ConflictClarifier

Rastreador de la Crisis Irán-Golfo 2026
CC
Events Archive
strikeAug 5, 2026

No Lessons Learned: Trump’s Insane Resumption of the Iran War

Summary

So the geniuses in the white house have begin to suspect that maybe, just maybe, as journalist Mark Ames noted on X, after weeks of CIA-targeted bombings from Ukraine into Russia, maybe those nefarious Russkies are assisting Iran in targeting U.S. bases in the Gulf. I’ve got news for these Beltway Einsteins: China’s helping Iran too. And probably North Korea. In fact, every member of the multipolar alliance is likely doing their part: the mental opacity afflicting Washington does not afflict them. They know very well who is trying to destroy them. So they take countermeasures. That’s called sanity. How did white house mega-brains conclude China and Russia may be feeding Iran targeting data? Welp, Iran struck very sensitive targets with unusual precision (which, in fact, it has done and will continue to do throughout this war, but its success rate can no longer be ignored). For instance, per the New York Times, several Blackhawk helicopters were at least damaged when Iran blasted a Jordanian air base. The hangar housing the helicopters was hit, as was the anti-drone surveillance system. According to Ames on X July 19, “Iran’s missile and drone capacity has been massively underestimated…And the IRI is still holding back.” This is something white house gasbags should have assumed when bloviating about destroying the Persian nation, but as Ames observed, the last U.S. attack on Iran occurred about 13 weeks ago, when Tehran shocked the world with its military puissance, and Trump’s attention span isn’t that long. So he probably forgot. Not learning obvious lessons is clearly a problem for this white house. Iran already beat the U.S. once. So what did Trump do? He struck again. And now he threatens a wider war, which is clearly suicide, as it means curtains for U.S. vassals like the Gulf Arab governments, and could easily plunge the world into economic depression. Trump threatened this wider attack on July 15, so by July 20, the headline in the Washington Post was, surprise! “U.S. teeters on all-out war with Iran after more troops are killed.” WaPo only cited three, possibly four, U.S. soldiers killed, but other, non-Pentagon sources estimate more. As military expert Will Schryver put it on X July 20, “the dilemma remains: withdraw and relinquish West Asia to the Iran/Russia/China bloc, or continue to fight and relinquish the entire empire.” This followed news that the U.S. had retreated its aerial refueling tankers to Israel. According to an Iranian source speaking to Fars News Agency July 19, Iran’s July 17 strikes on U.S. bases in Qatar, Saudia Arabia and Jordan “resulted in the destruction or damage of a number of American aerial refueling tankers,” so the U.S. military “in a clear retreat, transferred several of the surviving aerial refueling tankers to Ben Gurion airport [incidentally painting a big red bullseye on that facility].” That’s called fleeing. Not a good sign for the Trump regime, which relies on pugilism to mold diplomacy. Iran expert Trita Parsi tweeted July 20 that the Trump white house uses “a strategy centered on military action shaping the landscape of diplomacy, rather than a strategy in which the final outcome is determined through PEACEFUL diplomacy. Either the commitment is to diplomacy within the MOU, or it is to actions (military and non-military) outside of the MOU. It can’t be both. I suspect we will not see any SERIOUS diplomacy until this question has been settled. Unfortunately, we are not there yet.” And even more unfortunately, by the time we get there, we may have fought (and lost) an all-out war, resulting in lots of corpses, American and Iranian. I say lost, because as some observers have noted, all Iran has to do not to lose is to survive. Iran will doubtless do that. The U.S. cannot win: a ground invasion is suicide; ditto sending naval assets too close to the Persian coast; U.S. military bases in the region are indefensible and have already been torched. So all Trump can do is bomb. While he bombs, Hormuz is closed, the world economy tanks, and U.S. assets in the Middle East get wiped off the map. In other words, a war on Iran will make Trump the biggest loser; and we all know how he feels about losers. The only conclusion is he just doesn’t know what he’s freaking doing. And that’s alarming. Meanwhile, it looks like U.S. proxies, vassals and attack dogs in the region are prepared to go down with the Empire. For, as threatened, Ansar Allah has vowed a maritime blockade in the Red Sea against the Saudis. The problem is that on July 13, Saudi Arabia hit Sana’a International Airport, striking “the runway to prevent an Iranian Mahan Air flight carrying a Houthi delegation and patients back from Tehran from landing,” per Drop Site News July 20. On July 16, Ansarallah said those strikes on Sana’a would be answered, that it would retaliate by blocking Saudi access to Bab al-Mandab, thus rendering the Red Sea off-limits for the Saudis. And ta da! That appears to have happened. So if no oil transits the Red Sea, under normal circumstances that would mean seven percent of world oil shipments would be bottled up. But because of the Hormuz closure, oil was re-routed through the Red Sea, so that percentage is higher. Twenty percent of the world’s oil cannot now transit Hormuz. Add this Red Sea blockage and it will be at least 27 percent. So a fiasco just got worse. On July 20, the Intercept’s Nick Turse reported that CentCom “withheld information about Americans killed and injured from the public” in this latest Iran War. “The surge in deaths and injuries raises the official U.S. casualty count to at least 446…since the first ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran was struck on April 8. The first official told the Intercept that recent attacks had wounded ‘far more’ personnel than are reflected in the Pentagon’s current casualty count.” Reportedly, “dozens” were injured. Turse reports that the Pentagon’s “official tally was also previously adjusted downward by 15 casualties without explanation.” He notes that according to the New York Times on July 20, “the Pentagon withheld information on ‘dozens of U.S. military injuries in the Iran War.’” The article also covers the “significant” damage inflicted on U.S. bases by Iran the previous week, and that “Iran had learned how to defeat U.S. air defense systems by overwhelming them using a mix of ballistic missiles and drones.” Meanwhile, Trump mendaciously claims the Iranian military has been annihilated. There is reason to suspect that the CIA, unlike the pentagon, is not on-board with this whole idiotic Iran war project and that therefore white house lies will be exposed, sooner rather than later. So in all likelihood Trump’s latest Iran adventure will end like the last one – namely a total bust for the U.S. As we all know, a definition of insanity is repeating something ad nauseam and expecting a different result each time. This is not just Trump’s problem. Pretty much every U.S. president since the World War II fire-bombing of Dresden has sought to bomb his way to martial victory. All – post WWII – have failed. From the flattening of North Korea, to the two million murdered in Vietnam and on through this imbecilic Iran War, U. S. presidents have bombed promiscuously, killed loads of civilians, and then, despite obvious defeat, marched into the sunset as if nothing untoward or unexpected happened. Failure is never admitted. The white house is either silent or it lies, and millions of foreign corpses bear witness to its futile, pointless homicidal mania. This is what’s going on with Iran, and this is how it will end. “The “peace president” is up to his neck in innocent blood. And so is everyone who voted for him.

Actors involved

USIsraelIranProxyRussiaChinaUkraine

Sources

  • Eve OttenbergBy Eve Ottenberg

    So the geniuses in the white house have begin to suspect that maybe, just maybe, as journalist Mark Ames noted on X, after weeks of CIA-targeted bombings from Ukraine into Russia, maybe those nefarious Russkies are assisting Iran in targeting U.S. bases in the Gulf. I’ve got news

See this event through different lenses

Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.

Compare Perspectives

Community Notes

Community Notes

Loading notes...

Related events

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranUN
1 source

Iran says it struck US drone vessel in Strait of Hormuz, US denies claim Iran said it struck an unmanned US vessel entering the Strait of Hormuz, a claim Washington flatly rejected. The exchange deepens fears over oil shipping, stalled nuclear diplomacy and a ceasefire that is steadily unravelling.

Iran said on Sunday that it had struck an unmanned US vessel trying to enter the Strait of Hormuz, a claim the US military rejected as a "total lie". The exchange came a day after the US military said its forces struck three Iranian oil tankers in response to Navy warships being targeted with ballistic missiles.

The latest claims mark another escalation in the conflict, which began with US and Israeli attacks on Iran on February 28. Although a fragile ceasefire was announced in June, intermittent fighting has continued as negotiations collapsed and both sides kept trying to impose military and economic costs on each other.

Experts described the reported attack as dangerous, particularly because Iran's earlier attacks at sea had targeted commercial shipping. The US and Iran resumed attacks last week after about a month of relative calm, with the Strait of Hormuz and areas along Iran's southern coast again coming under attack.

Earlier in the week, at least five people were killed during a US bombardment that brought renewed focus to an area where a school was hit in the war's opening strikes. The Trump administration appears to have adopted a two-pronged approach to the conflict, responding militarily to attacks on the strait while also targeting foreign financial institutions that handle Iran's money.

At the same time, Tehran's new hard-line senior leaders have signalled that they are prepared to hold their ground after decades of sanctions. Iran has for years found ways to bypass sanctions, and now a US blockade of its ports, and continue selling oil to buyers to ease growing economic pressure.

That effort depends in part on a shadow fleet used to transport its oil. Iran's leverage is centred on the Strait of Hormuz, a key route for global oil and natural gas shipments that had been regarded as an international waterway before the war. On Sunday, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright said that an average of 9 million barrels of oil a day are passing through the strait, which he said should help ease pressure on energy prices.

His estimate appeared to be higher than the average flows over the past 28 days through the strait, according to TankerTrackers.com and other sources. Wright told CNN that with oil also moving through pipelines in the region, "we're probably two-thirds or more of pre-conflict flows.

" But those flows depend on the US Navy's presence to escort tankers and offer some protection against possible Iranian attacks. Wright said he expected other countries would eventually support the Navy's efforts. Meanwhile, Iran's nuclear programme, which was at the centre of the tensions that helped trigger the war, was supposed to be addressed in negotiations that fell apart soon after the US and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding in mid-June.

Diplomats say the US, Britain, France and Germany now want to refer Iran to the UN Security Council for failing to meet its nuclear non-proliferation obligations. Taken together, the fresh military claims, pressure on oil flows and stalled diplomacy underline how the conflict has continued despite the June ceasefire.

strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIranProxy
1 source

Iran War Day 191: Iran Threatens ‘More Intense and More Painful’ Retaliation After U.S. Strikes Mohammad Ghalibaf, the speaker of Iran’s parliament, issued new threats to the United States on Sunday. Following the apparent crippling of three Iranian oil tankers in U.

S. strikes on Saturday, Ghalibaf said his country would escalate its responses. “The era of proportionate responses has come to an end,” Ghalibaf asserted in a speech broadcast in Iran, adding that “any aggression against Iran's interests and security will receive a faster, more intense and more painful response.

” Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps also said it launched retaliatory attacks on several U.S.-affiliated ships Saturday, including what it claimed was a successful strike on a U.S. Navy drone (a Pentagon spokesman denied this). Subscribe Today Get daily emails in your inbox Elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel conducted strikes in southern Lebanon and the Gaza Strip.

Press reports indicate the strikes in Lebanon—which the IDF said followed an attempted Hezbollah attack on its troops—killed at least 7 and left 20 more injured. The strike in Gaza reportedly left two people dead, including a six-year-old girl. In the United States, Energy Secretary Chris Wright suggested the White House may never reach a deal to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program.

“There may not be a nuclear agreement,” Wright told ABC News on Sunday, “it may be simply destroying their capabilities to do it. An agreement may await the next administration in Iran. We simply don’t know that.” AAA reported that the average price of gasoline in the United States was $4.

15 per gallon.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIranRussiaUkraine
1 source

Republican Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana said Sunday he does not expect the ongoing conflict with Iran to be resolved before the November midterm elections, offering a wide ranging assessment of foreign policy, inflation and several closely watched Senate races during an appearance on a major Sunday political program.

Kennedy’s comments came just days after the U.S. military struck Iranian oil tankers in response to Iran launching missiles toward two Navy ships. Despite acknowledging the conflict remains unresolved, Kennedy argued that the broader region has become safer due to weakened adversaries, pointing to reduced threats from several groups and the removal of a longtime foreign leader from power.

He also defended the ongoing blockade affecting the Strait of Hormuz, describing it as an effective pressure tactic against Iran’s government even as it contributes to elevated fuel prices domestically. Inflation remains a top concern Turning to economic matters, Kennedy acknowledged that inflation continues to weigh heavily on American households, even as he characterized other aspects of the economy as relatively strong.

He cited several encouraging indicators, including 1. low unemployment 2. rising wages 3. a roughly 12 percent increase in average tax refunds 4. the creation of 136,000 jobs last month. Despite those figures, Kennedy said persistent inflation continues to erode confidence among voters and acknowledged that Senate Republicans missed an opportunity months ago to address the issue through a reconciliation bill.

He attributed the failure to a lack of support from party leadership and insufficient votes within his own conference, while maintaining there is still time before the election to take further action. Texas Senate race draws national attention Kennedy also addressed the competitive Senate race in Texas, where a Republican has not lost a Senate seat in 38 years.

With a recent infusion of campaign funding from a political action committee aligned with President Donald Trump, Kennedy expressed confidence that Republicans would ultimately hold the seat, though he cautioned that the race remains unusually close compared to historical trends in the state.

He connected voter frustration in that race and others to broader anxieties about the cost of living, ongoing tension surrounding the Iran conflict and growing public unease over the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure across the country.

Data centers face public pushback On the topic of data centers, Kennedy distanced himself from recent comments made by Trump suggesting that communities opposing new data center construction risked falling behind economically. Kennedy argued that the technology industry has done a poor job explaining the trade offs associated with artificial intelligence expansion, citing concerns among the public about job displacement, rising utility costs and heavy water usage tied to data center operations.

He suggested several changes could help ease public opposition, including transitioning toward closed loop water systems, requiring data centers to generate their own energy, improving the appearance of facility infrastructure and ending requests for state tax subsidies given the industry’s overall profitability.

Ukraine and Russia negotiations continue Kennedy also weighed in on ongoing diplomatic efforts involving Ukraine, following meetings between Russian President Vladimir Putin and senior Trump administration officials in Moscow. He expressed skepticism about Russia’s willingness to make concessions in any peace deal, while criticizing the House for failing to pass a sanctions bill targeting Russia.

Kennedy argued that continued economic pressure remains the most effective way to influence the Kremlin’s decision making moving forward. Defense secretary faces scrutiny Asked about renewed calls from a fellow Republican senator to replace Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Kennedy stopped short of fully endorsing recent leadership decisions but said he continues to support Hegseth absent clear evidence of wrongdoing.

Kennedy said his primary concerns center on increasing military resources, expanding drone based warfare capabilities in coordination with Ukraine and securing additional funding for the Defense Department. This article contains reporting originally published by NBC’s Meet the Press with Kristen Welker.

Location: Iran
strikeUnverifiedUSIsraelIran
1 source

Iran Vows 'Faster, More Painful' Response To US Attacks After Weekend Sea Battle

Iran's Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf on Sunday announced a heightened military posture in the war with the US, saying that new attacks on the country will "meet a faster, heavier and more painful response."

"If they haven't understood by now, they should understand before it’s too late that the rules of the game have changed and that from now on, any violation of Iran’s interests and security will receive a ‘faster, heavier, and more painful’ response,” Ghalibaf said in a post on Telegram. He has warned that Iranian retaliation will no longer be "proportionate". Source: US Central Command

Ghalibaf also conceded that Iran faces severe economic pressures amid US-led sweeping sanctions and the campaign of 'strangulation' and isolation efforts.

"Severe fluctuations in the exchange rate, inflation, unemployment, and market management are fundamental challenges that have put serious pressure on people’s livelihoods," Ghalibaf said.

He also laid out that the Islamic Republic must aim to bolster domestic production and use technology to "devise short-term and permanent solutions." Iran's military has all along touted that it never stopped manufacturing missiles and drones, even as US-Israeli bombs decimated many industrial sites.

Ghalibaf's words come a day after the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said it attacked three American military ships and three oil tankers using an "unauthorized" route in the Strait of Hormuz. Also, in the latest:

Iran said Sunday it struck an unmanned U.S. vessel trying to enter the Strait of Hormuz, a claim that the U.S. military dismissed as a "total lie."

The US military earlier on Saturday had struck three Iranian oil tankers, M/T Downy, M/T Stark 1, and M/T Kylo - in a major first of the conflict (that is, a US attack on civilian vessels).

The Iranian parliament speaker continues to try and troll Trump and Bessent on X:

Wheels up. Warm-ups before liftoff: Diesel ATH: Short it Your biggest creditor dumping: Good luck with Yentervention++ NOR cutting $80B: Rename Norway to Americaway Low recruitment: Debt-to-Service w/ DO[Israel's]W, per your puppeteers Oh. Fed's dot plot flashing red 😁 https://t.co/E1KzG1T6Yf pic.twitter.com/zJb56tsd7p — محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf (@mb_ghalibaf) September 6, 2026 Washington is meanwhile touting more and more energy flow through the Strait of Hormuz, while also appealing for other nations to help:

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright says on average nine million barrels of oil a day are getting through the Strait of Hormuz that should help relieve pressure on rising energy prices.

Wright told CNN with oil also moving through pipelines in the region, “we’re probably two-thirds or more of pre-conflict flows”.

Those flows, however, depend on the presence of the US Navy to help escort tankers and provide some protection against possible Iranian attacks. Wright said he expected other countries will eventually support the Navy’s efforts.

But events like this weekend are likely going to continue to escalate the crisis. "There’s going to be more clashes between the Iranians and the Americans. There can be miscalculations. There can be more civilian casualties" especially on the Iranian side, Sina Azodi, the director of the Middle East studies program at George Washington University, has explained.

The "small potatoes" conflict according to the Commander-in-Chief...

Reporter: Can you explain to the American people, if this is not a war, what exactly is it? Trump: A lot of people don’t call it a war. I call it a military conflict because it's small potatoes for us. It's not a big thing. Reporter: It certainly doesn’t feel like small… pic.twitter.com/a4hvccNCoD — Acyn (@Acyn) September 4, 2026 "The [US] secretary of defense can send more troops to the region, but I don’t think the Iranians are going to back down. They’re going to resist that blockade and impose further costs on the United States," the analyst said.

Indeed every escalation step ordered by Washington has typically resulted in the Iranians 'answering' with significant missile and drone attacks on US bases in the Gulf, and as far away as Jordan. Some analysts are calling this a successful 'debasification' campaign that has existed since the war's start.

Tyler Durden Sun, 09/06/2026 - 12:40