2026 Iran-Gulf Crisis Tracker
CC
Events Archive
strikeApr 14, 2026

As power politics returns, Korea must stand on its own - The Korea Times

Summary

The U.S.-Israeli strikes against Iran signal the end of an older model of global politics and the emergence of a new one. To ensure its survival, Korea must address its vulnerabilities and security blind spots, develop a new strategic playbook and fully commit to self-reliance. Traditionally, interstate military operations have been conducted within the strategic framework of diplomatic, informational, military, and economic instruments of national power. This model, systematized during the Cold War through U.S. national security decision-making structures and joint doctrine, has long served as a foundation for the integrated application of national power. Since then, it has been widely adopted in military doctrines and strategic planning processes worldwide. From this perspective, recent U.S. military action against Iran carries significant strategic implications. Notably, the United States — the very architect of this framework — appears to be prioritizing military pressure over fully integrated coordination with diplomatic, informational and economic tools. This has raised concerns within the international community that the global order is shifting from a norms-based system toward a more power-centric one. The United States now appears to favor rapid strategic responsiveness over multilateral processes grounded in comprehensive authorization from the United Nations Security Council. Compared to past operations such as the 1991 Gulf War, which were conducted within a U.N.-centered collective security framework, current actions emphasize speed and operational flexibility over multilateral legitimacy. This points to the emergence of a “post-legitimization” pattern as a possible model for future interventions, with states acting first and providing justification later. Significant changes are also evident in the informational domain. Rather than clearly articulating ultimate objectives and end states, the United States has maintained strategic ambiguity while preserving operational initiative. At the same time, by integrating satellite surveillance, signals intelligence and cyber monitoring systems, it has secured a precision intelligence advantage. This enables targeted pressure on facilities linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and missile forces, reinforcing the reality that information superiority is central to gaining operational initiative in modern warfare. From a military standpoint, the most defining feature of the current conflict is the structural asymmetry between U.S. and Iranian capabilities. The United States relies on limited but highly precise long-range strike capabilities, including carrier strike groups, strategic bombers, precision-guided munitions and global intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance systems. Iran, by contrast, employs asymmetric strategies centered on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, including proxy forces, mine warfare, coastal anti-ship missiles, unmanned aerial systems and ballistic missiles. In constrained maritime environments such as Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz, these asymmetric capabilities can significantly amplify strategic impact. In this sense, the conflict represents a classic contest between long-range precision strikes and anti-access/area denial strategies. Economic dynamics have also shifted. Following Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz — through which nearly 20 percent of global crude oil passes — the United States signaled a potential release from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve to stabilize prices while simultaneously increasing sanctions pressure. In doing so, it has leveraged both energy resources and the dollar-based financial system, demonstrating a comprehensive approach that mobilizes military, energy and economic tools to compel strategic outcomes. Taken together, these developments underscore a clear reality: The international system is no longer anchored in a stable, norms-based order. National strategic judgment is increasingly taking precedence over collective consensus, marking a broader shift from cooperation toward competition. Korea must respond to this evolving security and economic environment with strategic clarity and long-term vision. First, in the diplomatic domain, Korea should build a multilayered strategic network spanning the Middle East, Europe and the Indo-Pacific region, while institutionalizing security cooperation to safeguard critical energy routes. Second, in the informational domain, it must strengthen national-level intelligence capabilities by integrating reconnaissance satellites, maritime surveillance and cyber defense systems. Third, in the military domain, Korea should expand its ability to deploy mobile task groups to protect distant sea lines of communication and enhance sustained maritime control, particularly through submarine forces. Over the long term, acquiring continuous deterrence assets such as nuclear-powered submarines should also be considered. Fourth, in the economic domain, Korea should institutionalize economic security by expanding strategic petroleum reserves, diversifying energy imports and strengthening supply chain resilience in key sectors including defense manufacturing, shipbuilding and semiconductors. As a trade-dependent nation, Korea must draw clear lessons from the Middle East conflict. Security is not guaranteed by rhetoric but by capability. In a transforming international order, survival depends on preparedness for external threats. Emotional responses and wishful thinking offer little strategic value. The world is steadily moving toward an era of strategic self-reliance and Korea stands at the center of that transformation. Ret. Navy Capt. Moon Keun-sik is adjunct professor at Graduate School of Public Policy of Hanyang University in Seoul.

Actors involved

USIsraelIranProxyUN

Sources

  • Moon Keun-sikBy Moon Keun-sik

    The U.S.-Israeli strikes against Iran signal the end of an older model of global politics and the emergence of a new one. To ensure its survival, Korea must address its vulnerabilities and security blind spots, develop a new strategic playbook and fully commit to self-reliance. T…

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy
○ 1 source

PARIS: The head of the International Energy Agency said on Tuesday (Jul 21) that renewed fighting in the Mideast increases concerns over energy supplies but that the market still has cushions to absorb the impact. "The escalation in hostilities affecting the Strait of Hormuz and energy infrastructure in the region increases security of supply concerns and uncertainty over the market outlook," IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol said in a statement.

"For the moment, crude oil markets continue to benefit from several cushioning factors," he added, pointing to increased exports from several countries and Saudi and United Arab Emirates oil reaching markets by alternative routes. However, Saudi Arabia's main alternative route of using a pipeline to load tankers in the Red Sea port of Yanbu is under threat as Iran's Yemeni allies, the Houthis, declared they would blockade Saudi Arabia's ports.

Oil markets have for months feared that the Houthis would return to attacking shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden - as they did during the Gaza war - cutting off yet more crude from global markets. The initial market reaction to the announcement by the Houthis was restrained, however, as Iran indicated that mediation efforts were still underway, calming investor jitters.

"Threats to the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which has become increasingly important as a route to bypass the Strait of Hormuz, exacerbate these concerns further," said Birol, referring to the narrow passage between the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. The IEA, in addition to advising its industrialised nation members, also helps them coordinate the release of their strategic oil reserves in reaction to market disruptions.

Birol noted that ongoing government releases from these reserves have provided considerable relief to markets, and that nations continue to hold ample reserves. However, he warned "there is no room for complacency on oil security" and pointed to a drawdown of available commercial inventories, with low refining activity contributing to a tighter supplies of refined oil products like petrol and diesel than for crude oil.

Birol noted that additional supplies of liquefied natural gas from the United States and Canada have offset about 70 per cent of lost supply via the Strait of Hormuz. However, further delays in resuming Gulf exports "will be felt by all LNG importers, including Europe as it looks to refill its gas storage for next winter", he warned.

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxyEURussiaChina
○ 1 source

US stock futures rose, with Nasdaq futures gaining 1.4% and S&P futures up 0.5% as of 7:20 a.m. ET, led by semiconductor stocks after gains in Japan and South Korea. A report indicated TSMC plans price increases, while overnight events included a Houthi-imposed blockade on Saudi Arabia amid tensions involving Iran.

Trading showed higher commodity prices, a steeper yield curve, and a flat dollar, with upcoming data releases including the ADP weekly employment change and Philadelphia Fed non-manufacturing index.

Location: Arak
strikeUnverifiedUSIranProxy
○ 1 source

Reports indicate ongoing US-Iran tensions into a tenth day, including a tanker strike in the Strait of Hormuz and Houthi threats to Red Sea shipping. US Central Command conducted strikes on Iranian command, missile, and air defense sites, while Reuters reported mediator proposals for a 10-day ceasefire and statements from both sides outlining conditions for halting attacks.

Bloomberg data showed Hormuz transits reduced to six vessels as of Tuesday morning.

Location: Red Sea
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy
○ 1 source

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Iran attacked a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz early Tuesday, forcing its crew to abandon the ship, while the United States conducted yet another round of airstrikes targeting the Islamic Republic as they struggle over control of the key waterway.

The 10 consecutive nights of U.S. airstrikes haven’t compelled Tehran to loosen its grip on the strait, through which about a fifth of all crude oil and natural gas traded once passed in peacetime. Even as the U.S. and Iran inch closer to all-out war again, Iran’s interior minister traveled to Pakistan, a key mediator in the conflict, for talks.

However, it remains unclear just what new deal could be reached to end the fighting. The interim deal signed last month that was meant to end the fighting has crumbled. Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has largely stalled. And as fighting intensifies, both sides have targeted civilian infrastructure relied on by millions of people.

“Iran and groups supportive of Iran may target other U.S. interests overseas or at locations associated with the United States and Americans throughout the world,” the U.S. State Department said in a new warning to Americans. The escalation has pushed oil prices higher in recent weeks.

Benchmark Brent crude traded Tuesday above $88 a barrel and regular gasoline in the U.S. climbed to an average of $4 a gallon, keeping pressure on Americans’ wallets ahead of midterm elections this fall. Meanwhile, the U.S. military identified two soldiers who were killed in Jordan in attacks that left a third person missing.

Separately, the military confirmed another death in Iraq on Saturday during the “controlled detonation” of a downed Iranian drone. President Donald Trump took to social media on Monday to warn that “Every time Iran kills an American Soldier they will pay for that killing many times over!

” Trump was planning to attend a ceremony on Tuesday evening at Dover Air Force Base, where at least one service member’s remains were due to arrive. US strikes come as ships attacked The U.S. military’s Central Command said Tuesday it targeted “Iranian military command centers, maritime capabilities, missile and drone launch sites and air defense systems.

” It released more footage of bombings that targeted sites in Iran. “American forces remain postured and prepared to hold Iran accountable for unwarranted aggression toward civilian mariners seeking to freely and openly transit the strait,” the command said.

Iranian state media reported that explosions were heard in Fars, Hormozgan, Ilam, Kerman and Sistan and Baluchistan provinces. However, traffic through the strait has slowed to a crawl during the latest violence. Lloyd's List Intelligence said only three ships transited the strait on Sunday.

The British military’s United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center said a tanker came under attack early Tuesday in the strait off Oman, forcing the crew to abandon the vessel. Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard claimed the attack, as well as two other attacks on ships Monday in the waterway.

The route around Oman has been the one the U.S. military has encouraged ships to travel to avoid Iran’s control. The UKMTO separately reported Tuesday that another previously unknown attack on a ship took place early the previous day. Tehran also hit U.

S.-allied countries throughout the Middle East. Jordan military's said Tuesday that Iran targeted it with five drones and three missiles, all of which were shot down. Bahrain sounded its missile alert sirens Tuesday afternoon as another Iranian barrage targeted the island kingdom, which is home to the U.

S. Navy's 5th Fleet. Nearly 100 US injuries since early July The Pentagon’s chief spokesperson said nearly 100 U.S. service members have been injured since the U.S. restarted strikes on July 7, and 96% of them have returned to duty.

“The vast majority of injuries experienced were minor concussions,” Sean Parnell posted Monday on X in response to a New York Times report that the Pentagon has withheld information about troop injuries from Iranian strikes. He denied that the Pentagon was hiding data about injuries.

However, the Defense Casualty Analysis System, the military’s clearinghouse for reporting deaths and injuries in conflict, has not been updated as of Monday night with the latest attacks. Yemen rebels threaten attacks on other Mideast waterway Yemen’s Houthi rebels announced a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia on Monday.

The Houthis, who are backed by Iran, said they would block shipping between the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden by targeting the Bab el-Mandeb, a maritime chokepoint like the Strait of Hormuz, in response to an attack on Sanaa International Airport last week that they blamed on Saudi Arabia.

With the Strait of Hormuz blocked, Saudi Arabia has been relying on a pipeline to the Red Sea to get millions of barrels of oil out to market. The Houthis earlier demonstrated their ability to disrupt shipping there when they targeted ships for months over the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, with over 100 vessels attacked.

Saudi Arabia’s military said it would keep the waterway open. “All Houthi threats against transiting vessels will be dealt with swiftly and firmly, as such threats are a blatant violation of international law and fall under acts of maritime piracy,” said Maj.

Gen, Turki al-Malki, a Saudi military spokesman. A glimmer of hope for diplomacy Pakistan has intensified diplomatic efforts in recent days to resuscitate the interim deal. Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni arrived in Islamabad on Monday for two days of talks with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and others.

On Sunday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that the U.S. is still open to negotiating with Iran but that “it has to be real.” “If the door opens to diplomacy — if the guys that want to do something productive for Iran win and take control of that system, or take control of the negotiations — that’ll be a very positive development,” Rubio said.

“That’s not where we are tonight, unfortunately.” Iranian authorities on Sunday said at least 50 people have been killed and 517 wounded in the latest rounds of U.S. strikes. Since the war began on Feb. 28, 17 U.S. service members have been killed.