ConflictClarifier

2026 Iran-Gulf Crisis Tracker
CC
Events Archive
diplomacyMay 14, 2026

Trump’s Beijing Visit Will Not Change Global Alliances

Summary

Independent China expert Bronislav Vinogrodsky, in an interview with Pravda.Ru, spoke about Donald Trump's visit to China, Beijing's relations with Russia and the United States, the situation surrounding Iran and Taiwan. He also tried to explain why the strategic partnership between Moscow and Beijing will continue to deepen despite Western pressure. Trump's Visit to China and Iran Issue Q: Donald Trump's visit to China is now at the center of attention. Western media reports say Iran was the main topic of the negotiations. What do you think? A: Right now, two major processes dominate the planet: Iran versus the United States and Israel, and Ukraine. So Iran will undoubtedly be the hotter and more important topic. China, as a global power, cannot stay outside discussions on this issue. Q: What does Trump want from China? A: He does not want China to interfere. He does not want China to support Iran. China, in turn, says that it is not interfering anyway. And if it escorts ships through the Strait of Hormuz, it does so solely in its own interests. We should not expect China to openly declare that "the United States is wrong and Iran is right.” China is incredibly diplomatic and strategic. If it points somewhere, you should not look where the finger points, but where the direction itself leads. China, Russia, and Beijing's Interests Q: And where does the "Iran direction” lead for China? A: Toward supporting Russia and protecting China's own interests. Russia is China's closest neighbor, and the Chinese have a saying: "A close neighbor is dearer than a distant relative.” Russia supports Iran, and these are parallel structures: Russia and Ukraine on one side, Iran and Israel together with the United States on the other. China wants Russia to remain strong. That is why it certainly does not support the United States. Q: Is China helping Iran in practical terms? A: Obviously, some form of assistance exists, but nobody can speak about it directly. Everything happens discreetly. No one will openly supply weapons and publicly announce it. In the same way, China officially avoids taking sides in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Formally, it supplies nothing to anyone, although everyone understands how the situation actually works. The Decline of Europe and Russia's Pivot to the East Q: How important are integration projects involving China, Iran, and Russia, such as the North-South transport corridor? A: We are witnessing the decline of Europe and, after it, the United States. They still move forward on inertia, but it is already clear that much is deteriorating. The ideology itself has died. The United States has shown itself to be deceitful and morally corrupt in many ways. Hollywood still preserves some influence, but trust is gone. Everyone understands that the United States and Europe can betray their partners at any moment. China, meanwhile, has not betrayed anyone. It is a powerful partner. Russia also behaves consistently. Much of this stems from the fact that Russia has begun freeing itself from dependence on Europe. For centuries, we lived under overwhelming European and Euro-American ideological influence. Now Russia is going through a difficult but important process of liberation from that dependence. China also once stood on the brink of losing its independence. In the first half of the twentieth century, it was effectively semi-colonized. Britain, Europe, and the United States all tried to gain control over it. China therefore understands perfectly well the price of Western influence and does not support it. Putin's Visit and the Strategic Alliance With China Q: Vladimir Putin will travel to China immediately after Trump. He has already hinted at major agreements. What could they involve? A: Most likely, we are talking about new long-term strategic agreements between Russia and China across a wide range of sectors. Possibly new energy projects such as Power of Siberia 2. We can already see Russia-China cooperation expanding against the backdrop of sanctions and attempts to strangle Russia economically. A visa-free regime has appeared, people-to-people exchanges have increased, and all of this is genuinely working. Russia has turned toward the East more than once because the country spent a long time wavering between East and West. Of course, some forces suggest Russia should distance itself from China. Incidentally, that is one of Trump's ideas: let us manage the world together against China. But Vladimir Putin, in my opinion, does not tolerate betrayal. He will hold firmly to relations with China. The United States and Europe have betrayed others before, continue to do so, and will keep doing so — they lack moral principles in this matter. Taiwan as a Tool of Pressure Q: Taiwan is also described as one of the key topics of negotiations. Are any concessions possible here? A: Nothing fundamental will change. U.S. support for Taiwan serves as a strategic tool for pressuring China. Beijing has to spend enormous resources on this issue. The same happened with Xinjiang and Tibet — attempts to destabilize China from within. China fully understands how the United States operates. Perhaps both sides will exchange polite words, but in essence everything will remain the same. Q: So China will not make serious economic concessions over Taiwan? A: No, it will not. How Chinese Political Culture Works Q: When people look at Xi Jinping, they often sense complete emotional impenetrability. What kind of person is he? A: For Chinese leadership, this is entirely normal. They do not display emotions publicly. It is an ancient philosophical tradition. At home they may be open people, but public politics is a completely different story. The leader of a great power must maintain status. Q: Does he change in personal communication? A: I have never spoken with him personally, so I cannot say. Can China Be Destabilized? Q: Is it possible to trigger an internal revolution in China today? A: China has gone through such periods before. For nearly thirty years, the country existed in chaos and turmoil. The communists came and restored order. The issue was not ideology. They literally pulled China off opium and stabilized the country. Yes, there were difficult and controversial experiments — the Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward — but in the end China has moved steadily for forty years and delivered unique development results. All of this happened against the backdrop of constant attempts to prevent China's rise. The United States genuinely helped China with technology and investment because it benefited from moving production there. But the real question is who ultimately outplayed whom. Today China is independent from both the United States and Russia. Corruption and Purges in the Chinese Military Q: What do the purges in the Chinese military signify? A: There is a lot of money now, and people steal. Corruption scandals periodically emerge in the military: bribes, abuses of power. China became wealthier and accumulated serious resources, so the purges have also become larger in scale. Q: So this is more about corruption than politics? A: Corruption is always tied to politics. The moment a person starts stealing and taking bribes, that person automatically enters into conflict with the central authorities. How Trump's Visit Will End Q: How do you see the outcome of Trump's visit? Is any breakthrough possible? A: No. They will talk and part ways. There will be no breakthrough. Q: Then why does China need this meeting? A: China simply maintains relations. Trump tries to act aggressively, but many things do not work out for him. China's position appears far more stable. I do not believe Trump's visit will produce serious results. But after Vladimir Putin's visit, I think genuine breakthroughs and new agreements are entirely possible.

Perspectives

Iranian Official

The Iranian government condemns Donald Trump's visit to China as yet another act of U.S. foreign aggression targeting Iran's sovereign right to pursue its independent policies against American and Israeli pressure. Tehran emphasizes that any Chinese naval escorts through the Strait of Hormuz serve purely defensive and commercial interests, without interference, while underscoring Iran's steadfast resistance to external dictates. This dynamic further strengthens strategic partnerships with nations like Russia and China in the face of Western coercion.

Israeli

Iran's standoff with the US and Israel poses an existential threat to the Jewish state through Tehran's expanding proxy networks, from Hezbollah to the Houthis, demanding robust defensive measures. Trump's push for Chinese non-interference seeks to block Beijing from enabling Iran's military and nuclear advances, even as China escorts vessels in the Strait of Hormuz solely for its interests while deepening ties with Russia. This dynamic highlights Israel's imperative to neutralize these interconnected risks amid great-power maneuvering.

Neutral

Bronislav Vinogrodsky, identified as an independent China expert, discussed Donald Trump's visit to China in an interview with Pravda.Ru, covering Beijing's relations with Moscow and Washington, as well as developments involving Iran and Taiwan. He stated that Iran-related tensions represent a primary global issue alongside Ukraine, and that China would refrain from openly opposing the United States while acting in its own interests, including through limited measures such as ship escorts in the Strait of Hormuz. Vinogrodsky further claimed that the Russia-China strategic partnership would deepen despite external pressure.

Western

During his visit to China, President Trump sought Beijing's assurances against supporting Iran, aiming to neutralize threats to US and Israeli interests in the Strait of Hormuz without Chinese interference. Chinese officials reiterated their non-intervention policy, framing any naval escorts as serving purely national objectives while avoiding open alignment against Washington. This measured approach underscores Beijing's ongoing strategic partnership with Moscow, which persists in countering Western pressure on shared priorities including Ukraine.

Pro-Peace

In the context of Donald Trump's China visit, discussions center on Iran-US/Israel tensions and the Ukraine conflict, where escalation risks severe civilian casualties, displacement, and humanitarian crises across the region. China maintains a non-interfering stance, escorting ships through the Strait of Hormuz only for its interests, while pursuing diplomatic channels that prioritize de-escalation over confrontation. This reflects the deepening Russia-China partnership as a potential avenue for peaceful alternatives amid Western pressures.

Global South

China's measured stance during Trump's visit underscores its sovereign priority to safeguard energy routes in the Strait of Hormuz for national interests, rejecting US demands to isolate Iran as another exercise in neo-colonial containment. This restraint aligns with Moscow and Beijing's expanding partnership, which counters Western institutional failures to enforce unipolar control through sanctions and pressure. Global South observers see these ties as resistance to external dictates, advancing multipolar sovereignty over subservience.

Actors involved

USIsraelIranRussiaChina

Sources

  • Lyuba LulkoBy Lyuba Lulko

    Independent China expert Bronislav Vinogrodsky, in an interview with Pravda.Ru, spoke about Donald Trump's visit to China, Beijing's relations with Russia and the United States, the situation surrounding Iran and Taiwan. He also tried to explain why the strategic partnership betw

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

diplomacyUnverifiedUSIran
1 source

Key points: Bitcoin diverges from US stocks as Trump says Strait of Hormuz “open” Data from TradingView showed BTC/USD building on the week’s gains as the S&P 500 bounced from 7,696, its lowest level since Aug. 4. BTC/USD four-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView This came after US president Donald Trump posted a map of the closed Strait of Hormuz oil route to Truth Social where it was labeled “new US territory.

” Both the US and Iran lay claim to control of Hormuz, with Trump threatening US ally Oman with military action over its plans to work with Iran on charging tolls to shipping traffic. In a subsequent post, Trump confirmed that further diplomacy with Iran was not on the agenda.

“There are no talks or conversations going on, or scheduled, with the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Naval Blockade remains in full force and effect. The Hormuz Strait is open and operating. All water mines have been removed or detonated,” he wrote. S&P 500 one-day chart.

Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView As on Monday, oil avoided major volatility, with WTI crude down 1% at the time of writing at $84 per barrel. US government bonds continued to show strain, with the 30-year yield hitting 5.34%, its highest since January 2007.

“Bond prices are sending warnings,” BNY Mellon analyst Geoff Yu wrote in a research note quoted by the New York Times. Yu said that the surge came as “investors demand more compensation for inflation risk,” while also attributing the upside to government borrowing.

US 30-year bond yields one-month chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView BTC price faces crunch rebound test Updating X followers on BTC/USD, trader and analyst Aksel Kibar eyed the culmination of a potential reverse head-and-shoulders pattern at $62,300.

Related: Bitcoin price spike to $64.5K was ‘low-volume liquidity trap’: Analysis “If $BTCUSD is going to rebound, it has to come from here,” he argued on Monday. Kibar offered a $53,000 target in the event of the head-and-shoulders structure failing, with $76,000 a potential upside target should the rebound sustain.

BTC/USD one-day chart. Source: Aksel Kibar on X.com Previously, Cointelegraph reported that underwater investors were contributing to Bitcoin’s inability to break higher. Its rebound to $64,500 also stopped short of an overhead trend line, the 50-month exponential moving average (EMA).

This moving average is now in place as resistance at $65,827.

Location: Strait of Hormuz
diplomacyUnverifiedUSIran
1 source

Trump says no talks underway with Iran, Hormuz blockade remains in place US president says no discussions are taking place or planned with Tehran and reiterates that the naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz remains fully operational Washington: US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that no talks are taking place with Iran and that no discussions are currently scheduled between the two countries.

In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump also said the naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz remains "in full force and effect." The president did not provide further details regarding US policy towards Iran or any potential future diplomatic engagement.

Trump's comments come amid continued tensions between Washington and Tehran and renewed focus on security and navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important oil shipping routes.

Location: Tehran
diplomacyUnverifiedUSIran
1 source

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tuesday that Iran had “won both the war and diplomacy,” claiming those who initially sought Tehran’s “unconditional surrender” later sought negotiations. Speaking at an event, Araghchi said Iran resisted for days against what he described as “the world’s largest apparent military,” alongside another army claiming military power and with the support of nearly all Western countries and some other states inside and outside the region, according to the Tasnim news agency.

“Those who were seeking unconditional surrender, shortly after the war began, begged for negotiations,” Araghchi said. He claimed Tehran initially rejected a ceasefire and continued fighting until reaching a point where the other side accepted a ceasefire and negotiations “on Iran’s terms.

” “We fought with strength, and we negotiated with strength,” he said, adding that many foreign ministers had told him: “You won both the war and diplomacy.” Araghchi’s remarks came after US President Donald Trump called on Iran on Monday to give up and “raise the white flag.

Location: Tehran
diplomacyUnverifiedUSIran
1 source

- Iran demands US lift sanctions and return frozen assets to reopen Strait of Hormuz - Iran's Parliament Speaker warns closure of Strait continues until US ends military threats - Around 20% of global oil supply passes through the Strait, impacting energy security Iran has warned that the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until the US meets a set of conditions, including the release of frozen Iranian assets, an end to oil sanctions and what Tehran describes as a US blockade and military threats.

Al-Arabiya English reported that Iran's Parliament Speaker and top negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said the Trump administration must meet the conditions before Tehran considers reopening the strategic waterway. “Until the Trump regime removes the blockade, ends the wars across the region, returns Iran's stolen assets, lifts the oil sanctions, and ceases its military threats, the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed,” Ghalibaf said.

Until the Trump regime removes the blockade, ends the wars across the region, returns Iran's stolen assets, lifts the oil sanctions, and ceases its military threats, the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed. pic.twitter.com/fl2RrKnT1R— Seyed Mohammad Marandi (@s_m_marandi) August 18, 2026 Ghalibaf also warned that Iran was prepared to respond more forcefully depending on the actions of its adversaries.

ALSO READ: 'We Control Hormuz': Trump To Declare Strait As US Territory? Here's What President Says The comments add a new condition to an already fragile diplomatic environment, with the Strait of Hormuz at the centre of concerns over global energy supplies.

Around one-fifth of global oil supply typically passes through the waterway, making any prolonged disruption a major risk for crude markets, shipping and energy security. Earlier, Press TV reported that Ghalibaf is scheduled to travel to Baghdad on Wednesday at the head of a high-level Iranian delegation for discussions with Iraqi leaders.

The talks are expected to cover regional developments and bilateral cooperation, including border security, counterterrorism, economic ties and implementation of existing agreements. Iraqi media have also reported that the agenda could include a proposal concerning Iraqi oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz.

The visit comes as regional governments grapple with the implications of continued disruption in one of the world's most important energy corridors. ALSO READ: Hormuz Tensions: Another Ship Hit By Unknown Projectile, Says UKMTO Centre The security situation in the waterway has also remained tense.

The UK's Maritime Trade Operations agency, or UKMTO, said a vessel reported being struck by an unknown projectile while conducting an outbound transit of the Strait of Hormuz. “The Company Security Officer has reported that the vessel was struck by an unknown projectile while conducting an outbound transit of the Strait of Hormuz,” UKMTO said.

The impact damaged the vessel's engine room and resulted in a crew casualty, the agency said. The remaining crew was being assisted by the Omani coastguard. Essential Business Intelligence, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice, Daily Fuel, Gold and Silver Prices and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.

Location: Tehran