabia’s own battles against the Houthis in Yemen and other Iran-backed militias in Iraq. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters While Turkish and Pakistani media have gone into overdrive speculating on the notion of a new Middle East order, it remains unclear as to how the three militaries could actually fight a war together, side by side - and against which enemy? We have been here before. In 2017, similar fanfare greeted the appointment of former Pakistani army chief Raheel Sharif as the first commander of the Saudi-led IMCTC. Then as now, countering Iran and its proxies seemed to be the focus of the fledgling alliance. Self-fulfilling prophecy Questions are now being asked as to whether the Mecca deal is a pointed warning, aiming to deter Iran and its proxies from further attacks on Gulf states. Turkey, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have all had proxy conflicts in the region, from Syria, to Yemen, to the volatile Pakistani province of Balochistan. All three countries have had, or continue to have, major differences with Iran over how the region should be run. At the same time, it is no surprise that Israeli media have been particularly vocal over this announcement. For Tel Aviv, it marks the culmination of a self-fulfilling prophecy: for months, top Israeli officials have warned of the threat of a so-called new 'Sunni' axis shaping up to replace Iran as Israel’s main enemy. India, Israel and Greece have certainly raised alarm bells. As to whether they will translate into battle-defining realities, only time will tell From the former and potential future prime minister, Naftali Bennett, to former government spokesperson Eylon Levy, many Israeli figures have highlighted the supposed threat of a Pakistani-Turkish partnership backed by Saudi and Qatari money. Almost weekly, there is a new column touting the risk of Turkey invading Israel or becoming the “new Iran”. After an Israeli strike recently landed near the Pakistani embassy in Tehran, a Pakistani think tank close to the military issued a stark warning to Israel. And the Jerusalem Post recently published an article discussing how a reported Pakistani troop deployment to Saudi Arabia could shift the power balance of the Middle East. US President Donald Trump has made Pakistani military chief Asim Munir his go-to guy on Iran, calling him his “favourite field marshal”. Trump has also given Pakistan a front seat at the Gaza peace talks - all of which has made Israel nervous, particularly in light of a now-deleted post from Pakistan’s defence minister calling Israel “evil”, alongside resurfaced Turkish threats to intervene in Gaza. Turkish media outlets are already pointing to Greece as the first potential target of this new alliance. Greece, having become Israel’s main Mediterranean ally, has publicly raised the issue of Pakistani military assets in disputed waters as a sign of Turkish and Pakistani joint military preparedness. Open question It is also no coincidence that India, another ally of Israel, is teaming up with the Greeks to potentially counter a Turkish-Pakistani military alliance in the Eastern Mediterranean. Greece has raised the issue of Pakistani pilots training their Turkish counterparts, while India last year lashed out at Turkey for supporting Pakistan during the recent India-Pakistan conflict. Yet beyond symbolism, the extent to which Turkey can support Pakistan in combat remains an open question; as a Nato country, Turkey cannot go to war without impacting the entire military alliance. In addition, both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are buyers of US fighter jets and helicopters, and Washington has wielded its power to veto prior deals. In 2022, the US stopped Turkey from selling Pakistan 30 attack helicopters, in what would have been the largest Turkish-Pakistani aviation deal in history. Any potential future deals will thus come under significant American and European scrutiny. Saudi Arabia has never openly sided with Pakistan in its endless war against India, seeing itself more as a neutral peacemaker; indeed, India is one of Saudi Arabia’s largest trading partners, while Pakistan is the recipient of Saudi aid. Similarly, Saudi Arabia is unlikely to take sides in any Turkey-vs-Greece conflict. Just last month, an air-defence system operated by Greek military personnel in Saudi Arabia intercepted missiles launched from Yemen towards oil refineries in Yanbu, according to a Reuters report. So the question remains: beyond Israel’s alleged fears and a perceievd 'Iranian threat' to Saudi Arabia, is this alliance predominantly symbolic - a card to forewarn enemies that bilateral conflicts will now be multilateral, spilling across different geographies? India, Israel and Greece have certainly raised alarm bells. As to whether they will translate into battle-defining realities, only time will tell. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye. Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.

Actors involved

USIsraelIranProxy

Sources

  • Kamal AlamBy Kamal Alam

    Is the Mecca Agreement Israel's worst nightmare come true? The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, a trilateral pact announced last week between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey, marks a significant and hugely symbolic step for the region. Penned in the holy city of Mecca rather than

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSRussiaUkraine
1 source

Analysts from the Institute for the Study of War suggest that Russian military commanders may be providing President Vladimir Putin with exaggerated reports of battlefield progress, potentially hindering realistic ceasefire negotiations. While the Kremlin continues to demand the full annexation of Donetsk Oblast by year’s end, independent experts estimate that, at the current advance rate, Russia is unlikely to secure the remaining occupied territories until 2032.

These assessments remain subject to debate, as verified data on front-line movements remains limited.

Location: Moscow
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxyUNRussiaChinaUkraine
1 source

US stock futures declined slightly as Brent crude topped $97 per barrel following reported Iranian tanker attacks and unconfirmed reports of strikes on Saudi oil infrastructure. Asian markets experienced mixed results, with indices in South Korea, Japan, and China rising on semiconductor-related activity, while the Hang Seng index fell.

The text appears to truncate mid-sentence regarding a separate Amazon cargo plane incident.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
1 source

Iran has threatened to retaliate against any new US attacks on its assets, warning that the energy production chain in the region was "sprawling, accessible and exposed" and that US oil and gas companies there shared that exposure. "Strike our assets and you get struck," Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf said after US and Iranian strikes on shipping at the weekend that pushed oil prices up to six-week highs at one point on Monday.

On Sunday, senior Iranian security official Mohsen Rezaei said Iran would announce plans for a new restricted zone in the Gulf in the coming days, and that it would soon approve maps of a new shipping corridor through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has halted traffic through the strait, a vital global oil and gas supply route, since the war with the United States began with US and Israeli strikes on 28 February.

Mr Rezaei said the new restricted zone would begin from where a US naval blockade of Iran starts and extend into areas of the Gulf. Any ship entering the new zone would be added to an Iranian sanctions list, he said. "We will only commit to the Strait of Hormuz being open when they (the Americans) stop the sabotage, threats and attacks on Iran," Mr Rezaei said.

Underlining Iran's defiance, Mr Qalibaf issued a new threat to respond to any US strikes, in what appeared to be a response to a warning by US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that Iran's oil tanker fleet was "defenceless". "It’s simple: the oil and gas production chain here is sprawling, accessible, and exposed.

American oil and gas companies across these waters and facilities share that exposure," Mr Qalibaf, who is Iran's top negotiator, wrote on X. "Strike our assets and you get struck. We’ve already proven it. Ask the bases that are no longer viable," referring to Iranian attacks on US military bases in the region throughout the conflict.

Iran and US exchange attacks US President Donald Trump has yet to achieve the aims he set out when he launched "Operation Epic Fury" in February: to end Iran's nuclear programme, halt its ability to attack its neighbours and create conditions for Iranians to topple their leadership.

Tehran's clerical rulers remain in power and aim to emerge from the war stronger than before, demanding the lifting of sanctions and hoping to collect fees from ships that use the strait, which carried a fifth of global oil and gas shipments before the war.

After a pause in military action for much of August, tit-for-tat strikes have resumed following the unravelling of an interim ceasefire deal that was reached in June, and there has been little progress on getting the peace process back on track. US forces struck three Iranian oil tankers on Saturday, US Central Command said, including one off Kharg Island, Iran's key oil export hub, following attacks by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on US warships in the region.

Tehran has shown it retains the capability to attack US interests in neighbouring countries and to shut down oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. An average of 10 commodity ships transited the Strait per day in the past 10 days, the lowest since May, according to shipping data on Monday.

That contributed to a rise in oil prices on Monday, with Brent crude futures LCOc1 hitting their highest point since July 24 at $97.93 a barrel before slipping back to $96.19. Sanctions, oil blockade squeeze economy Iran has said it will step up efforts to tackle problems created by US sanctions that are crippling its economy.

However, the US campaign to throttle Iran's economy by blockading its oil exports and stopping sanctions evasion is growing increasingly difficult to withstand, three senior Iranian sources have said. Mr Qalibaf said at the weekend that, alongside the military front, Iran’s main battle was now over production and people’s livelihoods, citing currency fluctuations, inflation, unemployment and market management as big challenges.

The conflict has also impacted oil-producing Gulf Arab states such as the United Arab Emirates, which has come under fire from Iranian missiles and suffered attacks on its oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz. UAE presidential adviser Anwar Gargash said the country was building alternative routes for its energy exports and trade to ensure they are not "held hostage" by the war.

The impact of Iran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz on energy supplies has also been felt in the US as fuel prices have increased. The increase has weighed on Mr Trump's popularity as his Republican Party heads into elections in November when control of Congress is at stake.

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
1 source

Iranian officials issued warnings following weekend strikes on shipping that contributed to a temporary rise in oil prices, with Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf stating that Iranian assets would be targeted in response to any U.S. actions.

Concurrently, security official Mohsen Rezaei indicated plans to establish a restricted zone in the Gulf, proposing that vessels entering the area be subject to sanctions, while asserting that the Strait of Hormuz would only remain open if U.S. attacks on Iran ceased.

Location: Iran