ConflictClarifier

2026伊朗-海湾危机追踪
CC
Events Archive
strikeMar 28, 2026

The Iran war has given Trump his best hand against China — now he shouldn’t fold

Summary

The Iran war has given Trump his best hand against China — now he shouldn’t fold President Donald Trump should say the quiet part out loud: China’s years of economic, technological and diplomatic support for Iran did not merely underwrite the regime’s malign activity. It accelerated it, financed it and made striking the Islamic Republic necessary to defend the interests of the United States and its partners around the world. President Trump should rally America’s allies in Europe and the Gulf Arab states behind this message leading up to trade talks with Xi Jinping next month in Beijing. He should make clear that, without China, the Iranian regime would have never been able to pay for waves of military strikes on Israel, target US bases in the region or shut down Gulf energy infrastructure. And he should go one step further. Trump should establish that every country negatively impacted by China’s role as the world’s largest sponsor of sanctions evasion is equally impacted by the Chinese Communist Party’s market-distorting trade practices. In this sense, the strikes on Iran have given Trump an opening to extract concessions from Beijing on a range of issues fundamental to the structure of the global economy. He should therefore leverage America’s economic advantages in energy, trade and finance to not only hold Beijing accountable for its support of the regime in Iran, but to cut at the heart of China’s economic model as well. Here’s how. First, Trump should further target Beijing’s appetite for sanctioned oil. For years, China has sustained its state-subsidized export machine partly on the back of deeply discounted sanctioned crude from Russia, Iran and Venezuela. These sanctioned barrels accounted for roughly a third of China’s crude imports in 2025, saving the country billions. Trump has already removed Venezuela as a source of illicit oil flows, but he can do more to target Russia and Iran. Even amid the strikes, Iranian ships are making their way to China. As for Russia, it supplies over 10% of China’s imported crude. Cutting off these flows would compete with other administration priorities, such as relieving supply shock pressures on oil consumers generated by the war in Iran, but they would effectively raise the cost base for China’s industrial sector and combat its destabilizing, nonmarket practices in a targeted fashion. All of this is compounded by China’s vulnerability to energy supply shocks. About half of China’s oil imports and nearly 30% of its liquefied natural gas (LNG) transit the Strait of Hormuz. Disruptions there hit China far harder than the United States, even with the buffer Beijing enjoys from years of building a strategic oil stockpile. That is why China’s foreign minister initially asked Iran to respect the “reasonable concerns” of its energy exporting neighbors in the Gulf while providing only muted criticism of the US and Israeli attacks. Beijing is now caught between two bad options: Intervene on Iran’s behalf and damage its relationships with the Gulf monarchies it depends on far more than it does on Tehran, or stand aside and watch Washington dismantle a partner in Tehran that Beijing spent years cultivating. The second area of vulnerability relates to trade. The Commerce Department has already imposed statutorily sound tariffs as high as 93% on Chinese goods sold below cost — like anode-grade graphite used in electric vehicle batteries — and could launch further investigations while pressing the World Trade Organization to hold Beijing accountable. Commerce has also concluded that Beijing’s state-directed tactics in the semiconductor and shipbuilding sectors constitute threats to US national security. Chip tariffs took effect in December 2025 and will escalate further in 2027. Meanwhile, suspended shipbuilding remedies are set to snap back this November. These deadlines — coupled with new trade investigations announced just weeks before the summit and dozens of trade agreements being negotiated to bolster partner country export controls and transshipment enforcement — should be seen for what they are: targeted, yet widespread and growing economic leverage aimed squarely at Beijing. Where China has tried to preempt US pressure, its strategy has backfired. Beijing implemented its strictest rare earth and permanent magnet export controls last year, including restrictions directly targeting foreign defense supply chains. It later suspended those controls, but the damage was done. China triggered the exact response it was trying to prevent — a wave of multilateral supply chain diversification, with billions flowing from partners in Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, the Gulf and elsewhere into strategic sectors of the US economy. The third vulnerability relates to U.S. dominance in financial flows. The Chinese Communist Party has long sought to distinguish between official government policy and the actions of private companies — but the line between the Chinese state and its commercial empire is far from an impenetrable legal shield. Trump should direct Treasury and State to prepare sanctions designation packages targeting the many Chinese financial institutions that process payments for sanctioned Iranian and Russian crude, the hundreds of Chinese firms operating in sanctioned sectors of those economies and the joint ventures engineered to create distance between sanctioned entities and Chinese state-owned enterprises. These targets should explicitly include China’s state-owned entities that purchase output from so-called “teapot refineries” processing sanctioned crude, as well as any Chinese financial conduits being used to pay the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps for access through Iran’s territorial waters in the strait. Washington should signal to Beijing which firms could be targeted, what China stands to lose from being cut off financially and how the US has more targets ready if a deal cannot be reached. But Trump shouldn’t pull the sanctions trigger yet. Beijing is contending with one of the worst housing crises in modern history, collapsing household wealth and persistent deflationary pressure. Efforts to address any of these challenges — let alone all three — will be slow and necessarily weaken CCP control over key state resources. And all of that was true before the war on Iran compounded Beijing’s vulnerabilities. China simply cannot afford financial isolation from the West. It must negotiate. When Trump arrives in Beijing next month, he should push Xi for concrete concessions that this moment has made uniquely possible: a verifiable commitment to halt purchases of sanctioned Iranian and Russian crude; market access reforms that rein in Beijing’s overproduction and state subsidies; strict export controls on dual-use technology and precursor chemical flows to Iran and other US adversaries; and enforceable mechanisms to shut down Beijing’s broader role as a sanctions evasion hub. Washington has real leverage, but that leverage has a shelf life. A protracted conflict risks negatively impacting the petrochemical sector that provides feedstock for plastics, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and advanced manufacturing globally. The window to extract concessions from Beijing requires an urgent response from Washington — and it should not stand alone in making these demands of Beijing. The war should clarify something for European and Gulf partners that years of US pressure never achieved: China’s support for Iran is not an abstraction. It underwrote the regime that just destabilized their energy security, shipping lanes and regional order. That shared recognition should form the basis for a unified front — not just against Iran, but against the nonmarket practices Beijing has used for decades to hollow out allied industries and subsidize its export machine. It is time to hold Beijing accountable for keeping the Iranian regime afloat. The United States has a full arsenal of American economic statecraft to do just that. Elaine K. Dezenski is senior director and head of the Center on Economic and Financial Power (CEFP) at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), where Max Meizlish is a research fellow. Follow them on X @ElaineDezenski and @maxmeizlish.

Actors involved

USIsraelIranRussiaChina

Sources

  • Elaine K Dezenski; Max MeizlishBy Elaine K Dezenski; Max Meizlish

    The Iran war has given Trump his best hand against China — now he shouldn’t fold President Donald Trump should say the quiet part out loud: China’s years of economic, technological and diplomatic support for Iran did not merely underwrite the regime’s malign activity. It accelera

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranEUChina
1 source

Japan’s Defense Ministry said Friday that Iran used its geographical advantage to “inflict unbearable costs at a relatively low military expense,” effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz by indicating that it had laid naval mines, Kyodo News reported.

The ministry said Japan would strengthen its defense capabilities based on lessons from the US-Iran war, including by using defense equipment also operated by allies and like-minded partners to help ensure rapid supplies from other countries. It also stressed the need to maintain sufficient missile stockpiles and be prepared to quickly increase defense equipment production in an emergency, according to its first report analyzing the Iran war since February.

The US-Israeli war against Iran began on Feb. 28, with attacks targeting military, nuclear and infrastructure sites across the country. Iran responded with missile and drone strikes against Israel and US military facilities across the region. READ: EU joins US-led campaign to isolate Iran financially: Treasury chief Bessent Washington and Tehran signed a memorandum of understanding on June 18 concerning freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, but its implementation has stalled amid disagreements over security arrangements in the strait.

The Japanese report also said the country should take its own geographical characteristics into account when developing combat strategies, including the fact that it is surrounded by sea. The report noted the US use of AI to accelerate decision-making and operations, citing attacks on around 1,000 targets within 24 hours, while also highlighting the risk of AI making incorrect judgments.

“It is important to establish a process that maximizes the benefits of AI while ensuring appropriate human involvement,” the ministry said. The report comes ahead of a planned revision of Japan’s key security documents by the end of this year.

strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy
1 source

A major offensive by Yemen's Houthis to seize control of the gateway to the Red Sea has left more than 120 people dead, sources told AFP Friday, the country's deadliest clashes in years. Fighting erupted on Thursday, after the Iran-backed Houthis launched a ground assault along with rocket and drone attacks near coastal areas, vying for control of the narrow Bab al-Mandab strait at the Red Sea's southern entrance.

Yemen, embroiled in more than a decade of civil conflict, in July became the latest country to be drawn into the Middle East war as the Houthis upended a 2022 truce with the Saudi-backed government. Since then, the Houthis have imposed a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia and repeatedly attacked its ships in the Red Sea -- a vital alternative route for oil exports after Iran all but halted Gulf shipments by blockading the Strait of Hormuz.

The rebels are now trying to tighten their hold over the Red Sea, one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, which they have disrupted with attacks on passing vessels since the Gaza war broke out in 2023. The Houthi offensive aims to cut off the government-held port city of Mokha, under fire for weeks, and advance towards areas bordering the Bab al-Mandab, military sources told AFP.

The rebels have seized elevated sites overlooking government positions near the Red Sea and the city of Taiz further inland, a military source and a Taiz official told AFP, requesting anonymity. The Houthis could target ships from these elevated positions, they said.

The toll rose to 129 on Friday, according to an AFP tally compiled from several sources, up from an earlier count of 81. A Yemeni military official speaking on condition of anonymity told AFP that 66 of his men had been killed, while medical and military sources close to the Houthis said at least 62 militants had died.

Another medical source said a civilian had also been killed. Although the Houthis do not control areas bordering Bab al-Mandab, they hold the key port city of Hodeida north of Mokha. "They are going for Bab al-Mandab," said Mohammed al-Basha, of the US-based risk advisory Basha Report.

The Houthis want to control the hills overlooking Bab al-Mandab and Mokha before attacking the coast, a Yemeni official in Aden, the government's base since it was ousted from the rebel-held capital, Sanaa, in 2014. The government has sent reinforcements to Taiz from Aden on Saudi orders, he said.

"The Houthis feel that if they capture Bab al-Mandab or Mokha port they will be in a better position of power to negotiate with the government and the Saudis," Basha added. With Iran's closure of Hormuz, the Bab al-Mandab chokepoint has gained increased importance as a transit route for oil from Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest exporter of crude.

The narrow waterway connects the Red Sea -- and, via the Suez Canal, the Mediterranean -- to the Indian Ocean. In July, a fragile truce between the Houthis and the government fell apart after the rebels welcomed an Iranian plane to Sanaa, setting off a spate of attacks.

They later announced a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia and began hitting its ships and territory.

Location: Tyre
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUNRussiaChina
1 source

If passed, the resolution would follow up on one adopted on June 12 of last year declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for not fully cooperating with an investigation into uranium traces found at undeclared sites. Israel started bombing Iran's nuclear facilities the next day, soon joined by the U.

S. Iran's uranium-enrichment plants were destroyed or badly damaged. Iran has not let International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors return to the bombed sites since then or verify what remains of its stocks of enriched uranium, some of which was enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade.

FRESH DIPLOMATIC ESCALATION A resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation board reporting Iran to the Security Council would also be the culmination of a standoff over IAEA access to those sites, since the board has passed two resolutions in the past year demanding Iran declare its enriched uranium stocks and grant the IAEA full access to verify them.

"(The board) requests the (IAEA) Director General to transmit this resolution and the previously adopted resolutions ... to all Members of the Agency and to the Security Council and the General Assembly of the United Nations," said the latest resolution draft seen by Reuters.

It also "reiterates its call upon Iran to urgently remedy its non-compliance with its Safeguards Agreement by taking all steps deemed necessary by the Agency and the Board, so that the Director General can provide the necessary assurances regarding the correctness and completeness of Iran's declarations".

The draft has not yet been formally submitted to the board and negotiations over the exact wording are ongoing, diplomats said. Whenever the four powers have submitted a draft resolution on Iran in recent years, it has passed. Concrete action by the Security Council against Iran is unlikely since Tehran's allies Russia and China are permanent, veto-wielding members.

IAEA CONCERNS OVER ENRICHMENT Iran has often retaliated following IAEA board resolutions against it by escalating its nuclear activities or scaling back cooperation with the IAEA, but its options for both are currently extremely limited. It is unclear what other repercussions there might be on Tehran's conflict with the U.

S. As a party to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran has the right to develop nuclear technology, including enrichment, for peaceful purposes. Iran says it would never produce nuclear weapons. It is, however, the only country to enrich to 60% without making a bomb.

The IAEA has said the amount it has enriched to that level is of serious concern. The IAEA estimates Iran had 440.9 kg of uranium enriched to that level before its sites were bombed. That is enough, if enriched further, for 10 nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick.

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUN
1 source

The US and its allies Britain, France and Germany are pushing other countries on the UN nuclear watchdog's board to pass a resolution next week reporting Iran to the UN Security Council for the first time in 20 years, diplomats said on Friday. If passed, the resolution would follow up on one adopted on June 12 of last year declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for not fully cooperating with an investigation into uranium traces found at undeclared sites.

The US launched an air war against Tehran on February 28 in which, together with Israel, it destroyed or badly damaged Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities. Iran has not let International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors return to the bombed sites since then or verify what remains of its stocks of enriched uranium, some of which was enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade.

Resolution would be culmination of standoff over IAEA's access to nuclear sites A resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation board reporting Iran to the Security Council would also be the culmination of a standoff over IAEA access to those sites, since the board has passed two resolutions in the past year demanding Iran declare its enriched uranium stocks and grant the IAEA full access to verify them.

A draft text for the resolution has yet to be formally submitted to the board and negotiations between countries over the exact wording are ongoing, diplomats said. A draft is usually formally submitted early in the week of a board meeting. As a party to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran has the right to develop nuclear technology, including enrichment, for peaceful purposes.

Iran says it would never produce nuclear weapons. It is, however, the only country to enrich to 60% without making a bomb. The amount it has enriched to that level is "a matter of serious concern" to the IAEA. The IAEA believes well over 200 kg of that highly enriched uranium has survived the bombardments and is held in a tunnel complex at Isfahan and at the Natanz facility.

Location: Jerusalem